Home
We are having a little dustup on this subject on another thread... I'll go grab a link to that thread for anyone who wants to check it out, or heck, join the fray.

I will go first: yes, I hunt with a round in the chamber.

-jeff
Here's a link to the... uh... cordial discussion we've been having. The fun starts at about page 2.

https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/ubb/showflat/Number/1792859/page/0/fpart/1

-jeff
A rifle with out a round chambered is ..... a stick. You can carry a stick or a rifle your choice.
Originally Posted by Furprick
A rifle with out a round chambered is ..... a stick. You can carry a stick or a rifle your choice.


Wow, this place is just full of gems of wisdom... Please, teach me more!
I've been big game hunting for 40 years. Never even thought of hiking or stalking without a round in the chamber. What kind of question is that?
Already have 4 pages on the topic.
https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/ubb/showflat/Number/1792415/page/1/fpart/1
Jeff, I also hunt with around in the chamber.
I learned to shoot and hunt with an old .22 bolt action Single Shot Springfield that didn't have a safety.
Dad and Granddad started teaching me proper gun handleing at age 5. And my God help me if I got sloppy.
Never do...
I've hunted 24 years and have always had a round in the chamber. I saw the pictures that were posted of the "nasty" terrain found in SE Alaska. Big friggen deal,I've hunted areas in Western Washington that were worse that that stuff.

I must be an acrobat though,I don't spend much time on my ass when hunting it. I guess if you pay attention to what you're doing you stay upright.
I load my M1 put a few extra en blocs in my pockets and run through the woods blasting at any thing that moves and is brown!

Now why would I not load my gun when I am running throught the woods, it's the charge of the light brigade!
Depending on the situation, I have done both. When hunting steep, rough or slick terrain I will not have a round chambered. On a stand, in a blind or when making a final stalk I will have one chambered with the safety on. If it's a guided hunt I always ask my guide what he prefers.

Mike
The area i hunt here is crawling with grizz , always have a round in the chamber.
Considering I hunt and work in grizzly country, I'm always carrying "hot". However, if the situation calls for it, I'll uncock the rifle, or in extreme situations, empty the chamber.
I carry a round chambered, depending on the animal hunted, and the terrain. The other factor, is, did I leave my ammo, back at camp.
Originally Posted by blammer
I load my M1 put a few extra en blocs in my pockets and run through the woods blasting at any thing that moves and is brown!

Now why would I not load my gun when I am running throught the woods, it's the charge of the light brigade!


Ah, now I see why you call yourself "Blammer."
grin grin
We're at about 90% chambered, which is about what I was expecting...

Carry on gents!

-jeff
Was there an actual poll, or are you just counting numbers? Just curious.
Oh... I forget there's a way to do an actual poll. Nope, I was just sort of tallying them up in my head. I'll do a more formal count later...

Sorry for the confusion!

-jeff
Originally Posted by BOWHUNR
Depending on the situation, I have done both. When hunting steep, rough or slick terrain I will not have a round chambered. On a stand, in a blind or when making a final stalk I will have one chambered with the safety on. If it's a guided hunt I always ask my guide what he prefers.

Mike



Ditto........except I don't Elk hunt...........yet!!!


On relatively smooth terrain (easy walking) why not have a round chambered??? Isn't that what a saftey is for???


It is a shame my "Butler Creek Scope Cap" thread got derailed on this topic!!!

Hey, you got two good pages of cordial discourse on the scope cap thing before it went all to heck. Whadaya want?

:-)

-jeff
Originally Posted by Mossy
I've hunted 24 years and have always had a round in the chamber. I saw the pictures that were posted of the "nasty" terrain found in SE Alaska. Big friggen deal,I've hunted areas in Western Washington that were worse that that stuff.

I must be an acrobat though,I don't spend much time on my ass when hunting it. I guess if you pay attention to what you're doing you stay upright.

__________________________________________________________
+10 on all counts..:)...tho for me it's over 50 years including mil service in combat with a rifle company..

No condom needed for my rifle muzzle either..:)
I spend my hunting time knowing where my hands, feet( arse) and rifle muzzle are..:) It's second nature so one can hunt..Jim
Never a round in the chamber when on a horse. On my own two feet, on the ground, you better believe the chamber is HOT.

Steve
Not usually. About the only time me and my hunting partners load up is just before we shoot or if we have reason to be wary, like walking up on a bear kill or dead animal or on final stalk for an animal we already spotted and checked out. It takes too damn long to tell if a moose or sheep is legal to worry abotu snap shooting anything and having lived and hunting here in alaska for quite some time I'm no longer under the illusion that there is a rabid bear behind every bush. I do always carry a loaded revovler in a chest holster though.
Hot, cocked & locked.

I do not. I will chamber one when I feel that pulling the trigger is imminent.

I should add, I don't trust safeties, especially Remington safeties.
Soon as I hit the tree line, chamber is loaded.
i hunt empty chamber.

Loaded...jorge
One thing that must be mentioned is that the terrain and quarry can dictate things to a degree. Where I hunt blacktail- and maybe someone like Jim in Oregon would concur, maybe not... anyway, the deer I kill are typically in very close quarters with me. 20-50 yards. Even the sound of the safety snicking off has alerted them to me before. So, point being, to chamber a round at that point would be very impractical- even if I was so inclined.

I think the people hunting in more open areas, where you might have almost unlimited time to set up a shot etc, should try to understand that things are real different in some other areas. If I was sitting on a hilltop glassing for miles... I could see how that guy might feel that it was not necessary to chamber a round.

Anyway, thanks for the civility, it's a breath of fresh air and, carry on!

-jeff
Fork I called in today, pretty much the stuff I hunt in...

[Linked Image]

Called in another like this one and managed to run 7 rounds through my lever and then loaded them all back into the magazine. All the time the deer watched me and I kept blowing the call.

Now we know the area I hunt, here is one that came to the call also. I had to chamber a round in the 99 and pop up the tang sight, all the time he was looking straight at me from MAYBE 30 yards.

[Linked Image]

Yep, another 99 deer, same drill as the previous deer, although the distance might have been 40 yards. Nothing in the chamber when he walked in...

[Linked Image]

Paul's deer, maybe 50 yards, yep he had to chamber one...

[Linked Image]

Every single one of these from last year required a round to be chambered and (GASP) Butler Creek's to be opened...

[Linked Image]

Taking bets, did I see this deer at 60 yards, eye [bleep] with bino's and then chamber a round and slay him?

[Linked Image]

I'm fortunate to hunt dumb game....

Oops, almost forgot, pull from canoe, flip Butler Creeks, chamber round, kneel and slay wolf whilst being watched by said doggie...

[img]http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b297/Shoalcove/Wolf/Me.jpg[/img]

Wanna see any of the dumb whitetails that allowed me to chamber a round before killing them?
would those be sitka blacktails in a rainforest?
Yep, but they must either be stupid or I don't move around like a retard with taser in my ass.

Fluid motion, wind, and a little bit of calling can grant a man much...
A buck in rut ain't too smart, you ought to know dat. wink

Just funning with ya so don't go weird on me.

MtnHtr
A hardon will take a man places he wouldn't go with a machine gun! Agreed.........
Loaded.
Just to ease the mind, this one was looking HARD at me whilst Paul was hitting the call so he didn't take two steps into some silly [bleep]. Since it was early August and in velvet that should remove the rut factor.....

[Linked Image]

You know the drill, scope covers, chamber, kneel for shot, blah, blah...
My turn.. All these shot in the last 10 days. No hot rifles and all rifles wearing flip-ups. All within 100 yards. Most shot by the kids I take out. Funny how a 15 year old can understand the concept of a hot rifle. A few more bucks were taken, but I didn't get a pictures as I lost my digital camera. If you want to try "hard", try taking an 11 y/o in tow with an attention span of 15 minutes.

I'll be gunning solo the next 2 weeks. Empty chamber.

[img][IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v725/joelst99/jasoncompbuck.jpg[/img][/img]
[img][IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v725/joelst99/joelstrappingupforkhorn.jpg[/img][/img]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Whatever works for you, Steelie..:)
I know what 'works' for me..:) Jim
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Yep, but they must either be stupid or I don't move around like a retard with taser in my ass.

Fluid motion, wind, and a little bit of calling can grant a man much...



Pushfeed grin
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Yep, but they must either be stupid or I don't move around like a retard with taser in my ass.

Fluid motion, wind, and a little bit of calling can grant a man much...



Conquest grin
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Yep, but they must either be stupid or I don't move around like a retard with taser in my ass.

Fluid motion, wind, and a little bit of calling can grant a man much...


Swarovski grin
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Yep, but they must either be stupid or I don't move around like a retard with taser in my ass.

Fluid motion, wind, and a little bit of calling can grant a man much...



Partition grin
If I'm doing something during which I'd be willing to shoot, the chamber is loaded. If I am somewhere I'd be unwilling to shoot, or doing something I'd be unwilling to shoot then the chamber is empty. What this boils down to is that a round is chambered unless I'm climbing over, under or around something, or am too close to camp.
Calvin,

Great pics of the young men and their deer!
Good on ya..for taking them out and teaching helping them..

NOT everyone should carry hot...and you have to start with young hunters right.

Some will and do carry hot( I do, ....my 14 YEAR OLD YOUNGEST SON DOESN'T) ..

It's your decision..and each of us live with their choices..

The thread was about who does what..not who teaches what...Jim
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
We are having a little dustup on this subject on another thread... I'll go grab a link to that thread for anyone who wants to check it out, or heck, join the fray.

I will go first: yes, I hunt with a round in the chamber.

-jeff


This discussion of carrying hot or empty has already been the subject of at least one long and vociferous thread some time ago..............

Must've been my smart-aleck comment about "Yuppie Flippie Uppie" scope covers that made things take a turn for the worse........

Between carrying cold, push button scope covers, twisty knobs on scopes, charts taped to the stocks, no wonder there's so many elk running around in Colorado........ grin

Casey
Kind of ironic that in a place as "heavily populated" as Alaska, we have guys hunting empty. I gotta admit to carrying chamber empty, heavy mag (of course) while hunting most of the time. It's true there are occasions when I have the chamber loaded but I always feel a bit funny about that - and often it's not hunting, it's more often fishing. I suppose part of my quest not to kill myself or others with a rifle has to do with the fact that in these parts there are so many other ways to do it. That and the fact that unlike some who live where they move toward each other at over 100 miles per hour on a regular basis, that is not part of how I live so maybe I'm just a chicken.

I do understand how hunting in the thick stuff works and know how easily one could get shot or shot at. I recall on one occasion walking up on a fellow who I didn't see until I was about 30 feet away, perhaps less. He neither saw nor heard me. Had he been more aware and trigger happy, perhaps I wouldn't be telling this.
I'll happily run a rifle HOT next time in CO......
I was thinking the same. Funny how those in states that have 1 million hunters on opening day run hot, whilst I might see 1/2 dozen folks in a 6 month span, but I won't run hot.

Originally Posted by Steelhead
I'll happily run a rifle HOT next time in CO......


OK. If your down this way, we'll find some elk together.


Casey
I always hunt with a loaded chamber. The only time I unload the chamber is when I am going up a tree and when the hunt is over. 3 Position safeties are safer in thick stuff IMO over a Remmy style, so I dont worry about an accidental safety flip. I feel that between the gun safety, the safety between my ears and safe gun handling, I wont have a problem...its worked for years!
And you won't have to worry about a thing cuzz my rifles all have safties and they are 100%.....
Originally Posted by Kimberman
I always hunt with a loaded chamber. The only time I unload the chamber is when I am going up a tree and when the hunt is over. 3 Position safeties are safer in thick stuff IMO over a Remmy style, so I dont worry about an accidental safety flip. I feel that between the gun safety, the safety between my ears and safe gun handling, I wont have a problem...its worked for years!


Well said Kimberman! Agree 100%.

-jeff
So in the middle of a fall when are you thinking about the landing, when are you thinking about gun control, when are you thinking you "I'll go to church next Sunday if I live" during all of that?

You are a machine Jeff.............
Originally Posted by Steelhead
And you won't have to worry about a thing cuzz my rifles all have safties and they are 100%.....

______________________________________________________________
So Steelhaid, not to single you out..:)

Why then, won't you carry a hunting rifle in hunting country when your are hunting with a cartridge chambered?

Afraid of falling on your arse after a hard nite of partying ...or snagging the triiger after placing the rifle on safe..( you thought) or forgetting to put the rifle on safe?...

With a FIREARM,..YOU ever had and accidental or unplanned discharge?
I haven't.

You do have some great pictures, BTW..

That 'dumb' wolf thot you were Farley Mowat from the tales his great grandmother told ..:)..:)


Wish I ...or most of us could hunt in the SE AK rain 20 some days of ANY month..:) Jim

Originally Posted by Steelhead


You are a machine Jeff.............


You are a tool, Steelhead.

-jeff
I figured you would start talking about my tool, I can read sign....
So, Jeff. This is supposed to be a "Poll". Have you rolled any numbers for us?
No, let's let it roll a bit longer before I do that... maybe tomorrow, to get the guys who do internet at work? I'd say, top of my head, we are maybe 85/15 running "hot"...

We'll see soon...

-jeff
... and next time I'll figure out how to use the actual "poll" function...

:-/

-jeff
I could probably get you another 85/15 vote in your favor if there were more San Fran folks here.......
Most of my hunting is done where a quick unexpected shot is the norm, so yes I carry hot, but I don't carry guns that that make me nervous when carried hot. If it doesn't have a very good and positive safety, I don't use that gun.

Now, if I was hunting where it was dangerous, do to certain circumstances, like riding horseback, or maybe climbing in very rough country, I might take the round out of the chamber, and in very open country where a man usually has plenty of time to plan a shot, then I see no reason to carry hot.
Once I'm out of the vehicle, the firearms are loaded, rounds are chambered, and the safeties are put into the "safe" position and will stay that way unless I fire the weapons or have need to cross a fence or climb into a tree stand. There have only been a few times that I can recall not carrying a loaded weapon in the field and those few times have been dictated by the circumstances/situation, not by personal choice.

There are lots of folks whom I would prefer to go with an empty chamber if I was hunting with them, but I try to avoid those folks whenever possible.

Jeff
Klikitarik,

Quote
He neither saw nor heard me. Had he been more aware and trigger happy, perhaps I wouldn't be telling this.


How big are your horns?
I've carried hot the past 27 years. I've also had time to take the round out of the chamber and dry fire on passed up bucks multiple times before they bug out. While elk hunting this season I had a front scope cap brake and the safty flip to fire while bashing through some brush. I had emptied the chamber when it started getting really bad, but it still got me thinking. Over the past few years I find myself clearing my weapon more often while hunting. I could adjust to hunting cold. As often as I get flagged by other hunters I wouldn't mind more guys hunting cold as well.
I do carry my 1911 cocked and locked.
Quote
I figured you would start talking about my tool, I can read sign....


What tool?You are the one posting your cure for your feminine itch. grin
Quote
NOT everyone should carry hot...


Not sure why Jim, but that made me think of the now-infamous DEA agent in the school what shot his own self! smile
Quote
I'd say, top of my head, we are maybe 85/15 running "hot"...

Rudy is leading the polls too.
I have a round chambered in most hunting situations, but I always empty the chamber for horseback, climbing into a stand, crossing a fence or stream etc. I am very careful of what my muzzle covers and always use rifles with very positive safeties. Still I always advice people to never trust a safety.
Hell, i even like WCB too much to accidentally shoot him.. i hunt empty chamber...
Originally Posted by husqvarna
I have a round chambered in most hunting situations, but I always empty the chamber for horseback, climbing into a stand, crossing a fence or stream etc. I am very careful of what my muzzle covers and always use rifles with very positive safeties. Still I always advice people to never trust a safety.


Same here and I've been doing it that way for 35 years since my dad taught me how to hunt. Sure the hunter's safety course taught otherwise and I did it to make them happy and went right back to the way my dad taught me. Nobody in our family has accidently killed anyone or even had a accidental discharge of a weapon in all of the combined time we've been hunting.
Same as one of the posters stated, 98% of the time I hunt empty chamber, the exceptions being walking up on a bear kill or a kill that's been left out over night, or digging a wounded bruin outa the brush etc.

Never been a problem to chamber a round, but then I don't usually walk through the woods with the chainsaw running when I'm going to cut wood. There's plenty of time to pull the cord when it's time to do the serious work.

Seems the mileage do vary, odd how prevalent it seems to be around these parts to hunt COLD. (grin, maybe a pun there)

I guess if I gave a chit how the majority do things I wouldn't have moved here. It all kinda comes together I guess.

To my way of thinking it's a courtesy extended to those you hunt with, if you hunt solo, who gives a rats azz what you do?
Check out the thread on accidental discharges on the hunting rifles forum, it looks like most who've experienced ADs had them when they flipped off the safety. Same thing happened to me 20 years ago, luckily, nothing was damaged.

Now, here are a few observations (besides the obvious never trust a safety):

1) You can't have an AD when flipping off the safety on an empty chamber.

2) If you handle the weapon safely, having an AD when flipping off the safety won't hurt anything.

3) Having an AD will sure enough change your thinking on carrying one in the chamber, and will make you glad you're a member of the cult of wearing underwear whilst hunting.

And I agree 100% with 1AK's last sentence above.
I carry my firearms "hot" when I hunt.

This was my 46th deer season and I hunt the rugged coastal range of the Willaimette valley in Oregon for deer but hunting has carried me far and wide.

My dad taught me to treat any firearm I have in my hand as if it is loaded and the the safety is off.

This is a matter of personal responsibility. I handle firearms constantly and I'm comfortable doing so. If you only pull "Old Deathwind" out of the closet once a year for a weekend hunt, as a responsible adult you have to assess your ability to handle a firearm safely and I applaud those of you who adhere to this.

Doc
An issue even bigger than carrying hot is one's attitude toward the safety itself. Sure, I can look at the mechanism and often see the "invincibility" of the device. Yet, experience tells me that there are a multitude of ways compromise just about anything. Guns, for all the lawyers that are (understandably) behind them these days, are no exception. And while it would be nice to assume that all the fine folks here don't keep company with nor act in ways that would include them among the idiots responsible for those lawyers, I will venture that one would have to be extremely conceited to say that they have never made a mistake or done a foolish thing- even when handling a firearm. That said, anyone is statistically subject to being the cause of an accidental - and likely an uncontrolled - discharge.


I carry my chainsaw running most of the time too but the chain isn't moving. If it does I adjust the idle back where it belongs. Usually I'm trimming fencelines with it more than cutting firewood.
Do you load the chamber before you turn on the spotlight or after you see eyes?
I load my rifle when I get out of my truck, and unload it at the end of the hunt just before getting back in the truck. I personally have never known anybody to do it any other way.
Wow, guess this one is back again. I hunt with a round in the chamber with the exception of when the terrain dictates that it would be better to unload. Of course when carring in a saddle scabbard or any other form of transportation it is unloaded. Can't imagine anyone trying to convince me that walking around with an autoloading shotgun cold is conducive to shooting fast flying birds. Realistically, you wouldn't even get a shot most times because somebody in the group would kill it while you were putting a round in the chamber. Would certainly do as the Romans if I ever get a chance to hunt AK but otherwise I'll stick to what works for me.
Depends on the situation, but for the most part, I hunt empty. If I'm sitting in a deer stand in the woods, I'll be hot, but hiking the mountains, its almost always empty, unless on the final end of a stalk where shooting will be likely.

Can't say that I've had an experience where I wished I would have been loaded or didn't have time to.
I am the same well said guys we always unload for the same reasons but once we step into the woods we have a chambered round.

Originally Posted by SteelyEyes
Originally Posted by husqvarna
I have a round chambered in most hunting situations, but I always empty the chamber for horseback, climbing into a stand, crossing a fence or stream etc. I am very careful of what my muzzle covers and always use rifles with very positive safeties. Still I always advice people to never trust a safety.


Same here and I've been doing it that way for 35 years since my dad taught me how to hunt. Sure the hunter's safety course taught otherwise and I did it to make them happy and went right back to the way my dad taught me. Nobody in our family has accidently killed anyone or even had a accidental discharge of a weapon in all of the combined time we've been hunting.
If I am hunting yes.
If I am in transit to the place I am hunting, no.

Both scenarios can involve being dressed for the occasion, being armed and being in the field, they are not the same.

AGW
I hunt empty chamber.
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen

I will go first: yes, I hunt with a round in the chamber.

-jeff


I won't be hunting with you Jeff.

I always hunt empty. Where I hunt the terrain is typically steep and treacherous and a round in the chamber is a bad accident waiting to happen. It only takes one fall to kill yourself with an accidental discharge.

15 years ago I was hunting Caribou near Ungava Bay and the week prior to our arrival in camp a guy was killed a few miles from camp by an accidental discharge. He was hunting with his buddy and he stumbled into a thicket of some sort and the branches in the thicket tripped the trigger and the gun went off. The guy shot himself in the upper thigh with a 7mm mag and he bled to death because he mangled his femoral artery. His buddy tried to stop the bleeding, but it was a lost cause. Let�s just say everybody in camp was a total mess when we arrived for our hunt. I will never forget the look on those people�s faces!!! After that incident and I have never carried hot since. To each their own, but unless I am possibly the prey, I never carry hot.

You start you post with

Quote
I always hunt empty.


Then post.

Quote
unless I am possibly the prey, I never carry hot.


So you don't "always" hunt empty?

Never hunted in Africa and I don't think I can afford a brown bear hunt. Therefore, it is fair to say I NEVER carry hot. Only time it makes sense to me is if you are chasing something wounded that can eat you or kill you. I don't put elk in that catagory.
Quote
Never hunted in Africa and I don't think I can afford a brown bear hunt. Therefore, it is fair to say I NEVER carry hot. Only time it makes sense to me is if you are chasing something wounded that can eat you or kill you. I don't put elk in that catagory.


So you don't hunt with a round in the chamber,but would do so if you were to hunt dangerous game?Personally,I alway have a round in the chamber when cleaning game in grizzly country,or if I have to leave some of the animal and come back later to pack the rest of it out.
SJ,

You are seriously beginning to look like a complete moron.

What Poot is saying (and it doesn't take a genius to figure it out, despite the fact that you don't get it) is that if the risk of dying from carrying cold outweighs the risk of dying from carrying hot, it probably makes sense to carry hot.

Likewise, while I think it a foolish endeavor to carry hot while hunting, I would never suggest that our buys in Iraq and Afghanistan not carry hot, since there is a real possibility that a split second delay could cost them their lives.

Quote
What Poot is saying is that if the risk of dying from carrying cold outweighs the risk of dying from carrying hot, it probably makes sense to carry hot.


Exactly what I was getting at.I am surprised that you caught on. grin

So have you decided what the definition of an AD is yet?Since you avoided responding to my other post,perhaps I will repost it here so you can point out why you feel that my definition of an AD is incorrect.

Quote
The definition of accidental discharge is when the gun fires accidentally.If the round goes off as you chamber a round but before you intentionally pull the trigger,the discharge is accidental.Unless of course you intended for the gun to fire as you chambered the round with your finger off of the trigger.If the gun fires as you move the safety to the "fire" position,without intentionally pulling the trigger,it is an accidental discharge.Unless of course you intended for the gun to fire as you moved the safety with your finger off of the trigger.

I don't know about you,but myself and probably every other person on this forum do not intend for the gun to fire until we intentionally pull the trigger.Given that,any time the gun discharges without an intentional pull of the trigger,an accidental discharge has occurred.Where the gun is aimed,and whether or not someone was injured does not change the definition of accidental discharge.
As has been stated many times on this and other threads,guns are mechanical,and nothing mechanical can ever be trusted 100%.Therefore while careful gun handling can prevent an AD from causing any harm,the only way to COMPLETELY ELIMINATE any chance of an AD,is to NEVER place a round in the chamber.
Originally Posted by stubblejumper
Quote
Never hunted in Africa and I don't think I can afford a brown bear hunt. Therefore, it is fair to say I NEVER carry hot. Only time it makes sense to me is if you are chasing something wounded that can eat you or kill you. I don't put elk in that catagory.


So you don't hunt with a round in the chamber,but would do so if you were to hunt dangerous game?Personally,I alway have a round in the chamber when cleaning game in grizzly country,or if I have to leave some of the animal and come back later to pack the rest of it out.


Where are you going with this? Let me try to make this really clear because I am obviously doing a poor job of making my point. The only time I would �even� consider hunting hot is if I was tracking wounded game that is highly dangerous (Cape buffalo, lion, brown bear, etc.). That said, the chances of me going on a brown bear hunt or killing a cape buffalo are pretty slim, therefore, I think it is fair to say I don�t ever run hot.

I have family in Alaska and I spend a fair bit of time in brown bear and grizzly country and I do not carry hot, ever!! I hunt elk in grizzly country in Wyoming every few years and I don�t carry hot, ever!! So what part of that don�t you get????
So if you don't carry hot would you hunt birds with the gun open and when one flushes you load two shells and close the action, shoulder the shotgun and shoot? Or are you saying that game that requires a rapid shot can't be hunted safely? (The VP aside)
Quote
Where are you going with this? Let me try to make this really clear because I am obviously doing a poor job of making my point.


I understood you perfectly.Just making the point that given the right circumstances(in your case a wounded and dangerous animal)most people would carry a round in the chamber while hunting.And until you recover the animal you would still be hunting.
Originally Posted by AussieGunWriter
If I am hunting yes.
If I am in transit to the place I am hunting, no.

Both scenarios can involve being dressed for the occasion, being armed and being in the field, they are not the same.

AGW

____________________________________________________________
_ That sort of sums it up for me..
There's a difference between hiking, trekking, climbing to get into where you will hunt and ........hunting.

When hunting I hardly move perceptably by human terms..know where my next foot is going to be placed, work slow and am ready.
I am not busting thickets where I cannot see anything including my feet in front of me where there is a risk of snakking the rifle or myself..
I don't fall down, don't poop my pants when hunting or jam my rifle muzzle into the mud because I lost footing.
IF the going requires it, the rifle is slung, perhaps unloaded, handed to another ( IF anyone is even along with me) OR I figger out a better route.
More worried about breaking an ankle than shooting myself or another.

I DO wonder that some may take the 'hunting cold' position for safety because they realize they:

Are not in good condition nor agile ..
Are overweight, clumsy..

Hungover..( God forbid but it happens)

That then is a good precaution for such folks..Jim

Originally Posted by noKnees
So if you don't carry hot would you hunt birds with the gun open and when one flushes you load two shells and close the action, shoulder the shotgun and shoot? Or are you saying that game that requires a rapid shot can't be hunted safely? (The VP aside)


I hunt em with a sling shot......................
Originally Posted by jim in Oregon
[
I DO wonder that some may take the 'hunting cold' position for safety because they realize they:

Are not in good condition nor agile ..
Are overweight, clumsy..

Hungover..( God forbid but it happens)

That then is a good precaution for such folks..Jim



You just describded me to a T grin I am a fat ass that rides an ATV all day long and I only get off unless I run out of Twinkies............

I think you have it backwards, it is the folks that hike their asses off in steep terrain and go into hell holes looking for game that hunt cold. The possiblity of taking a spill is higher in those circumstances, therefore, it seems more logical to hunt cold. Thats my take anyway.
Poot,
Now I know you are a hunter..tho in different country..and as I have said on this and similar posts:
YOU hunt knowing your own limitations, physical condition, terrain, how fast you need to move etc...so you are safe and come back in one piece.
IF ya need a takedown rifle stowed in the backpack, go for it.

When a hunter hikes his arse off in steep terrain he ain't hunting..unless maybe for goats or sheep.:)

He's GETTING to where he's gonna hunt and the rifle is handled alot differently..Slung up, unloaded, on safe, even laid down at times... whatever..
When you need one or both hands and arms to negotiate the country..the rifle gets slung up and safe.

I hunt like I hunted men and lions and bears and like I still can hunt with a bow.

Slow and deliberate..not like I was busting my arse..

IF I am humping into where I want to hunt( or out) the rifle is unloaded and probably slung.
IF I'm doing a run around on a herd of elk, rifle is safe and slung up..

IF a hunter is falling down and getting tangled up..don't matter IF all he's packing is a slingshot, IMHO, he's in over his head, in the country...picked a poor route, out of condition, poor footwear, fatigued, or maybe all of the above or worse.Jim

Hey guys!

Do you all think I should total this up, just to see what the ratio is, or let it run a while longer before I do that?

It would be my preferance to see this thread be more of a poll than a debate over chambered vs. not, as that fire is raging elsewhere*, but obviously you guys do as you see fit.

* NASA called me and told me they could see the thermal imprint of our little dustup from the moon! :-)

-jeff

I mostly deer hunt from tree stands. I Have the chamber empty to and from the stand but I am definitely going to have a round in the chamber while I'm in the stand.

BTW the reddest (is that a word?) I've ever seen anyones face is the first and last time I have loaned a rifle. I had a boyhood friend up to my place to hunt. We had gotten together again at our 40 year high school reunion and I invited him for whitetail season. I knew he was an avid gun collector and has a world class collection of Colt revolvers. When he showed up he had a pre 64 model 94 Winchester in .32 Special but only had 30-30 ammo. I loaned him a 1903 sporter in 30-06. It is a beautiful little full Mannlicher style rifle put together by the Fajun Custom shop in 1973.

He hunted all morning from a ground blind then we met at noon for lunch. He had the rifle slung over his shoulder and I noticed the safety was off. I told him I sure hoped he didn't have a round chambered because the safety was off.

He told me: "No it is off, see." (pointing to the magazine cutoff)

"That's not the safety!" I blurted out.

I thought he was going to faint! He had carried the rifle all morning loaded with the safety off.

That rifle has a 3lb trigger. How he managed to go that long without a AD is beyond my comprehension.
I'll never loan out another gun.
Yikes, that is scary. That boy is one lucky person!!
ibfestus,
That 'near miss' goes back to the owner of the rifle and the one it was loaned to..
Both probably could have done differently.

First, make certain that anyone who is going to use a firearm is understanding of the way it works.

Second, IF someone hands you a firearm, make sure YOU know how it works..:) Jim

PS: make certain THAT IT DOES WORK and is in proper mechanical condition..:) Jim
Originally Posted by jim in Oregon
Poot,
Now I know you are a hunter..tho in different country..and as I have said on this and similar posts:
YOU hunt knowing your own limitations, physical condition, terrain, how fast you need to move etc...so you are safe and come back in one piece.
IF ya need a takedown rifle stowed in the backpack, go for it.

When a hunter hikes his arse off in steep terrain he ain't hunting..unless maybe for goats or sheep.:)

He's GETTING to where he's gonna hunt and the rifle is handled alot differently..Slung up, unloaded, on safe, even laid down at times... whatever..
When you need one or both hands and arms to negotiate the country..the rifle gets slung up and safe.

I hunt like I hunted men and lions and bears and like I still can hunt with a bow.

Slow and deliberate..not like I was busting my arse..

IF I am humping into where I want to hunt( or out) the rifle is unloaded and probably slung.
IF I'm doing a run around on a herd of elk, rifle is safe and slung up..

IF a hunter is falling down and getting tangled up..don't matter IF all he's packing is a slingshot, IMHO, he's in over his head, in the country...picked a poor route, out of condition, poor footwear, fatigued, or maybe all of the above or worse.Jim



Jim,
Point taken, but a lot of us do hunt in steep nasty locations where it is easy to lose footing. I just can�t imagine putting a gun �only� on safe when the possibility of taking a tumble is high. An empty chamber makes me feel a hell of a lot more comfortable in those situations. I think it is really a matter of semantics with regards to �what is hunting�. I consider myself hunting from the moment I leave the trailhead. I have shot more than one animal while crossing a steep nasty scree slope that I never would attempt with a round in the chamber. In those situations I steady myself and quietly jack a round in the chamber. This adds all of one second to the whole process all while decreasing the possibility of the gun going off should I fall.

The bottom line is I never know when a elk, deer, mtn goat, etc.is going to show themselves, therefore, I am hunting from the moment I start hiking. If I cross a nasty spot I don�t need to take the gun off my shoulder and remove a round from the chamber and then put a round back in the camber once I get to a section of easy walking, like you describe. If I leave the chamber empty I am safe for all conditions; I can hike as fast or slow as I want and I just need to run the bolt once to prep the gun for business.

Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
...
I will go first: yes, I hunt with a round in the chamber.

-jeff


I do too. No arguments, discussion or apology for same.

BCR
PootPeak,
Everyone's experience and terrain will be a bit different from the next fellow's.
Whatever YOU are comfortable with and is safe for your hunting..continue to do it well.Same with anyone else in either 'camp' on this matter.
( and I knew you ain't had twinkies very often..:)


Concerning safeties on hunting firearms:
They either work 100% of the time or don't use them and carry cold as you describe. or can the firearm..
That includes dropping the rifle ..or falling on it .

Mine DO work 100% of the time....But I have good time proven rifles with good designs...in perfect condition (and so few of them I can operate or even field strip them them in the dark..:) Jim
Originally Posted by jim in Oregon
ibfestus,

First, make certain that anyone who is going to use a firearm is understanding of the way it works.

Second, IF someone hands you a firearm, make sure YOU know how it works..:) Jim

PS: make certain THAT IT DOES WORK and is in proper mechanical condition..:) Jim


The guys in my favorite gunshop are good guys, but like any gunshop employees they get cavalier.

I believe that a firearm should be handed to another person action open. If the receiver of the firearm does not understand how it works, or it's not open, they should refuse to take it.

This has come up a few times when I've asked to see oddball firearms that weren't immediatly obvious how they worked, and they handed them to me (or tried to) with the action locked up. I hand 'em right back and ask them to show me how to clear the firearm... they look at me funny but do it.

A LOT of accidents would be prevented if everyone did that, all the time.

-jeff
Originally Posted by jim in Oregon


Concerning safeties on hunting firearms:
They either work 100% of the time or don't use them and carry cold as you describe. or can the firearm..
That includes dropping the rifle ..or falling on it .

Mine DO work 100% of the time....But I have good time proven rifles with good designs...in perfect condition (and so few of them I can operate or even field strip them them in the dark..:) Jim


Oy, Jim, what have you said... the "safety police" are gonna be all over you for that one... there goes my thread!

:-)

-jeff
Hot. Someone should pull the similar thread from a year ago.....very entertaining.

Originally Posted by jim in Oregon


I DO wonder that some may take the 'hunting cold' position for safety because they realize they:

Are not in good condition nor agile ..
Are overweight, clumsy..

Hungover..( God forbid but it happens)

That then is a good precaution for such folks..Jim



I hate to bust your attempt at painting a stereotypical picture of someone who carries "cold," but:

-I play hockey for the Minnesota NHL alumni team. I'm their goalie. I have been called a lot of things in my day, but I have yet to be accused of possessing minimal amounts of agility. Clumsy isn't really on the list either.

-I will be doing the Ironman triathlon in Madison, WI next year, and recently ran a marathon in less than 4 hours with ease. Feel free to tag along for the 2.4 mile swim, 112 mile bike, and the 26.2 mile run. I doubt if you'll be referring to me as "not in good condition" at the finish line....if you can make it that far. Heck, just show up tomorrow at 0545 for my Master's swim team workout. Let me know your opinion after the 3500 or so meters.

I am around 10% body fat. Not a rail, but not exactly overweight.

I rarely drink anything, and I don't drink to excess.


AND


I carry a rifle with an empty chamber.


GOALIE, Good for you on your condition and choices.

Your reading-comprehension skills may need some work tho..

as I said I WONDERED about SOME...>>:)..:)

I read all the posts about hunters falling down , damaging their rifles,jamming their muzzles full of dirt and muck..(even pooping their pants in incontinency), cutting themselves with their own knives.. etc and it does make a man wonder..:)

Anyhow,
IF that shoe don't fit you, good..!!!

Continue to do what works and you feel safe and comfortable with..Jim
why do I feel like I took a ride on the short bus after reading much of this?
Originally Posted by jim in Oregon
PootPeak,
Everyone's experience and terrain will be a bit different from the next fellow's.
Whatever YOU are comfortable with and is safe for your hunting..continue to do it well.Same with anyone else in either 'camp' on this matter.
( and I knew you ain't had twinkies very often..:)


Concerning safeties on hunting firearms:
They either work 100% of the time or don't use them and carry cold as you describe. or can the firearm..
That includes dropping the rifle ..or falling on it .

Mine DO work 100% of the time....But I have good time proven rifles with good designs...in perfect condition (and so few of them I can operate or even field strip them them in the dark..:) Jim


I see your side of it as well; the problem is not everybody has good gun handling skills and many never verify their guns are 100% mechanically sound like your firearms. For those folks a cold chamber is a safer bet in my view.

I see both sides of this issue, I just like the piece of mind of a cold chamber.
Most of the time. Muzzle awareness is critical. Just be sensable: climbing into stands, crossing obstacles...unload.
I carry my rifles with one in the spout - just as I do with my shotguns. The "danger" is nil. It's not the absolute faith in my safety that makes it so (although it's always on until a second or so before firing) - it's the absolute faith I have that my barrel is always pointed in a safe direction.

Why this practice is considered unsafe when hunting big game with rifles - and yet is considered safe when jumping birds with shotguns is something I don't understand.

Going down scree slopes, crossing streams, climbing trees and stepping over lots of deadfalls, is the exception to the rule - then I take the cartridge out, and take the safe off.

Until you've surprised a grizzly or two, at real close range - you can't appreciate why.
Originally Posted by BCBrian
Why this practice is considered unsafe when hunting big game with rifles - and yet is considered safe when jumping birds with shotguns is something I don't understand.


