Originally Posted by AcesNeights
[quote=AcesNeights]Fireball, I think northern Dave addressed your question best and as far as good men go I think he’s definitely in that group. Giving someone a bag of gold doesn’t mean you’re going to get a bag of gold. Getting what you give is more abstract than a this for that type proposition. If you give someone something because you want to bring them happiness then you’re intentions aren’t selfish so the act of bringing someone happiness by giving them something also brings the giver happiness when they see that they’ve brought happiness....if that makes sense.

At the same time if you try to bring meanness or unhappiness to someone then you’re likely to be unhappy. If your heart is angry and you want to bring that anger to bear on others then you’re likely to be angry, either at your intended recipient, at others or most importantly at yourself....once again I don’t know if I’m being clear but I know what I’m trying to say. Bad chit has a way of coming back to you just like if you were to go through life bringing happiness to others....it has a way of coming back to you, the giver, often in intangible ways.

I haven’t gotten involved in your other threads but I did want to point out that you were 100% wrong in your assertion that the good men here somehow had a duty to come to your internet aid. The good men here don’t generally get involved in childish rants nor do they involve themselves in the pile on threads. That’s partly why their reputation here is what makes them good men, they aren’t interested in bringing you or others any misery or anger, they prefer to bring support and happiness to those that need it. There are a lot of good men here and they have NO requirement to join you in your one man crusade, that doesn’t diminish their “goodness” it reinforces it.

I don’t have any problems with you nor do I wish you anything but happiness. I decided to answer this post because your question is a fair question and I felt it deserved a fair reply which is what I’ve tried to give you. You have to be happy and give happiness in order to be open to receiving it. Lately I’ve noticed that you are NOT happy .....your posts speak volumes. The way you responded to Doug on the Leupold thread and your posts here on the campfire are evidence of your unhappiness. I’ve chosen to not respond to your previous posts because I have no desire to bring you any further unhappiness but those posts were not constructive and were “mean spirited”. You chose to act in a way that brings upon you what you’ve “given”. You seem to be itching for a fight everywhere you go and then when someone obliges you get upset. You can’t have it both ways so ultimately it’s up to you to decide if you’re going to carry anger and hatred or love and happiness.

I’m sure that the stress you have with the medical issues of family can be emotionally taxing but you’ll not find happiness by taking your frustrations out on guys on the internet. If this place is really getting to you like I think it is I would suggest taking some time out to enjoy life with those people that truly love you, your family. Try to bring some joy into your life and make memories with those that are really important to you. Don’t try to bring misery to those that you don’t like on the internet expecting that will bring you joy because as you’ve seen it just brings more misery.....there’s that pesky “getting what you give” thing again.

I wish you and your family health and happiness. 👍



Now there is ONE well reasoned response to what his is about. This kind of response is what is very sadly lacking both in America and on the campfire. Both have turned into a slugfest, shouting match, and dogpile. Aces and Eights shows the contrast with his post. And I WILL and consider what you've said. Thank you for acknowledging mine was a fair question. I am pretty sure you will be the ONLY ONE, which further proves my point that people are quickly losing the ability to reason and blindly lash out if any message is presented that they find offensive.

As for bad things having a way of making the rounds and coming full circle, would you say that Steelhead (for example) may have earned the ire of anyone here by his actions, or are responses to him completely unfounded and unfair? In your opinion has he ever done or said anything that might illicit a negative response, or are any of his detractors completely off base? What about Leupold, have they earned their current reputation, or is it completely unfounded? Is it wrong to recognize it if you fall into the camp of agreeing there are problems (with either Steelhead or Leupold for example)?

Would you say it is anyone's given right to express his opinion on this board, or is it only those opinions which are popular with other posters?


_______________________________________________________
An 8 dollar driveway boy living in a T-111 shack

LOL