Originally Posted by AcesNeights
Why would he take the jab even if he had the benefit of foresight?….it wouldn’t have prevented him from getting infected and it wouldn’t have prevented him from transmitting it either. There’s nothing to indicate that the outcome would have been different had he taken a fake and ineffective vaccine.

Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Since it's now quite clear that the vaccine offers no protection whatsoever, I would imagine he'd still abstain. There's not been one scientific study that demonstrates that it prevents (or reduces) contraction, spread, hospitalization, or death. It's quite clear that it causes hospitalization and death, however.


But but..ivermectin....FLCCC. Faith in one...that didnt do jack either??? Jus' sayin