Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Elk Hunting Nosler Accubonds

I read complaints on line, but I have never seen one do anything but work perfectly myself.

I have killed 3 antelope with a 25-06 with 115 grain, a handful of deer with 6.8SPC, 110 grain, (thinking back I believe it's 7 so far) one deer with a 270 Winchester, 140 grain, one deer with a 308,150 grain, 2 antelope with the same 308 using 125 grain, and one deer with a 9.3X57 250 grain. For myself, I think that's my complete list so far.

Game I have seen killed with them is a lot larger list.
Probably 25 other antelope with 243, 25-06 6.5 Grendel 6.5X55, 6.5 CM 260 rem, 6.8 SPC 270 Winchester, 7-08 7MM Mag, 30-06, and 300 mag.

I bet I have seen about 30 deer killed with them with shells running from 223 , 243, 25-06, 6.5 Grendel, 6.5X55 260, 6.5 CM, 6.8 SPC, 270 Winchesters, 270 Short mag, 7MM Mag, 7-08, 30-06s 300 magnums 338 Lapua and 325 Short mag.

Elk I have seen shot with Accubonds have run from 270 Winchester, 7-08, 7MM Mag, 308s, 30-06s, 300mags, 8X57, 8MM Mag, 325 Short mag, 338-06, 338 Win Mag, 338 Laupa, and 375H&H.

I have also been along side a man who killed a large buffalo bull with a 375H&H using the 300 grain Accubond and one woman who killed her cow buffalo with my Ruger #1 in 9.3X74R using the 250 grain Accubond.

Overall that's a pretty good number of kills which I have either done myself or seen done, and so far I have not seen a single poor performance from an Accubond.

Some kills were better then others, but all those that were not as good as they could have been were not the result of the bullet, but where the bullet was placed. Most exited and the few that didn't looked like the ones in the Nosler advertisements. They worked perfectly. So those that gripe about them must be using some "other Accubond" because I have not seen the same "blow ups" they talk about.