Some here may remember that not all that long ago, several self-appointed Campfire consciences rebuked me for having mentioned something that someone had told me in a PM. IIRC, no one referred to the fact that I hadn't named the sender of that PM � so I've always assumed that they considered that omission appropriate.
Now several self-appointed Campfire consciences have been rebuking me for NOT having named certain confidential sources and for NOT having repeated here what they told me in confidence.
How's a guy to know what to do?
If PMs are sacrosanct, why not also face-to-face and telephone conversations, e-mail, and personal correspondence?
"Good enough" isn't.
Always take your responsibilities seriously but never yourself.
