The thing that gripes me about Sig is that they lie about what's going on. They claimed everything was fine with the P365 striker but then quietly changed it. Consumer videos documented the change that, according to Sig, never happened--until Sig got exposed, then they proudly announce how they are "improving" the gun to make it even better.
I was rooting for Sig up until the P365 fiasco. But, now, they're too similar to how Kimber has handled their rifle debacle...
Same thing they did with the 320, and the 556 issues before that. Anybody notice a pattern? I'm sure some of the fanboys will be along to tell us how good Sig is though...
The 365 is an awesome concept; too bad Sig forgot to tell the first customers that they're beta testers. I look forward to trying one when the bugs are worked out in a couple years.
