Originally Posted by HugAJackass
Originally Posted by Raisuli
Originally Posted by HugAJackass
Interesting theory. Now where are the facts to support that LBJ killed JFK?

Show me the facts not the theories.


HugAJAckass,

Circumstantial evidence is factual. Many convicts were convicted and sentenced to death based solely upon circumstantial evidence.


Circumstantial by definition is not factual. It's logical, but not factual.

You have to recall that many convicts that were sentenced to death based solely upon circumstantial evidence were later found to be completely innocent.

The logic pointed to them, the facts found them to be not guilty.


You might want to run your belief by a lawyer. Circumstantial evidence alone has sent many convicts on to their next lives, not necessarily above us.

When a jury or judge in a court trial accepts circumstantial evidence as factual, then under law it is factual.