The only place I've found where it's considered unsafe is on this internet chat forum. I've never heard hunting with an empty chamber advised in any hunter safety course, never known anyone who did it, and in 30 years of hunting never even known anyone who suggested it other than in this cyberworld. To me it's a solution in search of a problem. Maybe some of these guys need to take up knitting, but don't touch the needles until you're firmly seated.
Well said, from the Crow Hunter in Mississippi.......
Yeah, where were you this weekend? :-)

-jeff
Originally Posted by Calvin
why do I feel like I took a ride on the short bus after reading much of this?


Uhm... because... never mind.

-jeff

I am with Crow Hunter on this. Other than the internet I have never heard of anyone huning with an empty chamber.
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
Yeah, where were you this weekend? :-)

-jeff


And that s'posed to mean exactly whut?
I carry hot. I have always treated every gun as loaded and hence have muzzle awareness. I never point the muzzle towards a place I don't want a nice little neat hole. Even in the event of a AD (which I have never had) it would not matter because I am aware where my weapon is pointing.
here is something I just can't visualize- how did the guy shoot himself in the upper thigh with a 7mm? I am assuming it is a rifle- right? imagine how the rifle had to be pointed to do that!
Originally Posted by wildswalker
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
Yeah, where were you this weekend? :-)

-jeff


And that s'posed to mean exactly whut?


I got absolutely hammered on by the empty-chamber crew this weekend... that's all.

-jeff
Originally Posted by noKnees
I am with Crow Hunter on this. Other than the internet I have never heard of anyone huning with an empty chamber.


Field & Stream is looking for the two of you, they'd like to do an article....
TFF!!
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
Originally Posted by wildswalker
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
Yeah, where were you this weekend? :-)

-jeff


And that s'posed to mean exactly whut?


I got absolutely hammered on by the empty-chamber crew this weekend... that's all.

-jeff


Sorry, wasn't on the net much this weekend, didn't catch your gettin' "hammered"....

Been busy...ya know, huntin' and stuff like that.

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
I have taught Hunter Education in Montana for over 20 years and do teach the principle of an unloaded chamber in rifles. There is a difference in the type of hunting done with a rifle vs. a shotgun.

The main difference is that in shotgun hunting, the quarry is flushed and the gun is then fired as quickly as possibe to get the bird within shotgun range. The typical carry in this situation is a two handed carry, which gives the hunter the best control of his gun.

Of course, as was stated in an earlier post, muzzle control is paramount as well. The hunter has the responsibility to maintain the SAFEST condition at all times, whether shotgun or rifle.

On the other hand, a rifle is made for precise shooting, which means making the shot as steady as possible and at much greater distances. Carrying a round in the chamber while hunting, without the knowledge of any game in the vacinity, isn't the SAFEST option and therefore the reason that it is best to have an empty chamber. One less opportunity for an accident.

I understand there are many out there who would argue this point, that doesn't matter, and certainly doesn't make it safe. After you have taught several thousand young students and seen the things they don't know as well as the parents that don't know safety either, you would agree that it is in the best interests of all who share this sport to practice the most safe method.
jeff-
you can total if you want, but it won't change anyone's mind!

We cold-chamber guys surely ain't about to suddenly become potentialy dangers, and anyone that carries hot and has not had a negligent discharge (there are no accidental discharges ) needs to add YET. Hopeingly it won't ever happen.

To the hot chamber guys - why even bother to go cold when you get in the rig?

ironbender,

I didn't start this to rub in anyone's face; I just was curious what the ratio is. I don't expect ANY of this to change anyone's mind. We are basically arguing religion here!

Answer- because I don't road hunt. Among other reasons.

-jeff
Quote
(there are no accidental discharges


So if a properly cared for gun that hasn't been tampered with fires as the safety is pushed to the fire position(or when the bolt is closed to chamber a round) because of a mechanical defect from the factory,that could not have been for seen,what do you call it?
If it was a cold-chamber guy who's rifle fired while he was closing the bolt, he'd call it someone else's fault, probably.

-jeff
Originally Posted by Hemi
I
here is something I just can't visualize- how did the guy shoot himself in the upper thigh with a 7mm? I am assuming it is a rifle- right? imagine how the rifle had to be pointed to do that!


yes a rifle. The guy fell and rolled into bush, the gun could have been pointed in any direction. His partner said the branches likely hit the trigger. When you bust your ass like that you could just as easily blow your headoff. I don't think it is that hard to imagine after taking a nasty fall
OK. I should have said "very few". Most of the "unintentional" discharges one hears about fall into the ND category, IMO.

The condition you note says it for a cold chamber I think.
Jeff-
Don't doubt your intentions - sorry if it seemed like that.

To me, there is a HUGE difference between relative safety and absolute safety.

Carrying hot has a low probability of causing chit, but IF it does, the consequences too often are terribly high. That's where I'm at on this.
Quote
OK. I should have said "very few".


That is the problem with making blanket statements.They are usually proven wrong.
If you lose your footing on this good luck maintaining barrel control
[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by ironbender
OK. I should have said "very few". Most of the "unintentional" discharges one hears about fall into the ND category, IMO.



Ironbender, I want to take this moment to congratulate you for being the FIRST PERSON I have seen on any of these threads concede a point. I am dead serious here. I love to debate, and one thing that drives me NUTS on the internet is that nobody concedes or backs up a little and clarifies.

Hat's off to you.

-jeff
Gotta save this and show it to the wife! smile
That's one of my favorites-

Blanket statements are always wrong! smile
Always hot unless going under or over a fence or jumping a brook. I have never hunted with someone who didn't keep one in the chamber. Never been nervous about it. Most deer in my world would be up to full speed by the time the bolt slammed shut.
Are your deer faster than speeding boolits? smile
Only when you aim where they were .......
I have hunted with a chambered round 99% of the time when on foot. When I am on horseback, I don't have a round chambered 100% of time. Heck, you may even find a loaded rifle (or ten) in my house. I was always taught to treat them as if they were always loaded. The way I handle them never changes. If I see your muzzle pointed my direction. I will damn sure let you know where it will be placed if it ever happens again.

cK
Quote
OK. I should have said "very few". Most of the "unintentional" discharges one hears about fall into the ND category, IMO.


In all honesty,I do have to agree with Jeff on his point about you conceding that your statement was incorrect.I respect your changing your statement,and I do agree with your new statement.

Another individual here posted a blanket statement that carrying a gun with an empty chamber would completely eliminate accidental discharges.I informed him that an accidental discharge could still happen when he chambered a round or released the safety when he was ready to take the shot.However unlike you,he would not admit that his statement was not correct,instead insisting that if the gun went off it would not be an accidental discharge because he was preparing to shoot,and the muzzle was pointed in a safe direction.When I pointed out that if the gun went off before the trigger was intentionally pulled,it would be considered an accidental discharge regardless of where the muzzle was pointed.
It would be so much easier if more people shared your attitude.
We may not agree about hunting with a round in the chamber,but at least we can have a civil discussion and amend incorrect statements to make them correct.
Originally Posted by ironbender
Gotta save this and show it to the wife! smile


I was and am DEAD SERIOUS. I've spent the last weekend "debating" people who were incapable of a reasonable debate. Not you.

-jeff
ITS ALWAYS THE UNLOADED GUN THAT KILLS SOMEONE.
for the record,I dont use scope caps,and I usually chamber a round.
Originally Posted by fluffy
ITS ALWAYS THE UNLOADED GUN THAT KILLS SOMEONE.


More pearls of wisdom..
Hey Calvin! Nice to see you.

Got anything constructive to add?

-jeff
Do you?
Didn't have a prob. dancing the bolt, with my girl deer (she didn't even chit twitch)....this past month.

I fall over all the down timber...waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much, in the clear cuts, trying to get to where I want to be....to carry it hot. Too busy, really, to try and figure out where Ned is, at anyone time.....so I just figure it safest....

HoundGirl
ROOKIE'S........grin
HG;

Can figure that most would hunt with you any day.....

The reasons, don't stop with common sense re: rifle safety..... but they damned sure start there.
Originally Posted by HoundGirl
Didn't have a prob. dancing the bolt, with my girl deer (she didn't even chit twitch)....this past month.

I fall over all the down timber...waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much, in the clear cuts, trying to get to where I want to be....to carry it hot. Too busy, really, to try and figure out where Ned is, at anyone time.....so I just figure it safest....

HoundGirl



Impressive!
Did I say/word something wrong?

HoundGirl
No, I am very impressed and agree with you for all the same reasons.
Originally Posted by HoundGirl
Did I say/word something wrong?

HoundGirl


Houndgirl... no... no worries! You just stepped into a bit of a foodfight is all.

-jeff
Yes I hunt with a round in the chamber.
At times such as crossing very rough terrain or a fence I unload or at least open the action halfway. I then reload/close action.

Safety first and all that!
If you take some ballet lessons you can be hot in the steep, deep, and slick! smile wink
Ain't got the grace required.....call it my handicapgrin....

HoundGirl
Careful, this is one of those threads that begins to feel kind of like going to confession...... wink Sheesh, how much dignity are we willingly giving up in exposing the weakness of the human condition? frown
I just wonder how come I always get the guys with zero muzzle control??? Why do I end up getting guns pointed at me in error ao frigging often if all you folks are so incredibly gifted in muzzle control?

The reason is that few have a friggin' clue what muzzle control REALLY is and do not mind looking down the occasional muzzle. It is what they have seen and done their entire lives.
art
cocked and locked most of the time...
I'm guessing you don't buy lottery tickets?
With a guide or friend,empty chamber.On my own depends on the terrain and my level of comfort.
Just raffle tickets from kids...

When are you going to send me my rifle??? wink
Originally Posted by HoundGirl
.....so I just figure it safest....

HoundGirl


Might be a key word there.......
Girl?

wink
yes
Jeff-
maybe your next poll should be "how many people have had a AD" and then find out how many of them carry hot or not- befor and after the AD.
Quote
When are you going to send me my rifle???

Soon, very soon. I'll even deliver to you.
Originally Posted by Hemi
Jeff-
maybe your next poll should be "how many people have had a AD" and then find out how many of them carry hot or not- befor and after the AD.


There is an AD thread going, Hemi. I'm not sure how much more abuse I can take, and that sounds like another contentious topic...

-jeff
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Girl?

wink



Ooooh. You're on a roll today Sitka........


Casey
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
Originally Posted by Hemi
Jeff-
maybe your next poll should be "how many people have had a AD" and then find out how many of them carry hot or not- befor and after the AD.


There is an AD thread going, Hemi. I'm not sure how much more abuse I can take, and that sounds like another contentious topic...

-jeff



laugh

On the other hand, everybody could've just ignored ya' grin


Casey
Not on this topic.....as we see every 6 or 7 months!
So from what I'm gathering from the long-time guys on here, this has come up once or twice...Tried to search it, anyone have a link or anything?
A round in the chamber is bad, but ammo in the magazine??

I leave my ammunition at camp. When I see an animal I want to shoot I leave my rifle there, run back to camp, get the ammunition, run back to my rifle, load and shoot the animal. Most big game will stand in one spot for up to six hours, until I get back.

I immediately unload the rifle, leave it there, run the ammo back to camp, then run back to take care of the animal. Only an irresponsible dunderhead would have ammunition in the magazine while hunting.
That's funny right there.
Do not see the humor... When the guys claiming to be too incompetent to hunt cold tell stories as if they had the ability to do something even more difficult... No, pathos is a better word.
That is pretty funny grin Those bucks like to have their picture taken too so don't forget to get the film for the camara so you can load it too..grin!!!


Originally Posted by Henry McCann
A round in the chamber is bad, but ammo in the magazine??

I leave my ammunition at camp. When I see an animal I want to shoot I leave my rifle there, run back to camp, get the ammunition, run back to my rifle, load and shoot the animal. Most big game will stand in one spot for up to six hours, until I get back.

I immediately unload the rifle, leave it there, run the ammo back to camp, then run back to take care of the animal. Only an irresponsible dunderhead would have ammunition in the magazine while hunting.
Originally Posted by Henry McCann
A round in the chamber is bad, but ammo in the magazine??

I leave my ammunition at camp. When I see an animal I want to shoot I leave my rifle there, run back to camp, get the ammunition, run back to my rifle, load and shoot the animal. Most big game will stand in one spot for up to six hours, until I get back.

I immediately unload the rifle, leave it there, run the ammo back to camp, then run back to take care of the animal. Only an irresponsible dunderhead would have ammunition in the magazine while hunting.

______________________________________________________________
Henry..humorously...

I am starting to see the light..:)

My next hunting venture for big game down here will be different than what I've done safely and successfully for over 50 years..

First, I will insure that I am a bit hung over and in danger of pooping my trousers from the hard partying in camp the night before.

Adds some challenge and drama to the hunt I hear tell..:)

Then I'll park my old pickup on a log landing with a decent view of at least 600 yards down and out.

Get the Def Lepard CD blaring to get me in a killing mood..:)

Have a shot of Crown Royal with some coffee while the heater pumps.

Will use my new Swarovsky binos to glass the fresh cut below.

I will be fully prepared for 'safe hunting'..and have my rifle cased, with the brand new trigger lock in place.
Unloaded of course!

The key to the trigger lock will be on my neck chain, tucked securely under my woolies..

If I see an elk or deer, I will immediately determine IF it is legal..ask myself what day it is and IF it's shooting light..:)and do I have a tag..:(..


Have another shot of CR & coffee..:)

Then I'll get my rifle out of the case in the jump seat, turn down Def Lepard CD, AND locate my cartridges..which are on the handy elastic bandolier on the rifle's stock.

Trigger lock then comes off!

We're getting ready now!
ONE cartridge is placed in the mag ( one shot kill ya know) and

Then I get the Harris bipod positioned so I can shoot off the truck hood..Then the rangefinder comes out and I verify the range
...
Great..only 450 yards..

I check the wind looking at the wind flags I set startegically down on the cut weeks before..5 mph from the left quartering away..:)

Now the Butler creek scope covers get flipped up..I'm really getting serious NOW!..:)

I shoulder the rifle and think about chambering the ONE round in the mag..BUT WAIT!

The elk have moved a bit..so I range them again..467 yards this time!

I adjust my turrets on the Leupold variable scope and then I actually look thru the scope for a final affirmation of my chosen bull..

then I feel a fart coming on but end up pooping my pants and the fog from the creek below rolls in hiding the elk herd..

OH well!
Been a fine safe morning and I DO have an old cotton T shirt in the truck under the seat!..All is well! Jim


It's been argued several times. The search function does not find things very well for me either. There are three! threads on this topic right now. Some are started like this one and others are from drifting off course.
Originally Posted by HoundGirl
I fall over all the down timber...waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much, in the clear cuts, trying to get to where I want to be....to carry it hot. Too busy, really, to try and figure out where Ned is, at anyone time.....so I just figure it safest....

HoundGirl


I've waited a long time to weigh in on this thread. The level of acrimony on this topic (EVERY time it comes up!) is truly amazing.

Anyway, HG, I hear what you're saying. In the thick stuff we're all in danger of falling down. Each of us has to make an assessment of our individual situation and make the best call he or she can make.

Me, I hunt with a round in the chamber. Always. That's how I was raised and taught to hunt, both rifle and shotgun, and applied later when I began handgun hunting. My father learned to hunt in the Dirty Thirties, when his ability to bring home game for the table was a very real supplement to his family's meagre rations, and a missed opportunity to take game was not just a disappointment, it might mean empty bellies at bedtime. He taught me to be prepared to shoot decisively, and to waste no time in doing so. It's not an unsafe way to hunt. My father and I have walked a lot of hunting miles together, first just the two of us, but later with good friends and eventually my own son and daughter, and we've always hunted "hot". There has never been a problem. Not even close.

I've walked countless miles hunting upland birds with a live round up the spout. I've fallen down with a loaded shotgun at least 25 times. If you hunt birds hard behind flushing dogs as I have for the past 40-odd years, you're gonna fall down. It's tough, physical hunting at times, and I love it. I have fallen backwards over a dog chasing a bitch in heat that some damn fool brought hunting, and got knocked cold. No ND. I've fallen down in thick briars and got scratched to smithereenies. No Nd. I've fallen into a sinkhole with grass grown over it, and had my shotgun fly out of my hands and land hard on the ground. No ND. A tree limb fell on me in a windstorm once, knocking my lever-action rifle out of my hands, and the rifle (loaded and on half-cock) landed with a twig inside the triggerguard. No ND.

How many times have I had an ND while hunting over 40 years with a round in the chamber? Zero.

Why? Because I always have my mechanical safety on, I always watch my muzzle, and I always keep my finger out of the trigger guard 'til it's time to shoot.

The only exception is that when I'm hunting with a single-action sixgun, the hammer is down on an empty chamber.

The statistics say that if you shoot 100,000 rounds, the odds of having an ND are 100%. In my lifetime I have fired, by my closest guess, about 500,000 rounds of ammunition. I've had 3 ND's, which I regard as being ahead of the odds by a bit. I'm not being smug about it, it just is what it is.

ALL of my ND's occurred during administrative handling of the firearm in question. NONE occurred while hunting. None of my ND's caused injury to anyone because even though I "knew" the guns were unloaded, I made sure my muzzle was pointed at a safe backstop when I dropped the hammer.

Elmer Keith once had a visitor in his home who was admiring his No. 5 revolver. He asked Keith if it was loaded. Keith's reply: "Of course it's loaded! Every gun in this house is loaded! 'Empty' guns get people killed!"

I've put in time in a patrol vehicle with an issue sidearm on my hip, and it's always been cocked and locked. I legally carry a concealed firearm every day, and there is always a round up the spout. Carrying a sidearm in Condition Three is lunacy, IMHO.

No offense to those who think otherwise, just thought I'd let the 'Fire know what my experience has been.
Glad to see that most people took my post for what it was. Just a simple attempt to find some humor in this and the other posts on this topic. Sadly some are worked up to the point of calling each other names and threatening injury and death.



I didn't take the time to read all 18 pages of comments on this, and I find it a little humorous that this even comes up. To answer this question, HECK YES I HUNT WITH A ROUND IN THE CHAMBER! It's been my experience that deer don't tend to stand still and count to 10 Mississippi while I'm loading my gun. I've never seen a ringneck hover patiently waiting on me to dig a load of 6 shot out of my pocket and chamber it in the gun. No offense inteded, but to me this seems like a pretty lame question.
Lame as the guy shot in the leg I met last month?
Hey gopher, its an interesting read...If you have the time.
Originally Posted by Henry McCann
A round in the chamber is bad, but ammo in the magazine??

I leave my ammunition at camp. When I see an animal I want to shoot I leave my rifle there, run back to camp, get the ammunition, run back to my rifle, load and shoot the animal. Most big game will stand in one spot for up to six hours, until I get back.

I immediately unload the rifle, leave it there, run the ammo back to camp, then run back to take care of the animal. Only an irresponsible dunderhead would have ammunition in the magazine while hunting.


TooFFunny !!!
Thank You, Henry
Funny chit watching folks announce their incompetence as GOOD.....


Maybe that's why I'm laughing... let me check... nope!

-jeff
Maybe we should just outlaw all guns and ammo so we will all be safe. Who's with me????????


Come on Guys and Gals, let it drop. Some of you were born and raised to have one in the pipe, others were not, and still others have made the decision on their own due to something they have seen or heard about to not carry HOT. I respect each and every one of your opinions, but please don't try to force feed me on your thoughts when I am hunting in my sandbox. If I come to your sandbox, I will follow your rules within reason (I will not hunt naked or wear pink in any fashion, I don't care what your rules are).

Again, let it go. The anti's don't need any extra ammo and we are going to need to be a unified force if Hiliary is voted in.

CK
I'm a curious guy by nature, so when I walk through the woods I'm always checking my safety to see if it still works...as soon as they quit, I get them fixed.
Kodiak-you're right, I should read the whole thread, but it's not going to change my view on this. As for the guy who got shot in the leg-how'd it happen-what's the details. Every gun I own has a working safety on it. Unless I'm squeezing the trigger, that safety is on at all times, whether the gun is loaded or not. I don't make a habit of pointing the muzzle end of my guns at myself or any other human being. If you guys feel the need to hunt with an empty chamber, more power to ya', but I would have to think the vast majority of hunters keep one in the chamber on the off chance that they just might find a critter to shoot at. I am going back to read the whole thread now.
Originally Posted by gophergunner
Kodiak-you're right, I should read the whole thread, but it's not going to change my view on this. As for the guy who got shot in the leg-how'd it happen-what's the details. Every gun I own has a working safety on it. Unless I'm squeezing the trigger, that safety is on at all times, whether the gun is loaded or not. I don't make a habit of pointing the muzzle end of my guns at myself or any other human being. If you guys feel the need to hunt with an empty chamber, more power to ya', but I would have to think the vast majority of hunters keep one in the chamber on the off chance that they just might find a critter to shoot at. I am going back to read the whole thread now.


And at that time, you'll see my stance on hot or not...(Hot, usually, at work or play.)

Not suggesting it will (or in fact should)change your mind, only that its an interesting read.
Originally Posted by Crappie_Killer
(I will not hunt naked or wear pink in any fashion, I don't care what your rules are).

CK


I have...oh wait, are we talking about the same thing?


Loaded round in the chamber here while in the field. I'm surprised at how many stories I've heard over the years about people discharging their rifles inside their vehicles. A good friend's wife shot a hole through his pickup a year ago unloading her rifle!?


2Seventy
Ford or Chevy?

-jeff
Toyota?

HoundGirl
Originally Posted by HoundGirl
Toyota?

HoundGirl


Hehe [Linked Image]
502 cubic inches of raw american horsepower...Aaaar Aaaar Aaaar (tim allen impression)
Nice.
Got to love a bad azz rat motor!!!
I didn't know that 502 Chevy's were options in Toyota's!!
:Grin:
Originally Posted by 340boy
I didn't know that 502 Chevy's were options in Toyota's!!
:Grin:


Sure they do grin Toy's work great with Chevy power plants!! My rock crawling rig runs a 4.3l vortec and loves it grin

[Linked Image]
Poot,
that must an ATV on steroids!!
Cool...
Okay, I read the entire string, and I see some valid points here. First of all, I've never hunted from horseback, and if I did, the gun would be empty. Second-my hunting has all been done in Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. I've never hunted the western mountain ranges, and I can see where one would not want to risk an AD on steep slopes or in the "Black Timber" I hear you guys talk about. I should also clarify that my gun is never carried loaded when crossing a fence or climbing a treestand. However, I can't imagine sitting in a stand with an empty chamber. The buck I shot this fall came in on me very fast. I was very alert, and took the shot when the deer stopped to look over the clear cut I was watching. The whole thing took less than 5 seconds. That deer had no intentions of hanging around for very long, and I have no doubt that had I needed to open the bolt, dig a round out of my pocket, chamber the round and aquire a sight picture that that deer would have been long gone, or at best left me with a tough running shot. The doe I took was in a similar circumstance. The opportunities, at least the ones I experience, happen lightning fast. I can count on one hand the number of times I've been able to watch an animal for any length of time before getting a shot, and this is while hunting from elevated tree stands. I am constantly checking my safety. I've never once found it in the "off" position when I didn't want it to be. Muzzle control is always exercised. I wont' hesitate to let someone know if their gun is pointed somewhere it shouldn't be, and I expect the same of them. Outside of the instances I've sighted, my opinion is still the same. I do, and will continue to hunt with a round in the chamber.
You'll love this... [Linked Image]
Even the boggers couldn't keep it from going rubber side up grin I have been there a few times in the rock lobster. Took a hell of a roll in Moab on the Widow Maker......fitting name for an obstacle!!
I should have mentioned that proper Toy's wear Swampers.......that is a nice mini truck that rolled in that picture
Originally Posted by Poot Peak
Even the boggers couldn't keep it from going rubber side up grin I have been there a few times in the rock lobster. Took a hell of a roll in Moab on the Widow Maker......fitting name for an obstacle!!


Ah Moab...
Your rig makes sense now, I have been to Moab a few times to mountain bike-got to see some of those jeeps crawling up Amassaback(sp?)
Incredible!!
I should of mentioned in my last post I love your rockcrawler yota.Just needed some time to wipe the druel from my chin...grin..Sweet truck Poot.
Originally Posted by 340boy
Poot,
that must an ATV on steroids!!
Cool...


I am foot and horseback hunter. This truck is a one trick pony for rock crawling, so it would't work well filling the shoes of an atv. As you can tell from the photos, it shrunk a bit and doesn't have much cargo space grin

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]
Just a figure of speech, Poot!
Still, that is heck of a rig, must be mucho fun.
grin
Originally Posted by 7 STW
I should of mentioned in my last post I love your rockcrawler yota.Just needed some time to wipe the druel from my chin...grin..Sweet truck Poot.


Thanks. It is going to look a lot better than in these photos; I have been running my Miller mig and the tube bender lately and it is starting to morph into a proper rock pig. I will post some photos when it nears completion.
Originally Posted by 340boy
Just a figure of speech, Poot!
Still, that is heck of a rig, must be mucho fun.
grin


I know, I was just giving you a hard time!! Atv's are cool tools, unfortunatly people just abuse the hell of the forests hear in Colorado with them. I suppose I could drive my truck all over hell and back as well, but I am a huge supporter of "Tread Lightly" and keeping these rigs on designated trails, etc.
I am with you, I prefer to hunt on foot, I don't even own an ATV.
I do know hunters that are very careful with their ATVs-I guess it is the way things go, a few bad apples give other users a bad name...
frown
Bingo....I totally agree. Same in the off-road crowd. A few bad apples get good trails closed because they won't stay on the proper designated trails.
Nice Poot!

I had a TJ partly built and then gave up 'cause I needed to buy a new truck... had to sell it.

Wonder when they'll start Tundra's? They any good that way? I have one but it's way too new (for me) to hack into.

-jeff
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
Ford or Chevy?

-jeff


Ford. She just missed the transfer case.


I just stuffed this lump in my 67 fastback mustang..... I like it!!

[Linked Image]


[Linked Image]


Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
Nice Poot!

I had a TJ partly built and then gave up 'cause I needed to buy a new truck... had to sell it.

Wonder when they'll start Tundra's? They any good that way? I have one but it's way too new (for me) to hack into.

-jeff


Thanks Jeff,
In order to bring this thread from hell to and end, I am going to hijack it and post picture of wheeling in Moab in a Chevy powered Toy. This re-directing technique tends to work well with my three year old grin

Please promise me you will not do anymore "Poll" type posts or "Cult of" posts on contraversial topics that will polorize the entire forum wink

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Thanks Poot for taking this thread to a better level....theres a few other threads that need help too.
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
Originally Posted by jim in Oregon
ibfestus,

First, make certain that anyone who is going to use a firearm is understanding of the way it works.

Second, IF someone hands you a firearm, make sure YOU know how it works..:) Jim

PS: make certain THAT IT DOES WORK and is in proper mechanical condition..:) Jim


The guys in my favorite gunshop are good guys, but like any gunshop employees they get cavalier.

I believe that a firearm should be handed to another person action open. If the receiver of the firearm does not understand how it works, or it's not open, they should refuse to take it.

This has come up a few times when I've asked to see oddball firearms that weren't immediatly obvious how they worked, and they handed them to me (or tried to) with the action locked up. I hand 'em right back and ask them to show me how to clear the firearm... they look at me funny but do it.

A LOT of accidents would be prevented if everyone did that, all the time.

-jeff


I too believe a firearm should be handed to a person with the action opened.
Here's one for you.
Last week i stopped off at a pawn shop that now and again has some pretty nice rifles and at a decent price.
Anyway there was a Winchester rifle and i asked to see it.
Young guy gets it and lays it down on the counter with the bolt closed.
I picked it up and with the muzzle pointed at the ceiling i opened the bolt and at that time i inserted my little finger into the chamber to make good and sure it was empty.
About that time someone behind me spoke out and said"Finally,someone who knows how to handle a firearm"
It turned out to be the store owner and at that point started berating his young employee about ALWAYS opening the bolt AND to check the chamber.
You know there are such things like extractors that can and do break.

So having said all that i freely admit that i have been hunting at least for 45 years and have always carried a hot round in the pipe IF the terrain conditions were satifactory in my judgement.
Every one i know does the very same thing.
However after reading these threads about this subject and the Accidental discharge thread and the fact that my all time favorite hunting rifles are Remington 600's which i own several and are prone to have AD's when flipping off said safety(which at this point has never occured on mine)and since i plan on doing a lot of walk hunting in a few weeks when i go deer hunting i am going to give the cold chamber style a try.
I certainly hope i dont blow a good shot doing this but to there credit those rifles can be cycled pretty damn fast(you gotta love a short action rifle!).
Anyway i will give it a try.
Yes, but only because I like your pics... don't care while your chamber was hot or not
Poot,

There are several shortened Toy's in my area; they look like a lot of fun!

My TJ was a good time. I regeared it to 4.10 and had 'em put a Tru-Track front and rear at the same time... got it set up with some nice bumpers and Warn... a lift and some 33's was next, but then my old beater truck blew the engine HARD and I looked around and went... crap, I can't really afford to have a $12k vehicle that's just toy, not when I have to buy a new truck... so away went the Jeep.

I'll get another one someday.

As far as promises... well, can't do that, sorry! :-) You know, I didn't actually START this whole thing. Go look at the Butler Creek scope covers thread; it started there and was nicely contained and actually sort of winding down. Then Steelhead, in his infinite wisdom, did HIS cute little Idiot Post of the Year thing, and then I did start this thread because I was simply interested, at that point, in finding out roughly what the ratio of hot/cold hunters was.

I guess I need to scroll through this huge sumbitch at some point and tally it up... does anyone CARE what the exact number is? I'd guess, 85/15 carrying hot? Seem about right?

-jeff
That rig would be fun on the beach here.
Poot,
Very nice, that fastback must scream...
grin
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen

I guess I need to scroll through this huge sumbitch at some point and tally it up... does anyone CARE what the exact number is? I'd guess, 85/15 carrying hot? Seem about right?

-jeff


Why don't you do an actual poll, so you don't have to count? I, for one, would be interested in the results.
My Promise:

I will NOT start another thread having to do with loaded or unloaded carry. No way, no how.

:-)

YOU start it! Dang man, you think I'm nuts?!

I'll tally 'em up tonight or tomorrow.

-jeff
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
My Promise:

I will NOT start another thread having to do with loaded or unloaded carry. No way, no how.

:-)

YOU start it! Dang man, you think I'm nuts?!


-jeff


TFF.....I don't blame you crazy
Originally Posted by Poot Peak
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
My Promise:

I will NOT start another thread having to do with loaded or unloaded carry. No way, no how.

:-)

YOU start it! Dang man, you think I'm nuts?!


-jeff


TFF.....I don't blame you crazy


+1 ! BT
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
My Promise:

I will NOT start another thread having to do with loaded or unloaded carry. No way, no how.

:-)

YOU start it! Dang man, you think I'm nuts?!

I'll tally 'em up tonight or tomorrow.

-jeff


I don't blame you but thought I'd toss that idea out there anyway. smile

I don't know about here at the Campfire, but in general my guess is that 99% of the hunters in North America hunt "hot."
Well, I'd guess it's more in the high 80's myself, but it's really not relevant and it wasn't, and isn't, my intent to rub anyone's nose in this. I was curious. This last weekend, for a while there, I was getting just dogpiled by the empty chamber guys and I couldn't believe that "everyone" hunted that way, so I thought I'd start this and get a feel for the ratio.

My only comment at this point is, wow! Talk about a vocal minority!

-jeff
All right... gonna tally this up...

-jeff
Here's the results.

HOT: 47

COLD: 15

So... 68% carry hot. I tried to be completely accurate, but if someone said "I carry cold" on page 1, then said it again on page friggin' 11, I might have missed it and counted 'em twice. And of course, vice versa.

-jeff

Jeff- if you really wanna drive yourself crazy take a look see and see where the people are located at and hunting. I believe you'll begin to see a trend.

Dober
Hey Mark!

I am burned out... can't go there... care to share the trend you think you see?

Or are you smart enough not to step in poo?

:-)

-jeff
I'd be willing to bet that people who hunt in tight country (Minnesota etc) would be for carrying hot and or the prairie and or the south and or Tex etc and or the east. Not the friggin mtns is my point.

I'd also be for betting that a good share of the mtn hunting types (IE steep, deep and nasty) would be for running cold.

I could be way wrong been that many times b4.

Dober

It's a factor that has been debated, that's for sure.

I dunno. Most of the cold guys insist that there's never a reason to have a round chambered.

If I were in open country where by definition, there'd be time to set up the shot, there might not be any reason to chamber- I can see that. Likewise, on a horse or cliff climbing, where the force of a fall could be greatly multiplied over what a person could generate, same thing.

-jeff

No one ever suggested the majority hunted cold chamber. Just as people once thought the Earth flat... and the majority concurred... most fail to see the obvious logic in hunting with a cold tube, but that tide is slowly turning.

IME the most experienced hunters have a much higher rate of cold chambers. When the inexperienced actually try it and realize it not only can be done, but done with time to spare that rate will climb.

But as someone posted above about the difficulty in hunting cold chamber and fumbling with getting shells out of their pocket??? That is not the voice of the experienced...
art

Do not intend to demean the poster above, just think it bears noting for the clarity...
Quote
When the inexperienced actually try it and realize it not only can be done, but done with time to spare that rate will climb.


As previously stated,speed is not the only consideration for hunting with a round in the chamber.In fact,in my case it is the least important reason,the most important being the noise created by chambering a round.It really doesn't matter when hunting a less wary animal such as moose or caribou,but that mechanical sound will will spook a whitetail buck or bull elk.As I also stated previously,I do not always have a round in the chamber,doing so only in tight cover where game is regularly spotted at very close range.When mountain or prairie hunting or when hunting for animals such as moose,My chamber is normally empty.
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
Most of the cold guys insist that there's never a reason to have a round chambered.




It's lines like that that get you in trouble, Jeff. "Most" and "never" and other dogmatically presented assertions can and will bring out the worst in people. I think that was what made the original comment distasteful to many. I can live with the opinion and practice in general assuming it takes into account the factors specific to a given situation and persons. The attitude suggested by the dogmatic presentation, however, is more difficult to fathom, much less swallow. I don't think that has to be further dissected at this point.
But, in this particular situation, that statement is entirely justified. I don't think its a line that should get anyone in trouble, its just the fact of the matter in this particular instance.
+1

IMO, you are kind of beating a dead horse at this point, Jeff...
Stubby
Sound is the problem, huh? Yet you are slipping along so quietly they just do not hear you? Let's forget stand hunting for a minute so we are talking only about still-hunting.

Just keep preaching the "I can't do it" sermon and you will surely be correct, though lots of others do it all the time.
art
Art,

I agree with Stubby,where I hunt sound is the problem. It is hard enough to get your safety off without spooking at big whitetail at 30 steps.

I have to agree with Dober about the trends that I see in the thread. People who tend to hunt very rough country on the move tend to hunt with an empty chamber. People who tend to hunt really spooky critters in thick cover while sittin on stand or stalking very slow and quiet tend to have a round chambered.

I will say that I do not know a serious hunter here who is suceesful on mature bucks who does not hunt with a round chambered. You are welcome to come and try it though,maybe you can teach me something.


Britt
I think, too, that how plentiful/available game is plays into things. Guys in areas with lots of elk, liberal seasons, multiple tags... tend to say things like "People should just let the raghorns grow up!" or "If I miss an opportunity, so what? there's always tomorrow". Guys hunting elk in areas where not a lot of animals get killed might naturally feel differently.

We all know that there's a LOT of game in Alaska. Things are different up there. Us lower-48 guys save up for years to spend a week up there. It could be rightly called a hunter's paradise, could it not? So, when we have (for instance) Steelhead demonstrating that he can hunt empty by jacking all the shells out of his rifle with a buck watching, what I think he is not understanding is that people hunt blacktail on the west side of Oregon, for example, for FIVE WEEKS and the overall success rate of the tag hovers around 12%... it's extremely possible to hunt a bunch of days in the season and never see a deer, much less a buck, much less a buck in shootable circumstances. We are not exactly swimming in the things; you can't just walk out on a dare and jack the shells out of your rifle in front of the nearest buck! So to handicap oneself by requiring the noise and movement of chambering a round is not sensible in my opinion. Especially since, as I and 70% of the Campfire contend, it is perfectly possible to hunt safely with a round in the chamber.

Anyway, I do think the ease of hunting and/or availability of the quarry factors into things... just following up on Dobers idea here.

-jeff
Quote
We all know that there's a LOT of game in Alaska.

If only that were a fact, Jack.
There is a lot of game in AK because of the sheer size of the state. Game density is fairly low throughout the state. Sure, there are some locally high-density populations, but not many.
Didn't realize that. Sure seems like just about any guy I've ever known who's gone hunting up there, be it for bear, deer, moose, caribou, whatever.... comes back with meat. In fact make that every guy I know who's gone up there, can't think of a single failure to score. Not saying they don't exist but the guys I've talked to sure loved it...

(I talk to them because I really want to get up there and hunt someday!!)

Sorry you guys have it so bad up there! Jeez... without much game, what's the point? Just the joys of cold and lack o' women? :-)

-jeff
That's pretty much all there is.

Seriously, were your friends guided? That helps DSMF smile success rate! Sometimes a guy will encounter a gimmee, but mostly it's just hard work.
So what's next, Convincing people to go fishing, but not to throw thier lines in until they see a fish. Still hunting through timber for elk without around in the chamber amounts to about the saame thing. How absurd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. This discussion sounds like some snti hunter/gun guy that is paranoid aboiut getting shot and won't even touch agun
Well, they aren't all friends and I don't know all the details. And it's a relatively small sampling. Don't want to take this too far.

My buddy Jerry in elk camp has been up 3 times. They killed lots of critters. Not trophies (you should see his manky little caribou!) but anyway, "getting the meat home" has been an "issue" every time they've gone up...

Oh- forgot- they don't go guided. They floated a river once, and were flown in once, and I don't remember the other time.

