Originally Posted by mirage243
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by mirage243
I'm not saying he didn't hit it, I'm just saying he stretched the truth a little when he claimed the bullet blew a hole all the way through it. Ain't much ooomph left at 600 yards out of a pistol. Couple hundred pounds of energy left, tops.

Originally Posted by mirage243
Originally Posted by WyoCoyoteHunter
Don't compare a little .243 to a cast 44 slug.. You can tell who shoots and who doesn't..


You can tell who knows ballistics and who doesn't. That little .243 is totin over 3 times the energy at 600 yards that the 44 mag is. 😂😂

Don't let facts get in the way of a good arguement, carry on.



You right you can tell who knows and who doesnt and you don't.



You know what? I didn't bring up the .243 thing, you did. But, since we're talking about it, I want you to claim right here, right now, that you would rather use a 44 mag pistol over a 243 rifle to shoot a deer at 600 yards. Say it.



You are devoid of facts I never brought the 243 into this topic. You now change the discussion. The fact is that FPE is a poor indicator of lethality




I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first