O.K these guys in the corner crossing case were crossing to go hunting right? Backcountry HUNTERS and anglers is suppose to represent hunters right? So why aren't they representing non resident hunters who wanna hunt in Wyoming wilderness without a guide or resident. The arguement is its everbodys public land right? BHA wouldnt even need hunters to go to court to challenge this if they didn't wanna just pick and choose.
Maybe since it hasn't gone to court? I have no idea and that has nothing to do with corner crossing.
Start a new thread if you're concerned about BHA's involvement in accessing public wilderness lands. Ask RMEF, etc why they haven't represented hunters in wilderness land while you're at it.
