I can think of no other reason he would write that post, clearly his intent was to crap on the thread by Jorge and others, and the account of their hunt.
Maybe there's an explanation for OP's timing and intent. If taken at his word, perhaps he saw the collective praise being heaped on a high-fenced hunt as a genuine threat to the sport -fodder for the antis- and felt it was time to say something in order to squelch it.
This still would not explain why he himself would book a high-fenced hunt, be disappointed because it's a high-fenced hunt, and afterwards proclaim the dangers that high-fenced hunting presents to the sport. Maybe to him high-fenced hunting is OK as long as it's done discreetly, like autoerotic asphyxiation.
