Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
Originally Posted by STRSWilson
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
Here, let's post the direct link to the 17 minute video where Dr. Cole, towards the end of the video, states he is seeing a 10 - 20 fold (1,000% - 2,000%) increase in Uterine cancer in females who take the deadly shots.

Now, this is what I'd call a "verifiable fact", but smokee Pole says I'm a stalker.....

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Sjl0KqNIdNO2/




Actually, peer reviewed research is generally what passes for verifiable medical fact. Let us know when that happens.

So, according to you, if you see a murder with your own eyes, like Dr. Cole in the video link is seeing cancer increase, you won't believe the murder happened until after a jury weighs the evidence and a guilty verdict (Peer Review) is arrived at.

And, the person who committed murder gets to walk the streets after bonding out until trial, just like the deathly shots keep being given until the citizens find the backbone to rise up against this Mass Murder of the innocent taking place.

Do you need a "peer review", to read, to tell you not to look down the barrel of a fully loaded wheel gun with the hammer cocked or do you simply use common sense based on the facts your own eyes are telling you, cancer is happening / don't look down the barrel of a loaded gun?



Thankfully that is not how the medical community operates. Just because someone cites a few cases in front of a camera and then attempts to extrapolate that across the entire population does not rise to the level of evidence. Reminder, Anthony Fauci is is also a doctor spouting all sorts of baseless conjecture. Do you believe him as well?

This is why peer reviewed research is the minimum standard. But then again, EVERY doctor and researcher knows this so it is quite surprising when a doctor doesn't bother with this basic process and spouts his opinion without facts. One must question his motivation.


Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum