Not only that, but the vast majority of Leup buyers are 1-2-boxes-of-ammo-per-year hunters that will never use the scopes in such a way as to discover any deficiencies. The same goes for buyers of other brands that target that type of hunter as their customer base.
LOL.
In your hallucination the new MK 4s are for "1-2-boxes-of-ammo-per-year hunters"?
The MK 5 is the dominate scope in PRS/NRL and this new MK 4 is targeted to the same high volume shooters who run the dials hard.
Doug has already told us that he sees zero issues with the Leupolds he sells and if you are the first guy with issues he is just a phone call away. Pretty good reason to give him your buisness.
Your case of LDS is all on you.
You excel at twisting facts into falsehoods. Especially when you stand to make a dollar as a result. The data on Leupold customers that contact retailers, specifically Doug in this case, for service support includes all Leupold scope purchases, not just the not-even-available-yet MK4. Your (lack of) logic is shocking, sometimes.
Leupold does not dominate the PRS/NRL market. In your vaunted chart, notice that other brands are broken down into various models, where Leup has just the MK5. When you look at brands, not just models, Vortex is right up there, as well.
Your suggestion that I'm the first guy with Leupold issues solidly cements the fact that you're the one with LDS, not me. In fact, I mentioned that the data for other brands are convoluted as well, not just Leup. You are blinded to the whole story by your compromised motives and lust for relevance and success. I have no ulterior motive nor bias, but simply make observations based on my experiences. You, on the other hand...