Anyway, I'm sure it's very rough country and guys hunt hard but c'mon... you guys kill a lot of game up there. Are there really Alaskans who want to kill critter XXX who go out and don't kill it, pretty much? Sure doesn't seem like if from down here from the pictures of piles of deer heads and guys passing on multiple bears and so on.

Hey, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. Just exploring Dober's idea a little.

-jeff
Saddlesore... in case you don't know, I'm with you on that...

Right guys? :-)

-jeff
Britt
I agree fully most hunt hot. However, where I disagree is the concept it cannot be done with a cold chamber. I have hunted with an empty chamber in quite a few states including NY where most go at least a year or two between deer. I have used a pump gun and a double there very successfully for deer. The only time I have failed to kill a deer there was when none were seen at all.

Once the obvious fact it is safer sinks in and is accepted the success rates will not drop appreciably and it will become common practice. Will not happen anytime soon, but it is coming.
art
"Once the obvious fact it is safer sinks in and is accepted the success rates will not drop appreciably and it will become common practice. Will not happen anytime soon, but it is coming.
art"

Well, I dunno that I would take THAT from the discussion. Seems like most people are pretty vehemenant about hunting with one in the pipe, if that's how they hunt...

I think it's probably marginally "safer", though I still do have my issues with the idea of combining buck fever with a manipulation of a firearm action like that, but I don't think that's a major issue, just something that... well, I'm imagining a 16-year-old hunter all excited and cranking the balky bolt of a rifle, and it's not a safe-seeming thing to imagine, let's put it that way. I'd rather see that kid just popping off the safety in order to shoot to be honest.

That aside, the question becomes whether hunting hot can be considered "unsafe"- as opposed to just slightly less safe. There were upsetting blanket statements made by the cold crowd implying that we (hot guys) shouldn't even be in the woods. Hopefully, as things have simmered down, that kind of rhetoric has too.

There's an interesting thread on Risk Management going on:

https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbt...owflat/Number/1795021/page/1#Post1795021

That attempts to address that...

-jeff
Quote
I think it's probably marginally "safer",


My problem with a hot chamber is less with the probability of a negligent discharge as it is with the potentially high consequence that accompanies it.
Imagine this discussion between two old friends-
BigStick: "I drive a .223AI on each hip, and one between the teeth when I'm hunting, and I never know which one is loaded. Laffin..."

WyoWhisper: "I once had a horse with a replacement hip"

BigStick:"Whimper, you don't know fark about $hit!"


...or something like that
ironbender says: "My problem with a hot chamber is less with the probability of a negligent discharge as it is with the potentially high consequence that accompanies it."


Sure; I get that.

Obviously, the riskiest thing we all do, other than getting out of bed in the morning, is driving a car. It's also where we present the highest risk to others. I can't back that up with statistics but it's gotta be so, right?

I bet just about everyone on this thread speeds a little from time to time or in other ways, drives in a fashion that is not the absolutely safest they could drive. You show me someone driving, and I'll show you someone that could be driving safer. That's a reasonable statement, right?

However, we all accept that we are both endangering ourselves and endangering others every day when we get in our machines. In fact, I bet the majority of us drive big vehicles (I do) that are both not the safest for us, statistically (in crash tests and so on) and will absolutely crush a small car if we hit them or they hit us. Right?

In the same way, hunting can be seen as an assessment of risky behavior. If two guys are driving in seperate cars to a hunting area, and one goes 5 mph faster than the other, then the fast one hunts empty and the slow one hunts hot, who has presented a greater overall danger to themselves and society in general on that day?

Anyway, in my assessment, while it MIGHT be marginally safer to hunt empty-chamber, given a functioning firearm and good gun habits, the difference is vanishly small as far as your chance, in general, of hurting another person or yourself in life. And believe me, and Tom, and Ruraldoc, or not... but I would be greatly handicapped by needed to chamber a round- enough so that in my assessment of the risks and rewards, it's simply not worth it to hunt empty. I don't see the "value" there.

Then again, I will go 70 mph on the freeway, instead of 65. I guess I am willing to push it a little, looked at that way. 'Course... most of us are! And just for the record, I have not had a moving violation since 1989!

(I did do some damn fool things with cars and motorcycles in my wild youth though... gotta admit.)

-jeff
Wow. I just read this whole thing. I'm more than confused. I carry a 7600 pump, in NY. I mostly go in wicked thick areas, and walking over rolling hills I "jump"deer a LOT. So I do get that close. Everyone that I ever learned from goes hot.

I had my safety checked for absolute soundness (within it's physical limits) by a gunsmith that is familiar with 7600's. I did this AFTER have the trigger tuned.

There is no such fantasy as cycling this pump around here without giving up a shot.

BUT, I actually have always walked with the breech broken open and the safety on. I'm walking through rolling hills and heavy cover at this point. If I have to navigate tough terrain, or cross streams, I've always unloaded entirely.

At any rate, I always felt that I was doing pretty good. If I fell, it wouldn't be on all those boulder formations, and down 50' like some have alluded to. Likely, it would be flat on my face, and that just hasn't happened to me. Regardless, the forearm of the pump is not locked and therefore (as I understand) the trigger is useless.

When I get a shot, the hand holding the forearm only has to push forward, while my trigger hand moves the safety before touching trigger. Being left-handed, I actually have to reach around thte trigger guard to get to the safety.

If I'm doing something wrong, I'd like to know because I've been moving about with this rifle feeling that I had stuff pretty well worked out. Running completely cold with a pump rifle seems like a really difficult task around here.

I don't have a vote. I just want to find out if I'm less than safe.
Can't say I have ever hunted waterfowl, grouse, pheasants, partridge or deer with a cold chamber. (intentionally blush)Would not call it hunting until the guns are loaded, anymore than I would call it fishing until a line has been put in the water.

And when I have myself situated in the archery stand there is an arrow nocked. Though I do not draw the bow until a shot is eminent.
I shot an elk this year at 5 yds in thick aspen whips about 10 ft high. I don't think anyone hunting without one in the chmaber would have anything except tag soup. For those who say you can' walk up on an elk, I don't think know enough about stalking
If you find a coastal blacktail in Oregon that will wait for you to work the action on a lever rifle DON'T EAT HIM!

Clearly there's something wrong with him. You don't want to eat a critter that is obviously diseased with something that can make you that stupid.

Jeff, for your pole. I carry hot.
Originally Posted by ironbender
There is a lot of game in AK because of the sheer size of the state. Game density is fairly low throughout the state. Sure, there are some locally high-density populations, but not many.


ironbender, you need to relocate! Here's a quote from Calvin on "13 months" thread over on the the Alaska forum:

"Wed and Thursday I took a guy out who needed to fill the freezer. He shot 2 big forks and a 3 point. Bullets were recovered from all 3. He uses factory soft points and one of them was with a fusion. "

THAT'S what I'm talkin' about!

-jeff
Kodiak deer are one of the high density critters I mentioned.

We have lots of brown bears on the KP, and extremely limited opportunities to thin them. Brownies put the hurt on moose and caribou calves. There are areas thick with wolves - can you say "tacos"? There are areas thick with blackies - with the resultant depletion of moose calf recruitment.

Areas with deer are a different management paradigm than moose and caribou.
And those guys make up stories.
:-)

I ain't TOUCHING that one! I'll just take your word on it and step slowly away...

-jeff
You *are* trainable.
Anyway, it's interesting that (stories aside), two of our most vocal cold chamber guys are hunting where you take someone out and whack 3 bucks in a day... it is NOT like that in Oregon.

I believe you that it varies from locale to locale, but still -call me crazy!- I think the hunting would be considered way above average up there, wouldn't it?

I really want to get up there. I had this fantasy of taking my family on a canoe or raft trip down one of the major rivers, fishing and camping and hopefully not getting et by a griz, then flying them back home and staying up there for some caribou and or moose or whatever else I could rustle up hunting...

-jeff
Originally Posted by ironbender
You *are* trainable.


Ha!

Yeah, once I pissed on an electric fence. You do that ONCE.

-jeff
How many tags one might get or how prevalaent the game is is sorta moot to safe practices.
I don't think many hunters today are subsistence hunters..tho many DO have a considerable investment in time and expense just to be out there with a tag.

Regardless of whether you can get tags for six deer or one, predation permits for multiple elk or one, caribou or moose tags as AK or Canadian NA ..........or whether you may have one shot in every three seasons..or what..

The onus is on the man with the rifle to hunt safely with reliably functioning firearms and loads..identify his target, and assess his own physical-mental abilities for the circumstances of the moment, including, but not limited to, his hunting style, terrain, weather etc.

Unload?.Sling the weapon?.Hand the safe weapon to another?
Stay in camp and sleep it off?..:)

Be ready to chamber a cartridge?, or be locked and loaded.

Ain't no way to dictate what's best or right for every hunter or circumstance and... thankfully, responsible hunting folks still get the chance to make right choices.
So make them and choose wisely whatever ya do..Jim

Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
We all know that there's a LOT of game in Alaska. Things are different up there. Us lower-48 guys save up for years to spend a week up there. It could be rightly called a hunter's paradise, could it not?
-jeff


There are folks who think and expect things to be this way to be sure. The part that many fail to understand is how large the state is - two people can be a thousand miles apart and still be in the state- and, given the fact that so much of it is undeveloped, that means there are plenty of hiding places as well. It is truly amazing for some to come here and discover how much country they need to peruse in order discover one of the many critters we have. Then, of course, is the other factor, that being the feast/famine deal. Caribou (it could also be birds or other animals) -thousands of them- could literally be in the backyard on Wednesday and inaccessibly distant in rugged terrain only 20 miles -or a hundred- away by the weekend - or even quicker.

Mostly we - and most other people- don't brag about our lack of successes. And there are many. Those of us who do seem to have "great" success rates also have some rather significant investments in time and financially aquired resources. Going out scouting for a day -or running the trapline- might easily involve $100 worth of gas at a minimum just from the back door.

Klikitarik,

I hear you on the expense of scouting! It (price of gas) has cut into my woods time significantly. Gone are the days of tossing ten bucks in the tank and doing much of anything.

Don't you guys get some sort of dividend up there? Just put that in a special "hunting" account!

-jeff
Yes, there is the "dividend," a yearly but variable check we get (which the feds like since they take part of it as always with any form of income). I used mine to finally get my fuel bill paid down - it had gotten a couple of months behind. So yes, I did use it for hunting - after the fact.
Yeah, isn't that fun, paying for the fun after the fact.

This last hunting season, elk especially, looked like it was going to cost me a lot in missed money, but as it turned out it wasn't so bad. Try leaving town with a $10k commission hanging in the balance! No, I didn't get it... it evaporated, as they do, thus leaving me free to leave depressed but at least not feeling like I was about to take a $10,000 self-guided Oregon elk hunt! :-/

-jeff
Like a good Alaskan, you probably spent your PFD two or three times! wink
laugh
Originally Posted by ironbender
Quote
I think it's probably marginally "safer",


My problem with a hot chamber is less with the probability of a negligent discharge as it is with the potentially high consequence that accompanies it.


+1

That is exactly the reason I hunt with an empty chamber much of the time. �Potentially high consequence� is why I�ve flown aircraft for a fair number of miles but always let someone more experienced perform the take-off and landing. Its why I often drive far under the speed limit in adverse weather and road conditions. Heck � its why I often don�t drive at ALL in such conditions. (The wisdom of which many people have to learn the hard way.)

It seems to me that taking reasonable precautions to mitigate risk is a good thing. Even so, sometimes you have to drive in the snow and ice, however, or late at night when the drunks are out. Sometimes you get killed in the middle of the day in good weather and on dry roads because you make a mistake, because someone else makes a mistake, or maybe because God wills it. You exercise and eat healthy and sometimes you have a heart attack anyway.

Guess I�ll continue to hunt hot or cold, depending on the circumstances at the moment.

Dave took this cow last year after his first shot was a misfire. We had hunted all morning with cold chambers until shortly before he chambered the round that misfired. Just out of the picture 200 yards further back and to the left of the aspen another cow is down. I took it after borrowing the shooting sticks Dave had been using when he shot. Dave�s misfire and subsequent chambering of a new round and all the changing of positions so I could shoot didn�t affect the outcome for either of us.

[Linked Image]

Another of Dave�s shots � he�s the orange spot about 275 yards away. His deer is behind the cedars just to the right of him in the picture. Another empty chamber situation, with the shot taken from where I took the picture.
[Linked Image]


Took this year�s first cow elk in pretty open country at about 125 yards. Plenty of time to chamber a round while I was waiting for the cow to clear the herd and end up in an opening through the thin line of aspen the separated us.
[Linked Image]


This forkhorn mulie made the mistake of running in front of my truck as we were driving a 4x4 trail through the sage, trying to get to an overlook above a creek. We both thought it was a doe and Dave jumped out to shoot it with his .30-30. I put the binoculars on it and saw the antlers. Still had time to jump out of the truck, grab my rifle from the case, chamber a round and take the shot (although another second or two and it would have been over a fold and gone).

[Linked Image]

A productive area for both deer and elk over the years. Got the buck above not far from here. Not sure why a hot chamber would be an advantage�

[Linked Image]

The deer stayed on the wrong side of the Colorado/Wyoming line, but we spent several hours watching them as well as about 70 antelope that would have been easy shots if in season.

[Linked Image]

Shot this year�s second cow elk from this knoll. We had spotted the herd of a couple dozen when they were over a mile away. Took the shot at about 25 yards. I had chambered the round when they were about 500 yards away and turning toward me.

[img]http://www.hunt101.com/img/526815.jpg[/img]

Last day of this year�s hunt. Shortly after taking this picture I chambered a round in my .30-30, then sat and waited and watched. Seemed to be a reasonable thing to do�

[img]http://www.hunt101.com/img/526816.jpg[/img]


Only the first picture works. (for me)
Coyote Hunter,

Nice pics!!

That's comPLETEly different country than I hunt, for whatever that's worth.

In fact my goal is to get out and hunt some country like that! Looks like a lot of fun.

I note that you did chamber for the one pic in the thick stuff.

Thanks for sharing the cool pics!

-jeff
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
...
I note that you did chamber for the one pic in the thick stuff.
...


Yup, pretty common for me to do that. Half-cock safety with the hammer-block safety disengaged.
The BLR takes the half-cock thing to the next level. The hammer folds forwards sort of under the firing pin... hard to explain but brilliant when you see it. IMHO.

The crossblock safety looks pretty bombproof too on a Marlin, but I couldn't say I really know that- never taken it apart and you can't really see in there. It would appear that it puts a pretty good chunk of metal in the way of the hammer. However, I HATE the crossblock ergonomics, and just do what you do, half cock, when I've hunted with a Marlin.

-jeff
I have yet to see an elk in open country like that.Must be some type of hunting a kin to antelope. But hey, I hunt hot when hunting pronghorns too.
I have to agree with some of the other posters, in that I hunt both ways, depending on the situation/terrain etc. If in a stand, either elevated or on the ground or if still hunting, I have one in the chamber. If traveling, especially with wet, steep or rough terrain, I will go cold. Too many different situations to say "always" one way or the other for me.
Originally Posted by saddlesore
I have yet to see an elk in open country like that.Must be some type of hunting a kin to antelope. But hey, I hunt hot when hunting pronghorns too.


Yeah, there's no elk out in that kind of country.

Well, this one from 2003...
[Linked Image]

And a couple thousand on these hills every year, including the hundreds in this picture...

[Linked Image]



I just wish I had chance to hunt them in the open and not on the side of a moutain.
Coyote Hunter..

Great pics and great 'testimony' for hunting un chambered.
You wear your seatbelt when driving and looking?..:0

That isn't hunting..it's driving and maybe glassing-walking..and getting set up...by my experiences and country and game I hunt safely & successfully it has absolutely no relevance...for me.

Shucks, in that country, I could eat my lunch while watching whatever game was there bigger than a marmot out to a mile....:) Jim
Yeah... I can't even imagine hunting elk in that territory.

To put it in perspective, maybe, I sold a nice Springfield M1a that I wasn't shooting, this fall. I ended up with $1075 in "monopoly money" at the gun shop (Or about $850 on a cashout). Anyway, I used $600 of it to buy a fairly nice Leupold spotting scope... which I never even USED, not once, on the elk hunt that came up a few weeks later. There was just never any reason to get the damn thing out, and I wanted to!

Anyway, I do think that the terrain a person mostly hunts in has a large bearing on this discussion, as Dober mentioned and as others have mentioned... as a trend, at least, not a 100% indicator.

-jeff
jim in Oregon -

That country isn�t necessarily as easy as you make it sound. You can see game a long ways off, but they can see you, too. We put the sneak on a herd of 80 or so elk one day a few years back. Spotted them about 11:30 in the morning. Dropped a nice 6x5 with my first shot � about 15 minutes after sundown at 350 yards. Took us that long to get close enough for a shot. I went the last 100 yards on my back, pushing myself headfirst through sage and cactus with my legs.

Other areas have lots of folds, tall sage, and deep cuts that provide plenty of cover.

I reckon its as much hunting as sitting in a stand and more so than sitting over bait. Digging game out of the creek areas where the sage is over head high with tunnels and game trails through it is every bit as tough as hunting dense pines higher up. Maybe tougher.
Coyotehunter,
Didn't intend to say your country was 'easy' at all.
And you are right..IF you are not concealed covert in such wide open country..the game does 'see' you too..
How they react..when they see people afar off is another topic..

But it is different from the country I hunt.
Do what you do well and safely..That's what this thread needs to come down to..Jim
Amen to THAT!

-jeff
Originally Posted by jim in Oregon
...But it is different from the country I hunt.
Do what you do well and safely..That's what this thread needs to come down to..Jim


It is different, I'll admit. Love to go up high and hunt the pines and aspens, a very differnt world. Have had more luck down low, though.

I agree about safety. I tell my wife, friends, etc. that a successful hunt is one where everyone gets back home safely and in one piece. Hasn't always worked out that way, although no gunshot injuries, thank God.
I'll throw some gas on this fire. I hunt with an empty chamber, always have, always will. I have never seen any critter spook from a bolt cycle. Further (this is the gas part) I REFUSE to hunt with anybody that has one in the spout. I have read this entire thread, and (more gas) it seems to me that the guys that get it, get it, and the guys that don't, won't. I haven't met a guide yet that will pair up with someone that hunts hot. To me that's just the way it is.
R.
Whoosh! The sound of gas on the fire...

-jeff
I wouldn't hunt with someone who doesn't carry one in the tube. Shows they are too paranoid and insecure that they don't even trust themselves.If someone is that bad, I wouldn't trust them around me once they did chamber a round.

Being in the cheap camp. I have only gone on one guided hunt in my life, which BTW was in Alberta in the Red Deer River country. That guide insisted I chamber a round once I had my horse secured.Seems even the Canucks are a divided camp


WHOOOOOOSH , the sound of a bigger flame
Originally Posted by saddlesore
If someone is that bad, I wouldn't trust them around me once they did chamber a round.


grin



Originally Posted by saddlesore

Being in the cheap camp. I have only gone on one guided hunt in my life, which BTW was in Alberta in the Red Deer River country. That guide insisted I chamber a round once I had my horse secured.Seems even the Canucks are a divided camp


I guide. In the elk jungles it's hard enough to get clients who are unacustomed to big critters zooming through the timber like 600 lb cheetahs to gather their wits enough to make a shot. I always tell them to have a round chambered and be ready.



Originally Posted by saddlesore

WHOOOOOOSH , the sound of a bigger flame


laugh
I think I'm starting to see a pattern here. "Whoosh" must be some kind of secret code or protective mantra to be used when one gets a bird's eye view of a rifle's muzzle. I've always started with "Hey" (or something else) which can be applied vocally with enough force to address the point. (Perhaps I'm just paranoid and don't trust myself wink , but "whoosh" looks an awful lot like "shoot" spelled backwards so maybe I'll just stick with "hey" or something along those lines.)
Originally Posted by saddlesore
I wouldn't hunt with someone who doesn't carry one in the tube. Shows they are too paranoid and insecure that they don't even trust themselves.


It may show that or it may not show anything of the sort.

Some folks recognize that �stuff� happens � an unintended slip and fall, or brush or clothing snagging the trigger. Couple that with the fact that mechanical safeties are not perfect and there is a chance for disaster with a hot chamber � a disaster that an empty chamber would avoid. It is not at all unreasonable for someone to decide that 100% safe is better than something less so.

Reasonable people also recognize that people are not perfect � no matter how sure they are of themselves. People make mistakes and the chances of a mistake increase dramatically with fatigue or distraction. Again, an empty chamber is ALWAYS SAFE, a hot chamber not so much.



I still say that the act of an action manipulation upon seeing game has it's own perils that are under-discussed on this thread. We all know that a significant number of ND's happen when loading or UNLOADING a firearm. I really don't want to be 250 yards away, across the cut, from some empty-chamber guy when he doesn't get the shot and now has to unload his lever gun and then load it again! For instance.

The assumption of the empty-chamber guys is that they are all a bunch of cool assasins, and maybe in fact they are, but think if they had their way and every Tom Dick and Harry had to carry empty-chamber in the woods! I mean, seriously, think about that. There would be MORE ND's, I think!! I do not like the thought of thousands of buck-fever-stricken guys who don't hardly shoot or practice with their weapon suddenly needing to work the action in the heat of the moment.

Of course, the nugget of truth that we can all agree on is that in the end, the most important safety BY FAR is the head and hands and judgement of the gun carrier...

-jeff
You make a darn good point there Jeff. I have seen a lot of lever gun guys work the action without taking thier finger off the trigger.

IMO people who buy into the line that only safe hunters carry a rifle without one in the chamber reminds me of the anti gun crowd always making the argument that you are ten times more likely to have a suicide or shooting in your home if there is a firearm present, but they never say that if a bad guy comes in and you are not armed and he is, you are about 100% more likely to get shot.( ie ,you are too stupid to own a firearm)

If someone doesn't trust themselves enough to know when they should open the action when crossing hazzards or such and can't depend on themselves to practice safe muzzle control, they shouldn't be handling a firearm at all, empty chamber or not.

BTW. If one ever threw gas on a fire they would know what WHOOSH sounded like.
I don't think statistically there is any evidence or history that shows an increase in AD's among experienced firearms handlers who carry with a round chambered in rifle shotgun or handgun.

The key word would be experienced.

Experienced in the manual of arms of their firearm.
Experienced so even their reloads are proper spec and done well.
Experienced so they maintain their firearms in proper working condition.
Experienced in knowing when the firearm needs to be loaded or unloaded due to the situation and HOW to properly do that and 'verify' empty 'safe'.
Experienced in muzzle control..identification of target.

I think statistically there are far more 'accidents'... AD's and shootings ....by INEXPERIENCED firearms handlers who thought or assumed the firearm was unloaded and acted recklessly..carelessly .. at odds with safe general firearms handling.

Far more accidental field condition shootings because the shooter failed to control his muzzle, be aware of non targets forward of his shooting position, failed to properly ID the target..
While I agree that a TRULY unloaded firearm is the safest..hunting ( not walking in the woods or traveling on a quad or pickup or busting brush) REQUIRES the firearm to be loaded..else one is akin to what one poster said when he remarked that 'fishing' requires the line-bait-hook to be in the water..:)and just toting a fishing rig isn't 'fishing'..

IF the shooter-hunter conducts himself well while hunting knowing that... despite the mech safety on or off, his weapon is ready to kill, he should be mentally and physically prepared to exercise best diligence and safety.

I am NOT promoting chambered carry for the hunter in general..
In fact, there are folks who have no business in the woods handling a firearm whether hot or not..

Nor am I advocating empty carry while hunting.
Prove your own methods with cognizance of your abilities and the situation and be safe..Jim

My buddy used a turkey shotgun to vaporize a paper cup of white gas (Coleman fuel) into a campfire once... now THAT was an impressive combination of pyromania, guns, and gas. More like a fuel-air bomb than a whooosh, though!

-jeff
Jeff �

Your �For instance� about the levergun is one reason I�m especially slow to load one in the chamber of my Marlins and Browning leverguns. While it is possible to unload the magazines without fully chambering a round, and even to unload the chamber without picking up a new cartridge from the tube, it is considerably more awkward than simply cranking the lever. And the Browning holds 10 rounds. The crossbolt safety on two of the Marlins get used almost exclusively for unloading. I just find it easier to wait to load a round until its needed than go through the hassle of unloading the chamber and/or magazine.

As to �The assumption of the empty-chamber guys is that they are all a bunch of cool assasins, and maybe in fact they are, but think if they had their way and every Tom Dick and Harry had to carry empty-chamber in the woods!�. Guess I�d have to go back and reread the whole thread (not likely!) but I don�t think anyone made such an assertion, nor do I recall any of the cold chamber types suggesting that everyone else should carry that way, too. Would there be more NDs if everyone carried cold? I seriously doubt it. The first thing that would happen is a fair number of ND�s would be eliminated and you�d have to make up that deficit before moving into the area of �MORE ND's �. Remember � in order to have a hot chamber someone already had to load it, meaning the chance for an ND while cycling the action has already existed.

I agree the #1 safety is between the ears. Unfortunately that safety is probably not as reliable as mechanical safeties. People do make mistakes.
Originally Posted by saddlesore
...If someone doesn't trust themselves enough to know when they should open the action when crossing hazzards or such and can't depend on themselves to practice safe muzzle control, they shouldn't be handling a firearm at all, empty chamber or not.
...


What about the guy that slips and falls. Muzzle control is not always possible under such circumstances, and it isn't hard for a safety to get wiped into the "Fire" position or for something to catch the trigger. Slips and falls can happen in terrain where a wise hunter has already emptied the chamber, but they can happen anywhere. I've seen more than one person twist an ankle and take a dive on flat, open ground.

As soon as the chamber goes hot the chances of an AD/ND go up infinitely, no matter who is carrying the firearm. The only truly safe carry is with cold chamber.

I am not saying hot carry is an unreasonable risk - just pointing out the facts.
Coyote Hunter,

You are being reasonable and I'm glad that the "heat" has been turned way down on this!

There were several guys who came right out and said, in one way or another, that people hunting hot shouldn't even be in the woods. That, in fact, is where a LOT of the original heat was generated! Anyway...

Hey, your Browning must be a 44 mag to hold that many rounds?? I have a Marlin 44 mag carbine that's my only survivor of my Marlin levergun purge that just happened. Very cool!

-jeff
Wow....300 posts...By the way, I carry hot, always have, always will...Hunted the west since I was ten for everything from chukars to Elk to deer from the Cabinets to the Gifford Pinchot to the Snake River and on down the Mogollon Rim Country in Az...I don't use guides so I don't have to worry about someone telling me to carry hot or cold...I don't usually hunt with anyone else...I wouldn't have a problem with chambering a round sometimes and would other times, but I am not gonna start wondering whether one is chambered or not...I'll just carry hot cuz that's what I am used to....Fact, everyone I have ever hunted with has carried hot....If you wanna carry cold, more power to ya, but it's just not for me...Good luck hunting...
This thread is still going on?
We are the Eveready Bunny over here...

-jeff
One more post, Yes I hunt with a round in the chamber. Where I hunt if you do not, you will never get a shot. From seeing the animal to pulling the trigger I have never had more than 3 seconds if I had taken more time the animal would be gone. As well, racking the bolt would spook the animal.

Also, do we carry our pistols with no round in the chamber. Likely not, when you need it you need it. Carried one for 22 years and it never fired except when I wanted or needed it to.
DaddyRat,

You have a bunch of +1's to that, including myself!

-jeff
I do...
Originally Posted by Rman
I haven't met a guide yet that will pair up with someone that hunts hot.


When hunting with guides I've always started with an empty chamber. My experience (3-4 trips domestically and one to Africa) is that after a few hours, they've sized up the client's gun handling skills and are OK with going hot, at least in situations where a shot is likely.

Of course I unload when riding in a vehicle, crawling up a steep hill, rock-hopping across streams, etc.

When hunting with others I mainly worry about their muzzle control (or lack thereof). There's a reason the NRA's #1 safety rule is "Always keep the gun pointed in a safe direction."
Anyone else see muzzle discipline go to poop with a Safari sling? Couple guys I hunt elk with use 'em and I've had to get pretty pointy with them about it.

-jeff
I hunt whitetails from a treestand. My rifle is hot with the safty on. Of course I don't chamber a round untill I have pulled the rifle up into the tree!
31 Chapters later and yes, I still will hunt "Hot" as deemed appropriate by the conditions.

Jeff, did you ever run the numbers? I'm too lazy too look for the post..... BT

If I'm alone and hunting yes.

If I'm behind a guide, or other person while hunting NO.

Of course I unchamber when climbing, crawling, ... other junk.

Spot
Originally Posted by Blacktail53
31 Chapters later and yes, I still will hunt "Hot" as deemed appropriate by the conditions.

Jeff, did you ever run the numbers? I'm too lazy too look for the post..... BT


It was roughly 70/30, hot. It's a couple pages back. I think we've had mostly "hot" guys chime in since then so probably a little more like 72/28 or something.

The good guys are winning! (THAT'S A JOKE!! SHEESH!!)

:-)

-jeff
post count really important?

Edit: "The Internet consists of a group of people, beating a dusty depression into the ground, which contains the pounded remains of the proverbial dead horse."
Originally Posted by saddlesore
I wouldn't hunt with someone who doesn't carry one in the tube. Shows they are too paranoid and insecure that they don't even trust themselves.If someone is that bad, I wouldn't trust them around me once they did chamber a round.

Damn straight.

I'm not about to start wondering if I have a shell chambered.

I've experienced both sides of the spooked game aspect. I have had elk bolt from well over 100 yds from the sound of a hammer cocking, but on the other hand the biggest bull I've taken was only 65 yards and (due to a caucophany of unforseen events) I had to actually load my gun (not just cycle a round).

Hot....unless in a scabbard.

Most AD's occur when loading and unloading firearms.

Choose your poison.....

I carry cold, and my friends do as well. Can't get too worked up over what everyone else does.

Funny how some in the 'carry hot' crowd think they have a corner on thick woods and wary critters...
Originally Posted by Brother Dave
I carry cold, and my friends do as well. Can't get too worked up over what everyone else does.

Funny how some in the 'carry hot' crowd think they have a corner on thick woods and wary critters...


... and think that if you don't do it their way it must be because you are uncomfortable around guns, have poor gun handling skills and a level of insecurity that is off the charts...

It ain't necessarily so...


Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
...
Hey, your Browning must be a 44 mag to hold that many rounds?? ...
-jeff


Browning B92, a gift from Dad back in the mid-'80's. It was my backup elk gun for many years and hunted at least one day each of those years. It's my only unscoped rifle and is likely to stay that way.

It was also our protection against bears, lions and 2-legged varmints when camping with the family.

Love that rifle!

And how some folks seem to have a corner on all the luck. Of course it isn't perceived as luck, it's "good technique." I guess if you've been out and about long enough and never had to stare at the cold black eye at the end of the barrel, and especially if you've never had a hot one pointed at you as it slid or fell, you've been lucky. I do not wish my epitaph to read, "He was lucky 'til he died." I've know too many folks who've had close calls with that kind of luck. I prefer my luck in the positive rather than the negative.

To equate the use of a hot chambered bolt gun used for hunting, with an often/usually uncocked handgun, often used for self defense is absurd. I simply don't have much faith in a hot chambered, cocked gun which relies on a mechanical safety, luck, and 100% human perfection in handling to not go off. I know this human and several others too well.

I grew up on exposed hammer rifles and shotguns. They were never carried cocked, that action happening only when the gun was to be fired. My choice to not carry a hot chambered bolt gun relies not on some insecurity or paranoia, but on what I know. Does that mean folks who do otherwise are simply ignorant?
the funniest thing I heard when chatting with my friends about this was....

I asked "do you hunt with a round in the chamber?"

smart Aleck says "well I dang sure ain't fast enough to bayonette em!"

I was rollin....
Most everyone agreed the most likely scenario for a ND is when chambering/unchambering. Some would prefer to do that multiple times - in and out of the rig, crossing fences, crossing streams, going through thick stuff, walking in slippery areas, up or down steep stuff, on and off the horse, on or off the wheeler, etc.......

Seems far better to cycle once when you want your gun to go bang.

how do you think them actions get slicked up so much and the barrel not worn out? lol


http://attainkarma.com/scotts/beatit.jpg




smile laugh
If you're rifle isn't safe to carry loaded you should have it fixed. And if you cannot carry your weapon safely with a chambered cartridge, perhaps you should either practice with it more or pick up a different hobby.
Originally Posted by JLH
if you cannot carry your weapon safely with a chambered cartridge, perhaps you should either practice with it more or pick up a different hobby.


The same could be said about the person uncoordinated enough to get a round in the chamber quick enough to get a shot off. In fact, it would probably fit better with the latter.
I really don't care, I was just throwing gas on the fire. to each his own. Guess I have been lucky and not fallen or what ever for 50 years of hunting.
Scott, that's CLASSIC!

-jeff
Dontcha just hate it when people make sense even if it doesn't agree with your thinking....and you read it anyway? smile
"Read it all... let the brain stem sort it out!" is my motto!

:-)

If nothing else we've achieved a sort of North Korea/South Korea truce on the issue.. just lobbing the occasional mortar shell at each other...

-jeff
Sometimes.
Sometimes not.
All in the circumstances.
If it's perfectly safe to carry in the steep, thick and slick, why unload in your truck for the ride home...why ever unload?

Gas, mortar, grenade... smile
Legality would be one reason. In some states it's not legal to drive around hunting with a loaded rifle. How they differentiate between someone who isn't hunting... I don't know.

Another one is that by definition, the rifle is ALWAYS pointed at something you don't want to shoot, when it's in the truck. In the field it's NEVER pointed at something you don't want to shoot, unless as you guys say you go ass over teakettle, or have bad muzzle control.

I could go on.. but why risk provoking a war? When we have this nice... calm... truce! Complete with no-man's-land.

-jeff
Here is a mortar for you....

Jeff Olsen is the biggest [bleep] to hit the Campfire since LHonda.....
:-)

-jeff
laffin
I hunt where most carry hot yet very few if any are hurt each year. I carry cold and don't feel handicapped for doing so.

Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
:-)

-jeff


Do us all a favor, and utilize that edit function more often....
Can't imagine cycling a bolt is any louder than someone who just can't STFU whistle
TFF


I can recall as a kid everyone loading up in the mornings as soon as we left the truck. There was even a sense of urgency at times, like if you didn't load you might suddenly miss out on a deer.
For me there was always a slight sense of trepidation when walking around hot that was a little bothersome.

Nowadays I don't usually put one in the chamber but my rifle gets handled the same way. I also usually just load 3 in the belly and call it good when I used to hunt with 4 in the belly and 1 in the chamber. I've been hunting some with much less experienced hunters lately and it eases my mind a little when their rifles aren't hot but are handled like they are.

I don't recall ever missing out because of not hunting hot. I hunt in the woods, often thick, and every deer I've killed was because I knew it was there before it knew I was.
Originally Posted by 458 Lott
Can't imagine cycling a bolt is any louder than someone who just can't STFU whistle

Now THAT is funny grin
Originally Posted by Brother_Bill
Here is a mortar for you....

Jeff Olsen is the biggest [bleep] to hit the Campfire since LHonda.....


Wow...Pretty articulate there. Nice to see that people can be polite after all this time.
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
We are the Eveready Bunny over here...

-jeff


But it still has a ways to go to acheive the legendary status of Leupys vs Nikon and PF vs CRF......... grin


Casey
Originally Posted by Brother_Bill
Here is a mortar for you....

Jeff Olsen is the biggest [bleep] to hit the Campfire since LHonda.....



Jeez......


Casey
Quote
Can't imagine cycling a bolt is any louder than someone who just can't STFU


Then it must be very difficult to hear a bolt cycling in Alaska. grin
Oh fer chrissakes, horseshiedt is horseshiedt, and a troll is a troll...........hot or cold
dun wit dis crap
Originally Posted by Mac84
I hunt where most carry hot yet very few if any are hurt each year. I carry cold and don't feel handicapped for doing so.



Here in Colorado its a rare year when no one gets killed by a firearm during the hunting seasons. Some are shot intentionally (mistaken idnentity, "Officer, with the blaze orange hat and vest he looked JUST LIKE A DEER") while others are "accidents" involving loaded weapons and vehicles, falls, general stupidity, carelessness, inattention, etc.

The ONE CONSTANT in each case is the chamber was HOT at the time.

I understand the occasional need to hunt hot but in most cases I don't think it is really necessary. In griz country I would probably be hot all the time. In Colorado's open grasslands/sage I generally hunt cold, in dense pines where a shot opportunity may be fleeting at best, I tend to hunt hot. Other times it depends.

As I pointed out before, the chances of an AD/ND are:

Cold chamber = ZERO
Hot chamber = INFINITELY GREATER

Assess the risks and act appropriately. Its not hard to live with a missed shot opportunity. Killing your hunting buddy or family member, as happens almost every year here in Colorado alone, is a whole other issue.
You're full of crap, C_H. Everyone knows that a hot rifle is inherently safer than an unchambered rifle. Just ask Jeff and his gang of cronies.

Ah. when was the last fatality in CO during hunting season from a gunshot wound? Certainly not every year for sure.I believe less than half a dozen in twice as many years. Agreed that 1 is too many.

More people are killed from skiing into trees every year or waving golf clubs around in a lightening storm. I don't see any one waving a banner that everyone should go skiing without wearing skis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

You are correct, assess your risk and act accordingly

Sitting in a vehicle in your garage. Zero Risk
Hunting hot. Infinitely less than driving down I25

I can't let this one go by ......like so many here. I'd like to relate a short story about a guy who I'd hunted with a few times and knew he hunted 'cold'. It was his choice obviously. I hunt elk alone but this time I happended to be with this guy on the side of a mountain in Idaho. I'd spotted a nice 6x6 about 300 yards down the mountain with the binocs and pointed it out to him. He didn't ask if I wanted to shoot as he just sat down on the ground and threw his rifle to his shoulder. I was watching through the binocs and since I knew he was shooting a 300 Win. Mag. I answered his question, "How far away is he" with saying "just hold on the center of his chest".

I heard the bolt work to load a round into his chamber and waited for the bang, half pissed off that he thought nothing of discussing whose bull it was. Still looking thhough the binocs and waiting, I heard again the bolt 'work' and thought that's strange. He sat on the side of the mountain and unloaded his rifle until I told him what he was doing. Buck Fever....you bet but he shot and missed with the last round in his rifle.

OK, so most of us would NEVER do this but the story is just one of the side effects of carrying cold. And I should add the guy still hunts cold. Some people should stay out of the woods if they aren't confident enough to carry a hot rifle....just my 2 cents and I realize to each his own. You hunt hot or cold, it makes no difference to me. wink
I take that as a perfect example of why someone should hunt cold. If a guy completely loses his head while hunting, the last thing I want is for him to have a round in the chamber.

Some perspective on this might be in order. This removes much of the personal opinion, and the touchy feely argument where gun safety is concerned. As I wrote, I carry hot sometimes and sometimes I don't not all events and conditions are equal. It's based on what is going on each moment I'm in the field.


HUNTING SAFETY

According to the 1991 figures from the U.S. National Safety
Council, here are the annual rates of outdoor recreation-related
injuries requiring hospital emergency room treatment in the US:

Recreation # of injuries per 100,000 participants
-------------------------------------------------------------
Football 2,171.1
Baseball 2,089.6
Soccer 910.2
Bicycle riding 904.6
Skateboarding 869.2
Horseback riding 464.6
Ice skating 334.9
Fishing 141.2
Tennis 119.7
Golf 104.4
Swimming 93.3
Hunting 8.0

From the same source (1991 figures of National Safety Council), here
is the table of accidental deaths in the US:

Accident cause Mortality rate per 100,000 people
-------------------------------------------------------------
Automobiles 18.6
Home accidents 8.6
Falls 5.0
Poisoning 2.6
Fires 1.7
Suffocation 1.3
Hunting (among participants) 0.85
Lightning 0.04
Insect stings 0.02
Hunting (among non-participants) 0.001

-----------

"Many hunters have participated in hunter safety courses. Hunter
education is now mandatory in 39 states for at least part of the
hunting population. These educational efforts are an important part of
hunting today. Despite anti-hunter's claims to the contrary, hunting
has become an extremely safe sport relative to many other common
activities. The probability of being killed or injured in a hunting
accident is lower than when you are attending a sporting event or
major concert, playing billiards, or taking a bath.

[Report of International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies
Hunter Education Study Team. "Hunter Education in the United States
and Canada with Recommendations for Improvement." (Fred. G. Evenden,
Team Leader). Bethesda, Maryland. 1990 112p.]

-----------

"..the [U.S.] National Safety Council reports for 1988 there were 161
hunting fatalities, 49 of which were self-inflicted. Thanks in part to
hunter safety education classes, hunting fatalities have declined by
more than 50 percent over the last two decades.

In general, three-quarters of the hunters who have accidents have not
taken hunter safety education courses. Participating in hunting today
is safer than swimming, bicycling, playing baseball, golf, tennis,
touch football, basketball, fishing, horseback riding, and driving to
the place where you are going to hunt, if you look at the numbers of
injuries per 100,000 people participating in various sports compiled
by the National Safety Council. In 1988, ten states reported no
hunting fatalities, and Connecticut had no hunting accidents at
all. Statistics show that you are more likely to be killed by
lightening when outdoors than to be killed in a hunting accident. In a
normal season, more hunters die from heart attacks than hunting
accidents. According to the California Department of Fish and Game,
there is a 0.0015-0.00425 percent chance of being killed or wounded
while hunting deer in California. In 1992, despite the presence of
nearly half a million deer hunters in the field, no one was killed and
only one person was wounded in California.

In response to [president of Fund for Animals] Cleveland Amory's
charge that hunters are harming "many innocent bystanders", the actual
data show that "Hunting accidents involving non hunters are extremely
rare. On the average, only one nonhunter is injured by a hunter for
every 12 million recreation days of hunting. A nonhunter is 20 times
more likely to die from stinging insects than wounding by a
hunter.
Media tend to sensationalize accidental hunting deaths and
injuries, but in comparison with many urban areas where violence has
reached epidemic proportions, the woods and marshes during hunting
season are extremely safe, especially when you consider that everyone
hunting is armed with lethal weapons. In 1992 in California there were
no nonhunter injuries or deaths associated with hunting."
Originally Posted by saddlesore


You are correct, assess your risk and act accordingly

Sitting in a vehicle in your garage. Zero Risk
Hunting hot. Infinitely less than driving down I25



Talk about the swiss cheese analogy........

Driving (at least some form of transportation) is an absolute requirement for damn near everyone in the US. You simply cannot get by without it.

Hunting hot is only a requirement for those uncoordinated enough to be able to feed a round into the chamber under pressure.

So, JJ, I take it that you are perfectly comfortable crawling through the thick stuff, with a client carrying hot directly behind you?

As someone else so eloquently pointed out, the problem with people that carry hot is that it is rarely themselves that they kill or maim.

CAS,

In case you missed this part of my post:

"As I wrote, I carry hot sometimes and sometimes I don't not all events and conditions are equal. It's based on what is going on each moment I'm in the field."

My English and my power of articulation are not capable of making this more clear then what is typed here. I'm sorry that this may not be as well understood as I would like it to be for you.

As far as "perfectly comfortable" crawling through the bush with or without another hunter............. well I'm not sure I would be "perfectly comfortable" doing this myself, with another person, with a fully automatic 50 caliber machine gun, "perfectly comfortable" is a pretty high standard to meet. Can't say I've been Perfectly comfortable very often in much of my career where DG and Bears have been involved.

But,......... it's my choice to have this job nobody is holding a "gun to my head"!
I take that as a perfect example of why someone should hunt cold. If a guy completely loses his head while hunting, the last thing I want is for him to have a round in the chamber

Sad to say but you make me feel bad about hunting hot blush smile
I guess it's easy for some to forget that rifles are made with a safety. If there weren't a safety, then I agree everyone should hunt cold.

But I'm glad I don't have to do as you wish.
Ah, back to the safety thing. You got me there, nothing mechanical ever fails. Good point.

JJ,

I didn't miss any of your post. I just wondered that if it was safe to hunt hot most of the time, why isn't it safe to hunt hot all of the time?
I carry hot sometimes, and sometimes not. I'll give you an example of when I do:

When I use a side by side or an over/under while quail hunting, which I do more and more of lately.

I hunt behind a Springer. Gotta be hot there.

Depends on the situation.

rb
Also, never seen anyone hunt pheasant or chukar cold either. Chukar, especially, are typically in some pretty rough, steep, rocky-slidy country akin to deer (only half-jokingly, even sheep grin) habitat.

You hunt chukar cold, and chukar win. Hell, chukar win even when hunting hot, most of the time.

Now, that does not negate getting to a nasty spot and unloading until breached. But once across/over/under, it's back to hot.

I suppose hunting with pointers might open the door to hunting cold here.

But with flushers ...

rb
CAS with all due respect to another long time poster here, your line of questioning is unrealistic for me to answer.

There are plenty of things in life we do one way or another based on conditions. I'm quite certain that not everything you or I do,... every single time we do it,.... is done exactly the same. Not everything can be managed this way.

Again, My power to articulate this may not be up to the task. If it's too complex to understand this from what I have written here then I apologize.

I would not likely wear my seatbelt to pull my truck from the garage 20 yards or so,... so I could wash it in the drive way. That does not mean it's always safe to drive without a seatbelt. Maybe this analogy helps a little bit? If not....... Well I'm sorry, you're on your own to make what you wish of my post and my opinion on this topic.

I suppose the complexity of this is well beyond my mental capacity to grasp. I must carry hot for much of my work, and my recreational sport hunting persuits. I cannot imagine for one second that I would be knocking pheasants down with any......even marginal success carrying my shotgun empty. This involves fighting bush and sidehills, mud, sand, snow, and every earthly possibility. All while watching everything but where I place my feet. I've never met an upland hunter who did otherwise, nor have I ever heard a single one suggest it.

Yet while using a rifle and sneaking slowly and deliberately through the bush watching each step carfully to prevent a single twig from snapping is somehow more dangerous and higher risk. I'm quite simply not intelligent enough to grasp these matters nor to understand the point of this debate.
"I didn't miss any of your post. I just wondered that if it was safe to hunt hot most of the time, why isn't it safe to hunt hot all of the time?"

If it safe to drive most of the time, why isn't it safe to drive all of the time? Let's stay with driving a moment. More accidents happen in inclement weather such as rain and snow. Some people make a decision to never drive in the rain or snow. Other people will always drive regardless of the weather. Some, perhaps Mr. Hack, will look at his window, consider all of the variables, deliberate carefully and decide to drive (or not) based on his years of experience, his assessment of the conditions and his skill level. Because you or I would choose not to drive in a particular situation does not necessarily make Mr. Hack "unsafe" or reckless or foolhardy. He is engaging in legal activity in compliance with the law.

Now, Mr. Hack can drive in the worst blizzard in recorded history and emerge unscathed. You may go out in perfect conditions driving a perfectly maintained car and die. So it goes.

People jump from airplanes for sport. They kayak wild rivers. They race anything with legs or wheels. They climb mountains. As a species, we engage in complex and unsafe activities, often for nothing more than our own amusement. In most instances, the law acknowledges our right to go in harm's way (though this is changing). The law also holds us accountable for our actions.

If Mr. Hack is guiding for me in the dark of Africa, I would prefer he tell me that he is carrying hot. Call it full disclosure. If he is my PH, I'm going to trust his knowledge and experience. If he says he thinks carrying hot is appropriate, I'm going to think he knows more about Africa than me. If I find his muzzle pointing at me during a hunt (which I think damn unlikely), I will politely point this out. If it happens more than once, I'll be on a flight back to the U.S. No hard feelings, mind you, but gun safety is a religion in my family... though much like Christianity, there can be differences in theology. smile

I believe a hunter has the right to carry hot or carry cold in the field. As with driving, I think competent adults should be allowed to make personal decisions, bear the risk and accept responsibility. I'm not going to force someone else to wear a helmet or buckle a safety belt... though the law may. Whether a man hunts carrying hot or cold is his business, not mine... that is until he puts me at risk. I will not hunt with a person I think is less than perfectly safe. There are people I trust more holding a loaded gun than others holding a potato gun. The same holds true for other hunting ethics. If I don't like a guy's ethics, I won't him with him. This is how the hunting community shapes its values... not through the legislature but how we choose to engage in our sport, or in the case of Mr. Hack, our calling.

One might choose not to wear a seatbelt when driving across as frozen lake just as one would likely carry a weapon hot while crawling through the alders after a wounded bear. Both situations actually likely lower one's risk of injury.

One of the "crux" issues in my mind is the fact that many hunting situations have no reason to carry hot other than a big "what if." In many cases these what ifs can be accounted for through greater hunting skill and diligence on the part of the hunter. Those are the situations where I have the biggest problem with a cocked, hot rifle. It's called hunting, in part, because we pit our senses and skills against the animals'. If we come up short, having the ability to blast away at a fleeing animal who "beat" us at the game is, perhaps, not even sporting - if that even matters.

This is the big game forum. Big Game are typically hunted with high powered rifles. That is really the context in which the topic should be addressed. MOO of course.
Some of us carry with a round chambered because we are fit, agile, move slowly and deliberately ..and just have been trained well and PREFER to be ready..and we can do so without risk.to ourselves or another..
That may not work for the majority of folks who have firearms.

Whatever a hunter chooses to do let him be accountable and responsible.Jim
Jim
You continue to amaze with your inability to face simple facts...
art (with arm in air to protect watch that is only waterproof...)
It amazes me that you can claim to have never slipped, tripped or fallen, not once, in 50 years in the field.

Recreation # of injuries per 100,000 participants
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hunting 8.0



I'd be curious to know the number of AD's...as I'm guessing lots of folks got off easy, but not joining or contributing to the injured list.
Dave the lower statistics chart show mortality of .85 per 100,000 Can't say if it's AD or not. While looking into this I found something interesting. There was 92 fatalities in 2001 involving tree stands nation wide, but only 23 with firearms. Of the 23 all I read were due to the shooter not seeing the person hit. There was ZERO deathes due to AD. This was from a statistical website on cause of death and injury in the USA.

Oh yeah they broke this down by age group and education as well. Almost all the "shooters" involved had never been to hunter safety classes, and most did not even have a hunting license. Only 2 were over 30, one was over 50. The rest were under 30 years old.

The demographic for high risk starts to clear up these issues quick. I wish they had a column for those who had been drinking as well, but they did not share that data.
Ironbender. Not with a firearm in my hand that created an unsafe condition. Condition your mind right and you can keep good muzzle control even a$$ over tea cups. You might break something, but not shoot yourself to boot. Besides,most bolt guns,all you have to do is lift the bolt so it won't fire. Sure don't have to unload it.

I firmly believe that the carry cold camp have created a problem when none exist or at least that there is such a low acceptable risk that it doesn't matter. Ironic that it looks like all the cold carry camp are younger hunters. Don't know for sure, just from reading a lot of past post from others for a number of years.

The poster relating the hot carry about shotguns in high weeds vs stealthly stepping through not so dangerous areas has it about right. JiminOregon has it about right too. Wonder how many of our lads in Iraq carry cold. About 400,000 troops can't have it too wrong or you would here a lot more about it.

The most dangerous hunting activity is turkey hunting. More people have been killed turkey hunting than any other aspect of the sport. Amost all from either stalking someone calling or mistaken red and blue colthing for a turkey head. It has nothing to do about carrying hot or cold. By the time the trigger was pulled they could have been either way a minute before.
Glad no one ever told The Greyhound that blacktails can't be hunted cold-chambered.

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by saddlesore
Ah. when was the last fatality in CO during hunting season from a gunshot wound? Certainly not every year for sure.I believe less than half a dozen in twice as many years. Agreed that 1 is too many.


While I don�t have the current figures, I recall reading several years ago(late �90�s?) that we had a season with one archery death and zero firearm fatalities. What struck me, and the reason I remember it, was that this was the first year with zero firearm fatalities in some time.

The most recent death I know of was the father who took his teenage son hunting for the first � and last - time. I remember an ATV was involved somehow � I think he leaned his rifle against it.

Quote


More people are killed from skiing into trees every year or waving golf clubs around in a lightening storm. ...

No doubt about it.

Quote


You are correct, assess your risk and act accordingly


Hah - we agree on something!
Quote


Sitting in a vehicle in your garage. Zero Risk
Hunting hot. Infinitely less than driving down I25



Not infinitely less, but very small. You just don�t want to discover you�re one of those who make it greater than zero.

Hunting cold would be an example of infinitely less.
Originally Posted by saddlesore

� Condition your mind right and you can keep good muzzle control even a$$ over tea cups. You might break something, but not shoot yourself to boot.


Since you�ve never fallen in 50 years, per your previous post, how do you know? I know I wouldn�t place any bets on anyone keeping their muzzle controlled during an uncontrolled fall.

Quote

I firmly believe that the carry cold camp have created a problem when none exist or at least that there is such a low acceptable risk that it doesn't matter.


Perhaps its only a �problem� for the dead and injured and the folks responsible?
Quote
Ironic that it looks like all the cold carry camp are younger hunters. Don't know for sure, just from reading a lot of past post from others for a number of years.

I�m 56 years young.

Quote

Wonder how many of our lads in Iraq carry cold. About 400,000 troops can't have it too wrong or you would here a lot more about it. �


I imagine they carry cold quite a bit, depending on where they are and what they are doing.

"I firmly believe that the carry cold camp have created a problem when none exist or at least that there is such a low acceptable risk that it doesn't matter. Ironic that it looks like all the cold carry camp are younger hunters. Don't know for sure, just from reading a lot of past post from others for a number of years." (I couldn't get the "quote" function to work, so I lifted this from saddlesore's post)

Speaking only for myself, I carried hot all the time, until I passed through my 40's. Then I got so used to carrying a cold chamber when hunting on horseback that I realized that I was giving up nothing tactically.

Now I carry cold all the time, unless I have my eyes on a specific animal I'm stalking, and conditions are otherwise acceptable to me to chamber a round.

Arguments about the military in war zones are stupid. Of course soldiers and marines carry hot -- people are trying to kill them. When I was stalking Cape buffalo in the Zambezi Delta I carried hot, and needed to. But deer and elk aren't trying to kill me, so instant response isn't more valuable than a .1 second later response.

If you're right about the "cold carry camp" being mostly younger hunters, then I'm glad to see that they've developed good sense sooner than I did. But I know quite a few of us will never be mistaken for Gen X'ers whistle.

After reading this thread, I'm dazzled that so many people are so offended that I've made a simple choice that enhances the safety of those around me and has yet to present any disadvantage to me in taking game. It sorta reminds me of the people who are offended by various rifle and ammunition companies coming out with offerings that don't suit their fancies.

Sort of smacks of self-absorbed self-aggrandizing self-righteousness.

(And for God's sake, don't any of you go misreading my handle and blaming My Other Brother Darrell for my maunderings...)

DN
Originally Posted by saddlesore
Ironic that it looks like all the cold carry camp are younger hunters.


I thought Art was about 107?!?!?!?!? Am I wrong? smile (Sorry, Art, I couldn't resist)
Originally Posted by jim in Oregon
Some of us carry with a round chambered because we are fit, agile, move slowly and deliberately ..and just have been trained well and PREFER to be ready..and we can do so without risk.to ourselves or another..
That may not work for the majority of folks who have firearms.

Whatever a hunter chooses to do let him be accountable and responsible.Jim


I guess I must not be fit, agile, or slow moving etc.....or does it simply mean that I am intelligent, knowledgable, and good at what I do?
Always with a round in the chamber.
OK. It's about this point in the conversation that some one suggests a compromise of sorts.... smile

I think you should just close the bolt while holding the trigger so it's a loose sloppy pin drumming on the primer. At least it's not cocked, right? blush
Originally Posted by ironbender

I think you should just close the bolt while holding the trigger so it's a loose sloppy pin drumming on the primer. At least it's not cocked, right? blush


That would be a solution for sure - tongue in cheek though it is- if the firing pin was somehow unable to make contact with the primer - even in an impact. That was what seemed like a reasonable solution to me except for that obvious and very dangerous fact. Having grown up with exposed hammers on rifles and shotguns, it was quite easy and obvious to carry a live round chambered but in an uncocked position. They were very fast and quite quiet to bring into action if desired. Transfer bar revolvers are roughly more of the same. Unfortunately, the typical bolt gun is not so easy to make this way. That is a big part of the reason I stopped carrying loaded and locked, that and the fact that I watched a hot chambered rifle go sliding muzzle first toward me with nothing other than the safety to prevent the trigger from being pulled. Yikes! (And a safety which doesn't block the sear and/or the striker ain't much.)
Sometimes hot, sometimes not, it just depends on how and where i am hunting.
I vote we grab a backhoe and bury this thread.

This thread and others like it prove nothing and solve nothing.
It's divided our readership into Hot / Cold camps, and I think that is a loss to all of us.

This reminds me of the "Helmet Law".
Let those who ride, decide.

My mind is made up and so is yours. So lets leave it alone and not try to polarize the issue.

Have a great Thanks Giving. BT

CAS
"I thought Art was about 107?!?!?!?!? Am I wrong? (Sorry, Art, I couldn't resist)"

And I am so like totally sensitive, too! wink Between my age and my hair I cannot guess which one keeps me up most at night...
art
You're still a youngster! (A folically-challenged youngster, but one anyway grin.)

I pity the Dude that could call me a youngster! He must be OLD!
Well, I'm 65, so 50's are youngsters to me..

Muledeer. I am not offended by you carrying cold, what ever floats your boat. I carry hot and don't plan to change. Why are post about the military carrying hot stupid? We are not talking about deer/elk trying to kill you here, we are talking about the relative saftey of carrying hot and cold. Certainly if a few hundred thousand troops being 18-20 yr sold, scared crapless carry hot into battle or bad guy zones, there is no reson why the average hunter cannot.

Quote by CH "The most recent death I know of was the father who took his teenage son hunting for the first � and last - time. I remember an ATV was involved somehow � I think he leaned his rifle against it." ( I'm not clever enough to do those boxed quotes.

See, it's those damn ATV's. We ought to ban them. If it was about leaning one on an ATV, I don't consider that carrying hot while hunting. I consider it darn stupid for not unloading before you get back to the close vacinity of your vehicle.You cannot fix stupid, whether you carry hot or cold. Mine usually gets emptied about 100 yds from the truck or 25-50 yds from the mules.

We might as well continue this thread. It's 9 degrees this AM, I Have nothing better to do ,except to mayb edo some reloading until the turkey is done and it's darn entertaiing
7.5 degrees up here in Evergreen........man its a cold one. Just started a fire and I am getting ready to watch football and stuff my face with turkey.

Happy Thanksgiving everyone!!!!
-9 F in Bozo...
Happy Tanksgiving!
I leave on Wednesday next week for my elk hunt up near Cook city; I am going to freeze my shorthairs off!!! -9 in Bozo is not what I wanted to hear!!

Brad,
have a great Turkey day with the family and enjoy plenty of grape today. Just pulled some killer Russian River Pinot's from the cellar for big meal this afternoon.
18 here in Touchet, gotta drive 7 hours tonight to pick up some livestock first thing in the morning tommorow. Then Back home Friday afternoon. Thanksgiving on the road with the family again this year!
Happy Turkey Day JJ. It is always a good Turket Day when the family is with, even if you aren't at home.

Ted
Ted, I know you know the Russian River is a GREAT area for Pinot's! Sounds like a good time!

I might head down towards Jellystone tomorrow and see if I can kill a bull. Really, conditions are just now getting good for putting elk down!
The colder it is the better the elk hunting
Really, I didn't know that...
The colder it is ,the more the in the morning and earlier in the afternoon. Real cold,they eat all day
Since this is the festive thread- Happy Turkey day to all of ya, hot and cold carriers alike, and go whack a bull Brad!

-jeff
Dude... ever heard of tongue in cheek?
OK... should have typed KILL a bull elk, Brad! :-)

-jeff
Thanks Jeff, I decided to whack a 150 class Whitetail yesterday morning on the way to elk hunt instead:

[Linked Image]
Talk about a slow, heavy, bullet!
eek

I trust no one besides the deer was hurt?
Originally Posted by Brad
-9 F in Bozo...
Happy Tanksgiving!

Jetstream is pulling our weather to you. It's 42* here. It sucks...
Brad- that sucks!! Truck still work? Looks like you really nailed the sucker. Last deer I hit was a big buck too, but he ran out and hit ME on the side of my old truck. I never saw him; scared the crap out of me as I thought I'd hit someone or something big had fallen off my truck or something.

When I first got my '06 Tundra, first new truck I've ever bought, it was a disaster magnet. Trees dropped limbs on me, I somehow picked up some fresh paint off the road, and then with under 5000 miles on it a crankhead broke in, smashed the window, scratched the door all up, destroyed the dash getting my locked glove box open, and stole a pistol to boot. I've since installed a metal pistol safe in the center console... anyway... things do seem to have calmed down since then but I was swearing it'd be the last new truck I ever bought for a while there! :-)

Is it gonna screw up your hunting or do you have a backup?

Would sure be nice to have a GOOD football game today...

-jeff
Balmy 44 degrees here west of Alpine Oregon. It was 24 degrees at daybreak. My brother and I went elk hunting this morning, didn't see a thing but 4 deer.

Happy turkey day everyone.

Doc

Jeff, it runs fine... it's a toyota grin.

In fact, all I did was pull the quarter panel out so the tire had clearance and went elk hunting. I wasn't going to let a suicidal deer wreck my hunt...


Love the Toy's myself.... we have my Tundra and Land Cruiser. 25,600 miles on the Tundra now and I have yet to even change a light bulb!

-jeff
Originally Posted by saddlesore
The colder it is the better the elk hunting


Saddlesore must be right. It was 75 degrees here in northern Virginia yesterday, and I didn't see one elk.

John
I haven't been following the thread; how did we get from hunting "hot" to Toyota's and the weather in Virginia???


Just curious.............. smirk
I usually hunt cold in an Isuzu and expect if it does get colder here with a bit more snow I will be able to see several hundred head of elk in a month or so. grin

On a more serious note the first time I remember this discussion it was on the old coffee shop and if I'm not mistaken was stated by ole "Backpack Hunter". Several who participated in this thread did so on that one also. No conclusion was reached then and none has since that and none ever will. You can make book on that!! cool

BTW, has anyone ever run into Backpack Hunter recently? I think his name was Don something. I always enjoyed his posting.
Yep
Originally Posted by Brad
Thanks Jeff, I decided to whack a 150 class Whitetail yesterday morning on the way to elk hunt instead:

[Linked Image]



Dont'cha you just hate it when a deer runs into your truck?.......... cry



Casey
I can't believe this thread is 41 pages long.........
Change your settings...I've only got 9 pages!
We just need someone to stir the pot again... then we could make it to 41 pages!

(KIDDING!)

-jeff
[Linked Image]
Cowbell?
This will come back againby June '08. It gets hotter than politics.
What is this thing called a 'safety'?
If you are packing a gun you're packing a gun. If you're hunting you should be hot in the chamber, muzzle forward if you're the lead man, muzzle up if you're not.
Wow, quite a read on cold chamber vs. hot...again.

I skipped this thread at the time because I have read many like it in the past. Inquiring as to why SH had left the forum I was directed to this thread. I'm still not sure why he would leave the forum over this, being an old pro at the banter himself.

As far as the subject matter, I'm one of the few here that isn't even qualified to give an opinion, and one of the few to actually learn a little something from such threads. I have come away from threads such as these not with an absolute theory on the subject, but hunting method that incorporates many of the opinions here.

My 700 will hold four rounds, but I only load it with three because I find it makes it much easier to slide the bolt back and push the rounds down into the magazine when need be...besides, who deserves four shots at something? smile

There are situations where I feel my chances are high that I am about to jump a deer, I'll slide one in, safety on, thumb at the ready and take two steps and pause with the rifle at the ready. If I am out in the open or climbing, I slide the bolt back and push the rounds down. I have yet to lose track of whether or not I had one in or out.

I'll be the first to admit to not being a good hunter, either are the guys I hunt with, but I'll still go with them for they are good friends. The first time I hunted with one such friend, on two occasions his sling slipped off his shoulder and walking behind him I found myself with a birds eye view of his barrel, so I'm not gonna argue that accidents don't happen; especially with casual hunters who only hunt three or four times a year. On the other hand I'm not prepared to say I will never slip one in the chamber when the time feels right...it doesn't have to be either or.

Many speak about being good with the bolt at crunch time where I have become good at chambering a round and un-chambering a round when the situation calls, and good with keeping track the state of my rifle.

I think there are correct answers on both sides of the fence here and months ago decided to take advantage by using the best of both sides...so there! smile
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
We are having a little dustup on this subject on another thread... I'll go grab a link to that thread for anyone who wants to check it out, or heck, join the fray.

I will go first: yes, I hunt with a round in the chamber.

-jeff
I read this question and I'm replying without reading any other post in this thread. Yes I hunt with a round in the chamber. When I carry one of my Glocks, be it concealed carry or open carry at camp, I carry with one in the chamber as well.
NYH2,

Thanks for playing!

The Cliff Notes version is: about a 75/25 ratio of guys who hunt with one vs. guys who don't... but the "cold" camp has some very... uh... shall we say "vocal" proponents and that resulted in an... ahem... entertaining thread. If you've got some time, read through it!

-jeff
I have never killed a Buffalo, lion or elephant with an empty rifle and I am always loaded in the chamber in the African bush..I always carry a round in the chamber when actually hunting. You will not get a shot on many ocassions with a round not in the chamber, you will be a stumbling, fumbling, dork trying to load a rifle in a tight spot or on a disapearing animal..ONly on national TV and apparantly the internet can everyone sit and talk and wait and load before they take that broadside perfect shot..Where I hunt its a bit more hectic than that..You have a window of opertunity and you had better take advantage of it...A gun pointed at nobody is a safe gun.

Never loaded in the camp, home, car, or in the saddle scabbard.

common since should be a perfect guide but I see from 42 posts this has not been the case.
Ray, agree mostly with you except "A gun pointed at nobody is a safe gun"... that simply isn't true as Remington concluded forty years ago that 100% safe gun handling is never possible.

I only keep one up the spout when I'm on the trail of something, until then the chamber is empty but then I mostly hunt alone so it's a moot point.
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
...
The Cliff Notes version is: about a 75/25 ratio of guys who hunt with one vs. guys who don't... ...



What was the percentage for the "It depends on the situation" camp?
Good question- I don't know. It would be WAY up there, though. Personally, if I'm putting the rifle in a position where it could be mechanically dismembered, like in a scabbard on a horse or climbing up a cliff or something, it will be unchambered. I'm guess that's true of EVERYONE. So I'd say the 'it depends...' camp is virtually everyone, ultimatly.

-jeff
Originally Posted by DocFoster
[Linked Image]


Even a two-year-old can see the problem with this.

[Linked Image]


Is this dead enough?

Now, let's argue about something else.

Hey, I know, "Jeff, I didn't know Oregon was an island in the Aleutians." (You are west of me, right?)
Guess I better change it to "West of "almost all" of you, Oregon"!

:-)

Happy lookin' kid. I was seeing tons of hares up where we hunted elk this last year. I was really kicking myself for not tossing a .22 or shotgun in with all the other crap I'd brought...

-jeff
Quote
Personally, if I'm putting the rifle in a position where it could be mechanically dismembered, like in a scabbard on a horse or climbing up a cliff or something, it will be unchambered.

Say, south-of-me-Jeff, I thought that BLR was bullet-proof? Sort of a pun there!
You damn cantankerous "westerners"! :-)

Ironbender, I'm talking situations with big force multipliers- like cliffs and 1500-lb horses- where the literal dismemberment of the rifle is a possibility. Not walking round in the woods...

-jeff
How many ways are there to beat a dead horse...
Originally Posted by atkinson
I have never killed a Buffalo, lion or elephant with an empty rifle and I am always loaded in the chamber in the African bush..I always carry a round in the chamber when actually hunting. You will not get a shot on many ocassions with a round not in the chamber, you will be a stumbling, fumbling, dork trying to load a rifle in a tight spot or on a disapearing animal..ONly on national TV and apparantly the internet can everyone sit and talk and wait and load before they take that broadside perfect shot..Where I hunt its a bit more hectic than that..You have a window of opertunity and you had better take advantage of it...A gun pointed at nobody is a safe gun.

Never loaded in the camp, home, car, or in the saddle scabbard.

common since should be a perfect guide but I see from 42 posts this has not been the case.


In the right situation and with the right game not only will you not get a shell chambered you�ll be dead. I�m no snack.
Originally Posted by wildswalker
How many ways are there to beat a dead horse...


I don't know, I'll get back to you when it's good and beat! :-)

-jeff
Beings how I mostly bow hunt for big game, I'd have to go with an "it depends". I usually have an arrow nocked though, but am rarely at full draw smile

Most of my "gun" big game hunting is done with a shotgun. I rarely go, but when I do, it is usually a drive situation. Most shots are at running deer who are already aware of you and are trying to get the hell out of dodge. Racking a slide on a shotgun makes little difference in time or noise. Most times in this situation, I go cold. Since this type of hunting appeals very little to me, it is very rare that I go.

On the even rarer occasion where I am still hunting with a gun, I am generally hot. Depends a lot on the terrain and conditions. If I am likely to walk up on an unaware deer and I am hunting alone I will carry hot.

At any rate, I rarely gun hunt. The season in OH is a week long, limited to shotguns/muzzle-loaders/revolvers, and generally filled with a bunch of degenerates out blasting at any thing that moves. This is not the type of hunting that I prefer. I can bow hunt for four months at deer that are usually unpressured. I am familiar enough with the property that I hunt that I usually have all the deer named. Gun season here just does not do much for me. Now, before I catch hell for that opinion, I will state that if I could gun hunt the same way that I bow hunt, I would probably prefer that.

BTW Jeff, look how far WEST of you I am.
Ha! Good one...

-jeff
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
Originally Posted by wildswalker
How many ways are there to beat a dead horse...


I don't know, I'll get back to you when it's good and beat! :-)

-jeff


Carry on...

The humor is Priceless........
Yes.

Nuff said,

cur dog
In much of B.C. grizzlies are common. Suprised grizzlies don't take kindly to being suprised. Also, they aren't known for always warning you of their intentions.

An unloaded rifle is, indeed, a stick.

Sticks aren't much good at dissuading charging bears.

I'm positive that becoming part of the "circle of life" - is more romantic as an abstract idea - than it would be when it is happening in real life.

Nice to see this thread still going, and going, and going.....
i keep one in the chamber for the same reason i keep a 45 auto cocked and locked on the nite stand by my bed you might not have time to chamber a round if a nice buck apears and only gives a spilt second to shoot or a armed intruder breaks in your home you better hope you don't have to wast time chambering a round
Yeah, but I'm shootin blanks! laugh So it doesn't really matter.
I'm a very inexperianced hunter, but here is my thoughts on it.
I have three different situations
1st.
If I'm concentrated in my hunt for non-dangerous game, I would always have one in the chamber unless I was climbing something with the safety on.

2nd.
If I'm just lazily wandering the woods content weather i find game or not, I would not have one in the chamber and it would be on safe

3rd.
If I was to hunt in dangerous game areas, I would have my rifle off of safe but an empty chamber. This is because cocking the rifle would be second nature to me where is turning the safety off I would more likely forget. I would instinctively load the chamber. Turning the safety off wouldn't be as instinctive to me.
I ALWAYS hunt with one in the chamber and the rifle on safe and NEVER point my rifle at something I'm not willing to shoot.

Anything more complex than that leaves a lot of room for error and confusion in a potentially bad time or situation.

Nuff said....

$bob$
I always have one in the chamber while out hunting with a rifle unless climbing over a fence or into a stand then its time to empty the chamber.

Now with a shotgun out hunting the only time I remove the round is when I'm getting out of my layout blind while hunting waterfowl. I don't like the idea of checking decoys and maybe my dog or someone else's jumping into the blind and setting the gun off while I'm infront of the blind. So I always remove the round and stick the barrel into the floor of the blind pointing into the dirt and make anyone hunting with me do the same, if they don't and I watch everyone else too, then I pickup my decoys and go home or they go home...

This is sort of a side channel, but up where I shoot a lot it's a pretty informal range. Where I set up my "bench", I have my back to the logging road that gets you up there, which gives me the willies when I get my puffs and muffs on! Anyway, when I go down range to change targets or tape up my old holes or whatever, I don't just take any ammo out of the rifle, I pull the dang BOLT and put it in my pocket! Last thing I want is someone sneaking over there and shooting me with my own damn rifle, and it'd be pretty easy up there to get away with it, and get the $4k to $8k in rifles I usually have with me...

Anyway...

-jeff
Jeff,

When I go shooting I actually carry one of my rifles loaded with me to change the targets for exactly the same reasons you stated. Your not alone. wink
Yeah, I do that too most of the time... usually I have my little AR up there to screw with while the barrels are cooling. Even still I'll pull that bolt though!

-jeff
I thought I was "paranoid pete" when I had concerns like this at the range. It appears I'm not alone, and they may actually be justified. Both sides of the sword at once.
I keep a couple rounds in my pocket and open the bolt and carry the rifle with me to change/check the targets. some one could easily take the rifle while away from the bench..
Jeff - Carry with 1 round in the chamber, firing pin down on safe. Sorry about the truck.
Good point. I am starting my 8 year old hunting and this is a safty thing that when you think about it should be done with a
young new hunter.
Yea its loaded unless I am crossing a fence or climbing over brush. An unloaded gun is no good when you spot your game animal.
Does anyone hunt with an unloaded muzzleloader until they sight an animal?
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Does anyone hunt with an unloaded muzzleloader until they sight an animal?


That's kind of comparing apples to oranges. I can load a round from the magazine in about one second. Takes me considerably longer with my muzzlestuffers.

Mechanical safeties can and sometimes do fail and to rely on them is to accept a certain amount of risk. When hunting non-dangerous game it is a risk I often choose not to accept.

Human safeties are even less reliable. People can and do make mistakes - and rather frequently. In my experience people who suggest they are error free in their gun handling are simply wrong.

This is not to say I don't hunt with a round in the chamber. as sometimes I do and sometimes I don't. But I don't ignore the additional risk when doing so.

No one has ever been shot with an EMPTY chamber - intentionally OR accidently.
Many people have been shot with a LOADED chamber � intentionally AND accidently.

Not trying to tell anyone what to do, just pointing out some facts.


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Does anyone hunt with an unloaded muzzleloader until they sight an animal?
That's kind of comparing apples to oranges.
No it's not. A round in the chamber is just as live as a capped and loaded muzzleloader. You're just trying to create a justification to explain your reasoning.

Cautious and attentive gun handling trumps any mechanical "safety" any day. More people have been shot with "unloaded" guns than loaded ones.
We've hashed this stuff out on this thread- and then some- just so you know... there's a wealth of humor, blood and guts, outright insults, friendships forged and lost, arguments sharpened... all on these blighted 23 pages of this thread! :-)

I think your post (Coyote Hunter) is reasonable and well-stated. And I am not at all interested in revisiting the horse we so thoroughly beat to a dusty depression already in this thread. That said, I do take issue with this:

"No one has ever been shot with an EMPTY chamber - intentionally OR accidently."

For a couple reasons. First, for a gun handler to assume that they are carrying a "safe" firearm because it's empty can, we know, be a recipe for disaster. I carry chambered and I know, beyond any doubt, that I am carrying a loaded firearm and must act accordingly. Not saying YOU would do this, but it's pretty easy to imagine some bucko being careless because hey, his gun is empty.

