Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Arbery verdict in.......

Time for the resta the story, and a moron recap. Apology for interruptin the uniform agreement relative to the Texas porch Honkey massacre.

Skip ta the end, for the TLDR version.

You can tell from the gitgo, when a liberal's referencin the matter, cause they call it the "Arbery" case.

The POS joglar's dead. There was never a "Arbery" case. Liberals wanted it ta all be about the joglar, and race, and it was.

Modern day lynching of 3 white guys. The liberals needed it, after the KR case.

The Judge in the case ruled that a state statute didn't apply to the defendants, which the judge had no business doing.

Judges rule on the law, not the facts. A judge can hear facts ta decide probable cause ta stop, in a evidence ruling, but not the ultimate issue in a case.

That's the point of a jury trial. For the jury ta decide the facts.

So, the judge decided the defense couldn't say they were stoppin the joglar because he'd been stealin from their neighborhood.

And of course, they were right, the joglar was the guy in the videos of the burglary, and they'd been called on the day in question because the joglar was back.

Which would have been the equivalent of the KR judge rulin that self defense couldn't be argued.

Did the defendants have the right ta try and detain the joglar runnin down their street? Of course, they did, pursuant to statute.

They had a reasonable belief that the joglar was the thief that had been stealin from their neighborhood, and they were right, as the video shows.

Felony or not, the statute allows a person, on reasonable suspicion ta detain a suspected lawbreaker.

But the joglar was a felon, in any event. The felony crime of Burglary doesn't have a requirement of theft, nor possession of stolen property.

Felony Burglary is defined as simply entering into a structure, with the intent ta commit a crime. The crime might be theft, but doesn't hafta be. Might be vandalism, or any other crime.

So, in the video of the joglar casin the house under construction, it proved entry into a structure, cause he was standin inside, and intent ta commit a crime, whilst he was lookin around for items of value.

Felony burglary.

So, the defendants were within the law when attemptin to identify and detain the joglar.

but, the jury wasn't allowed ta consider that, cause then the white defendants might have had a hung jury on that issue, or been found not guilty.

So, the judge took that defense away, and told the jury they could not consider it, even though the issue of being within the law was a jury question, just as self defense, is a jury question.

And, the judge did that at the end of the trial, after the evidence had been presented. So the defendants were hung out ta dry.

The judge instructed the jury that they should find the defendants guilty if they shouldn't have tried ta detain the joglar, after the judge instructed the jury the defendants shouldn't have detained the joglar.

Then, instructed the jury that if somebody died when the detaining happened, its felony murder. So, the entire fact finding and decision making process was dictated by the judge.

And of course, the result of this lynching was the guilty verdicts.

The judge allowed the joglar ta be referred to as the victim, allowed demonstrators with bullhorns outside the courtroom, as happened in Kenosha, and further, allowed "less than" Sharpton and Jessie Jackoff ta sit with the joglar's family during the trial.

The judge also made certain that the jury heard that one of the trucks in the chase, had a "confederate flag" on a license plate.



TL;DR version: The judge refused to allow the defendants a defense to the charges in the case, resulting in the guilty verdicts.

The jury got half a story, and had no choice under the instructions, but ta find the defendants guilty.


For the liberal joglar defenders:

Give yourself one moron point, if ya posted that the citizen's arrest law in effect at the time, only appied ta felons.

Give yourself two moron points, if ya thought burglary hadda involve stealin somethin.

And Three points if ya insisted the joglar hadda have stolen property in his pockets whilst runnin from the scene of the crime, ta be guilty of burglary.

Better luck, next time.