The second and third shoots were clearly justifiable. How was the child molester still an immediate threat of death or serious bodily injury after he threw the incendiary device?
At what point when being chased by BLM felons when cut off from your group are you NOT in fear for your life?
That's the wrong question in my mind. The question is, what leads you to the reasonable belief that the specific member of you shot in self-defense was an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury? I explained earlier why I don't like using the word fear in justifying deadly force in self defense. Subsequent to asking the quaoted question, several links were posted that helped provide greater context.
I felt confident that he would not be convicted of murder, but was struggling with some substance to help me articulate it.
Damn Paul... have you been living under a rock? these violent rioters have killed and attempted to kill several people.... that is the imminent threat
Originally Posted by Judman PS, if you think Trump is “good” you’re way stupider than I thought! Haha