Second, many gun accidents happen during the loading, unloading, and action-manipulation stages of operation a gun. When you combine the heat of the moment- buck fever- with the necessity to load your firearm, I see potential for problems there that might even completely counterbalance whatever extra safety a guy might achieve by carrying unchambered! It's certainly debateable, at least.

Anyone driving to go hunt in a truck with mud tires is risking himself and everyone else on the highway MORE than if they carried chambered (assuming proper gun handling). A vehicle is the device by far most likely to kill you violently, and by far the most likely device you will operate that could kill someone else violently. So, if you are using mud tires on the freeway (poor wet traction, etc) then... think about that. If you've lifted your truck, for shame! And if you are going 10 mph over the speed limit, don't even bother to tell ANYONE about how they are unsafe carrying hot.

Just my .02. Again. :-)

-jeff
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter

Originally Posted by Bricktop
Does anyone hunt with an unloaded muzzleloader until they sight an animal?

That's kind of comparing apples to oranges.


No it's not. A round in the chamber is just as live as a capped and loaded muzzleloader. You're just trying to create a justification to explain your reasoning.

Cautious and attentive gun handling trumps any mechanical "safety" any day. More people have been shot with "unloaded" guns than loaded ones.


Sorry, no one has ever been shot with an unloaded gun � it is a physical impossibility. Many people have been shot with a rifle that was believed to be unloaded, but believing a gun is unloaded does not make it so.

I agree that gun handlers need to be cautious and attentive but even the most cautious and attentive handlers have lapses, just as mechanical safeties can fail. Over the years I have seen many, many cases of human failure in this area but only one - ONE - case of a safety failure. The safest situation is an empty chamber � period.

I also agree that a capped and loaded muzzlestuffer is as dangerous as a loaded rifle. The Department of Wildlife in my home state of Colorado considers an uncapped muzzleloader to be �unloaded�, whether or not powder and bullet are loaded in the barrel. I consider such a condition to be �partially loaded� but agree with the DOW that an uncapped muzzlestuffer is far safer than one that is both loaded and capped. In fact, I often remove the cap but leave the barrel loaded with powder and bullet in situations where I would unload a cartridge rifle.

But as I said, apples and oranges. Empty chambers are often practical when rifle hunting, rarely so when hunting with a muzzlestuffer. Unless in deep woods I rarely have a rifle shot opportunity where I couldn�t load first, then shoot. The same situations are often far too fleeting to do so with my muzzlestuffers, however. This year alone I took a buck mulie and two cow elk. All three could have been taken starting with an empty rifle chamber with time to spare and while all three could easily have been taken starting with a loaded and capped muzzlestuffer, a muzzlestuffer with no powder or bullet in the chamber would have meant no game in all three situations.
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
�

I think your post (Coyote Hunter) is reasonable and well-stated. And I am not at all interested in revisiting the horse we so thoroughly beat to a dusty depression already in this thread. That said, I do take issue with this:

"No one has ever been shot with an EMPTY chamber - intentionally OR accidently."

For a couple reasons. First, for a gun handler to assume that they are carrying a "safe" firearm because it's empty can, we know, be a recipe for disaster. I carry chambered and I know, beyond any doubt, that I am carrying a loaded firearm and must act accordingly. Not saying YOU would do this, but it's pretty easy to imagine some bucko being careless because hey, his gun is empty.


As noted in my response to Bricktop above, believing a rifle is unloaded does not make it so. Mistaken beliefs are often contributing factors in a disaster, but the number of people who have been shot with unloaded rifles is exactly ZERO. The number is considerably higher for people who have been shot with rifles mistakenly BELIEVED to be unloaded.

Quote

Second, many gun accidents happen during the loading, unloading, and action-manipulation stages of operation a gun. When you combine the heat of the moment- buck fever- with the necessity to load your firearm, I see potential for problems there that might even completely counterbalance whatever extra safety a guy might achieve by carrying unchambered! It's certainly debateable, at least.


I agree that many accidents occur while loading and unloading firearms, but most that I am aware of have occurred while in camp or at the vehicles, good places to be unloaded in my book. It would be interesting to see actual statistics on this matter.

That said, no one has ever been shot with an unloaded firearm but many have been shot with firearms that have just been loaded. In all such cases human failure is a major contributing factor.

In fact, I cannot think of a situation in which someone has been shot where human failure was not the prime contributing factor. In other words, a case in which proper gun handling technique was followed flawlessly.

Quote

Anyone driving to go hunt in a truck with mud tires is risking himself and everyone else on the highway MORE than if they carried chambered (assuming proper gun handling). A vehicle is the device by far most likely to kill you violently, and by far the most likely device you will operate that could kill someone else violently. So, if you are using mud tires on the freeway (poor wet traction, etc) then... think about that. If you've lifted your truck, for shame! And if you are going 10 mph over the speed limit, don't even bother to tell ANYONE about how they are unsafe carrying hot.

Just my .02. Again. :-)

-jeff


Jeff �

Understand that I am not against carrying hot � I do it often, just as I often carry cold. My contention is simply that loaded chambers are less safe than empty ones. You�re not likely to get killed in your lifted truck with mud tires when you�re parked off the road.


I think the reason some contend that a person has or can be shot with an unloaded weapon is that they either don't understand the definition of unloaded, or they don't know how or simply are too lazy to check properly. Coyote Hunter is quite right; an unloaded gun cannot shoot.

And having had the experience of hunting with a rifle I thought was chambered and hot - and missed an opportunity because it wasn't, I know that the mistake could as easily be made in reverse. "I thought" does not make anything so. "I thought" must be replaced by "I know." And while the intent of "never point a weapon at something you are not willing to shoot" is a good idea and the motive behind it pure, the truth is, that barrel is going to be pointed in a lot of ways I don't want to send a bullet. I am simply not willing to walk around with a bullet stopping cap on the end of my barrel just so I can carry hot with near impunity.

The level of awareness one must have to safely carry hot requires more attention than I am willing to spare when I am hunting on a minute by minute, hour by hour basis. While I know one can become accustomed to it - which usually means one's attention to it becomes less - I will not hunt with folks I care so little about that I am willing to allow that to happen. To me, it makes more sense to keep the focus on locating game and not worry about whether everyone's barrels are pointed safely at all times- because if one really cares about their own skin, they need to be attentive to all with whom they hunt, especially so when chambers are hot.

Are there times when a chamber needs to be loaded? Of course, but the act of doing that, especially if the rifle is carried ready to go, is very simple and quick. A great majority of the time, especially where and how I hunt, that is easily accomplished. (It's surprising too, how much one can learn about animal behavior in the moment it takes to chamber a round while both of you are aware of each other. It's often not what one might assume either.)
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
More people have been shot with "unloaded" guns than loaded ones.
Sorry, no one has ever been shot with an unloaded gun � it is a physical impossibility. Many people have been shot with a rifle that was believed to be unloaded, but believing a gun is unloaded does not make it so.
Exactly how thick-headed are you? Look up the words "irony" and "metaphor" in a dictionary. Get someone to explain them to you. My kids understand the statement I made.


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
The safest situation is an empty chamber � period.
No, the safest situation is to treat every gun as if it were loaded. Exclamation point.


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
The Department of Wildlife in my home state of Colorado considers an uncapped muzzleloader to be �unloaded�, whether or not powder and bullet are loaded in the barrel.
Couldn't care less what your "home state" considers; that's not the focus of this discussion.


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
But as I said, apples and oranges.
Both grow on trees and the metaphor for this discussion is that a loaded gun is a loaded gun is a loaded gun. You're trying to justify your reasoning through some rather creative circular "logic."
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
More people have been shot with "unloaded" guns than loaded ones.
Sorry, no one has ever been shot with an unloaded gun – it is a physical impossibility. Many people have been shot with a rifle that was believed to be unloaded, but believing a gun is unloaded does not make it so.
Exactly how thick-headed are you? Look up the words "irony" and "metaphor" in a dictionary. Get someone to explain them to you. My kids understand the statement I made.


Originally Posted by Klikitarik
I think the reason some contend that a person has or can be shot with an unloaded weapon is that they either don't understand the definition of unloaded, or they don't know how or simply are too lazy to check properly. Coyote Hunter is quite right; an unloaded gun cannot shoot.



BTW, I did find those terms. They were located on either side of "cavalier" which I found alongside the 13th definition for "unloaded": "a casually formed belief, sometimes held about weapons; cavalier" wink
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
More people have been shot with "unloaded" guns than loaded ones.
Sorry, no one has ever been shot with an unloaded gun – it is a physical impossibility. Many people have been shot with a rifle that was believed to be unloaded, but believing a gun is unloaded does not make it so.
Exactly how thick-headed are you? Look up the words "irony" and "metaphor" in a dictionary. Get someone to explain them to you. My kids understand the statement I made.


Originally Posted by Klikitarik
I think the reason some contend that a person has or can be shot with an unloaded weapon is that they either don't understand the definition of unloaded, or they don't know how or simply are too lazy to check properly. Coyote Hunter is quite right; an unloaded gun cannot shoot.
BTW, I did find those terms. They were located on either side of "cavalier" which I found alongside the 13th definition for "unloaded": "a casually formed belief, sometimes held about weapons; cavalier" wink
Do you or do you not agree that ALL firearms should be treated as loaded weapons? (I really don't want to discuss the differences between figurative and literal speech.)
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Exactly how thick-headed are you? Look up the words "irony" and "metaphor" in a dictionary. Get someone to explain them to you. My kids understand the statement I made.


The discussion here is about physically loaded and unloaded firearms. As are my comments. Mistaken beliefs do not change the facts of whether a firearm is loaded or not.

I�ll accept your resort to personal attack as your tacit admission that you�ve lost the argument on the basis of merit.


Quote

No, the safest situation is to treat every gun as if it were loaded. Exclamation point.


While treating every gun as if it was loaded is good practice, it does not change the fact that a loaded gun can still fire while an unloaded gun cannot. The safest situation is an unloaded gun as there is ZERO chance of it being fired. Handling it as if it was loaded does not make it safer but remains good practice.


Quote

Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
The Department of Wildlife in my home state of Colorado considers an uncapped muzzleloader to be �unloaded�, whether or not powder and bullet are loaded in the barrel.
Couldn't care less what your "home state" considers; that's not the focus of this discussion.

Nor do I, although I�ve never known an uncapped muzzlestuffer to fire. I was merely pointing out that I consider a muzzlestuffer to be unloaded when there is no powder and bullet in the barrel, which is contrary to the legal definition in this state.


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
But as I said, apples and oranges.
Both grow on trees and the metaphor for this discussion is that a loaded gun is a loaded gun is a loaded gun. You're trying to justify your reasoning through some rather creative circular "logic."


Not at all. I can load a cartridge firearm form the magazine in a second or so. It takes me much longer with my muzzlestuffers. As a result I tend to hunt hot with the muzzlestuffers far more frequently.

I�ll accept your resort to personal attack as your tacit admission that you�ve lost the argument on the basis of merit.


Originally Posted by Bricktop
Do you or do you not agree that ALL firearms should be treated as loaded weapons? (I really don't want to discuss the differences between figurative and literal speech.)


Treating all firearms as if they are loaded is good practice, as I stated above.

Treating an unloaded firearm as if it were loaded does not, however, make it safer. What it does do reinforce good habits. Treating all firearms as if they were loaded reduces the chance of an accidental discharge when a firearm actually is loaded - whether the condition is correctly known or not.



Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
The discussion here is about physically loaded and unloaded firearms.
It's a discussion you seem to have difficulty grasping. I'll accept your inability to comprehend various figures of speech and metaphorical statements as your tacit admission that you're just a very inexperienced individual for whom discussion is often difficult and labored.


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
The safest situation is an unloaded gun as there is ZERO chance of it being fired.
So you hunt with an unloaded muzzleloader?


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
I can load a cartridge firearm form the magazine in a second or so. It takes me much longer with my muzzlestuffers. As a result I tend to hunt hot with the muzzlestuffers far more frequently.
Your "logic" thus far for hunting with a loaded muzzleloader vice a loaded cartridge firearm is that it takes you longer to load the muzzleloader. So by your "logic," it should be okay to hunt with a round in the chamber of a cartridge firearm as long as you leave the rest of your ammo back in the truck. Great plan.

Go ahead and try to explain again how a capped and loaded muzzleloader is safer than a loaded cartridge firearm.
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
We are having a little dustup on this subject on another thread... I'll go grab a link to that thread for anyone who wants to check it out, or heck, join the fray.

I will go first: yes, I hunt with a round in the chamber.

-jeff

If I were stationary, I would hunt with a round in the chamber. But when I'm mobile, no, never. I consider this unsafe. And my WYO guide would have a fit too!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
The discussion here is about physically loaded and unloaded firearms.
It's a discussion you seem to have difficulty grasping. I'll accept your inability to comprehend various figures of speech and metaphorical statements as your tacit admission that you're just a very inexperienced individual for whom discussion is often difficult and labored.


More personal attack. Nice. Proves my point that you can�t argue based on the facts.
Quote


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
The safest situation is an unloaded gun as there is ZERO chance of it being fired.
So you hunt with an unloaded muzzleloader?


By my definition (no powder or bullet in the barrel), no. It takes me much too long to load them, although I have waited until I was far from the vehicle to load powder and bullet. Don�t really consider walking around with no powder and bullet in the barrel �hunting�. By the State of Colorado�s official definition (uncapped, whether there is powder and bullet in the barrel or not), frequently. It only takes a moment to cap the nipple (although still considerably longer than chambering a round from the magazine) and there are times I prefer the additional safety of an uncapped nipple. By the way, my go-to muzzlestuffer is a Remington M700 ML. Same trigger group and safety as the standard M700�s. (The other is a more traditional Thompson with a side-hammer.)

Your argument is a non sequitor, by the way.

Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
I can load a cartridge firearm form the magazine in a second or so. It takes me much longer with my muzzlestuffers. As a result I tend to hunt hot with the muzzlestuffers far more frequently.
Your "logic" thus far for hunting with a loaded muzzleloader vice a loaded cartridge firearm is that it takes you longer to load the muzzleloader. So by your "logic," it should be okay to hunt with a round in the chamber of a cartridge firearm as long as you leave the rest of your ammo back in the truck. Great plan.
[/quote]

Another non sequitor.

What I�ve said consistently was I hunt with both loaded and unloaded chambers depending on the circumstances. I�m quite comfortable doing so because it only takes a second to chamber a round, whether with my bolt guns or my levers. I tend to hunt hot (capped, with powder and bullet in the barrel) with my muzzlestuffers because loading time is much longer � not because a loaded muzzlestuffer is safer than a loaded cartridge rifle but because the time lost in loading them could cause lost shot opportunities. That said it is not uncommon for me to walk into or out of an area with an empty barrel and uncapped nipple. As noted above I don�t really consider such walks �hunting�. It is not uncommon for me to no cap on my Remington yet have powder and bullet in the barrel, although by and large this condition is considerably less frequent than an empty chamber in my cartridge rifles.


Quote

Go ahead and try to explain again how a capped and loaded muzzleloader is safer than a loaded cartridge firearm.


Twist it anyway you want, but I�ve never said a loaded (capped, with powder and bullet in the barrel) muzzlestuffer is any safer than a cartridge firearm with a loaded chamber. Never said it or even suggested it, no matter how obliquely. Nor do I believe it to be the case.

I hunt hot or cold depending on the circumstances of the moment and have not advocated one method or the other. All I�ve done is point out the obvious - that unloaded firearms are safer than loaded firearms. Apparently some here think that good handling technique can overcome the potential danger of a loaded firearm, rendering them as safe as unloaded firearms. Such arguments defy both logic and common sense.

Remember- Don't hunt while your loaded.
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Remember- Don't hunt while your loaded.


So, just to make sure I understand, you mean you would unload before you get loaded?

Or is it, don't get loaded while you're loaded?

Or is it okay to get loaded while you're loaded, but only if the circumstances would make being unloaded while you're loaded more dangerous than being loaded-loaded?

Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
The discussion here is about physically loaded and unloaded firearms.
It's a discussion you seem to have difficulty grasping. I'll accept your inability to comprehend various figures of speech and metaphorical statements as your tacit admission that you're just a very inexperienced individual for whom discussion is often difficult and labored.
More personal attack.
Absolutely not. It's an observation of your communication style based on your inability to understand certain figures of speech, the inability to understand metaphors, the inability to notice how certain words are emphasized by being placed in quotations, and your literal interpretation of various statements.


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
The safest situation is an unloaded gun as there is ZERO chance of it being fired.
So you hunt with an unloaded muzzleloader?
By my definition (no powder or bullet in the barrel), no. It takes me much too long to load them, although I have waited until I was far from the vehicle to load powder and bullet. Don�t really consider walking around with no powder and bullet in the barrel �hunting�. By the State of Colorado�s official definition (uncapped, whether there is powder and bullet in the barrel or not), frequently. It only takes a moment to cap the nipple (although still considerably longer than chambering a round from the magazine) and there are times I prefer the additional safety of an uncapped nipple. By the way, my go-to muzzlestuffer is a Remington M700 ML. Same trigger group and safety as the standard M700�s. (The other is a more traditional Thompson with a side-hammer.)

Your argument is a non sequitor, by the way.
My argument asks for a simple yes or no answer. You've instead chosen to respond with a rather creative answer describing Colorado's legal definition of a loaded firearm that only thinly disguises your hypocrsiy.

I'll break it down to your terms: do you or do you not hunt with an UNCAPPED muzzleloader? Just answer yes or no.

Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
I can load a cartridge firearm form the magazine in a second or so. It takes me much longer with my muzzlestuffers. As a result I tend to hunt hot with the muzzlestuffers far more frequently.
Your "logic" thus far for hunting with a loaded muzzleloader vice a loaded cartridge firearm is that it takes you longer to load the muzzleloader. So by your "logic," it should be okay to hunt with a round in the chamber of a cartridge firearm as long as you leave the rest of your ammo back in the truck. Great plan.
Another non sequitor.
Absolutely not. It highlights your hypocritical argument.

Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
What I�ve said consistently was I hunt with both loaded and unloaded chambers depending on the circumstances. I�m quite comfortable doing so because it only takes a second to chamber a round, whether with my bolt guns or my levers. I tend to hunt hot (capped, with powder and bullet in the barrel) with my muzzlestuffers because loading time is much longer � not because a loaded muzzlestuffer is safer than a loaded cartridge rifle but because the time lost in loading them could cause lost shot opportunities. That said it is not uncommon for me to walk into or out of an area with an empty barrel and uncapped nipple. As noted above I don�t really consider such walks �hunting�. It is not uncommon for me to no cap on my Remington yet have powder and bullet in the barrel, although by and large this condition is considerably less frequent than an empty chamber in my cartridge rifles.
What you've stated consistently is you believe the time required to load a muzzleloader somehow makes it less dangerous than a loaded cartridge firearm.


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Go ahead and try to explain again how a capped and loaded muzzleloader is safer than a loaded cartridge firearm.
Twist it anyway you want, but I�ve never said a loaded (capped, with powder and bullet in the barrel) muzzlestuffer is any safer than a cartridge firearm with a loaded chamber. Never said it or even suggested it, no matter how obliquely. Nor do I believe it to be the case.

I hunt hot or cold depending on the circumstances of the moment and have not advocated one method or the other. All I�ve done is point out the obvious - that unloaded firearms are safer than loaded firearms. Apparently some here think that good handling technique can overcome the potential danger of a loaded firearm, rendering them as safe as unloaded firearms. Such arguments defy both logic and common sense.
I haven't seen anything yet in anything you've posted in this discussion that would qualify as either logic or "common" sense. You've stated that you think it's too dangerous to hunt with a loaded cartridge firearm, but you don't apply the same safety practice to a muzzleloader because you take longer to load it. You're either a hypocrite with regards to safety or you're very inexperienced with firearms.
In a word, "Yes". smile
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Remember- Don't hunt while your loaded.



Now that's the best advice of this entire thread! grin


I can't believe this thread is still alive........



Casey
Troll built himself a 22 page bridge.....
Just when you thought it was safe to go into the woods:

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
More personal attack.
Absolutely not. It's an observation of your communication style based on your inability to understand certain figures of speech, the inability to understand metaphors, the inability to notice how certain words are emphasized by being placed in quotations, and your literal interpretation of various statements.


Its personal attack whether you choose to acknowledge it or not.

Originally Posted by Bricktop
My argument asks for a simple yes or no answer. You've instead chosen to respond with a rather creative answer describing Colorado's legal definition of a loaded firearm that only thinly disguises your hypocrsiy.

I'll break it down to your terms: do you or do you not hunt with an UNCAPPED muzzleloader? Just answer yes or no.


What I�ve done was provide conflicting definitions, the legal definition for this state and my own, as well as how I hunt. You ask if I hunt with an uncapped muzzlestuffer and the answer is clearly provided in my post above as �frequently�. That would be a �Yes� in some circumstances and a �No� in others. There is no hypocrisy there, just decisions to act differently as I see fit in varying circumstances.


Originally Posted by Bricktop
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Your "logic" thus far for hunting with a loaded muzzleloader vice a loaded cartridge firearm is that it takes you longer to load the muzzleloader. So by your "logic," it should be okay to hunt with a round in the chamber of a cartridge firearm as long as you leave the rest of your ammo back in the truck. Great plan.
Another non sequitor.
Absolutely not. It highlights your hypocritical argument.


Another non-sequitor, yes. The time required to load a firearm does not affect the safety of the loaded firearm. The reason I tend to hunt with a loaded (capped with powder and bullet in the barrel) muzzlestuffer more frequently than with a loaded cartridge rifle is that doing otherwise (even with just the cap removed) would cause me to lose shot opportunities that would not be lost with a cartridge rifle that simply needed to be loaded from the magazine.



Originally Posted by Bricktop
What you've stated consistently is you believe the time required to load a muzzleloader somehow makes it less dangerous than a loaded cartridge firearm.


On the contrary, I have never stated or suggested that and do not believe it to be true.

Let me be as clear as I can here � my belief is that a loaded (capped with powder and bullet in the barrel) muzzlestuffer is just as dangerous as a cartridge firearm that has a loaded chamber. That is why I often remove the cap just as I would empty a chamber.


Originally Posted by Bricktop
[I haven't seen anything yet in anything you've posted in this discussion that would qualify as either logic or "common" sense. You've stated that you think it's too dangerous to hunt with a loaded cartridge firearm, but you don't apply the same safety practice to a muzzleloader because you take longer to load it. You're either a hypocrite with regards to safety or you're very inexperienced with firearms.


To repeat myself, I hunt hot or cold with BOTH my cartridge rifles and muzzlestuffers as I feel appropriate for the circumstances at hand.

And contrary to your assertion, I have NEVER stated I think �it's too dangerous to hunt with a loaded cartridge firearm�. This is (at least) the second assertion you�ve made regarding my statements that is a complete fabrication.

Perhaps you would see the logic in my statements if you weren�t so busy inventing things to attribute to me that I haven�t said.






Where I hunt, yes I always have a round in the chamber. If hunting some area in another part of the country where you need to hike or climb and not worry about jumping the animal you're hunting I could see where circumstances might be different.
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
More personal attack.
Absolutely not. It's an observation of your communication style based on your inability to understand certain figures of speech, the inability to understand metaphors, the inability to notice how certain words are emphasized by being placed in quotations, and your literal interpretation of various statements.
Its personal attack whether you choose to acknowledge it or not.
Perhaps you're just a little insecure and thin-skinned, but I'm only posting my observations. Whether you acknowledge it or not.


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
My argument asks for a simple yes or no answer. You've instead chosen to respond with a rather creative answer describing Colorado's legal definition of a loaded firearm that only thinly disguises your hypocrisy.

I'll break it down to your terms: do you or do you not hunt with an UNCAPPED muzzleloader? Just answer yes or no.
What I�ve done was provide conflicting definitions, the legal definition for this state and my own, as well as how I hunt. You ask if I hunt with an uncapped muzzlestuffer and the answer is clearly provided in my post above as �frequently�. That would be a �Yes� in some circumstances and a �No� in others. There is no hypocrisy there, just decisions to act differently as I see fit in varying circumstances.
Can you or can't you just answer yes or no?


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Your "logic" thus far for hunting with a loaded muzzleloader vice a loaded cartridge firearm is that it takes you longer to load the muzzleloader. So by your "logic," it should be okay to hunt with a round in the chamber of a cartridge firearm as long as you leave the rest of your ammo back in the truck. Great plan.
Another non sequitor.
Absolutely not. It highlights your hypocritical argument.
Another non-sequitor, yes. The time required to load a firearm does not affect the safety of the loaded firearm. The reason I tend to hunt with a loaded (capped with powder and bullet in the barrel) muzzlestuffer more frequently than with a loaded cartridge rifle is that doing otherwise (even with just the cap removed) would cause me to lose shot opportunities that would not be lost with a cartridge rifle that simply needed to be loaded from the magazine.
Again, you're trying to stretch things here and justify your answer by making 2 + 2 = 5. You're trying to justify one firearm is safer than the other simply because it takes you longer to load it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bfq5kju627c



Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
What you've stated consistently is you believe the time required to load a muzzleloader somehow makes it less dangerous than a loaded cartridge firearm.
On the contrary, I have never stated or suggested that and do not believe it to be true.

Let me be as clear as I can here � my belief is that a loaded (capped with powder and bullet in the barrel) muzzlestuffer is just as dangerous as a cartridge firearm that has a loaded chamber. That is why I often remove the cap just as I would empty a chamber.
No, you've stated over and over that you believe it's dangerous to hunt with a round in the chamber of a cartridge firearm. Yet when the same circumstances are applied to a muzzleloader -- a "muzzlestuffer," in your parlance -- you state that you hunt more often with a capped, live muzzleloader becuase you're afraid you'll miss a shooting opportunity. That line of thinking by itself tells me you're either an over-confident firearms neophyte or simply a hypocrite about safety.


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Bricktop
[I haven't seen anything yet in anything you've posted in this discussion that would qualify as either logic or "common" sense. You've stated that you think it's too dangerous to hunt with a loaded cartridge firearm, but you don't apply the same safety practice to a muzzleloader because you take longer to load it. You're either a hypocrite with regards to safety or you're very inexperienced with firearms.
To repeat myself, I hunt hot or cold with BOTH my cartridge rifles and muzzlestuffers as I feel appropriate for the circumstances at hand.

And contrary to your assertion, I have NEVER stated I think �it's too dangerous to hunt with a loaded cartridge firearm�. This is (at least) the second assertion you�ve made regarding my statements that is a complete fabrication.
No, you've stated that you think it's more dangerous to hunt with a live round in the chamber of a cartridge firearm than a capped and loaded muzzleloader. That's your assertion, not mine.


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Perhaps you would see the logic in my statements if you weren�t so busy inventing things to attribute to me that I haven�t said.
I've only had to quote your posts. I'm too tired and lazy to invent anything.

To summarize what I've gleaned from your posts:

You believe it's basically a dangerous condition to hunt with a live round in the chamber of a cartridge firearm, though you sometimes do as the circumstances dictate.

You believe it can be dangerous to hunt with a capped and loaded muzzleloader, though you tend to do more often than not because of the length of time it takes you to cap one.

You think the two types of firearms can't be compared even though they both launch projectiles that can be potentially hazardous to the recipient.

You are unfamiliar with the adage "More people have been shot with 'unloaded' guns than with loaded guns." (Note the quotation marks.)

Those are your beliefs are they not? (Just answer yes or no.)

My take is every gun should be treated as if it were loaded. Safety rules should be applied consistently to ALL firearms and under ALL circumstances. Anything less highlights your ignorance or hypocrisy.
Bricktop
Without going into the argument, simply addressing your argumentation tactics... Enough is afriggin' 'nough!

Where do you get the idea you can ask questions that can only be answered "yes" or "no" in an open forum. That may work in the courtroom. May work where somehow you are appointed top dog, but not here.

You have continued to rephrase the argument and attributed statements to others not made by the other. Every post you make is the same.

Now, can we let this POS thread die?
art
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Where do you get the idea you can ask questions that can only be answered "yes" or "no" in an open forum.
Art:

The point was I was asking a for a simple answer to a simple question, not some long, drawn-out treatise on the theory of relativity.
....Ever hear the old hunter's story of how bad it got when he turned on the trail and saw a grizzly charging, no cartridge in the chamber, three in the magazine, and four in his pocket.....NO, you hadn't heard him tell it? I didn't figure you had..(Playing of TAPS here)...
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Its personal attack whether you choose to acknowledge it or not.
Perhaps you're just a little insecure and thin-skinned, but I'm only posting my observations. Whether you acknowledge it or not.

You�re obviously in a state of denial, but that�s OK.

Originally Posted by Bricktop
Can you or can't you just answer yes or no?


�Yes� and �No� are not always appropriate answers, as is the case here. Neither would be entirely correct as I hunt with my muzzle stuffers both capped and uncapped depending on circumstances. As I said before �You ask if I hunt with an uncapped muzzlestuffer and the answer is clearly provided in my post above as �frequently�. That would be a �Yes� in some circumstances and a �No� in others. � If you must try to simplify the answer to a single word, choose one. You will be partially correct either way.



Originally Posted by Bricktop
Again, you're trying to stretch things here and justify your answer by making 2 + 2 = 5. You're trying to justify one firearm is safer than the other simply because it takes you longer to load it.


Please show me where I�ve stated anything of the kind. You can�t because I haven�t. Instead I�ve repeatedly stated that both are equally dangerous. Once again you�re making things up and attributing them incorrectly to me.

Originally Posted by Bricktop

No, you've stated over and over that you believe it's dangerous to hunt with a round in the chamber of a cartridge firearm. Yet when the same circumstances are applied to a muzzleloader -- a "muzzlestuffer," in your parlance -- you state that you hunt more often with a capped, live muzzleloader becuase you're afraid you'll miss a shooting opportunity. That line of thinking by itself tells me you're either an over-confident firearms neophyte or simply a hypocrite about safety.


Since many people and animals have been shot with loaded firearms, accidently or intentionally, and none have ever been shot with an unloaded firearm, one might reasonably conclude loaded firearms are more dangerous.

The level of danger varies due to the circumstances extant. Sometimes the danger increases to a level I am unwilling to accept, in which case I modify my behavior. Even with my cartridge rifles there are times when I am willing to accept a higher level of danger than I am at other times. There is nothing hypocritical about that.

Originally Posted by Bricktop

No, you've stated that you think it's more dangerous to hunt with a live round in the chamber of a cartridge firearm than a capped and loaded muzzleloader. That's your assertion, not mine.


Once again you�re making things up.

Please show me where I made such a statement and I�ll concede your point.


Originally Posted by Bricktop
I've only had to quote your posts. I'm too tired and lazy to invent anything.


You have attributed a number of statements to me that I have never made. In such cases you have NOT quoted me because there is nothing to quote.


Originally Posted by Bricktop

To summarize what I've gleaned from your posts:

You believe it's basically a dangerous condition to hunt with a live round in the chamber of a cartridge firearm, though you sometimes do as the circumstances dictate.


What I�ve contended is that it is more dangerous to hunt with a loaded firearm than an unloaded one, for the simple reason that no one and no animal has ever been shot with an unloaded firearm.

And yes, I hunt with both hot and cold weapons depending on circumstances at the time.

Originally Posted by Bricktop

You believe it can be dangerous to hunt with a capped and loaded muzzleloader, though you tend to do more often than not because of the length of time it takes you to cap one.

Yes, a loaded muzzlestuffer is just as dangerous as a loaded cartridge rifle.

And yes, I often treat them differently. There have been many times when I have hunted with a loaded muzzlestuffer (capped with powder and ball in the barrel) in situations where I would have an empty chamber in my cartridge rifles. More frequently, however, in situations where I would empty the chamber of my cartridge rifles I will remove the cap from my muzzlestuffers.


Originally Posted by Bricktop


You think the two types of firearms can't be compared even though they both launch projectiles that can be potentially hazardous to the recipient.

I said comparing the two is like comparing apples and oranges. Apples and oranges are easily compared and in fact, as you pointed out, have many similarities. They are equally dangerous when loaded but their mechanical differences are significant enough to warrant, in my case, handling them differently in the field.


Originally Posted by Bricktop


You are unfamiliar with the adage "More people have been shot with 'unloaded' guns than with loaded guns." (Note the quotation marks.)


Actually I am quite familiar with it but disagree. Whether you define �unloaded� as �actually unloaded� or �loaded but mistakenly believed to be unloaded�, many millions more people have been shot with �loaded� firearms than �unloaded� firearms.

No one has ever been shot with an unloaded firearm. A mistaken belief that a firearm is unloaded does not make it so.


Originally Posted by Bricktop


Those are your beliefs are they not? (Just answer yes or no.)


No � I take no credit for the things you made up and attributed to me.


Originally Posted by Bricktop


My take is every gun should be treated as if it were loaded. Safety rules should be applied consistently to ALL firearms and under ALL circumstances. Anything less highlights your ignorance or hypocrisy.


My take is that loaded guns are always more dangerous than unloaded guns and that no amount of safe handling can make loaded guns as safe as unloaded guns.

I do agree, however, that good handling technique requires that guns be treated as if they are loaded. Better safe than mistaken and sorry.



[Edited to correct a spelling error ("forearms" instead of "firearms") and to add the missing word "be" in the second to last sentence.]




Again, can't we just let this die?
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Again, can't we just let this die?
There once was a man from Nantucket......

You guys stop me if you've already heard it.....
Huh - how do you hunt with an empty chamber, especially in thick cover where a quick shot is all you might get (if lucky).

This reminds me of the instructions that came with a Colt Double Eagle (remember these?) warning: "Always carry the pistol with an empty chamber; load when absolutely certain that you will shoot." And this was a pistol Colt hoped to sell to police departments. No wonder Colt is nearly out of business.

Originally Posted by djs
Huh - how do you hunt with an empty chamber, especially in thick cover where a quick shot is all you might get (if lucky).


Hunting with an empty chamber is easy. Shooting with an empty chamber is impossible.
Yep!
Well, I wasn't gonna say anything becasue Art asked, but now I've gotta chime in.

Do I hunt with a round in the chamber?

Heck no, that would make it very unsafe when I use my scope to check things out.

I'm joking, please don't start another thread.....
Originally Posted by smokepole
Well, I wasn't gonna say anything becasue Art asked, but now I've gotta chime in.

Do I hunt with a round in the chamber?

Heck no, that would make it very unsafe when I use my scope to check things out.


My thoughts exactly grin grin grin











I can't believe this thread is still alive............

Casey
"If I am hunting yes.
If I am in transit to the place I am hunting, no."

bingo.
Originally Posted by djs
Huh - how do you hunt with an empty chamber, especially in thick cover where a quick shot is all you might get (if lucky).

This reminds me of the instructions that came with a Colt Double Eagle (remember these?) warning: "Always carry the pistol with an empty chamber; load when absolutely certain that you will shoot." And this was a pistol Colt hoped to sell to police departments. No wonder Colt is nearly out of business.



djs -

When hunting heavy timber I usually have a cartridge in the chamber, especially when using my bolt guns. Somewhat less likely to do so when using the levers.

But a lot of my hunting is done in open country where the time required to load a cartridge is relatively unimportant. Here are a few pics from the last few years:

This first picture is not mine but rather Klikitarik's - a grizz taken in Alaska with a Marlin .45-70 in what looks to me to be pretty open country. Don't know but I suspect starting with an empty chamber would have made little difference in this case.

[Linked Image]

They are hard to see, but there are a LOT of elk in this picture - total herd size probably 1,500 to 2,000 including out of the picture to the right. Private land that we can't hunt, but some people have access. We have watched hunters glassing the herds from up close for long periods of time as they chose the animal they wanted. Clearly with the time they have taken an empty chamber would be no detriment.
[Linked Image]

Here's an open ground antelope I took in 2003 with my Marlin in .375 Win. The shot was 167 yards across grass. Loaded the chamber just a couple seconds before the shot.
[Linked Image]

Here's a small 6x6 bull I took in 2003 with my Marlin .45-70. Loaded the chamber shortly before the shot, after walking about half a mile through the sage:
[Linked Image]

Here's a picture of my hunting buddy, Dave (in orange hat), and his 2003 cow. Mine is down in the snow field on the far hillside. Started with a loaded chamber but had plenty of time to load had it been necessary.
[Linked Image]

Here's a picture of the first of two cow elk I took last fall. Started with a loaded chamber but an empty chamber would have made no difference in the outcome:
[Linked Image]

Dave scoping for deer last fall. Clearly an empty chamber would be no problem here:
[img]http://www.hunt101.com/data/500/medium/811532704-R1-14-9.jpg[/img]

I took 2007's second second cow elk on this hill. Spotted a small herd over a mile off and watched them untill they came right up over the hill at me. My shot was maybe 40 yards but only because I waited for a cow to clear - the closest opportunity was under 25 yards. Didn't load the chamber until I knew the elk were headed towards me, maybe 600 yards out.
[img]http://www.hunt101.com/data/500/811532703-R1-03-22_004.jpg[/img]

Yup, there's often deer and even elk in the sage:
[img]http://www.hunt101.com/data/500/medium/811532703-R1-07-18_008.jpg[/img]

Like this forkie, 2007. Started with an empty chamber and loaded just before the shot.
[img]http://www.hunt101.com/data/500/medium/811532703-R1-05-20_006.jpg[/img]
Coyote Hunter - this topic may be getting worn out, but I have sure enjoyed looking at your photo's - thanks.
yeah, what odessa said.
Coyote Hunter,
Great pics of a hunting world and terrain absolutely foreign to folks who hunt timber, rough country where shots on elk or bear or lion are often measured in seconds and softball throwing distance.

Being old school mil-police-hunter for many years, I carry hot always.CHP & hunting..

