Originally Posted by qwk
Originally Posted by Jimmypop
Originally Posted by qwk
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by SLM
I’m not struggling at all.
Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation.
If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty.
If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue.
Pretty simple really.

[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]

Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.

You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.

LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.

She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.

Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.

If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?


The mini NF fell from a chopper and worked well after but I read that as well.
lol 10k for a guy you blow to drop a perfectly good scope on the ground. I have a sledgehammer test that I will put money on. You pathetic fool.
I don’t blow anyone. I will put my money where my mouth is. Not many in this thread will follow suit. Hint

Nice bullchit story about the nxs though. 😂.
You post a picture of 10 large with your screen name and I will photoshop a NXS in a picture for you. LOL

You care way too much.

Last edited by Jimmypop; 01/12/24.
Love Ksmïthïnhïzzër/fląvöřÐ.