Well I don't really want to type out all the fact on a phone, but Zimmerman was attacked while he was on the phone with 911, then pulled a gun...after being physically assaulted. The GA guys decided to try and do some sort of citizens arrest for a something? Pulled a gun when the guy wouldn't stop and then blasted him when he went for the shotgun.
They made poor decisions and paid for them. Obviously
Both made a stop. Both were attacked. So are you saying the GA guys shouldn't have had their weapons exposed... that's the difference?
You are missing a glaring difference in the two cases. Review the charges against the Georgia boys and see if one of the charges might be what precipitated the whole affair.
Ok, which one?
False imprisonment is a felony in GA. Under GA self-defense laws there are three circumstances identified in which self-defense is not authorized. Surely this deep into the conversation you have troubled yourself with reading the applicable GA self defense laws right?
Since Georgia law allowed citizens arrest which allows citizens to detane law breakers. Then the false imprisonment is canceled out
NOT 'Law Breakers', in general or of any kind, but those that you witnessed or have REASONABLE and PROBABLE grounds, known to have committed a FELONIUS act and are trying to evade/elude capture.............
"...A man's rights rest in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box..." Frederick Douglass, 1867
