Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by deflave
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by deflave
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
The second and third shoots were clearly justifiable. How was the child molester still an immediate threat of death or serious bodily injury after he threw the incendiary device?



We don't know because we weren't there.


I ask, because it is going to be a key legal question.


There's going to be a lot of "key legal questions."

Despite popular opinion in 2020, not everything has to be on video to become evidence.


I understand that.






Stop digging then. This was a good shoot(s) on every level. The only downside is there was only on KIA instead of three or three dozen
This sums it up.


The thread just wouldn't be complete without your inane spew.

Last edited by PaulBarnard; 08/27/20.