Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on how I am an idiot. I'm willing to concede it if you are willing to back it up.
It is hard for me to agree with statements you make that 'defy logic and fact', even according to you. So I am not an idiot if I agree with things that are illogical and fictional? Or do you still want to argue that even handloaded, the 30-30 kills better than the 35 Rem?
It may be the case that you are somehow correct, and that the science, views of ballistics technicians, and opinions of most others including myself are wrong. Like I said, I am willing to concede that if you can back it up with something. Otherwise, I'm going to stick with the physics, and you can feel free to call me whatever you like.
