His legal obligation was to not put himself in the position he put himself in.
Could the same argument have been used for George Zimmerman and Kyle Rittenhouse?
No, because in either case, Zimmerman and Rittenhouse were never the aggressor.
Isn't it a matter of perspective whether Zimmerman was the aggressor? Couldn't "poor" Trayvon have perceived that he was being cut off from his path by a pursuing Zimmerman?
