I read almost anything I can about guns and have a library of over 1,000 books on firearm history, development and use (civil and military), as well as cartridges.
Some writers may be knowledgeable, but do not interest me; the "Me and Joe" stories, or a firearms review that just includes a range test are not very interesting. I am interested in the development and technical details of the product, as well as how it shoots (variations between guns means that I'll probably not be able to duplicate the test gun's performance).
I enjoyed Bob Hagel's writings and currently like John Barsness, as well as most of the Rifle/Handloader writers.
As for the writer's backgrounds, I like to learn about them. this knowledge helps me understand the writers expereinces and gives me a frame of reference in which to consider the article.
