To be simple, again. Ahmaud Arbery was the only person that night in that place who was entitled by Georgia law to use deadly force.
So, when Arbery attacked Travis McMichaels in an attempt to snatch his shotgun, what was Travis McMichael's legal obligation, assuming he wished to avoid being charged with murder? Please be specific.
That's a false choice. His legal obligation was to not attempt to detain Arberry at gunpoint in the first place.
Not a false choice. At some point in the interaction, that choice forced itself upon Travis. Assuming Travis didn't wish to be charged with murder also, what was his legal obligation at that point? If you cannot answer the question, the reasoning behind your general argument is fatally flawed.
No, it's not. His legal obligation was to not put himself in the position he put himself in. You do understand that, right?
