A response was made to what you had posted at the time, not what you dug up after the fact. No other links are/were mentioned until after your reply. Typical.
So information quoted after my previous post is not admissible to prove the credibility of my data?You are just bitter that by posting my sources to prove my previous post was correct,I also proved your accusation to be in error.It must really bother you to have other people back up their posts,when you aren't capable of doing so.Typical
One of your new links does bring up over 400 Tundra engine failures.
So why not quote his post if it is credible?Could it be because this person simply made a claim with no data to back it up?Could he be just another Toyota hater like you that makes baseless claims?
