Originally Posted by isaac
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Well stated.

================

How could it be well stated? I thought you said it wasn't Bundy's land. Further, you can't put a lien against land Bundy didn't own.

They can place a lien against his personal property(cows)only after a judgment is first entered against him.

The most likely event to occur is the rendering of a judgment against Bundy and a Rule To Show Cause whereupon he could be jailed until he complies with a court order.

If the government wanted to be wiser, instead of vindictive, they possibly could work out a settlement with some sort of judgment reduction and assist Bundy in the relocation of his herd.



Or,..the government could just fug off,..since it has no legitimate claim to ownership of 85% of Nevada, anyway.