I'd like to know if the 1993 tortoise ruling would still hold up in court today based upon common sense evidence.
Bundy has been grazing cattle for twenty years since then, not to mention since the 1800s, and if it really was endangering the tortoises it would surely be evident by now.
Was Bundy screwed by the court in 1993?
In my mind that's is the only relevant question that might affect his ability to keep grazing cattle on public land. There's no doubt he owes the govt $$$ in unpaid grazing fees and he's in the wrong for not paying those fees but ...
Is there a fair way to settle this if he was screwed in 1993?
