I still think a 9.3 Creed would do a job no other cartridge could do.
Geno
That would be lame.
A 366 Creed would be much handier.
In some sort of Martini action.
Jim,
I loves me some Martini action. Especially after a woman gets into them Martinis. Unless she's one a them crazy biotches.
Yes, 366 in American nomenclature. Even an old set in his ways curmudgeon knows that. From page 3 (by my account) of this thread:
Quote
Should I start a new thread?
When do we see a 9.3 Creedmor? To take advantage of the amazing properties of the 9.3mm (.366?) diameter projectile in a short action rifle.
Why not, they already have 6mm Creedmor, and I think a .22C also right? I say upsize!
Geno
PS then we can have threads about the 9.3x62, 9.3x57, vs the 9.3 Creed.
Hope all is well up there on the high plains. And your able to cut and bale some hay this year.
Geno
PS I really do think the discussions regarding the benefits/lack thereof of the 9.3x62, 9.3x57, vs the 9.3 366 Creed would be exciting. One better for moose, the other barely adequate for deer and such nonsense. ehnm would test them all on rabbits though, and declare none as good as a 460Weatherby.
The desert is a true treasure for him who seeks refuge from men and the evil of men. In it is contentment In it is death and all you seek (Quoted from "The Bleeding of the Stone" Ibrahim Al-Koni)
