Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
They're are effective. You dont attract the fat cat donors unless you have something to offer.



This sounds like a description of Berman and Company, the guys behind "green decoys," the most vocal critics of BHA. The guys who defended the tobacco industry, corn syrup, and fish with mercury. Nothing wrong with defending or lobbying for products using a high-powered Washington lobbying firm, that's capitalism at it's finest. And it's also done through non-profits Berman sets up so that the "fat cat donors" who back him remain anonymous.

Ironic, ain't it?


What is wrong with the tobacco industry, corn syrup, and a lot of big game fish have mercury. How does this pertain to hunting and gun rights?

Last I checked everyone has known for years and years that smoking is bad for you as is corn syrup. You have choices in life to make, it's called personal responsibility.

Also as the old saying goes "two wrongs don't make a right"

I don't think anyone here is saying Rinella, Newburg, and BHA aren't great marketing platforms. Of course they sell a lot of products. That doesn't make them right, and it only goes to show how stupid and divided both the hunting and gun community is. You Live by the Sword so shall you Die by the Sword.

Eat Fish, Wear Grundens, Drink Alaskan.