I understand why you might think that based on all my other acomplishments, but no.
I did invent the first 4 oz effective centerfire suppressor, so I got that going for me.
Which is nice.
No you didn’t.
Stop lying.
Originally Posted by jackmountain
Dumb question John, isn’t the point of a suppressor, to reduce noise? Size and weight are moot if it doesn’t reduce decibels to the point it’s safe to shoot sans hearing protection? Why bother otherwise. The threads on long range hunting all have the same comments, that it doesn’t reduce noise enough to negate the use of protection.
Not dumb at all.
OSHA considers 140 DB at the ear an acceptable amount of sound to which I can subject my employees.
My 4 oz Ti on a 6.5mm CM bolt gun has 140 DB at the shooters ear.
For spotters slightly further away we are way down in the 130 DB range.
I understand why some may want more suppression but how much weight will you tolerate on a hunting rifle?
Shooters ear numbers on an AR which is hard to get good shooter ear suppression. It's the little numbers LZMax. 139.5 DB.
So you took you product to the max allowable 140 db and couldnt use your "science" to reduce that down. Or did that "science" cut into profitability too much. Where you able to get down in the 100 db or lower range in development or did you just say [bleep] it make it as light as possible and push to 140db if that is what it takes.
So yours is made out of Titanium as its main selling point but yet people say on that link they have to wear hearing pro with yours and dont with others.
Gotcha..
I’m pretty sure at this point that you could get a Blow Job from Selma Hayek and find something to complain about it.
😂
Originally Posted by Bristoe
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/9130/uOXlqM.gif)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/923/4oBpiu.jpg)
