All information, from any source, is debatable and in need of self-examination on how the information presented makes what you do with it up to you.
If you see in print: "a daisy bb gun caused a fatality", does the oddness of the initial headline mean you would ignore reading the story and determining on your own how YOU use the information, or do you read the story and use the information to help yourself in the future?
Every informative atricle has it's merits, some more than others. How you use what is read is up to you , silly or not.
I will keep handloading my MkV 300 wby, and hopefully gain knowledge from the information, if and when available, about accidents others may have experienced. There are many reloaders who have barely enough mechanical skills to do this type of operation safely, but few accidents occur.
Chicken little or no, you have the ability to use information to gain knowledge, if you choose to not do so, it is up to you to make that determination. Lessening the value of written information does nothing to help others safely enjoy firearms.
