No, I don`t want to reconsider, the technical aspects "worked out". The conditions under which the shot was taken, were IMHO,perfect. I think I also mentioned that I ASSUMED he had thought it out. But, I was not there. Nor was anyone else that has posted here.




As far as "ethics" are concerned,and please excuse my rotten spelling,the only thing here is our "personal" ethics. His personal ethics broke the shot. Mine didn`t nor did yours.

"Ethical", who or what decides that? I don`t have to tell you many that visit this site consider anything remotely resembling long range( I`ll say 150yrds and over) un-ethical, as the dictonary defines it.
Are they right?