Never had an AD or killed anything or anyone who wasn't my intended mark.Jim
My sister never died until she died.

Originally Posted by jim in Oregon
Coyote Hunter,
Great pics of a hunting world and terrain absolutely foreign to folks who hunt timber, rough country where shots on elk or bear or lion are often measured in seconds and softball throwing distance.

Being old school mil-police-hunter for many years, I carry hot always.CHP & hunting..

Never had an AD or killed anything or anyone who wasn't my intended mark.Jim


Jim -

You are correct about such places being foreign to some folks. I understand people hunt different terrain but even if they didn't I don't have a problem with people in my party carrying hot provided two things are true:

1. The mechanical safety or safeties on their weapon are functional. Had a guy one year that carried hot for a week. We found out on the last day, after getting back to camp in the afternoon, what he had known all week - that his safety was busted. The rest of us showed considerably more restraint than he deserved and I never hunted with him again.

2. That the person or people carrying hot observe good handling techniques. Had another person I hunted with that couldn't control his muzzle and when it was brought to his attention denied there was a problem. That was my last trip with him, too.

My post was not meant to suggest that people should do it my way (which is actually a mix of hot and cold depending on circumstances) but rather to provide those to whom it is foreign a graphical demonstration of circumstances where hot ot cold makes no difference in the final outcome.

For what it is worth I sometimes carry concealed and usually do so with the hammer down on an empty chamber, safety off. My older brother carries concealed daily, locked and cocked. Both ways work. If I ever need it, I'll probably wish mine was cocked and locked, too. Flip side, he will never forget the day his thumb slipped while lowering the hammer, causing a hole to suddenly appear in the floorboards of his car...
Coyote Hunter,
I really didn't want to ressurect this controversial thread...:)

ALL my handguns have no 'safety' ..pistols or revolvers..other than my own cognizance..

Longguns are infinitely more 'safe' than handguns in the hands of a competent hunter..safety or not.
I don't rely on any mech safety when hunting.
When the firearm needs to be unloaded it's unloaded.
Otherwise, it's ready to deal a killing shot in the hands of the competent hunter.
Each hunter should assess his own hunting needs and circumstances, competentecies, and ensure his firearms are in proper working order and make his own decisions concerning hot carry.Attend to your companions also ..if any,... for IF in company of others..THEY are the largest potential threat..Jim
I just don't know if I can bear to see this thread die. It must have been hunting with a loaded chamber
Just goes to show you, stupid knows no end.
Scoreboard.

-jeff
Originally Posted by jim in Oregon
Coyote Hunter,
I really didn't want to ressurect this controversial thread...:)

ALL my handguns have no 'safety' ..pistols or revolvers..other than my own cognizance..

Longguns are infinitely more 'safe' than handguns in the hands of a competent hunter..safety or not.
I don't rely on any mech safety when hunting.
When the firearm needs to be unloaded it's unloaded.
Otherwise, it's ready to deal a killing shot in the hands of the competent hunter.
Each hunter should assess his own hunting needs and circumstances, competentecies, and ensure his firearms are in proper working order and make his own decisions concerning hot carry.Attend to your companions also ..if any,... for IF in company of others..THEY are the largest potential threat..Jim


Plus one, absolutly.

I can't believe this thread is still alive. Can we chitt can it now and move on.??
Originally Posted by Blacktail53
Originally Posted by jim in Oregon
...
ALL my handguns have no 'safety' ..pistols or revolvers..other than my own cognizance..

Longguns are infinitely more 'safe' than handguns in the hands of a competent hunter..safety or not.
I don't rely on any mech safety when hunting.
When the firearm needs to be unloaded it's unloaded.
Otherwise, it's ready to deal a killing shot in the hands of the competent hunter.
Each hunter should assess his own hunting needs and circumstances, competentecies, and ensure his firearms are in proper working order and make his own decisions concerning hot carry.Attend to your companions also ..if any,... for IF in company of others..THEY are the largest potential threat..Jim


Plus one, absolutly.

I can't believe this thread is still alive. Can we chitt can it now and move on.??


OK, a couple questions, some agreement and - surprise - a disagreement.

First the disagreement. A long gun is not "infinitely more 'safe' than handguns in the hands of a competent hunter". Not even close, although I agree they are much easier to control. Still far short of "infinitely" safer. Relatively speaking, they are closer to the other end of the scale.

I do agree each hunter needs to make their own assessment. I also agree that hunters need to watch their fellow hunters closely. As far as I recall most of the Colorado shooting incidents that occur while hunting involve a shooter and a shootee. I assume the same is true in other states.

Now the question. Just what kind of pistols and revolvers are you and 'jim in Oregon' shooting that don't have any safeties? Every handgun I've ever fired had at least one safety, some have multiple safeties.



Does not putting your finger on the trigger until ready to shoot count as a safety? If it does then that is the only one I figure most sensible people need. Gun Ownership 101: Treat every gun as if it were loaded, do not point a gun and put your finger on the trigger unless you intend to do some damage to what it is pointed at.

Answer to Poll: Yes I hunt with a round in the chamber.

Coyote Hunter, could you show me where the safety is on my single action army revolver.
I can.....take your right index finger and point it just in front of your right ear, 3/4's high....grin.

As you implied.......that is the best safety of all.
Originally Posted by jmcdguns
Does not putting your finger on the trigger until ready to shoot count as a safety?

Not in my book, as it relies on things that are not a part of the firearm itself.

Originally Posted by jmcdguns

If it does then that is the only one I figure most sensible people need. Gun Ownership 101: Treat every gun as if it were loaded, do not point a gun and put your finger on the trigger unless you intend to do some damage to what it is pointed at.


Its a good idea, but one that is often not followed for whatever reason. Even the most "sensible people" make mistakes and have accidents. I don't trust either mechanical safeties or humans not to fail when it comes to loaded firearms. If I had to put my trust in one or the other exclusively, however, I'd go with the mechanical safeties as in my experience they are far less likely to fail.

Originally Posted by jmcdguns


Answer to Poll: Yes I hunt with a round in the chamber.


That puts you in company with the majority. I'd be willing to bet, however, that you don't go around cocked and loaded with all the safeties that are present disengaged?

Originally Posted by jmcdguns

Coyote Hunter, could you show me where the safety is on my single action army revolver.


Can't speak to your firearm specifically but it is my understanding that the original Colt SAA's had four hammer positions: "cocked", "half-cock/loading", "safety" and "full down" - thus the distinctive, multiple clicks heard when bringing the hammer back from the full down to the fully cocked position. If correct, the "safety" position would definitely qualify as a "safety". Haven't handled a genuine SAA since I was a kid (probably the late 1950's) so perhaps I'm wrong.

Or not. Just went to the Colt web site and pulled up their SAA instruction manual. (http://www.coltsmfg.com/cmci/downloads/Manuals/LoRes/Single%20Action%20Army%20Revolver.pdf) It seems Colt calls the the first notch back from the full down position the "safety notch" and describes the hammer position when using that notch as the "safety position".

Regardless, my guess is that 'jim in Oregon' shoots handguns other than SAA's, although he may shoot them as well. My question about what type still stands as I'm genuinely curious what handguns don't have safeties of any kind.
Iguess it is all matter if risk assesment taht we all must do.I prefer to go with a little more risk I guess. IT doesn't hurt anyoneexcept myslef as I hunt alone.

Speaking off risk assesment. I know lot on this thread think going around with a loaded chamber is assisne, but what about all these idiots doing snow recreation.

Two young boys killed by running into trees sking. 6 snowmobilers stranded for several dyas, caught in a strorm. several other snowmobilers caught in avalanches, several skiers sking out of bounds and caught in a avlanches. The last is a brohter and his siter in southern CO got caught in an avalance. The brother was able to walk out the next day and cell phone the polce, but hadn't seen his sister since the avalanche.

The deaths are tragic, but all attributed to stupid people and the rescue operations are paid for by the public.
CH you are absolutely correct, the first notch back on a SAA from full down is considered the safety. When carrying that revolver I prefer to have the chamber under the hammer empty as I must cock the hammer to fire it "five beans in the wheel".


Originally Posted by saddlesore
Iguess it is all matter if risk assesment taht we all must do.I prefer to go with a little more risk I guess. IT doesn't hurt anyoneexcept myslef as I hunt alone.

Speaking off risk assesment. I know lot on this thread think going around with a loaded chamber is assisne, but what about all these idiots doing snow recreation.

Two young boys killed by running into trees sking. 6 snowmobilers stranded for several dyas, caught in a strorm. several other snowmobilers caught in avalanches, several skiers sking out of bounds and caught in a avlanches. The last is a brohter and his siter in southern CO got caught in an avalance. The brother was able to walk out the next day and cell phone the polce, but hadn't seen his sister since the avalanche.

The deaths are tragic, but all attributed to stupid people and the rescue operations are paid for by the public.


I would not attribute these deaths to stupid people, these deaths are tragic but more appropriately attributed to people that like to take a little more risk, just like you.
When you go into the back country and there are predicted snow storms of 2-3 ft or,there are extreme avalanche warnings, and you still go,that is stupid
Originally Posted by jmcdguns
CH you are absolutely correct, the first notch back on a SAA from full down is considered the safety. When carrying that revolver I prefer to have the chamber under the hammer empty as I must cock the hammer to fire it "five beans in the wheel".


If I was carrying a SAA I'd carry an empty under the hammer as well. No need to do so with my Blackhawk or Super Redhawk due to the transfer bar system, although no reason not to, either, for my needs. (Besides, if 5 .357's or .44 won't do it a 6th probably won't make much difference). My Kimber .45 and Browning 9mm are usually empty in the chamber when carried.
WOW this thread is still going on?!?!?!

[Linked Image]

Hemi
CoyoteHunter said:

"Regardless, my guess is that 'jim in Oregon' shoots handguns other than SAA's, although he may shoot them as well. My question about what type still stands as I'm genuinely curious what handguns don't have safeties of any kind."

The Kahr semi's don't have any safety. You pull the trigger, bang. No way to change that. My favorite carry pistol. They have a long, relatively smooth DAO trigger pull. You have to want it to go bang, in other words!

I'm pretty sure Glocks don't either, other than that trigger lever thingie. Pull the trigger, bang.

I think it's neat that this thread has stayed alive. The reason I think that is because it was started in the spirit of civil debate and, for the most part, has stayed that way. Hat's off to all (OK, most) participants for that!

-jeff



jeff pm me your address. Im goona send you a big azz spoon so you can stir the pot a lil easier grin
Kahr and Glock both have firing pin/striker blocks, the firing pin/striker can not move unless the trigger is pulled to its most rearward position moving the block so that the FP/stiker may go forward. This is a mechanical safety that is moved simply by pulling the trigger.
Jeff -

I guess we could debate what constitutes a "safety", but I'll let the manufacturers speak for their own products:

Glock --
"When the trigger is pulled, 3 safety features are automatically deactivated one after another. " Glock goes on to explain what each of these safeties are: "trigger safety", firing pin safety" and "drop safety".

Kahr --
As jdmcguns has pointed out the Kahr shares the striker block feature with the Glocks. The only way to fire the Kahr is to fully depress the trigger. Kahr calls this feature a "passive safety" in their product brochures.

In addition, the Kahr handguns are of a DAO (Double Action Only) design meaning the striker is not in the fully cocked position until the trigger is in the fully depressed state.




Quote
Gun Ownership 101: Treat every gun as if it were loaded, do not point a gun and put your finger on the trigger unless you intend to do some damage to what it is pointed at.


That's the whole ever loving point. Spend one weekend hunting bear here this spring, I promise you will fall at LEAST once during that weekend. If you have complete control of your rifle whislt busting your ass you are amazing.

Originally Posted by SeaRunRainbow
Quote
Gun Ownership 101: Treat every gun as if it were loaded, do not point a gun and put your finger on the trigger unless you intend to do some damage to what it is pointed at.


That's the whole ever loving point. Spend one weekend hunting bear here this spring, I promise you will fall at LEAST once during that weekend. If you have complete control of your rifle whislt busting your ass you are amazing.



lmao.....

The risk/reward analysis, in any given situation, is pretty easy for me...

DN
Boy, we've got some stubborn old farts here. I can't believe this is still going! Some of us do-some of us don't neither side is right or wrong-let it go guys! Jeez!!!!!!
Originally Posted by jmcdguns

Coyote Hunter, could you show me where the safety is on my single action army revolver.


This thread started as a "do you hunt with" question. I suppose many or most also took it as a typical bolt rifle question. When you turn it into an action type question, then there will be differences. For example, a revolver is a multi-shot weapon, capable of firing several shots without reloading. Where, therefore, is the magazine? Obviously it's the cylinder.

I don't think anyone is suggesting that they hunt or that responsible people will only hunt with an unloaded weapon. That is quite ridiculous.

Are all weapons equally as safe with a loaded chamber? Can all weapons be carried uncocked with a loaded chamber? Are some weapons safer even without a mechanical safety than are others that have them? Would a reasonable person hunt with a traditional exposed hammer weapon fully cocked?

Is there any hunting advantage to carrying a SAA revolver with a round under the hammer? Does that make it easier or quicker to get off that (first) shot undetetected?

Is the risk equal, to walk in front of a fully loaded uncocked weapon (such as a revolver or lever gun) or a chamber loaded and cocked weapon (a typical bolt gun)?

Shotguns and bolt rifles tend be cocked and oftne rely in a tiny sear to prevent the hammer from falling, regardless the fact that a mechanical safety exists. No one has disputed that safe handling of a firearm is a foremost method of preventing and "accident". Just like the sears found on many common modern hunting weapons- which are measured in tiny fractions of an inch, however, safe gun handling does not void the risk of having an unsafe discharge. It only reduces that risk.

Many gun designs work on the principle of reducing risk. Similar to safe gun handling all they do is reduce risk but don't eliminate it completely. Carrying a gun unchambered, especially one which has a high risk "safe" condition like the typical modern bolt gun, is a positive way to deal with an otherwise high risk potential. I know that it works for us and rarely includes lost opportunities. The opportunities that I have missed have involved human error, not an unloaded chamber, by a wide margin.
Is this still a poll? If it is than yes. I don't remember them saying you should not in hunter safty coarse, but that was 36 yrs. ago.
Hunt as opposed to walk in an area on the way to hunt. I hunt with a bolt loaded when I expect to shoot. I travel to actual shoot area with empty chamber. What I mean is that if I am walking in to an area where I expect to see game, my rifle is loaded with empty chamber. When I expect to see game, I load chamber. If I am alone bolt is cocked with safety on, If with partner uncocked. Cocking a cock on open bolt is only a matter of raising and lowering bolt handle which is easily done on way to shoulder. It is past practice as Dad always hunted empty, chambering as he saw game, I was not as quick as him and lost game so adjusted to present practice when I was 17 or 18.

Randy
As far as the safety on a Kahr or Glock, yeah, they have some "safety" stuff engineered into them. I thought we were talking about a safety in the classic sense- something that prevents the gun from firing if the trigger is pulled. With both of the above, you pull the trigger, they go bang.

One comment about the safety of carrying "cold". This is not a knock on SeaRun or any one else, but let's look at this from a collective point of view for a sec.

Imagine for a moment that we DID legislate stupidity, and from now on, every man Jack among us is required to hunt with an empty chamber. I contend that the rate of accidents would be higher than if we did the opposite and legislated that everyone had to hunt with a round in the chamber.

By way of illustration, how many people are killed with or by guns they thought were unloaded (or unchambered) every year? How many are killed by falling in the woods, having the mechanical safety on their rifle fail, and having a AD/ND? I bet the ratio is thousands to one!!

-jeff
Yes, my main safety is located between my ears.
Most revolvers, single or double action, don't have a "safety" as such. Many double action autos don't have a safety lever, button, toggle, etc. either.
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
Originally Posted by jmcdguns

Coyote Hunter, could you show me where the safety is on my single action army revolver.


I don't think anyone is suggesting that they hunt or that responsible people will only hunt with an unloaded weapon. That is quite ridiculous.



Klik,

Good post...

What has given this thread (as well as the thread that spawned it) it's "legs" was indeed that some of the more.... vociferous members of the cold-carry crowd were indeed saying that it was irresponsible or downright dangerous to hunt with a chambered weapon. Comments were made to the effect that we should "stay out of the woods", or "please don't teach you children how to use a gun", stuff like that...

It WAS ridiculous, I agree!

-jeff
Medicman
"...If with partner uncocked. Cocking a cock on open bolt is only a matter of raising and lowering bolt handle which is easily done on way to shoulder."

That is a serious mistake... The pin is now resting on a live primer, with serious force behind it. Banging the end of the pin, or perhaps the rifle could possibly ignite that primer...
art
Jeff -

I thought we were talking about hunting weapons used in the pursuit of legal game rather than defensive weapons, so the Glock and Kahr are rather irrelevant in my opinion. That said, a fair number of police have managed to shoot themselves or their coworkers with Glocks, so you have a point. You pull the trigger and they go bang - but only when loaded in the chamber.

As to your contention that fewer people would be shot if we legislated that everyone hunt with a loaded (in the chamber) firearm as opposed to an unloaded (in the chamber again) firearm, it simply defies logic in my opinion.

Take a look at where shooting accidents occur. Many are due to misidentification of the target. In my sample of Google hits I would say MOST rifle related shootings fit in this category. According to Texas, however, shotguns are the most common problem overall, accounting for 55% of shooting accidents while hunting in 2003 - the problem being people don't make sure the shooting lane is clear. That same year 38% of the hunting related shooting accidents involved a rifle, 5% involved a handgun, and 2% involved bow-and-arrow. The report, interstingly, stated that only about 20% of the shooting incidents involved people (shooters) who had taken hunter safety classes.


My google search found far too many instances of misidentified targets to mention, and too many incidents of shotgunners peppering someone else while shooting game, but here are a few other incidents I found:
* a man shot himself with his handgun while climbing over a fence
* a man was shot when his dog stepped on a loaded shotgun in the bed of a truck
* a man shot a friend while putting a rifle in his truck he thought was unloaded
* a man killed his son when a loaded rifle on an ATV slipped and discharged
* a man was shot by his 9 year-old nephew while sitting in a blind (apparently no geese around at the time)
* a youth was shot by an adult with a .22 while hunting (but apparently not while shooting game)
* a man was killed by his own rifle after he dropped it off a 12 foot rock outcropping while switching to his shotgun to shoot a fox
* a man slipped on a wooden ladder attached to a tree stand and shot and killed himself
* a man was killed when a child climbed onto an ATV that had a shotgun strapped to it
* a man dropped his muzzleloader which resulted in it discharging and killing him
* a kid shot his brother while unloading a .22 after having taken shots at game
* and so on.

In each case an unloaded chamber would have prevented mishap, but I was unable to find any case in which an unloaded chamber was involved in an accidental shooting. Go figure.

You posited earlier in this thread that people loading their firearms just prior to shooting might lead to an increase in accidents due to the stress of the moment. I could find no occurance of this happening in my Google search so I submit that while it may happen on occasion it is not as nearly common as incidents that arise from having an already loaded chamber.

The facts are that poor firearm handling technique is common as dirt and accidents happen - which can and often do lead to accidental shootings when a loaded firearm is involved. When unloaded firearms are involved you will still have poor firearms handling techniques and accidents, but at least the accidental shootings are eliminated.



CH,

Thanks for the well-thought post...

2 comments then I'll leave it to others to comment (better than I can I mean).

First, you are correct that an unloaded chamber won't kill anyone. But my point was, a significant number of gun accidents occur when people just "know" that the gun was unloaded (the ultimate unchambered, yeah?) but in fact, it wasn't. Obviously, those are careless people- no argument there. My point is not that a loaded chamber is safer than an empty one on some sort of physics level, 'cause it ain't. My point is that people get careless when they think the gun is not loaded. During the course of a day, with game around, I can certainly imagine a gun being chambered and then unchambered (maybe, and that's the point) several times. That's got serious potential for problems.

Second comment... only 3 of your examples happened during what I mean by "hunting". Hunting is being in the woods, game on, killing mode on... Riding in an ATV is a CLASSIC empty-chamber scenario; so is climbing a tree or crossing a fence, or having your gun in the back of your truck with the dog flailing around. That's common sense and I'm sure you agree. Personally, any time there's a "force multiplier" like a long drop, a horse, an ATV, etc involved... the rifle should be unloaded IMHO. Because the operator cannot control the muzzle, and because the physical stresses that the rifle could be subject to go far, far beyond just falling on your butt in a clearcut.

I truly believe that a lot of this is just regional. If I were lucky enough to hunt with an empty-chamber guy in, say, Wyoming or Arizona where there was really not a lot of chance of killing animals in tight quarters, but the idea was rather to spot them from far away and then work closer, I would have no problem carrying cold if the person I was with was really hung up on that. On the other hand, I don't care what other folks have said- there is NO WAY some of the deer I have killed would have been tagged if I had to chamber a round. No way. And thinking through them (I've only killed 16 so I can remember them all), the added need to chamber a round would have been one more thing to deal with- in a negative way, a potentially unsafe way.

And you don't get many 2nd chances hunting our 18% blacktail tag in Oregon, either, which ties into things too. On a practical level, in areas like Calvin described when he talked about "taking out a visiting buddy who killed a nice 3x3 and two forkies for the freezer" (not an exact quote) missing out on a buck is obviously not a big deal. Around here, it is...

In the final analysis it comes down to safe gun handling. I think it's possible to be a safe gun handler in the woods with a loaded chamber. Others don't... to each their own.

Thanks again, I respect your opinion and enjoyed reading your post.

-jeff
Originally Posted by Penguin
Just when you thought it was safe to go into the woods:



It's alive.........IT'S ALIVE!
Quote
It's alive.........IT'S ALIVE!


In a vegetative state, though.
Yes, I hunt with a full magazine and a round in the chamber, safety on. When crossing a fence I hold my dad's gun while he climbs over, then hand both guns over to him and climb over myself.
Originally Posted by ironbender
Quote
It's alive.........IT'S ALIVE!


In a vegetative state, though.


Mmmm... love that avatar, Ironbender!

I think it's in a coma, but having the same dream... over, and over, and over....

-jeff
Just look how skiddish whitetails react to the release of a bow string. It would be hard for me to throw one in the tube and get a shot off in the split second they give you. Rule of thumb, If the muzzle isnt pointed at the target make sure its pointed at the ground.


Jeff -
IMHO the "ultimate unchambered" is a firearm that truly has an enmpty chamber, not one that is mistakenly believed to be empty. People get carelss around guns, loaded or unloaded.

There is indeed a potential for problems when chambering or unchambering a round, which is just one reason I often leave my firearms with an empty chamber until a loaded chamber is actually needed or I believe that the need will soon be forthcoming. Your comment about "CLASSIC empty-chamber" scenarios demonstrates one of the fallacies of your argument that people might be safer if they hunted with loaded chambers - if people loaded up every chance they got only to unload again in such situations, then reloaded again after the situation has passed, often repeating this cycle several times thoughout the day, there would be many more opportunities for people to get injured during the load/unload processes.

I understand that many hunting situations are not conducive to loading a firearm's chamber immediately before taking a shot. That's one reason I don't make any claims that everyone should hunt with an unloaded chamber, nor do I always hunt that way myself.

Unfortunately, as I said, poor gun handling is common as dirt. Unloaded chambers are the only antidote that has 100% success.


Coyote Hunter,

To be clear, I'm not making a blanket statement that people would be safer with loaded chambers. I should have been more clear about that; it's late in this debate... I'm just pointing out that the empty-chamber scenario isn't all perfect. I'm saying there is a reasonable counter-argument to the claim that we would all be safer with unloaded chambers. There's still going to be plenty of accidents. The difference between the two scenarios would be small in the end, I bet.

But, I'm not saying that that leads to "everyone should be running around with loaded chambers", either. There are plenty of times a gun should be unloaded or unchambered...

...Just not in my hands, when I'm hunting my critters on my turf <g>! :-) That's my only beef- being told that I'm unsafe in the woods carrying hot. Ain't so. And by their actions, about 75% of the Campfire agrees with that, BTW.

-jeff
Jeff -

My point is the empty chamber scenario IS perfect when it comes to shootings - its only when the chamber is loaded that people run into problems.

Looks like we agree that, at least for ourselves, there are times where it is appropriate to hunt hot and times when a cold chamber is better. We just disagree as to the specifics, which is fine. Each individual has to chose for themselves.

As far as what others think, its never been much of a concern to me. Prior to the mid-1800's I'll bet you'd have found that 75% of the whites in the south thought slavery was OK, and the US Supreme Court agreed with them at one time. Throughout history there are lots of examples of the masses being wrong. smile
AD shooting accidents in hunting situations occur when firearms handlers THINK the chamber is empty and they either act carelessly or violate safe firearms handling procedures..esp muzzle direction-control, identification of target and background for the shot.

That and poor transportation procedures.

IF one conducts himself properly and considers the firearm hot, he will either make good judgements in carrying hot or unload and positively verify safe.

There is no wiggle room on safety...
Every 'accident' is preventable even when we know the risks and take them intelligently.Jim








Originally Posted by jim in Oregon
AD shooting accidents in hunting situations occur when firearms handlers THINK the chamber is empty and they either act carelessly or violate safe firearms handling procedures..esp muzzle direction-control, identification of target and background for the shot.

That and poor transportation procedures.

IF one conducts himself properly and considers the firearm hot, he will either make good judgements in carrying hot or unload and positively verify safe.

There is no wiggle room on safety...
Every 'accident' is preventable even when we know the risks and take them intelligently.Jim



Most accidental shootings, as near as I can ascertain, involve shotgun hunters unintentionally hitting bystanders. Fortunately, many of these cause little if any injury, although the potential is certainly there serious injury and death do occur as a result. The second most common cause appears to involve rifles and mistaken target identification. Accidental shootings do occur outside these situations but they seem to be a small percentage overall. In other words, the vast majority of 'shooting accidents' occur with guns that are known to be loaded and are intentionally fired.

One might rightfully consider that ALL accidental shootings are the result of poor gun handling technique and a loaded chamber. All other conditions are incidental, including slips, falls, weapon drops and so forth - the risks are always there, as anyone that has tripped over their own feet can attest. Its just that sometimes the risks are significantly greater than at other times.

The only way to positively prevent accidental shootings is to maintain an empty chamber, which works 100% of the time. People 'wiggle' on safety every time they load the chamber.
From my understandng,Turkey hunting is about the most dangerous type of hunting in reference to firearms and hunting. HUnters stakling callers and hunters mistaking that bright red /blue head.Can't imagine sitting in a turkey blind/concealed with a cold chamber though.
Originally Posted by saddlesore
From my understandng,Turkey hunting is about the most dangerous type of hunting in reference to firearms and hunting. HUnters stakling callers and hunters mistaking that bright red /blue head.Can't imagine sitting in a turkey blind/concealed with a cold chamber though.


Nor can I. Hunting dense woods with an empty chamber doesn't generally make much sense to me either, although I've been know to do so at times - especially when the downfall is really thick and I'm spending all my time climbing over or under. Good time to have a levergun...
Nor can I imagine turkey hunting "cold". DAMN those ugly birds can see and hear!!

-jeff
While looking for something else on F&G's website, I came across this. FYI.


Quote
Miscellaneous Tips
While hunting in Alaska, I do not carry a live round in my rifle's chamber. I am far more concerned about an accidental gunshot wound hurting myself or my partner in a remote area than about bear protection. In most big game hunting situations in Alaska, there is ample time to chamber a cartridge after game is spotted and stalked.


LINK
I don't get to say this very often, so WITH GUSTO:

Pot Stirrer!!

:-)

-jeff
I don't know this Gusto fellow, but oddly enough I once had a dog so named.

That was for those that never heard of such a thing in hunter ed classes.

But I'm so damn old I don't need to take a hunter ed class. Sad I don't know any better. YMMV.
That's a great dog name!

I always wanted a dog named Dude. C'mere, Dude! Get the frisbee Dude! Etc.

My kids have named our last couple dogs... hence "Lucy", who should have been named Knuckles, short for Knucklehead. But she's a good Lab and an enthusiastic bird dog who doesn't look at me TOO harshly when I miss the grouse we've spent all afternoon trying to find. :-)

-jeff

Gusto was a Dachshound(sp) and wire haired terrier mix. About 10 pounds of hell - he thought he was 100 pounds I believe. One of the smartest gogs I ever had. A friend used to say Gusto was so ugly, he was cute.

Dawg names ought to be another thread. I wanted to name our black, female lab Oprah...wife wouldn't let me.
That would be a good thread.

My kid named one of our cats "Jack" which is short for AxleJack, which was the name of her imaginary friend when she was little... anyway, I always thought AxleJack would be a great rock band name...

-jeff
With a big game rifle, no. With a shotgun, yes. When I'm packin', yes, cocked and locked.

Wayne
hell this is the yukon, we always carry loaded on safe.
hell this is Alaska, we always carry with a cold chamber. Unless we have blue tape across the muzzle, then loaded and safety off.
Ah, the real reason Barnes is discontinuing the XLC. That tiny blue dot down the end of the muzzle is enough to scare game off...... and if not, they can see the blue in midflight and cause misses.......

Yep, I'd better start carrying hot and safety off with those last XLCs.....
Crap. Is this POS still running? wink
Hell yes. We'll have to hit it over the head on judgment day. :p

Will
Originally Posted by ironbender
Crap. Is this POS still running? wink


Incredible....... grin



Casey
Originally Posted by Penguin
Hell yes. We'll have to hit it over the head on judgment day. :p

Will



Anybody have a box of silver bullets? grin


Casey
Quote
Most accidental shootings, as near as I can ascertain, involve shotgun hunters unintentionally hitting bystanders. ..........The second most common cause appears to involve rifles and mistaken target identification.


Yep, that is pretty spot on. And when and where those folks chambered the live round had little effect on the tragic event. I'm 42 years old and I have never heard of an "in the field" hunting accident in my home state of Alabama that involved an accidental discharge. Nope in every single case that I have ever heard of the weapon was fired intentionally. So pardon me if I find this whole debate a bit overblown.

Most of my family's land is very thick. If you are going to stalk hunt on it and try to chamber a round only when you see a deer then you might as well stay home and watch football. Even when hunting from a treestand the typical shots on deer are so close that the sound of you chambering a round would almost certainly spook them. So yeah I guess the woods would be slightly safer for humans if no one had a round in the chamber (be safer if we just stayed home too I guess) but it would sure be hell and gone safer for the deer.
Todd, well put and I agree 100%. And, basically, so does about 75% of the Campfire membership according to this "poll". Don't let the vocal minority give you a different impression.

-jeff

10% of the fishermen catch 90% of the fish... Does that mean that being a [bleep] fisherman is better?
Todd_Bradford �


Unfortunately the first and second-most common types of shooting accidents do not eliminate the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and other most common types.

There is no doubt that there are times when it is appropriate to hunt with a round in the chamber, cocked and safety on. Nor is it hard to imagine situations when it might be best to be loaded and cocked with the safety off, especially in DG country. That said, there are many situations in which the condition of the chamber makes absolutely no difference as to whether game is harvested or not. Nor is there any known instance � none - where someone bas been shot with an empty chamber.

There are no shortage of �in the field" hunting accidents where the trigger was not intentionally pulled, certainly not here in Colorado and I�m sure the rest of the country as well. Further, many accidents occur during the process of loading and unloading a firearm, as well as due to a failure to unload a firearm. I�m quite sure the victims would disagree that the debate is �a bit overblown�. I suspect you have never been seriously injured or killed by �friendly fire�.
I said back about 300 pages ago, it's not the probability of occurrence but the magnitude of the consequence that I find unacceptable.
Originally Posted by Todd_Bradford
I'm 42 years old and I have never heard of an "in the field" hunting accident in my home state of Alabama that involved an accidental discharge. Nope in every single case that I have ever heard of the weapon was fired intentionally. So pardon me if I find this whole debate a bit overblown.


Todd_Bradford -

I'll take you at your word that you've never heard of a case in your state of Alabama where someone was shot when a firearm was fired unintentionally. That does not mean, however, that such occurrences do not happen. In fact, they do.

Here are some examples from the 'Alabama Hunter Education and Hunting Incident Statistics' for 2005-2006. You can access the source data here:
http://www.outdooralabama.com/hunting/education/instructor/2005Accident.pdf

In summary, the 2005-2006 season was the safest on record up to that time but firearms accidents still happened, both fatal and non-fatal. Here is the number of firearms accidents going back to the 1973-74 season:


Code
Year      Fatal   Non-fatal
==============================
1973-74     19      25
1974-75      5      20
1975-76      5      25
1976-77     11      25
1977-78      9      22
1978-79      6      17
1979-80      7      27
1980-81      7      35
1981-82      9      34
1982-83      6      33
1983-84      8      39
1984-85     15      37
1985-86     11      31
1986-87      6      34
1987-88      3      34
1988-89      6      37
1989-90      3      36
1990-91      3      29
1991-92      5      24
1992-93      7      31
1993-94      5      22
1994-95      7      24
1995-96      4      26
1996-97      3      19
1997-98      2      22
1998-99      1      15
1999-00      1      15
2000-01      4      13
2001-02      3      18
2002-03      4      23
2003-04      2      11
2004-05      2      7
2005-06      3      5



From 1992 through 2006 the firearms incidents look like this:

Code
Shooter Swinging on Game                                 38
Mistaken For Game                                        70
Victim Out of Sight of Shooter                           41
Victim in Line of Fire                                   12
Ricochet                                                  2
Total Intentionally fired incidents                     163

Removing/Placing Firearm In/Out Vehicle                  16
Unloading Firearm                                         6
Clubbing Game                                             1
Gun Fell From Insecure Rest                              11
Improper Crossing of Fence/Obstacle                       5
Mechanical Failure                                        4
Improper Handling                                        24
Riding With Loaded Firearm                                5
Shooter Stumbled and Fell                                16
Gun/Trigger Caught on an Object                          17
Unknown Cause                                             6
Climbing/Descending Tree                                  2
Total non-intentionally fired incidents                 113


Unknown Self-Inflicted                                    6
Unknown Two-Party                                         4
Other                                                     7
Total Unknown/Other incidents                            17


In 2005-2006, the non-fatal incidents involved the following:

Code
Trigger caught on object                                        2
Removing firearm from vehicle                                   1
Gun discharged in ATV accident                                  1
Accidental discharge-debris hit victim in head                  1
Accidental discharge in vehicle                                 1



Since 1974 you have at least 113 incidents in Alabama where the firearm was probably NOT fired intentionally.

I submit that a practice of not loading the chamber until needed would have eliminated many of these shooting incidents, both fatal and non-fatal.

Again, I am not against hunting with a loaded chamber and in fact often do so. All I am saying is that it does increase the risk of accident as NO ONE has ever been shot by a firearm with an empty chamber.


Chuckled when I read the one instance of 'clubbing game' discharge. Would have made good YouTube footage...
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
NO ONE has ever been shot by a firearm with an empty chamber.


Seems clear to me...
Originally Posted by Brother Dave
Chuckled when I read the one instance of 'clubbing game' discharge. Would have made good YouTube footage...


laugh laugh

Wham! Blam!

Wham! Blam!

laugh


Casey
Coyote HUnter
"Nor is it hard to imagine situations when it might be best to be loaded and cocked with the safety off, especially in DG country."

Whoa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Having followed wounded bears into puckerbrush willows and alders with an empty chamber and still managed to find time to slip one into the chamber I cannot fathom the mindset that would believe there would not be time to slip the safety off. That goes so far into the ozone I have to respond even though I bowed out of this style-over-substance pissin' match a long time ago.
art
Art, wise up my man.

The Dangerous Game we hunt around isn't as Dangerous as where some of these folks hunt.

Nor is our Thick Brush as Thick as theirs, or our Rough Country as Rough.

Also, our animals aren't nearly as wary.

In addition, we're more clumsy and prone to falls.

In summary, it's OK for you and I and a few others to hunt cold, but as we've learned here...doing so elsewhere would be useless, and a guy may as well stay on the couch.
Forgot to add a ..grin.. and disclosure that I can't believe I'm posting on this thread either...lol.
Remember:

You only need the chamber hot if you wearing blue or have blue tape on your muzzle.

Otherwise, you can hunt safely without fear of being seen be everything in the woods.

Damned blue.......
VA, you are trying to create an unholy alliance between the Blue Tape From Hell Thread, and the Loaded vs. Unloaded thread. May I suggest that should you succeed, the resulting beast might surge beyond control and consume even the most stouthearted amongst us?

Just a thought <g>.

-jeff
There are some, um, striking similarities between the two threads. Surely YOU have noticed that, JEFF.
To say it with Rooster Cogburn (John Wayne): Oh, a gun that's unloaded and cocked ain't good for nothin'" grin

But seriously:
In Germany it's against the law to climb a treestand with a weapon with a live round in the chamber. And when stalking through rough terrain it's also unlawful to have a round in the chamber.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Coyote HUnter
"Nor is it hard to imagine situations when it might be best to be loaded and cocked with the safety off, especially in DG country."

Whoa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Having followed wounded bears into puckerbrush willows and alders with an empty chamber and still managed to find time to slip one into the chamber I cannot fathom the mindset that would believe there would not be time to slip the safety off. That goes so far into the ozone I have to respond even though I bowed out of this style-over-substance pissin' match a long time ago.
art


Sitka deer -

When writing that my thoughts were not that one might wander around the countryside or go poking through the alders going after wounded game but rather that a hunter might find himself standing his ground in a defensive situation where the time spent fumbling with a safety might make a difference in the outcome.

In particular I was thinking of smallish (like the Ruger) three-position safety and gloved hands or a safety that has been subjected to moisture in freezing weather (I had one freeze up in the "safe" position one day). I was also thinking in terms of pack animals like wolves or hyenas or maybe a pride of lions. In such situations is is not a all hard for me to imagine I'd slip the safety to the fire position even if I was praying I never had to actually fire.

One might argue that such a situation is not "hunting", but that's a pretty fine point if the situation occurs in during a hunt.


P.S.

I freely admit I didn't give the whole idea a lot of thought as it quickly became apparent that I could not imagine all possible situations let alone evaluate them.

I also admit that such situations are likely to be rare in the extreme rather than commonplace, as are events like getting struck by lightning or winning the lottery.
CH
I stand by my statement in its entirety. Wearing gloves in any situation where dexterity is critical may be a contendable point, but "fumbling" with a safety is not... Having had the pleasure on more than one occasion of trailing wounded bears and having had two bears die touching me I think I have a clue what goes down. I also think I have had enough time thinking real hard about it to understand some, if not most, of the risks.

The risks inherent in a fool with a hot chamber and safety off greatly outweigh anything a bear might do. Bears usually have sense enough to try to escape.
art (back on sidelines slowly shaking his head)
Boy, for guys that claim to want this thread to die... ya'll sure keep applying the ol' electrodes to Frankenthread's heart and calling for lightning! :-)

Sitka Deer, I am impressed that someone who literally has wounded bears die touching them (are you implying that their last charge was stopped that close, or something different?) would go so far as to dive into the brush after a wounded bear without a round in the chamber. Now THAT is putting your money where your mouth is.

It also seems a bit nuts from here, but, whatever. You are many times the hunter I will ever be and I concede that.

But I will take your bait and am happy to debate this with any reasonable takers, which the present company appears to be, so here we go.

Looking at the above situation in it's entirety, I think a reasonable case can be made that what you are doing would be MORE dangerous in general, not less. Here's why. Let's pretend that it isn't you we are talking about here to remove any element of me vs. you here. Let's just imagine two groups of hunters, with a wounded bear in the brush, that might likely die so close to one of them that it touches them- in other words, these are "interesting times", as the Chinese curse goes.

Both groups are good gun handlers. One group dives after their bear chambered but with the safety on, and practicing good gun handling. The other dives in unchambered; I don't know if this means their safety is off or on as I've heard the "cold" guys express it either way. You tell me.

So the guys fan out. This is an inherantly dangerous situation in several ways, obviously. Ignoring the dangers from the bear or from getting shot inadvertantly through the brush by another hunter intentionally firing his weapon, we are left with the danger of an UN-intentional discharge.

I contend that it is at least debateable that in the heat of the moment, with a wounded bear charging, it is LESS safe to have to do a full action manipulation before shooting. Hands are flailing, bear is charging, etc. These are exactly the moments that guys say CRF rifles are needed for, because people make bad physical mistakes in these moments when required to manipulate the action of their rifle. Yeah?

The other group needs to raise their rifle and click the safety off and shoot. A simpler physical action.

I offer this in the spirit of debate. I'm not interested in slinging mud. I know that Sitka, ironbender, Coyote Hunter, etc are not either or I wouldn't bother typing this.

Thoughts?

-jeff
If you had a clue about how such things work I might take the bait... Ain't no fanning out and ain't no group gig...

Yes, two bears have come straight at me and died on my boot tops. One straight up and one previously wounded. Almost all die facing the other way.
Sitka, I'm not baiting. Please don't try to make this something it's not. You are the one saying you have bears dying at your boots without any further explanation; don't flame on me for trying to understand what's happening there.

If you are alone, why not have a round in the chamber? Is the astronomically small chance of hurting someone, somehow, far away with your chambered round (which would require BOTH poor gun handling AND your mechanical safety to fail)- is that minute chance worth slowing down your ability to stop a wounded bear in the brush while hunting alone? Especially considering that- ta da! poor gun handling or a mechanical failure of your rifle STILL PROVIDE that astronomically small chance for Mr. Murphy to sneak in once you chamber your round?

Seems if you have bears dying at your boots you are cutting things pretty fine.

-jeff

Art did you feel alive afterwards? wink


we all hunt with a hot chamber eventually.


when we decide to chamber is the debatable point.


seems a lot of folks chamber too early for my comfort level,

but certainly not Art!
At some point, Custer, you have to decide if the band of Redskins who chased you to the brink of the cliff is more dangerous than would be sliding over the edge, suspended only by a length of 1/4" rope long enough to make the 200 foot rappel to the bottom.

wink

That's kind of how I view the little bit of metal which holds back a fully loaded firing pin. I worry less about hammers or firing pins which can be manually brought brought into action over a live round than a rifle which requires the firing pin to be loaded when a round is chambered.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
CH
...

The risks inherent in a fool with a hot chamber and safety off greatly outweigh anything a bear might do. ...


Don't get hung up on bears or even DG.

My statement was "Nor is it hard to imagine situations when it might be best to be loaded and cocked with the safety off, especially in DG country." Perhaps I should have left off the "especially in DG country" part.

It seems that at that at some point even you turned the safety on your firearms to the "off" position or you likely wouldn't be posting here - so we are discussing the timing and circumstances of that action, not whether or not such an action is justified or foolish.


As I said, I don't recommend moving around with the safety off but if extreme danger was imminent I wouldn't stand around with the Cross Bolt Safety engaged on my .45-70, nor would I wait until the last possible instant to thumb the hammer back to full cock - too many things could go wrong, including forgetting to disengage the CBS or the thumb slipping off the hammer. At some point the "foolishness" of being fully prepared to fire is exceeded by the "foolishness" of being unprepared.


But as I said, don't get hung up on DG. My guess is that the majority of hunters have, at one time or another, intentionally hunted with a loaded chamber and the safety off. It is called "the shot not taken". In my own case there have been many incidents while varmint hunting (and we all know how dangerous prairie dogs can be) where I have slipped the safety off to take a shot then slipped it back on again without firing. A little slow on my part perhaps, but hardly foolish. When it comes to big game have been multiple instances where I have had game in my sights and was ready to fire, only to slip the safety back on again without doing so. Sometimes I was a little slow, sometimes I just decided not to shoot. I've long lost track of the number of times I've swung on a bird, safety off, only to slip the safety back on without firing a shot. If that makes me a fool, so be it.
Can you make a rifle with an empty chamber accidentally discharge through negligence, malfunction, or mishandling?

Can you make a rifle with a loaded chamber accidentally discharge through negligence, malfunction, or mishandling?

Which of those two previous questions is answered in the affirmative?

If the latter (and it will be), why risk it unless and until it is absolutely necessary?
Can you make a rifle accidentally discharge while manipulating the action to load a round with the safety off (which is how VAnimrod hunts)?

Is the "moment of truth" in hunting a very high-stress situation, therefore multiplying the chance of an accident of the above type?

Does good, safe gun handling trump all?

-jeff
And where, exactly, have I EVER said that I hunt with the safety off?

Safety on, chamber empty.

Game sighted, and my intention is to shoot, I chamber a round. When the crosshairs are on the target, the safety goes off. NOT BEFORE!

That you're making schit up, whilst still upset that I haven't ignored you and your stupidity on certain issues, shouldn't really surprise me.

As stated elsewhere, when you act like a dumbazz, you'll be treated like one. When you say stupid schit, you'll be called on it. The "don't flame me" schit don't fly, when you're advocating unsafe practices.

The "moment of truth" happens on hunting shows. Schit happens in the field, i.e. tripping, falling, crossing fences and blowdowns, etc. That's where a loaded chamber will get you or someone else killed.

And, yeah, gun safe gun handling trumps all.

Rule #3 of Gun Safety: Keep the gun unloaded, or a round out of the chamber, until ready to fire.
I sure thought I read a post of yours just the other day where you said safety was off, chamber was empty. Must have been someone else. If I can I'll dig it up. My apologies for misrepresenting your hunting practices.

And dude- chill! You CANNOT upset me. Even when you stoop to utter juvenile BS harrassment- which you have done repeatadly- it doesn't upset me. It barely cracks the annoying threshhold. In the time I've been here, all I've see you do is post insults and rude one-liners. Maybe I missed the part in your first 17,000 posts where you said something meaningful but as far as I (and trust me, a whoooole bunch of others) am concerned, you are not a serious person, just an agitator who likes to act tough to impress your boyz.

You are not a serious person and not worth getting upset over.

So chill.

-jeff
It was WGM, one of the other... how shall I say this... "vehement" cold-carry guys. It's here:

http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/ubb/showflat/Number/2042086/page/0/fpart/1

I get you guys that I have on "ignore" mixed up sometimes.

My apologies once more for misrepresenting your hunting practices. It stuck in my mind because to chamber w/o the safety seemed... bad.

-jeff
Absolutely hunt with a loaded chamber...and if expecting a momentary shot the safety is off and ready to go....forget political correctness...this is reality...
A little short of 80% of the Campfire agrees with you, Gila.

-jeff
Sheep tend to flock.
baaaaaa
Quote
Sheep tend to flock.


And it looks like the shepherd returned to the flock after running away from the forum to cry in private grin .
No shepherd here.
True enough. And a great observation for a thread about sheep herding.

Of course, the question is, can good gun handlers hunt safely in the woods with a round in the chamber. Call us sheep or whatever you like, but do glance up at the scoreboard from time to time and realize that a whole bunch of ethical, serious, safe hunters disagree with you- and really don't like being told we are fools, or don't belong in the woods, or some of the other things that are buried... oh... 20 or 30 pages back in this pig of a thread!

:-)

That's all it boils down to for me Steelhead. There is absolutely nothing wrong with hunting cold- but if it is safer, which has been contested by myself and many many others, it's by a meaningless margin and it ain't worth putting down your fellow hunters over. In my opinion.

-jeff
Nope a gun without a round in the chamber isn't safer. Get your neighbor's kids lined up with a round in the chamber and safety on and have them squeeze the trigger several hundred times whilst pointed at your head.

Then have them plow through some brush, over rocks, etc whilst said loaded gun is pointed at your head.

Report back the results, if you live, and I will buy into it.
Quote
Get your neighbor's kids lined up with a round in the chamber and safety on and have them squeeze the trigger several hundred times whilst pointed at your head.

Then have them plow through some brush, over rocks, etc whilst said loaded gun is pointed at your head.


Do you have your rifle pointed at your head when you chamber a round to take a shot?Why not?It would be idiotic to suggest that anyone have a loaded gun pointed at their head for any reason.
If you feel frustrated or upset,it would be better for all on this forum if you were to simply run away from the forum like you did before,than to post such stupidity.
Quote
There is absolutely nothing wrong with hunting cold- but if it is safer, which has been contested by myself and many many others,


Stuppy, if you read JO's quote from above you should be able to understand my post, then again probably not.

Quote
Stuppy, if you read JO's quote from above you should be able to understand my post, then again probably not.


I don't understand why anyone,even you, would suggest something so idiotic as walking around with a loaded gun pointing at their head.Unless of course you are trying to win the award for most idiotic post of 2008.As it stands,you have a contender.
JO says a chambered gun is as safe as an unchambered gun. If you can navigate this country and tell me where you gun is pointed 100% of the time I will kiss black cat's azz.

Since he says a chambered gun is as safe as an unchambered gun, what is the problem?
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen

There is absolutely nothing wrong with hunting cold- but if it is safer, which has been contested by myself and many many others, it's by a meaningless margin and it ain't worth putting down your fellow hunters over. In my opinion.

-jeff






jeff -

I agree its not worth putting down fellow hunters over, but then again I hunt both ways depending on circumstances.

As to contesting whether an unloaded chamber is safer than a loaded chamber, consider the 1973-2006 Alabama statistics I posted here:
http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/ubb/showflat/Number/1792857/page/1/fpart/14

In particular I call your attention to the "intentionally fired" and "non-intentionally fired" numbers for the period from 1992 to 2006. Granted, I created these categories myself based on information provided for this time period in the report, but I think they are fairly accurate - certainly more than enough so for our purposes here.

We don't know if the "intentionally fired" accidents were situations in which the shooter carried hot ot cold. We can surmise, however, that the chamber was intentionally loaded prior to the shooting and that a cold chamber beforehand would have made no difference in the overall total. There were 163 such incidents for 55% of the total.

By contrast the "non-intentionally fired" incidents would have been dramatically lower if the shooter had a cold chamber at the time. In most cases a cold chamber would have prevented the incident altogether. There were 113 such incidents or about 38% of the total.

Within the "non-intentionally fired" category we have the "Improper Handling" subcategory with 24 incidents. Even if we assume all of these could have been avoided by carrying "hot", which is unlikely in the extreme, there are still 89 incidents or 30% that could have been avoided with an empty chamber.

There are also 24 "Other/Unknown" incidents during this time period for 8% of the total.



Here are the breakdowns of the shootings:

From 1992 through 2006 the firearms incidents look like this:

Code
Shooter Swinging on Game                                 38
Mistaken For Game                                        70
Victim Out of Sight of Shooter                           41
Victim in Line of Fire                                   12
Ricochet                                                  2
Total Intentionally fired incidents                     163

Removing/Placing Firearm In/Out Vehicle                  16
Unloading Firearm                                         6
Clubbing Game                                             1
Gun Fell From Insecure Rest                              11
Improper Crossing of Fence/Obstacle                       5
Mechanical Failure                                        4
Improper Handling                                        24
Riding With Loaded Firearm                                5
Shooter Stumbled and Fell                                16
Gun/Trigger Caught on an Object                          17
Unknown Cause                                             6
Climbing/Descending Tree                                  2
Total non-intentionally fired incidents                 113


Unknown Self-Inflicted                                    6
Unknown Two-Party                                         4
Other                                                     7
Total Unknown/Other incidents                            17



You can contest the idea that a cold chamber is safer than a hot chamber all you want, but the evidence weighs heavily against you.

Hunting with cold chambers could have avoided at least 89 (30%) of the total shooting incidents for the 1992 through 2006 period. Depending on the breakdown of the "Improper Handling" and "Unknown/Other" categories the avoidable incidents could be as high as 137 or 47% of the total.

I suggest that none of the injured people would consider such high percentages to be "meaningless".
No, I say that it's perfectly possible to hunt safely with a round in the chamber.

As I said above, in may be safer by some incremental margin to hunt cold- but then, it might not, too. You prove to me that it's a good idea to have a bunch of yay-hoos frantically chambering their rifles when they see a deer for instance. Now THAT sounds like a mess to me. And here's the clincher. Some small percentage of those yay-hoos will then forget to unchamber, and be walking around thinking they have an empty rifle when they don't. There's another mess for you. Or, those same yay-hoos, after chambering their 30-30 or whatever, will now have to rack ALL the rounds through the rifle to clear it.

Accidents happen with guns. They happen when people manipulate the action, they happen when they think the gun is empty, they happen upon loading and unloading. Those things count as a debit against the increase of safety that might be gained if everyone was compelled to carry cold.

And it wouldn't work for beans where and how I hunt.

And a lot of other guys have said the same things as I just said, several times over. :-)

-jeff

CH,

Nice post.

How, though, can you tell in how many of those cases, the person thought it wasn't loaded? That's one case where the cold chamber theory is fool's gold.

Further, I agree with you on a bunch of those... that the gun should be unloaded in the situation that are shown above- like climbing a tree, riding...

The key is safe gun handling. An appalling number of those examples are blatant cases of poor judgement or poor gun handling. As someone here likes to say, you can't legislate stoopid. You could tell everyone in Alabama that they had to hunt cold and I bet the total numbers would work out about the same.

The most dangerous thing any of us do anyway, to ourselves and those around us, is to drive a car. If you are driving to go hunting in a truck with mud tires on a rainy road ,or going 10 mph over the speed limit, or driving an old truck with a big steel bumper, you are risking those around you more than carrying hot or cold or whatever. I bet. So let's be realistic about the risk we are talking about here.

-jeff
wink
Coyote_Hunter
Well put and I hereby humbly apologize for jumping you earlier. I still agree with what I stated, but you do not deserve the delivery based on what you just posted. You clearly DO get it.
art
Several things you mention are fallacious.

Hunting cold does not mean more chambering and unchambering of rounds. If anything it would be less. If that does indeed raise the risk level, then "hot" is worse in that respect.

There is no "fool's gold" in carrying cold. If so, then you really aren't carrying cold. Carrying cold means checking the chamber whenever the action is closed. Regardless, the rifle is still treated by the same rules - right? Cold is safer.

It really is not difficult to unchamber even a levergun without emptying the magazine. It's very simple. I do it frequently; no problem. (I also unload my leverguns through the loading gate when it comes to that.)

Enough time and experience in the field under anything but gentlemen's hunting conditions will undoubtedly provide one with more than enough fuel to to spoil one's appetite for carry hot as a general practice. That's why I rarely carry chambered.

Having a "panic accident" while chambering "in the heat of battle" suggests a lack of experience hunting with firearms. I very rarely use the safety on any weapon. It is really quite simple and safe to deliberately work the action. That's all there is. The rifle is ready to go; no safety to worry about, etc.

I do understand that some types of hunting seem to demand carry hot. I have spent a bit of time in the Oregon rainforest and have a clue what that is about. I also have hunted whitetails in the swamps and forests of Minnesota. I am not completely ignorant of the whats and whys involved. Neither does it surprise me that these, and others like them, are also the areas which seem to produce high numbers of accident and fatality statistics. There is a reason. While it may be comforting to you to see others of like mind, one has to remember that beauty, truth, worth, and other things of value are not decided democratically. One can operate more safely and still be successful. That's all that some have tried to convey. Some things are better learned through experience. Gun accidents don't happen to fall among them.
Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
No, I say that it's perfectly possible to hunt safely with a round in the chamber.

As I said above, in may be safer by some incremental margin to hunt cold- but then, it might not, too. You prove to me that it's a good idea to have a bunch of yay-hoos frantically chambering their rifles when they see a deer for instance. Now THAT sounds like a mess to me. And here's the clincher. Some small percentage of those yay-hoos will then forget to unchamber, and be walking around thinking they have an empty rifle when they don't. There's another mess for you. Or, those same yay-hoos, after chambering their 30-30 or whatever, will now have to rack ALL the rounds through the rifle to clear it.

Accidents happen with guns. They happen when people manipulate the action, they happen when they think the gun is empty, they happen upon loading and unloading. Those things count as a debit against the increase of safety that might be gained if everyone was compelled to carry cold.

And it wouldn't work for beans where and how I hunt.

And a lot of other guys have said the same things as I just said, several times over. :-)

-jeff




jeff -

Say what you want but unless you can provide factual data its just hot air.

There are a number of problems with your contention:

1. The statistics are heavily against you. During the 1992-2005/6 period only 6 incidents (2% of total) involved unloading a firearm. Considering that most people hunt with a "hot" chamber and have to unload at least once a day and people that hunt with cold chambers MAY have to unload one or more times a day, there is already a prodgidous amount of unloading going on. Contrast the 6 unloading incidents to the 107 other incidents (36% of total) in the "Non-intentionally fired" category during the same time frame. The number of incidents involving triggers that snag on something or hunters falling is over 5 times greater than the number of incidents that occur during unloading.

2. There are no statistics in the report for the number of incidents where a firearm was being loaded and it is quite possible the number is 0.

3. The vast majority of hunters are quite capable of loading their firearm from the magazine without shooting someone in the process, even when game is present. Statistics bear this out as well as every shot after the 1st involves a reload. If people were getting injured by follow-up shots it should show up in the "Intentionally fired" category. The number of such incidents in Alabama, from 1992 through the 2005-2006 season, is zero incidents or 0%.

4. You propose that many accidents would happen because people would forget their firearm is loaded. We already have that situation. Truly empty chambers would eliminate the shooting incidents that result.

5. Those "yay-hoos, after chambering their 30-30 or whatever, will now have to rack ALL the rounds through the rifle to clear it"? Well, no, it is entirely possible with most if not all leverguns to eject a cartridge from the chamber without loading another in the process, just as it is possible with bolt guns.

Accidents do happen with guns, but unloaded chambers reduce the likelihood of a shooting incident to zero.

A cold chamber man not work for you (I suspect it would work better than you are willing to admit) but that does not mean a hot chamber would be safer.




Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Coyote_Hunter
Well put and I hereby humbly apologize for jumping you earlier. I still agree with what I stated, but you do not deserve the delivery based on what you just posted. You clearly DO get it.
art


Thank you. I understand where you are coming from and have to say I would have been changing my shorts had I been in your boots.
For me, it all depends on the situation. If you're hunting hardwoods whitetail from a treestand, what good is an unchambered round? On a crisp foggy morning, how long would that buck hang around while you work the bolt..about 0 seconds flat.

If I'm hunting the west, I see no reason to have round chambered while glassing. If I'm stalking or tracking, there's always a round in there & the saftey is always on.

If I'm guiding, you'd better believe I insist on a client's rifle chamber being boolet-free, unless he or she is making the final stalk on their own.

As far as saftey, my grandpa drilled into me at a young age that every gun is loaded, especially when it's not. I suppose it would be safer to not hunt at all, then again I may slip in the bathtub.
I carry a 1911 daily in condition 1, I'm comfortable with it. Hell, I even fell about 6 feet off of a wet log hiking with a cocked and locked .45 on my hip. Not a problem. I was raised that there is no such thing as an unloaded chamber or firearm. But to each his own.

My biggest beef with "empty" firearms/chambers is getting flagged. I've seen a lot of people flagged, and I have been flagged, because others were not muzzle aware of their "unloaded" firearms.
Originally Posted by mortre


My biggest beef with "empty" firearms/chambers is getting flagged. I've seen a lot of people flagged, and I have been flagged, because others were not muzzle aware of their "unloaded" firearms.


I think many of us have an even bigger beef with getting flagged by the loaded ones. It doesn't have to happen more than once to make one realize that looking at an empty bore has to be preferable to looking at the end of a bullet in the same bore. In either case there are words.

Cold carry never excuses lack of proper adherence to safe gun handling. Anyone who suggests that it does fails to understand the basic reason for carrying cold.
Klik and CH, well said and I'm listening, I really am.

The crux of the whole thing is two-pronged for me and really boils down to this:

-It is possible to be a good, safe hunter with a round in the chamber in normal hunting circumstances. About 3/4 of the volume of this thread was generated by "hot" carriers, responding to a relative few "cold" carriers, who were saying that the above wasn't possible, and that we didn't belong in the woods. You guys are not saying that and I appreciate that.

-Second, I can only speak from personal experience with regards to killing blacktail within a 60-mile radius of Eugene, Oregon. It's close, it's thick, the shooting lanes are tiny, the animals are few and far between. I don't expect someone hunting a 66% deer tag- which is Alaska for 2003 IIRC- to really "get" that, but it's a big part of things here where I hunt. We have a month to fill a single buck tag and the success rates are under 20%. I'm not blowing my one chance on a buck to solve a non-existant (or hardly-existant) safety problem.

I will concede the much more open country, where I hunt elk, it's a lot easier for me to imagine hunting cold. It would not be a handicap or at least not much of one.

Finally, and we'll never know this for sure, but I do truly believe that if carrying cold was somehow mandated the accident numbers would remain more or less the same. The details would change; they might go down some fractional amount, I'll grant that, but my opinion is that dumb azz people would find just about as many ways to screw up as they do now.

-jeff
My best guess is those who go all weak in the knees about a loaded chamber are also the ones who can't take a dump in the woods without filling their pants, but if it makes you feel better do what you want......just don't insist I follow "your" rules.
Remember to roll the window down before you shoot!
Originally Posted by TexasRick
My best guess is those who go all weak in the knees about a loaded chamber are also the ones who can't take a dump in the woods without filling their pants, but if it makes you feel better do what you want......just don't insist I follow "your" rules.


Now that's just ignorant...I don't care who you are.

DN
Quote
Now that's just ignorant...I don't care who you are.


About as ignorant as:

Quote
Get your neighbor's kids lined up with a round in the chamber and safety on and have them squeeze the trigger several hundred times whilst pointed at your head.

Then have them plow through some brush, over rocks, etc whilst said loaded gun is pointed at your head.

Report back the results, if you live, and I will buy into it.
OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!! I have been hunting 52 years with a genuine deathly hazard in my hands with a round in the chamnber. I think I will lock up all my guns in my safe and quit hunting. What was I thinking.

I want to meet the fellow who can look down the bore and see the bullet or an empty chamber. Never heard of that method for checking for a loaded chamber.

I wonder if some guys have ever heard of acceptable risk management.

Same thing here, carry cold if you want,but don't try to tell me how to carry or admonish me if I carry some other way than what you think is accpetable. Especially if we do not hunt together

Always have one in the pipe when hunting on our property. When in the mountains with others then always an empty chamber unless I am not mobile and set up ready to shoot.
Originally Posted by saddlesore
OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!! I have been hunting 52 years with a genuine deathly hazard in my hands with a round in the chamnber. I think I will lock up all my guns in my safe and quit hunting. What was I thinking.

I want to meet the fellow who can look down the bore and see the bullet or an empty chamber. Never heard of that method for checking for a loaded chamber.

I wonder if some guys have ever heard of acceptable risk management.

Same thing here, carry cold if you want,but don't try to tell me how to carry or admonish me if I carry some other way than what you think is accpetable. Especially if we do not hunt together



My comment on ignorance was directed at the fellow who inexplicably made a connection between how one carries his rifle and how one takes care of bodily functions in the woods.

I carry cold unless I'm actively stalking visible game and preparing to fire. What you do is up to you. Casting aspersions about how people manage other parts of their lives is ignorant, and I stand by my statement.
Apparently stubby is unable to understand the difference between sarcastic post (mine) and a stupid post (TexasDick)
Quote
Apparently stubby is unable to understand the difference between sarcastic post (mine) and a stupid post (TexasDick)


Just because it was in a sarcastic tone,doesn't mean that it wasn't stupid.
You should know about that......
Originally Posted by saddlesore


I want to meet the fellow who can look down the bore and see the bullet or an empty chamber. Never heard of that method for checking for a loaded chamber.





Me too....nor have I. I never mentioned seeing. All I said was "looking at." You CAN figure out why you'd be looking at the end of a bullet when the muzzle of a hot chambered rifle is pointed at you. There is no need to get goofy about that.

My idea of risk management includes not ever wishing to trade my life in order to, perhaps, get a shot at a trophy animal of any kind.
Can I throw a rookie question into the mix?

Aside from sitting in a stand, when on the ground, cycling a lever action 45-70 with game within say 75 yards...can it be done without the game hearing, or spotting the movement a majority of the time? Wouldn't this give the game an extra jump on you?
Yes, they would hear that. And if you were wearing blue, the game would be over.

Just funnin'.

Mark
Can't believe this has gone to 60 pages plus. Good Gawd guys, get on with it and let this die.
Originally Posted by Barkoff
Can I throw a rookie question into the mix?

Aside from sitting in a stand, when on the ground, cycling a lever action 45-70 with game within say 75 yards...can it be done without the game hearing, or spotting the movement a majority of the time? Wouldn't this give the game an extra jump on you?


At that range, and if all else is quiet, there is a very good chance they will hear the sound of the action cycling the round into the chamber. On the other hand the wind rustling the leaves or melting snow dripping off the trees or a plane flying overhead or a thousand other noise sources can disguise or completely obscure the sound.

Either way, I often carry my lever guns with an empty chamber.
Originally Posted by gophergunner
Can't believe this has gone to 60 pages plus. Good Gawd guys, get on with it and let this die.


Why - because you're tired of it? It is obvious that others are not. May I suggest you simply not click the link?
I can't. Steelhead says he can. YMMV
It'd be out of the question for me... not even debateable.

YMMV.

-jeff
Jeff-
Your best post ever!
smile
Originally Posted by gophergunner
Can't believe this has gone to 60 pages plus. Good Gawd guys, get on with it and let this die.


Change your preferences to more posts per page. I have "only" 13 pages of this! crazy
Have had no problems cycling a round into a Savage 99 and busting a deer. Can't comment on 75 yards though, the two I did it with last year were at 40 and 20 yards.
Well, see? It's not the same, is it? ..grins!
Steelhead, how many deer tags can you get, out of curiousity? And what general region do you hunt?

Alaska overall is a 65% tag for deer, or it was in 2003. I've never hunted a 65% tag. I've hunted a 45% doe tag, and it was an absolute gimmee for anyone with any skill willing to hunt a little.

I submit that you are hunting a high-percentage tag in Hunting Paradise and it's a little disingenious to extrapolate that to us downtrodden masses hunting a low-percentage, single buck tag.

If all my hunting was like the 45% tag I mentioned... heck.. I might hunt empty-chamber just to add a little challenge to things.

-jeff
Following your math then about 4 out 10 deer should also run when I chamber a round or wave blue, it ain't so.

I have said it before, it has worked for me on whitetail in at least 6 states also.

What is the percentage of Alaskan's killing 4x4's? I figure that should change the equation.

Dude, NONE of the deer are running away when I chamber a round.
Shot this whitetail at 25 yards. When he came into view and started working a scrape I chambered a round.

[Linked Image]
I guess shooting wolves in the rain forest of SE Alaska is a LOW percentage deal. Yep, no round in the chamber when I saw this bitch.

[Linked Image]
That rifle was a long time ago. wink

rb
Noticed the wood and lack of turrets did ya........
If you say so.

Thinking of the two deer I was able to whack in Oregon this last year, the little bedded buck saw me and started to get up just as I shot him. I'm glad I didn't have to chamber for him. The doe was trotting, and was a mature old doe that I had to do a triple-take on to make sure it wasn't a buck. She had that old-deer chest protrusion and everything; big deer.

Anyway either of them would have been unneccesarily more difficult if I'd had to chamber. The little buck might have turned into a running shot. The doe, I would not have been able to calmly triple-check the lack of horns, then shoot her in the last available shooting lane, if I'd been cranking a round into the chamber...

That's just me. This isn't worth fighting about (again... and again... and again...) It's just one of those things I guess.

Have a good one!

-jeff
The bear are pretty spooky and quick to run but I some how managed to get one shoved in the tube on this on at 70 yards (did I mention he was looking directly at me)...

[Linked Image]
This should snap ya. Had to dig the gun out of my pack, hold the rod under my pit and chamber a round...

[Linked Image]

I realize that ain't fair since there is probably a 67.12457% on halibut over 50 pounds.
Remember JO, just cuzz you can't do it don't mean it can't be done and done well.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Remember JO, just cuzz you can't do it don't mean it can't be done and done well.


I do know that; it's one of life's lessons everyone who's anyone learns.

Please remember, however, that I never said that people shouldn't hunt cold chamber. Those sorts of negative pronouncements have only come from the cold-chamber crowd, and a lot of this thread was generated by the hot-carry crowd basically defending their right to hunt. Instead, I have steadfastly maintained that a good gun handler can hunt with a hot chamber, and that there are good reasons, for some of us it seems, to do so. Maybe one of those good reasons is that I'm not the hunter someone else is- fair enough. But, since I AM a good gun handler and responsible adult, I will cheerfully hunt hot to maximize my chances of tagging an Oregon blacktail buck.

-jeff



Hunting cold trumps every reason you have given for hunting hot. So a deer gets away, big deal.

Originally Posted by Jeff_Olsen
...

Please remember, however, that I never said that people shouldn't hunt cold chamber. Those sorts of negative pronouncements have only come from the cold-chamber crowd, and a lot of this thread was generated by the hot-carry crowd basically defending their right to hunt. Instead, I have steadfastly maintained that a good gun handler can hunt with a hot chamber, and that there are good reasons, for some of us it seems, to do so. Maybe one of those good reasons is that I'm not the hunter someone else is- fair enough. But, since I AM a good gun handler and responsible adult, I will cheerfully hunt hot to maximize my chances of tagging an Oregon blacktail buck.
-jeff


Don�t forget that some members of the �carry hot� crowd were making ridiculous statements to the effect that if you choose to carry cold you shouldn�t be in the field.

Overall there are times when it is appropriate to carry hot and even more times when the difference between a cold or a hot chamber is moot with regard to putting game on the ground. With deference to the terrain others hunt, I can honestly say I don�t think there is an animal I�ve killed that would have lived it I had had a cold chamber (and in fact I often did).

There is one thing a hot chamber can never be, no matter how good and conscientious the hunter � it can never be as safe as a cold chamber when it comes to accidental or negligent shootings. That doesn�t make cold the right way or even the best way for all circumstances, it�s just a statement of fact.

When hunting with others around I prefer cold chambers all around.
Just to keep things in perspective a bit, blacktails only live in that portion of the state which resembles the rainforests of the Pacific Northwest. That isn't most of the state or even close. The majority of Alaskans - and Alaskan hunters- have probably never seen a wild blacktail in the state. There are none within hundreds of miles of where I live. Never killed one; never seen one either.
Klik,

Oh they are there, all around you, all the time. They are just such sneaky bastiges that you can't see 'em! grin

(what the HECK does your new sig line mean anyway?)

-jeff

As I understand them, those deer like trees. Lots of places where trees don't exist where the ground is permanently frozen.

My sig line follows yours. I just hold my dog to lower standards. (I hate the hot feeling on my leg when caught unaware.)
Sounds like your dog is huntin' with a loaded chamber <g>!

Yeah... blacktail like trees, to say the least.

I should try and get a picture from out in my little 16-acre chunk of the rainforest... I'm not sure a photo could really capture how thick it is out there though.

-jeff
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
blacktails only live in that portion of the state which resembles the rainforests of the Pacific Northwest.


goona have to argue that
Is there a moderator here? Real question??? This ones been run to the ground with the frame showing sparks on the pavement....?????
As long as it stays civil, why kill it? It's not mandatory that anyone read or post on it...

I like your analogy though, Sturgeon! :-)

-jeff
This thread has sure shown me the proverbial light, all I can say is that I used to hunt cold....this thread now has me convinced that there is no need for my (so called) paranoia. Carrying hot is where it's at, I have given alot less credit to the mechanical safeties, and my own superior gun handling skill's, than I should. I really don't want to miss any opportunity to kill one of our super sneaky ninja buck's. Beyond carrying hot/cold, I dont' even know how I've managed to kill deer with a bow these last 15 years. Thanks to all you guys with your opinions....if nothing else, know that you have convicned one guy that he was just paranoid, and insecure, about his rifle handling skills. Here's to a future of more, and bigger, buck's while carrying hot!!!
Originally Posted by BradArnett
This thread has sure shown me the proverbial light,


me too...........
anyone that hunts with a empty chamber should not be hunting. and needs pysco help.
I've been thinking about this topic for months now..:)

Considering that the actual shooting on legal game( elk, deer, bear lion for me) is only about less than 1% of the time in country hunting, I have decided that Steelhead and others are right about hunting cold..AND taping the muzzles of their rifles...:)
Shucks, the majority of my hunts I could be carrying a good 35MM camera and have as much action..but it'd be 'hot'..:) Jim
Originally Posted by Hubert
anyone that hunts with a empty chamber should not be hunting. and needs pysco help.



Hubert-I'm curious but how much time do you or have you spent hunting in the west?

Thx
Dober
I also wonder how many folks are hunting 11 months of the year? How many carry a rifle everyday whilst outdoors? Carry one to check traps, go fishing, hike, to the boat. Rifles are a daily carry item here and I can't remember a day spent outdoors when I didn't have a rifle with me. The only month of the year I can't shoot something fairly big and furry is July.
Steelgead, Not many of us live-work where you do..or are so unencumbered with family that we can live-work in the outdoors....:)

I DO carry a handgun every day tho..and it is always 'hot'..:)

Either the H&K P7M13, or one of my older S&W .357 M27 revolvers..:) Never had an AD..Does that count..:)..?Jim
Is it always in your hand?
Of course not...tho they are as 'safe' and manageable IF I were to carry them in hand as they are holstered..:) Jim
Nope, but I'm assuming you don't carry said gun chambered so as to have an extra 1/3 of second in time to get the drop on a deer?
Originally Posted by Hubert
anyone that hunts with a empty chamber should not be hunting. and needs pysco help.


Oh yeah, well anyone who hunts with a round in the chamber is a suicidal maniac and needs psych help.
Originally Posted by Hubert
anyone that hunts with a empty chamber should not be hunting. and needs pysco help.


I once watched a herd of elk from 11:00 in the morning until dusk when I finally got a shot - a little over 6 hours. Having a hot chamber during that period would have created needless risk and made absolutely zero difference in taking the game.

In fact, had the chamber been hot it would have been unloaded before the shot anyway. I covered the last 100 yards on my back, head first, pushing myself though the sage and cactus and snow with my legs. While turning around to sit up I managed to get some snow in the end of the barrel. I pulled the bolt, cleared the snow from the barrel with a twig of sage and visually inspected the barrel before reinserting the bolt and loading the chamber. The 6x5 antlers are down in the barn.

Frankly, I much prefer to hunt with those that carry cold.
You guys are still "debating" this, eh?

I'm not sure, but somehow I doubt if the venison jerky I am snacking on would taste any better if I had had a round in the chamber while hunting. MMMMMMM, teriyaki. MMMMMMMMM.

Anyhow, carry on.

smile

Probably would not taste any worse if you had a round in the chamber either
My dad can beat up your dad.........
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Nope, but I'm assuming you don't carry said gun chambered so as to have an extra 1/3 of second in time to get the drop on a deer?

____________________________________________________________
Steelhead, I've killed more deer and elk with a stickbow than you have lived in years.., so no, it's not to 'get the drop' on any deer..:)...Maybe just my combat-hunting training competencies?
YMMV..as may others..:)

Besides, as I indicated in my earlier post late on this interminable thread..
I've seen the light..and no longer will carry Hot when rifle hunting....:)

I'm also considering stainless and composite stocks..IF I can find them for my old rifles..:)

You still working for the U.S.C.G. down in that remote outpost?Jim



Originally Posted by mud_bogger
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
blacktails only live in that portion of the state which resembles the rainforests of the Pacific Northwest.


goona have to argue that



You know something I don't? I won't argue, but am happy to learn. I do know they don't live on the tundra of our area - nor in the tree lined rivers of same.
Oh Im not arguing that blacktails live in the rainforest parts of oregon.

