Originally Posted by BuzzH
Originally Posted by MontanaCreekHunter


You are so wrong I am not going to waste my time correcting you. I will say you might just want to read what I wrote again really slow! And nowhere did I say that I expect every group to support every aspect of hunting. But I will be god damned if I am going to support any group that does not support 2A PERIOD!

EDIT: And any group that doesn't support Wolf or Griz hunting for that matter.


No, I'm not wrong...you're a group of 1 on your make believe Island.

WYBHA gave public testimony at the WYGF Commission season setting meeting in support of the proposed grizzly season here in Wyoming. You can listen to the testimony given, contact any of the WYGF commission, or GF Director if you like.

In regard to wolves in CO:

The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation and the Public Trust Doctrine define fish and wildlife resources as the property of the people and managed by the state and federal agencies entrusted with their stewardship. Backcountry Hunters & Anglers acknowledges this model as the foundation of science-based fish and wildlife management and we support hunting, fishing and trapping as appropriate management tools. BHA does not endorse advancing wildlife management policies and decisions by state or federal legislation or voter referendums and ballot initiatives. We are obligated as an organization committed to hunters and anglers to advance sound stewardship policies that are guided by science over politics, emotion, and conjecture.

While the presence of wolves and evidence of natural colonization in Colorado has instigated passionate conversations, BHA’s policies related to wildlife management remain unchanged. We do, however, recommend the following actions be considered related to future wolf management needs in the state:

• Update Colorado’s dated wolf management plan to incorporate new science, wildlife and habitat data, and the growing body of evidence that suggests natural colonization of the grey wolf (Canis lupus) is a reality in Colorado.

• Direct the appropriate decision-makers to study, evaluate, and secure new sources of funding to support the new financial burden of wolf management in Colorado.

• Develop a plan to evaluate potential livestock depredations and community conflicts, provide for ongoing monitoring, and create a compensation program that mitigates livestock losses for impacted commercial producers.

• Direct the appropriate decision-makers to create durable policies for any new livestock compensation programs that protect state-based revenue sources provided by hunters and anglers (Game Cash Fund) and create legal compliance with and insulation for federal funds provided by the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act of 1937 (Pittman–Robertson).

• Facilitate cross-jurisdictional collaboration with neighboring states and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service related to future wolf management needs in Colorado.



The Montana chapter in opposition of I-177, which if it would have passed, would have been the end of wolf trapping in Montana:

https://www.backcountryhunters.org/montana_bha_opposes_i_177

So, what group are you contending isn't supportive of wolf hunting/trapping or grizzly bear hunting? You seem confused.



WOW still flying clear over your head. But by all means keep on your rant. By the way there are a lot of guys that are on the island of not liking BHA. And even if I was alone I rather be alone then surrounded by a bunch of morons that can't see the big picture. Keep on keeping on. But this is my last post in response to anything you have to say on the subject.


Eat Fish, Wear Grundens, Drink Alaskan.