The facts are there. How about a rational evaluation of them instead of denial and distraction.
.........................Ok! What facts are you referring to?
Now before you answer that question, let me just say that all of the so-called evidence that the demCRAPS have brought forth in both the Schiff hearings and now the Nadler hearings, is all based on heresay. Second, third and fourth hand on down the line heresay, legally under the law, is in-admissible in any US court of law.
Also the dems have put forth two articles of impeachment in the house. Abuse of power and obstruction of justice.
And yet within their articles they do not site any specific crimes proving abuse of power and obstruction of justice......Their articles of impeachment are not based on ACTUAL FACTS....Only suppositions and OPINIONS of committing crimes.
If they really had a legit crime or crimes committed by the POTUS which are ACTUAL justified crimes under the Constitution of the US, then why was all due process denied the POTUS during the Schiff hearings? If ya got the goods and can present OVERWHELMING evidence of crimes, then why were there not open hearings along with all due process, INCLUDING the right to call witnesses and cross examine,,,, accorded the POTUS??
DemCRAPS are trying to establish crimes by manipulating facts into their own narrative based on heresay, opinions and conjecture..
