Rather, I'm a convinced believer in the imperfectability of human nature and a student of history. That's all that one requires to be open to the possibility (likelihood, in fact) of conspiracy.
True, a student of Human Nature, Natural Law, and History would indeed be open to the likelihood of conspiracies. They are a fact of life.
The problem is that you're not a very good student of history. As history has laid out the facts about this event, over and over and over again. Each time the conclusion is clear, Oswald acted alone.
Since the facts are dismissed, you are left with a theory. Thus, you are in fact a conspiracy theorist, when it comes to this topic. In fairness, I will isolate this topic from others, and apply the title "conspiracy theorist" to where it fits.
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams
