Originally Posted by hillbillybear
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by 4ager
Originally Posted by hillbillybear
Here is yet another question that gave my students fits in the post-bellum lectures:


Did the US military learn any lessons from the Civil War that helped them in the Spanish American War?

Were they more/better prepared for major military operations in the spring of 1898 than they were in the spring of 1861? Use comparison and contrast to examine this issue in detail.


Yes, and no.

We had no clue what we were going up against as far as advanced weaponry (bolt action rifles) and were still stuck in the musket era as far as infantry weapons. We had no clue how to do amphibious invasions. We still had no clue how to do light infantry assaults or use of unconventional tactics/combatants (RoughRiders figured that out, along with better weaponry).

We had an advantage when in came to some assault tactics and especially in assaults on fortified defenses and use of trenches. However, this was essentially a draw with what the Spaniards brought to the table.

By far, our greatest advancement and advantage was in the use of ironclad warships. We learned very quickly that wooden vessels were no match for iron clads and that proved decisive against the Spanish.

Thumbnail sketch of a much larger and longer topic.


This. Especially when you consider the number of Spaniards holding San Juan and Kettle Hills....



and don't forget the German advisers and their Krupp cannon and Maxim guns.


There was a considerable bit of artistic license concerning these two items in the movie earlier mentioned by JoeBob. ( hell in the movie there were t even Kruppe they were 75 mm French Puteaux guns).


Founder
Ancient Order of the 1895 Winchester

"Come, shall we go and kill us venison?
And yet it irks me the poor dappled fools,
Being native burghers of this desert city,
Should in their own confines with forked heads
Have their round haunches gored."

WS