Originally Posted by Boxer
'fan1,

You are talking out your azz...though that is hardly anything "new". Groovin' on how 700's chambered in 243Win is "rare" and how the .257" 115gr NBT with it's pedestrian .453 BC is gonna outpace a SAAMI 243Win,whistlin' vastly superior BC values at like speed. That's purty [bleep] funny!

For starters,the .243" 105 'Max is on the average 1.235" in length,though the .257" 115 NBT is but 1.200". Though on the "bright side" the 115 NBT do have a schit load more bearing surface and a much lesser profile,should that cheer you up.


[Linked Image]


Then there's the fact,that the 105 costs less too...but hey,the 25-06 burns a bunch more powder to be a distant second place and you've got that going for you. 'Course there's the fact that a 700 will kiss 'em and that COAL will nestle mag confines to boot. You'll have to pardon my being afforded the luxury of not being forced to guess,while you play with your Imagination and practice your Pretend. Here's hopin' you keep doing so aloud,because it is funnier than [bleep]!

A leetle more extrapolation,to fuel your Imagination and to perhaps pry some more pearls of "wisdom" from your pie hole. Boolits matter far more than headstamps. Hint.

[Linked Image]

Where do you amazingly dumb [bleep] come from?!!? Texas? Here's to the inherent humor,of your being forced to use you,as a barometer of "evaluation".

Laffin'!


Boxer, you're an ignorant cuss. You argue that cost, recoil, effeciency (powder), bullets and accuracy are important factors when we all know that it's caliber, what has always "worked" and mine is cooler then yours that kills stuff. Get a clue man, common sense has no place here!