Below is a paste from an article on Meat Eater about this case.
"The Road Ahead A separate civil lawsuit brought by Eshelman against the hunters was transferred from state to federal court. It remains possible a favorable ruling on that case could address the underlying legal questions surrounding private control of the airspace as well as the legality of blocking the American public from lands they own as citizens. Attorneys for the defendants have suggested they will argue that the Unlawful Inclosures Act of 1885 makes it illegal to prevent anyone from otherwise lawfully accessing public land.
A civil trespass suit must show nominal damage from the event in question. This leaves many to wonder how the Missourians’ shoulders passing briefly through the outer inches of the millionaire’s 20,000-acre ranch could have physically or financially harmed him, even if the standard for nominal damage doesn't require any substantive loss or impact to be met. With that said, the event might have weakened his control of the thousands of acres of federal public lands he claims exclusive access into. The judge may choose to simply dismiss the case based on that reality."
That rich A-Hole who owns the adjacent land seems to view that public land as his own for which he has exclusive access...The hunters were served a separate summons just after being found not guilty, to reappear for a similar corner crossing charge from 2020. IMO these cases are insane, and at what point do the hunters sue Eshelman? They are being harassed unjustly IMO by both Eshelman and those local Wyoming civil servants.
