While I haven't exactly adhered to the good advice in the brief quotation in every respect, I surely understand the whys and wherefores and can appreciate them. It seems #2 is the biggest stumbling block for those who take issue with the fellow's opinions. I suspect most people who have taken shots at longer distances on game animals know quite well, even if they don't like to admit it publicly, that there have been instances where things have, or could have, gone badly very easily. Second shot challenges are not simplified as distances are extended. As advice goes, it's really pretty hard to fault I think.
Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
