Originally Posted By jwall Yeah - it's not like the 270 doesn't have a 160 ! No ?
Jerry
>>Bellydeep>> Recognize this ?
"A" being the operative word " b d p.15
Now -Please note MD's comment-----not mine.
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
Several years ago I did an analysis of the available .277 and .284 bullets and came to the conclusion that there were even more .277 bullets available.
These days there's an even greater selection of .270 bullets,....
But as always, somebody will pick nits with all this--which is why, as I mentioned earlier, arguments about ALMOST identical cartridges go on far longer.
" ALMOST identical" Just tryin to sort the FACTS !!!
Jerry
I doubt he found more than one or two 160gr bullets for the .270 during his search.
I'm not going to waste time counting how many are available in 7mm.
There might be more .277 bullets available, but they are not concentrated at the heavy end of the scale like 7mm bullets are.
Whether or not that is necessary is another matter. But there is no doubt the .280 owns the game when it comes to S.D.
Originally Posted by shrapnel
I probably hit more elk with a pickup than you have with a rifle.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
I have yet to see anyone claim Leupold has never had to fix an optic. I know I have sent a few back. 2 MK 6s, a VX-6, and 3 VX-111s.
