I'm a NR hunter as a Montana resident and will continue to probably be a NR hunter in other states, that being said ive never come close to spending the money in another state than I do in property taxs and state income taxs here in Montana so how does the NR arguement claim they pay more than a resident. Theres no sales tax other than hotels theres no way NR pay more than residents even with the NR license fees.
Just total up what NRs pay for a license vs what the total for residents pay for licenses. That is where g&f gets revenue.
I did, its true NR pay more in licenses. MT basic FG budget is 58.5 million NR licenses total about 26 million who picks up the 32 million shortfall, residents with there licenses and property and state income taxs
G budget is 58.5 million NR licenses total about 26 million who picks up the 32 million shortfall, residents with there licenses and property and state income taxs
