Objectively in retrospect,what's the criteria used to garner said scope as being "viable". Is it round count? Tracking ability? Zero retention? The reticle? In summation and in conjunction with those factors,how much REAL use has the platform seen and in what kind of conditions? I ask,simply because I've never seen one worth a fhuqk,but would categorize them as being superior to the Reupold 1.5-5x...despit that hardly being an "accolade".
Do tell. Hint......................
Stick,
I've sent my share back for elevation, windage mess ups, so I know they're not the most robust. But, I do like their std. duplex.
Glass is good and like it's said, "They Hell when they well, they just don't be well all the time".
I do have their Beaverton, OR address on speed dial...
They're sleek and light weight. The 1.5-5x20 isn't the best light gatherer at dim light. This one is a tad better, but not as good as larger scopes.
Everything can be a compromise one way or the other.
