Carried over to what? Wilson bought out NULA, not Barrett. Or am I misunderstanding the gist of your post?
No, I see I could have worded that a lot better. Keep in mind that my post wasn’t directed at Wilson and their new ULA style, but more in general.
What I was getting at, it’s easy to see what design/features whatever people want. Why are companies always seemingly doing the opposite?
I mean we have a rifle here that’s looking to fill a gap that was once filled by NULA and Barrett. Why try and reinvent the wheel instead of making what people are asking for? What am I missing here?
Like i said earlier, I’m very ignorant to some fact or another that’s probably very obvious…but I just don’t get it.
