By your analysis and conclusion the purchase of a license is tacit approval for a hunter to behave in a reckless manner.
Complete and utter bullsh**.
Show me where I said that.
I do have a different definition of what constitutes "behaving in a reckless manner" though.
It's handling or discharging a firearm such that you endanger people or property.
Not the big game animal you're legally hunting and trying to kill. How do you endanger something you're attempting to kill? Use a bigger gun and kill it deader?
But I will admit, it's funny to hear a layman who's been arguing a legal point talk about how laymen shouldn't argue legal points.
