I said simply,that in the range you love to cite,that the "issues" are imagined and would squarely state that you are in wayyyyyyyyyyyy over your head...to hint you've a clue about rifles. I own these "affected" wares and curiously enough,due to their performance,pards have went nuts procuring same. But,we all shoot,which of course do skew things,though not in your favor. None of which is secreted.
Further,Kimber has really dropped the .284" ball and hamstrung their 224 and 243 wares,due to twist rates.
Feel free to Imagine your way out of those facts...just don't forget to do so aloud.
Laffin'!...................
What a complete and total dumbazz, though you did sidestep the original question with aplomb.
So again, Larry, why did Kimber re-design the 84M and 8400 with a 10* shallower ramp?
You've already said it's due to beancounters, which of course is laughable.
So why was the feedramp changed Larry?
PS, try to stay on topic if your meds allow...
Vagenius...why do mine feed empties?
Laffin'!..................
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
