It makes sense if you are doing it "for the women"... I just read and talk face to face w guys that were THERE on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan and they tell me the 9 SUCKS. Not to mention JWP's link above.. 9mm is for girls...
And how did it "suck"?
How did the 9mm stack up against .40s and .45s in side by side comparison?
What was the sample size for each caliber?
What loads were they using? Because if they weren't the loads the FBI considered or what I'll carry, I couldn't give a flip less about somebody's "one time at band camp" stories.
Afghanistan and Iraq were "one time at band camp"? seriously? See JWP's link on US Army tests on the 9 v 45.
For the most part, yes. Because the stories almost always come from people with no actual field experience that are second hand at best and have no basis in anything resembling scientific, unbiased testing. Until I hear the basis for an opinion from "the sandbox" I treat them all as band camp stories.
You're welcome to prove me wrong by providing answers to the very simple questions that would dispel all doubts about whether or not someone should trust the source.
And I did see the link from the test ONE HUNDRED AND ELEVEN YEARS AGO.
I also saw a report from 1951 about there not being a vaccine for polio. And a study from 1928 that said penicillin didn't exist.
Maybe, just maybe things have changed since NINETEENFREAKINGOHFOUR.
