Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire JFK assassination, Best theory?

,.........Oh really???.....Dreadful logic and superficiality of the conspiracy theorists??? Really???.....So these folk have failed abysmally to tell us how the WC was wrong???....You been hiding in a hole for the last 50 plus years? .....You obviously have not been keeping up with their seminars ( I've attended 8 of them including 2 where Dr Cyril Wecht was the keynote speaker)..Dr Wecht is a world renowned forensic pathologist.......Well here are a few items for you to mull over which were presented by the medical and forensic experts who ARE critical of the WC findings and conclusions.

ITEM......The ammo the WC says Oswald used was a 160 gr, 6.5mm, round nosed FMJ bullet. The WC says the first shot fired passed through Kennedy and Connolly at the same time and therefore both were hit by the same bullet......Ok. Well we have a problem. WC exhibit 299 (the magic bullet that the WC says passed through both men at the same time) which broke 4 ribs in Connolly and broke bones in his right wrist and lodged in his left thigh weighs 158.2 grains. So a bullet that did all of that wound damage and breaking bones loses less than 2 grains of weight?? The bullet fragments recovered from John Connolly far exceeded the 2 grains lost by the Oswald bullet WC exhibit 299. Well that was all discovered by the conspiracy theorists of which you criticize......Care to explain how you can have an original bullet weight of 160 gr, losing approx 2 grains of weight during the shooting, to then discover that the combined weight of WC 299 and the recovered bullet fragments from Connolly far exceeded 160 grains?....Simple answer is you cannot. That alone right there proves more than one shooter. You forget that part of the so called conspiracy theorists that you are critical of do include world renowned forensic pathologists who are experts in bullet wounds......

ITEM:....The WC says Oswald fired 3 times from the 6th floor TSBD Building using 6.5mm 160 gr round nosed ammo. 2 hits one miss. The one miss the WC says, was the bullet that hit the curb to then cause debris to fly up and knick James Tague in the face who was standing near the triple overpass on the southwest side of Dealey Plaza....So that leaves 2 bullets remaining to have caused all of the wound damage to Kennedy and to Connolly.....Ok. Well we have some major problems here with not only physics but with these two Oswald bullets that virtually defy the laws of physics and bullet impact characteristics of which over the years WC critics including expert pathologists of which you criticize have discovered....The WC says that the fatal head shot came from the rear using the Oswald ammo already described, which entered the rear of Kennedy's skull and exiting his right temporal area. Z film frame 313.. Well ok. But we have another huge problem here. How? Very simple. A 6.5 mm 160 gr round nosed bullet that enters the rear of a skull as an entrance wound CANNOT AND WILL NOT CREATE a massive hole of several inches in diameter as seen by 16 doctors at Parkland hospital. In other words, it is a PHYSICAL impossibility for the Oswald bullet as a wound of entrance, to create such a large skull wound AT THE POINT OF ENTRY by a bullet fired FROM THE REAR......So the WC in their findings, virtually defies physics and bullet impact characteristics and how those characteristic relate to bodily impacts......Well guess what Grizz. All of the above was discovered over the course of many years by the WC critics and conspiracy theorists of which you are critical of which include bonafide experts in the field of forensic pathology. Who as you tem ARE SILLY PEOPLE?......We may never know the names of those who actually pulled the triggers.

Who killed JFK?.....Not Lee Harvey Oswald. Because if Lee Oswald were in fact the lone killer firing 3 rounds from the 6th floor, then those bullets that he used would have had to defy the basic laws of physics as it relates to bullet impacts on or into the human body... Those 2 remaining bullets that the WC says caused all of the wounds to Kennedy and to Connolly? Impossible for only two bullets to have caused all of that wound damage to both men.....In the case of JFK, when the laws of physics are applied, when basic forensic pathology is applied, the only conclusion is that more than one shooter was in fact firing from not only the rear but from the front as well.....Sometimes it is difficult to set opinions aside. But in the case of the J FK assassination, you must follow the laws of physics and forensics to determine what really happened of which I have tried to do on this thread.

The WC was wrong and failed miserably to even explore the overwhelming evidence of a multiple shooter conspiracy. Why? Because their conclusion was already a pre determined outcome that Oswald acted alone even before the WC was even formed....Why? Because the govt feared a conspiracy conclusion, which very well may have implicated the Soviet Union, which then it turn, could have led to WW3....The truth was covered up so that a possibility of WW3 could never come to pass.