I live south of all that rain and the country here varies greatly
they are just as common in the scrub oaks, heavy timber an my favorite The rimrocks.

Heres some prime blacktail country
[Linked Image]
He/I/we were talking in terms of Alaska. Can't recognize that area but will assume you know what you are talking of, especially assuming it aren't Alaska. There's at least 1000 more trees per square mile just in your pic than there are in total for the 1000 square miles right around me.
whoops

Went back an re-read that post an I guess I didnt see the alaska part. My bad
Yes I also keep 4 spare 30 round mags in my ballistic vest. This is silly...
Yes...can't believe the life in this thread...
You guys are still "debating" this, eh?..."Goalie"

This thread reminds me of crab grass... about the time your thinking it's dead......

Why don't we all just say, "sometimes", and move on?
If there is no round in the chamber, I'm simply taking a walk. I go with a round loaded, therefore, I'm hunting. 1Minute
In my mind, hunting does not always mean shooting, and even, perhaps, killing, something. Hunting is more an act of looking for and finding a certain animal. Most of the time I spend hours looking for a certain animal. Many times I see several of said animal which I have no interest in for a number of reasons and have no need to shoot. Whether on the range or in the field, usually when the chamber gets loaded it means something will be shot.

Here's another twist; do you catch your brass when hunting (and consequently potentially screw up a second shot opportunity), or do you let it fly?
Let it fly, but keep track of where I was and collect it later.
Originally Posted by KodiakHntr
Let it fly, but keep track of where I was and collect it later.


Ditto, but I occasionally lose one.

My philosophy is shoot until they are down and stay that way. I figure being ready in case a second shot is needed is more important than catching the brass.
I've done both- let it fly and find it later, or catch it- but I'm always surprised at the time at how important it is to me to either catch or track that piece of brass! Kind of silly.

-jeff
Yep,I do alot more finding than I do hunting also. I usually catch my brass. I generally do not take a second shot if I know the 1st one went where I wanted it too. Guess I am too much of a meat hunter to grind up more meat when the animal is dead on it's feet. Then too, a lot of my hunting is in dense timber where a 2nd shot is usually not possible
Almost never lose a piece of brass. Was a criminal offense growing up and it is automatic.
Yup, looked until it was found as a kid.

And I'm a firm believer in put one in 'em, and if the situation warrants it, hammer in a second one. Or third, if needed. (Had a big "dead" mule deer walk away from a road and down to a creek with no blood left in him....)
Bump
38 pages...why the bump?
Women always bring up the past...
This is soooo last year, but I'll start: I always hunt with a round chamber.
makes sense..
DFTFT
....isn't this thread dead yet......? cry
Yes. If I have to do some serious climbing up or down a canyon wall or something I might take it out.
Originally Posted by 1minute
If there is no round in the chamber, I'm simply taking a walk. I go with a round loaded, therefore, I'm hunting. 1Minute


+1

Never have I heard a more true statement spoken!
of course.
+1

Ingwe
It's rare when I have an empty chamber while I'm hunting.....the little thingy on the side is called a safety!

Chris
Should also be a little thingy in our heads called a safety...works better for some folks than others...
Ingwe
as soon as I step into the woods, or am about to I chamber a round, unless its pitch black and I'm walking to the stand, in that case I will load the magazine but leave the chamber empty.

has anyone ever jumped an animal they are hunting and had them stand there waiting for a shot? I have, and if my gun were empty I would sure feel foolish, rather than be getting the knife out to gut him
Originally Posted by Colorado1135


has anyone ever jumped an animal they are hunting and had them stand there waiting for a shot? I have, and if my gun were empty I would sure feel foolish, rather than be getting the knife out to gut him



I've been caught one time like this (and my gun was empty) was a nice buck too. Will never happen again....
Originally Posted by CLB
.....the little thingy on the side is called a safety!




The little thingy is a mechanical device...Is it not???????
Mechanical things have been known to fail!!!!!Have they not?????

Think about it!!!!!!


George
Originally Posted by GeorgeS3
Originally Posted by CLB
.....the little thingy on the side is called a safety!




The little thingy is a mechanical device...Is it not???????
Mechanical things have been known to fail!!!!!Have they not?????

Think about it!!!!!!


George



George,

Simply post your opinion on the topic. Sure things can happen. I'm still not changing how I do things. I also know how to handle a firearm. I've been around the block a few times over the past 30 years.

Chris
Those that hunt hot have not normally tried any other way, so they fail to realize that the time it takes to chamber a round will not in most cases cause them to loose the shot opportunity.

On the flipside, those that hunt with a cold chamber won't have to explain to the police why they killed their son, friend, or hunting partner because the killing of the animal was more valuable than the human life they disregarded out of ignorance, stupidity, or both.

The discussion is safety, pure and simple. No one can argue that a person carrying hot is more safe than one who does not...Period.

If you carry hot you are putting your possible trophy ahead of your life and the life of the people around you. Some folks can do that, and some cannot.
Loaded and safety on. I never touch the trigger until the rifle is up and the sights aligned.
Loaded safety on pointed in safe direction at all times... Unless I have to do some sketchy hill/rock climbing cross a fence (then I will remove the shell from the chamber).. I don't want to sneak up on find myself 50yds from an elk and have to try to quietly jack a shell into the chamber
some like to crap and then wallow in it....wondering why 32 pages wasn't enough and why JO wants to dig this up again....JO is a JO,answered myself...feel free to carry on
I chamber a round but still need to cock the firing pin on my bolt actions.The millisecond it takes I can live with, shooting a hunting partner I cannot live with and no animal is worth my partners life. I will not rely on a safety to keep my gun from firing, they have been known to fail. Just about everyone knows or has been around a gun that has gone off when it is not suppose to. My last 2 hunting partners that I went for a walk with were my kids, round chambered but firing pin not cocked,see moose simply lift handle and put back down and your ready.
I really like my marlin as all I have to do is pull the hammer back and it has that 1/2 safety thing so it is a really safe one to walk with.
My ruger #1 and my model 88's do not do that,you would have to load and rely on the safety so I do not chamber rounds unless I am by myself walking. That is just the way I do it. If my partner wants to walk with a round in the chamber and rely on the safety he can walk by himself as it is me he is going to shoot.
Originally Posted by 257STEW
I chamber a round but still need to cock the firing pin on my bolt actions.The millisecond it takes I can live with, shooting a hunting partner I cannot live with and no animal is worth my partners life. I will not rely on a safety to keep my gun from firing, they have been known to fail. Just about everyone knows or has been around a gun that has gone off when it is not suppose to. My last 2 hunting partners that I went for a walk with were my kids, round chambered but firing pin not cocked,see moose simply lift handle and put back down and your ready.
I really like my marlin as all I have to do is pull the hammer back and it has that 1/2 safety thing so it is a really safe one to walk with.
My ruger #1 and my model 88's do not do that,you would have to load and rely on the safety so I do not chamber rounds unless I am by myself walking. That is just the way I do it. If my partner wants to walk with a round in the chamber and rely on the safety he can walk by himself as it is me he is going to shoot.


So where is the tip of your firing pin resting on your bolt action rifles when the bolt is closed and the handle needs to be raised and lowered to cock it?
In this case with mine, the tip is pushing against the primer of a loaded round, and a small accidental blow to the back of it will fire the rifle.
Also, and not to pick on any one individual, I know that if you pull the triger on a loaded pre-64 94 Winchester with the hammer on half-cock (safety), it can release the hammer to fall on the firing pin. I had it happen once when I was a kid and I was fiddling around pulling on the trigger with the safety "on". The hammer fell, trying to fire the shell in the chamber, but the rifle (thank God) didn't fire. I NEVER forgot what could have happened if it had fired.
I guess in that instance anyway, there wasn't enough weight behind the hammer falling to set off the primer. Maybe next time, huh?
IMO the firing pin is not resting "against" the primer,it is inside the bolt, and the spring that ejects it from the bolt is not under tension and still seems safer than a safty,we are after all human and forgetting is part of our make up as well as being naive.
Look at park brakes, everyone has seen or done the classic jump out of the car and get back in and release the brake to find out it was not set to begin with. Just about every trucker I know has gotten out of their truck and back in and go to release the air brakes and realized they never pulled the button before they got out. Safeties can be the same way,think they are on and they are not.
All I am saying is that no animal is worth any ones life and I do not take the chance. I live to hunt and my hunting would be over if I ever shot someone. Many a person is living with the guilt of doing just that(accidentally of course,intentionally is a whole different thing) and I do not want to be one of them.
I hunt with a round chambered and safety on. I hunt in the midwest and if I am "hunting" it means that I am either sitting, 95 percent, or walking very slowly. I almost always hunt alone and use my binoculars to ID possible game. If I am walking to or from my hunting area I unload completely.
Neither hot nor cold is �wrong� and I hunt both ways depending on conditions.

One thing is for sure � an empty chamber is 100% safe 100% of the time � no exceptions.

Another thing, an empty chamber should not be an excuse for poor handling technique and ignoring standard safety rules.

Looking back on my kills over the years I�m hard pressed to think of one big game animal I�ve taken that I could not have harvested if hunting with a cold chamber. Many, in fact, were taken when I was hunting cold.

Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Neither hot nor cold is �wrong� and I hunt both ways depending on conditions.

One thing is for sure � an empty chamber is 100% safe 100% of the time � no exceptions.

Another thing, an empty chamber should not be an excuse for poor handling technique and ignoring standard safety rules.

Looking back on my kills over the years I�m hard pressed to think of one big game animal I�ve taken that I could not have harvested if hunting with a cold chamber. Many, in fact, were taken when I was hunting cold.

Was thinking the same thing as i was writing my previous posts, nothing ever got away because i had to chamber a round.
Almost all guns have inertial firing pins. The pin isn't long enough to rest on the primer of a loaded cartridge. if this weren't so, engaging the safety wouldn't relieve pressure on the primer unless the safety cams the firing pin away from the round. Many bolt action rifles have this feature.

Went hunting with a friend once. When we and several others returned to the campsite around noon, a fellow came into camp with a '94 Win. cocked! I asked him to take care of this as we didn't come into camp with a round in the chamber. He looked down, suprised, and ejected the round in the chamber. Said he got the rifle the night before and wasn't familiar yet. Seems he chambered a round in the morning and had been walking around all morn with the hammer cocked!

he was embaressed and we showed him how his new rifle worked. He had never been hunting before.
Bill
Originally Posted by Colorado1135
has anyone ever jumped an animal they are hunting and had them stand there waiting for a shot? I have, and if my gun were empty I would sure feel foolish, rather than be getting the knife out to gut him


Unless you walk around with the rifle already shouldered like a swat ninja clearing a building, you have to mount the rifle before you can shoot. It takes zero extra time to work the bolt while you're mounting the rifle to your shoulder, just a little cooridination and practice. Are all of y'all really that clumsy that you can't run the freaking bolt while bringing the rifle to eye level? It's not that dang hard. If it is, you need to practice a little more with your rifle or take up golf.
Originally Posted by CLB
It's rare when I have an empty chamber while I'm hunting.....the little thingy on the side is called a safety!

Chris


There is a little thingy in your head called a brain too....try that.
Originally Posted by 257STEW
IMO the firing pin is not resting "against" the primer,it is inside the bolt, and the spring that ejects it from the bolt is not under tension and still seems safer than a safty,we are after all human and forgetting is part of our make up as well as being naive.
Look at park brakes, everyone has seen or done the classic jump out of the car and get back in and release the brake to find out it was not set to begin with. Just about every trucker I know has gotten out of their truck and back in and go to release the air brakes and realized they never pulled the button before they got out. Safeties can be the same way,think they are on and they are not.
All I am saying is that no animal is worth any ones life and I do not take the chance. I live to hunt and my hunting would be over if I ever shot someone. Many a person is living with the guilt of doing just that(accidentally of course,intentionally is a whole different thing) and I do not want to be one of them.

Try this - remove the bolt from your rifle. Twist the back so that the bolt is uncocked (I'm assuming a cock on opening action). Look at the firing pin protruding through the firing pin hole. Press against it with your finger. Does it move back in to the hole? If not, then the firing pin is resting on the primer when you have a cartridge in the chamber and the bolt uncocked. That's MUCH worse than carrying hot with the safety on.
The only thing worse than carrying hot, is carrying one like described above, with the firing pin resting on the primer.

Can't think of a single bolt action that doesn't rest the firing pin on the primer in that scenario.

Originally Posted by 257STEW
... and the spring that ejects it from the bolt is not under tension ...

It most certainly is under tension, even when uncocked the firing pin spring in a bolt action rifle is under considerable tension.

It's holding the firing pin tight up against the primer in that cartridge that you have chambered, which you unfortunately think is safe because the action is not cocked....
i think you should so that you would be prepared to blow your brains out if this thread keeps going much longer....
Damn, where's Liar24 to set us straight on the rifle engineering questions?
probably in SC picking up anther Winchester
CLB---
Again....not trying to pick on you. You were at the right place at the wrong time.....I still say that a safety is a mechanical device. They can fail....
How many people have been carrying hot with the gun on safe, walking thru whatever thick stuff and looked down and found that the gun was no longer on safe??????? Once was enuff for me. A little practice is all it takes to shuck one as your rifle is being shouldered to be fast and safe!!!!

George
No one seems to have brought up the point that no matter whether you carry "hot" or empty, you should KEEP YOU FINGER OFF THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOU ARE READY TO SHOOT!!! ALSO, practice pointing the rifle in a safe direction at all times when you're carrying it. It only takes a little practice and then the safety becomes somewhat redundant.

One year, in deer camp, one Rambo was waving his rifle around and someone told him not to point it at him. "Oh, it's okay. I've got the safety on." He was taken to school in short order and not invited back next year.
Originally Posted by tzone
Originally Posted by CLB
It's rare when I have an empty chamber while I'm hunting.....the little thingy on the side is called a safety!

Chris


There is a little thingy in your head called a brain too....try that.



Tzone,

I can use my brain well thanks! There is no point in bantering this with you. I never fully rely on the safety, but it is there for a reason and in 30 years, I have never had a problem with any malfunctions. One can hunt safely with a round in the chamber and does not make someone irresponsible.
Originally Posted by triggerguard1
Damn, where's Liar24 to set us straight on the rifle engineering questions?


Matt,

Now this is something I would like to see also.

Chris
Originally Posted by GeorgeS3
CLB---
Again....not trying to pick on you. You were at the right place at the wrong time.....I still say that a safety is a mechanical device. They can fail....
How many people have been carrying hot with the gun on safe, walking thru whatever thick stuff and looked down and found that the gun was no longer on safe??????? Once was enuff for me. A little practice is all it takes to shuck one as your rifle is being shouldered to be fast and safe!!!!

George



You have made a couple good points George.

Chris
Walking thru thick stuff, the rifle is at port arms, my trigger finger is along side the trigger guard and my thumb is behind the safety making sure it's in place. If it is super thick and I have to really creep along doubled over, the rifle is pointed ahead as I weave the muzzle thru the brush. My trigger finger and thumb are in the same place however.
I've never understood folks that tell tales about finding their bolts missing or their floor plates open with all the ammo gone, and now their safeties off.
257stew; What kind of a boltaction rifle do you have? When you load a shell in your boltaction's chamber, do you then hold the trigger while gently letting the bolt handle down, then hunt that way? If you do, you are putting the firing pin up against the primer. I don't know of any boltaction rifle in my safe that has a floating firing pin. Again, what kind of rifle do you have that we are talking about here?
Try this: point the rifle in a safe direction and rap smartly on the back end of the firing pin with something that for sure contacts the end of the firing pin itself. Make sure your rifle is pointed in a safe direction, because I know on mine, it will fire.
Do I hunt with a round in the chamber? Naw, I generally aim at them and click.
I suspect all hunt with a round in the chamber at some point, else the obvious point you make MD. But the question is really one of when the round goes in. And I suspect that varies from time to time with every hunter. Many choose to hunt empty-chambered for the most part, while others run things mostly hot. And a great many conditions, not the least of which are terrain, play into what makes sense.

Is it any safer or less safe to sit in a tree stand with one in the spout versus hiking in steep terrain with the rifle slung and both hands busy to maintain balance. (Can a person actually maintain positive muzzle control with the rifle carried across the back on a sling?) And, not every firearm works the same way either. Carrying an exposed hammer weapon which relies on a down hammer as a safety versus a weapon using an always-cocked hammer which is either blocked or the trigger blocked does strike me as being the same deal. (I know very well that a blocked trigger can be potentially very hazardous, yet a simple gun like a lever action Marlin, Winchester, or even and H&R single shot can be carried hot quite safely. I still don't carry an exposed hammer weapon chamber loaded when it is in a scabbard though.)

The real answer to a question like this lies in using judgement. And that judgement must always be alert to the situation just as one must always be alert to keeping the weapon directed safely. Truth is, I load and unload quite often when a weapon is carried in my hands. On the sling or in the scabbard I rarely expose what I consider an extreme risk by not unloading the chamber.
My bolt guns are rugers but maybe we need to know what rifle you are using.The chances of walking with my rifle and having something "rap smartly" on my firing pin is remote, having a gun go of because a safety has somehow failed is far more likely to happen.All kinds of things can happen when you have fatigue ,cold fingers,excitment etc.There is a reason for alot of jobs in this world to have hours of service limitations applied to them as we are only human .I am not saying you are wrong and will go check my rifles out to see if they will do as you say.
With the pressure of the firing pin spring already exerting as much pressure as it does, and the pin of a Ruger will be pressing hard against the cartridge's primer, you don't need to do anything more than bump the rifle to hard to potentially set it off. With all due respect, what you are doing is probably the most dangerous thing anyone has posted in the thread. I'd prefer to run chamber hot, rifle cocked, safety off.
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
With the pressure of the firing pin spring already exerting as much pressure as it does, and the pin of a Ruger will be pressing hard against the cartridge's primer, you don't need to do anything more than bump the rifle to hard to potentially set it off. With all due respect, what you are doing is probably the most dangerous thing anyone has posted in the thread. I'd prefer to run chamber hot, rifle cocked, safety off.


Plus 1 million.........


Simply setting the rifle down to lean against a tree or pickup could potentially set it off.
Scary indeed.
A primed but otherwise empty case in my Ruger77 in 300WM, a 700 in 30-06 and a mauser 25-06 each went off with a rap on the shroud with a rawhide mallet. I could not make them go off by banging on the butt... But I was not hitting them hard enough to damage them and that could easily happen in a real situation...
Well I guess we learn something everyday. Thanks for informing me. From now on I will walk with my rifle "cold" unless I am walking by myself,which I do a lot as still hunting is my favorite way to hunt . Again thank you guys and girls.
why wouldn't you?

if you are that unsafe or around someone who is...

I'd take up golf instead....

to me this question is like asking "do you play golf with a golf ball?"

NO I use a basketball, as it is a lot safer for those around me...and I don't want to hurt anyone..
Klik,

I made the obvious point because this thread has gone on for 73 pages now with no real end in sight--and I couldn't stand it anymore.
I hear crickets.... grin grin
I hear music and I see a curtain falling... And a hunter learned something about his rifle that may prevent his having an accident.
It's a good day. smile
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
A primed but otherwise empty case in my Ruger77 in 300WM, a 700 in 30-06 and a mauser 25-06 each went off with a rap on the shroud with a rawhide mallet. I could not make them go off by banging on the butt... But I was not hitting them hard enough to damage them and that could easily happen in a real situation...


Yep, the good ole Rawhide Mallet. It gets lots of use around here come trigger tuning time.
Originally Posted by Seafire
why wouldn't you?

if you are that unsafe or around someone who is...

I'd take up golf instead....

to me this question is like asking "do you play golf with a golf ball?"

NO I use a basketball, as it is a lot safer for those around me...and I don't want to hurt anyone..


Wow, what an analagy......

I'll take an errant golf ball over a bullet any day thanks. YMV, obviously........

And if you're good enough to know the exact moment you're going to slip, trip, or fall and can maintain perfect muzzle control during same, you're a far better man than any thus listed on this site......
Originally Posted by 257STEW
Well I guess we learn something everyday. Thanks for informing me. From now on I will walk with my rifle "cold" unless I am walking by myself,which I do a lot as still hunting is my favorite way to hunt . Again thank you guys and girls.


I learned that very tid bit on this site, about 6 month's after I first joined. Sure glad I did.

I hunt cold almost exclusively now, and always when with a partner. Too much at stake not too, and it is far from a hindrance, given a clue and a little coordination. Currently instilling the same practice in my daughters hunting training.
It's an Oregon thing
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
Do I hunt with a round in the chamber? Naw, I generally aim at them and click.



It doesn't work--I've done tried it a couple times.......... cry

You get that sinking feeling as the bulls butt disappears into the timber.....



Casey
Originally Posted by Steelhead
It's an Oregon thing



Did somebody revive this thread just for you?....



Casey
Mr. RiverOtter;
I�ve been present on two occasions when shotguns discharged as they were being un-cocked with a live round in the chamber.

The first time was a Russian Baikal single shot and the 2nd time was a Mossberg bolt action. The first time was when I was very young and it happened to me, the 2nd time it happened to another hunter who did it behind me without me knowing it was being done. Both times a safe muzzle direction saved me, but still scared me spitless. frown

Suffice it to say it is a topic I cover very thoroughly when I teach gun handling in CORE. wink

When I hunt with anyone else, which unless it�s our daughters is pretty rare, I insist the person I�m with has a cold chamber. In my work I�ve done far too many accident investigations to believe that the vagaries of life will never catch up to me. I�m just not that lucky.

When I hunt down here in the Okanagan, not only is the rifle empty but it�s often slung, as I find I glass better with two hands.

As you know down here, we can bump into whitetail or mule deer, elk, moose, California Bighorn, goats, bears and a few species of range animals too. Since we have gender and on most animals point restrictions as well, one has a bit of identifying to do before proceeding.

If the piece of ear or leg that I�ve spotted turns into a legal animal, I then heat up the chamber and do my best to empty it into the animal. I�ll note that about half the time I hunt with a Number One and the rest of the time a bolt gun of some description. Both actions can be used with about the same amount of elapsed time I believe.

While I�m sure my method has perhaps cost me a deer or two, I can�t really complain too loudly as our red meat seems to come off the mountain for the most part.

I suppose it might be a regional thing as well, but for us here in the mountains with the shin-tangle and such it has been a safe and productive way for us to hunt.

Good luck on all your upcoming hunts and especially those with your daughter. Good on you for taking her out!

Regards,
Dwayne
This topic is being discussed in a couple of other forums i say each to his on someone wants to hunt with a cold chamber its there business and yes it is safer
I choose to hunt with a round in the chamber i hunt by myself sometimes i take my nephew he does not even carry a gun he is t0 young ill leave it out then
Iam also a hunter safety instructor and i dont teach people to hunt with a empty chamber i teach them how to handle a gun as if it were loaded at all times
I carry a round chambered,bedded mature whitetail bucks don't put up with giving you a chance to chamber a round. I don't know anyone personally that walks around with a empty chamber.What I do not agree with is guys that have a chambered round in their vehicle thats a no go for me..If you practice good muzzle control and have reasonable experience it is very safe.
Originally Posted by jcdixon77

Iam also a hunter safety instructor and i dont teach people to hunt with a empty chamber i teach them how to handle a gun as if it were loaded at all times


Mr. jcdixon77;
First off I'd like to send you a tip of the hat for being an instructor, thank you for your time teaching the next generation.

To clarify a point, I don�t teach the students how they should carry either, as it is a topic that all the instructors where I teach can�t agree on! grin

What I meant to say and should have been more clear on it, was that I teach them the inherent danger of carrying a rifle or shotgun with a chambered round in the �uncocked� condition where it would have the firing pin resting on the primer.

Indeed we try to instill the thought that every firearm they handle should be treated as loaded, which sounds like the same thing you folks do as well.

Thanks again and good luck on your upcoming hunts.

Regards,
Dwayne

Id agree 100 %
Dwayne uncocked chabered round is about as dangerous as a combination as someone could come up with Im glad i read this though I have never mentioned it in class i guess I took it for granted a person would not do. Going to make a note of it .

Good luck on your future hunts as well we don't get started with rifle season here for another 5 or 6 weeks
Clark

I dont know anyone thats hunts with a cold chamber. When I head for the woods I chamber a round always have always will.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
It's an Oregon thing


Dude, you're killing me. Can't argue with facts. cry
I have hunted with many claiming perfect muzzle control. I have never seen an example...
i've never seen an animal stop to say, "hey bonehead, ya gonna chamber a round so you can shoot me".....

there's always a round in the chamber, and safety on. i hope if something should happen to tug on the trigger while moving thru the woods it works at that point in time.

toys around the house also always have a round in the pipe.
i have no children, and wife knows they are loaded and knows how to use em......

pity the bump in the night......

new mexico hunting...
I won't sit here and argue the fact that hot is as safe as cold, but if you have ever tracked deer in the sands of NM you would hunt HOT or go home empty handed.I also understand many will reply they would rather go home empty handed.
Hunt by myself and hunt hot.
Lots of talk about what won't work but has never been tried.
Different hunting areas and strategies require different techniques,i'm not saying cold isn't an option most of the time but there are times when it is not.
I hunt with a round in the chamber safety on. I keep and arrow knocked in my bow when I hunt. I carry a round in the chamber when I CCW (always). I carry a gun a work everyday with a round chambered. Why wouldn't you? If you are practicing safe firearms handling its not an issue.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
I have hunted with many claiming perfect muzzle control. I have never seen an example...


Must be an Alaska problem. I concur.

(I gotta admit though, I don't really understand why a normally hot chamber hunter would unload for vehicle travel if it isn't illegal, yet most seem to think that is a good idea.)
if someone is that worried about there ability to handle a firearm, they have no business touching it at all.
You seem to be genuinely ignorant in your failure to grasp the level of risk which many folks in Alaska face in their daily lives. I dare say it is probably higher in so many ways than

If I was a worried person, Alaska would hardly be a suitable place to live, especially not rural Alaska. That doesn't mean I become cavalier about potentially dangerous things over which I do have some control. In fact, it is precisely those things over which one has control which separates the fools from the rest.

It is not the ability to handle a firearm - or not- which is a concern; it is the fact that one simply has to accept the fact that things will happen which are beyond one's control which can compromise the safe handling of a weapon. And I'm sure Alaska does not have a singular lock on that problem.

One accepts risk with many things. That is never more true in the US than when living in Alaska. But accepting some risk and daring the odds are two different things entirely.
First of all i wasn't talking about Alaska. and yeah there are risks with everything, it just depends on which idiots behind the wheel.
Speaking of which... I hope the cold-chamber risk managers don't speed on their way to hunting camps this year. smile No mud tires, either. Or jacked-up rigs. Damn things are a hazard to everyone on the road.

And no bacon, either. Take that baby aspirin...

The blacktail buck I cut up today wouldn't have died that evening if I'd been sitting there "cold". At least not for me. One of you real sourdoughs might have pulled it off, though that doesn't put meat in MY freezer.... wink

Muzzle discipline is the key... It's all just a question of degree, anyway. EVERYONE unchambers if things get wierd enough- climbing a cliff or whatever. Or at least they should.

Akin to wearing your seat belt only when it's raining.

I continually read "Muzzle control" and that's the whole ever loving point, one never has 100% control.
Here is a good example:

Originally Posted by Cossatotjoe
show up in the strangest places. Anyone ever had one of your rifles load itself after years of sitting in the back of the rack?

I never keep any loaded weapons around except for one shotgun and one handgun in the house. But today, while showing my nephew a few candidates for his new deer rifle, he racked the bolt a couple of times on a .270 and out flies a shell. Now, it wasn't in the chamber before he worked the bolt a few times and there was no real danger because safe gun handling was being practiced, but I was a little shaken, then mad at myself.

I honestly don't know the last time that rifle was used and I really don't know how it was loaded. Well...I guess I know I left it with a few in the magazine but I don't know why or how.

So, I know I'm preaching to the choir, but I'll reiterate the old axiom to treat every gun as if it is loaded because it just may be.



I think the above points to the problem that many have. I'm safe. Notice the bold, no real danger because safe gun handling was being practiced.

Just how the [bleep] is A) Giving a kid a gun without checking that it's loaded B) Handing over a rifle without the action open C)Having the kid verify all considered safe gun practicing.

Course lots of folks said 'Good reminder'. If nothing else, agreeing with JO should give folks pause, but I'm sure lots of you ALWAYS practice safe gun handling.

Hot, from the minute I'm out of my Polaris Ranger until I'm back in the Ranger.....unloaded when traveling.

I keep gas in my truck when not in use. And, I don't smoke.

I like fried chicken, women and brown whiskey......
If your hunting game that stands there and lets you clank a round into the chamber, you must be on a farm....
If you'd stop missing wink they wouldn't learn what the "clanking" and thunking was all about. Somebody must be educating all these animals which flee at the mere hint of an ill-intentioned thought. grin
I've changed my view on the hot/cold carry over the past several years. I don't think I was ever "unsafe", but a bullet can never be called back.

In the truck, on the atv, I don't even have one in the mag.

Walking in/out/still hunting I've got the mag loaded but empty chamber. Once I'm in the stand one goes in the chamber. If I'm on the ground, once I spot game, one goes in the chamber.

Safety is always on until I'm set to send a bullet on the way.

Muzzle control/safe handling should be a given, but I know I've only got control over so many things....

Last year a friend and I were going to call 'yotes. My rifle was unloaded (mag and chamber). We were still at the truck, getting our "stuff" out. Just as I moved my rifle from one side of my body to the other with the muzzle pointed up and away from him (and anything else except blue sky) he stepped up and across passing the side of his head right in front of the muzzle. The rifle was unloaded and I did all I could to safely handle the rifle, but it still bothers me that my rifle was pointed at someone for a split second. He didn't even notice but was very appreciative of my apology....

The more things I see, the more I'm aware of how little control I have at times, and the more seriously I take the things I do have control over.

JCM
I'm just happy for all the posters who obviously have never fallen flat on their face on top of their muzzle, or seen their whole rifle go in a direction that was completely unplanned, due the crap they were walking on shifting or breaking. I've taken some nasty falls just to keep my rifle sighted in...if you get my drift.

I had to smile when I read the part about the guy in this or another thread who always carries his rifle at port arms and has his hands and fingers just so. Good for him that he doesn't hunt in anything thicker than he does. Personally, I have to use my hands to keep from getting my eyes poked out, or to keep myself upright by hanging onto things. A rifle safety doesn't know if it's your finger or a stick pushing it off.
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
You seem to be genuinely ignorant in your failure to grasp the level of risk which many folks in Alaska face in their daily lives. I dare say it is probably higher in so many ways than

If I was a worried person, Alaska would hardly be a suitable place to live, especially not rural Alaska. That doesn't mean I become cavalier about potentially dangerous things over which I do have some control. In fact, it is precisely those things over which one has control which separates the fools from the rest.

It is not the ability to handle a firearm - or not- which is a concern; it is the fact that one simply has to accept the fact that things will happen which are beyond one's control which can compromise the safe handling of a weapon. And I'm sure Alaska does not have a singular lock on that problem.

One accepts risk with many things. That is never more true in the US than when living in Alaska. But accepting some risk and daring the odds are two different things entirely.



Good post Klik. If I may, I'd like to add to it.

Statistically, the chances of an accidental discharge or a negligent discharge (which IMO a lot of ADs really are) are low. The problem is that if or when it occurs, the consequences are too great.

Quote
I'm just happy for all the posters who obviously have never fallen flat on their face ...

If one were so inclined to reread this entire mess, there is at least one poster that actually, and unbelievably claims to NEVER have slipped, tripped, or fallen in 50 some years of combat and hunting.
Not freakin once!

So, it's possible........










or not.
Originally Posted by BlueDuck
If your hunting game that stands there and lets you clank a round into the chamber, you must be on a farm....


Over 20 years of hunting Colorado big game carrying both hot and cold, never lost an animal I can think of because the chamber was empty and never hunted anything but free-ranging, wild animals.

Comments like yours show a definite lack of experience.
Would a constitutional ammendment to never carry hot make you cold carriers feel better/safer?

Run it by your dim leader......
The first time this topic came up years ago I went out and practiced dry firing on some deer. I could get off sometimes dozons of fake shots on bucks or does before they would walk or run off. These where all public land blacktail and mule deer. And I've killed plenty of big game on the run while packing a hot chamber.

If you want to live dangerously be the lead guy on a raid into a building. You're as likely to get shot by the "professional" behind you as the bad guy shooting at you front.

Having a ND on family or friends is not something I want to experience in my life.
Originally Posted by BlueDuck
If your hunting game that stands there and lets you clank a round into the chamber, you must be on a farm....


Not everybody hunts by charging through the woods taking ass shots at whatever jumps up...
I'm sure none of the cold chamber gents carry a revolver...right?
Bill
Originally Posted by wahoo
I'm sure none of the cold chamber gents carry a revolver...right?
Bill


Can't speak for the others, but on occasion I carry a revolver. I sometimes carry an autoloader, too, although concealed and not hunting. In both cases my preferred method is with an empty chamber. In the revolver that means the one under the hammer.

Of course when I carry concealed with an empty chamber I'm not going into places where I'm likely to be in harm's way. I try to stay away from places like that.
Originally Posted by Stan V
Would a constitutional ammendment to never carry hot make you cold carriers feel better/safer?

Run it by your dim leader......


If you are referring to Obama, he is the President pro tem, but he is not my �leader�. I actually don�t know of any of his stated opinions I agree with.

And no, neither a Constitutional Amendment nor any other law would make me feel better or safer. I carry both ways depending on circumstances and don�t relish the idea of more government intrusion.

Carry the way you like, I�ll carry the way I like, when I like.

I think most of the cold carry people feel the same way. Further I think we are all amused at the way some hot carry proponents obviously feel threatened that some folks come to a different conclusion than they do regarding method of carry. We regularly get accused of being too stupid to handle a firearm safely when cold carry is undeniably the SAFEST way to carry when it comes to Accidental Discharges.


I could care less how anyone carries their rifle when hunting if they are alone.....I find it hilarious that we've become such a nanny state that some feel the need to press upon their comrades in arms how a rifle should be handled while hunting.


Get over yourselves. Frankly, those that protest the most probably shouldn't risk ever loading a rifle, handle an auto loader, or drink a beer and drive within 2 hours.

It's OK to swim after you've eaten, it's only an old wives tale that you'll drown if you swim within 30 minutes of eating.


When I entered a building I wanted the guys behind me to be loaded hot and the safety off. I trust the men behind me alot more than what may be on the otherside of the door I'm kicking in. I see you have a military avatar that mentions sniper. How many doors does a sniper kick open a day compared the a regular infanrtyman on patrol.
Thank you for your service!!
First of all to JeffO: Thanks for starting this thread 2 years ago, because the response from people that I know who have considerable experience have caused me to rethink how I go about this. For 51 years I carried with one in the chamber and thought that was the way it was done. The comments of some I have come to respect on the fire has changed the way I do things. Even when I carried hot, I hunted as safely as I could and often reminded myself an animal-big or little-is not worth the regret I would have if something went wrong.

A while back I related an incident I had crossing a stream that was no more than 2 feet wide. I made one jump and with hands wet from rain the shotgun slipped and hit the ground. I caught the barrels pointing at my chest. Said that was dumb and went on. In my mind I kept hearing this sound and the longer I went I knew it was the hammers falling. Opened the action and out ejected 2 shotgun shells. Bill Ruger saved my life with his hammer blocks on the Ruger O/U. Stupid on my part, but I've hunted with many safe hunters that would have taken that same two foot level leap without unloading.

I have taken many other falls with both shotgun and rifle. If you hunt you can guarantee it will happen sometime/somewhere, level ground or difficult, it's just a matter of time. Usually you will get away with it, but again it's just a matter of time until you don't.

Cold from now on with a rifle and action open with a shotgun. Admittedly shells in the chamber with action open in an 0/U or laying on the lifter if a pump. Safety on at all times.

Again thanks Jeff and thanks to those who explained why I should change.
Thank you.
Don't make assumptions. How many military snipers do you know that only preformed missions as a sniper from the day they left Benning till the day they retired.

As far as people behind me. They have plenty of time to flip the selector switch on the way up and I trust some a hell of a lot more than others. If you've bonked so many doors explain how over the course of a deployment (on only the good Lord knows how many missions) you always had your personal favorite door bonking buddies with you.

If you're LEO how many "SWAT" ninjas are actually good and how many are there because they drink beer with the right guys.

In both cases there can be incredible warriors or absolutely dangerous idiots behind you. When sheitte gets real noisey good men can do some wierd stuff. Self preservation kicks in and bad sheitte does happen.
For the Army guys... what we need is a Seal to settle the mine's bigger issue.
Bill
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Of course when I carry concealed with an empty chamber I'm not going into places where I'm likely to be in harm's way. I try to stay away from places like that.


Sorry, but that's the dumbest statement I've read in a long, long time! Do you go to the mall, movies, restaurants, gas stations, grocery stores, school, church, hiking/walking trails, work, or anywhere else for that matter, because they're all "places like that"!


Never left Benning served in the Marine Corps nothing against the Army. Been in the sandbox with 1st Battalion 8th Marines and 3rd battalion 8th Marines. Never saw a sniper attached to a platoon and never had a warrior I didnt know behind me when kicking in a door. When that door opens I want a proffesional with the safety off covering the left right and overhead ready to fire.If the man behind you is an idiot that safety being on aint gonna help you. Its a high intensity environment thats why we trade off and take turns kicking in the door. I will take a trained Marine with a hot weopon and safety off over a trained marine safety on anyday your YMMV. What conflicts before Iraq did you kick in alot of doors before becoming a sniper.

Bye the way Roque I respect your service. Wish you the best.
Quote
When that door opens I want a proffesional with the safety off covering the left right and overhead ready to fire.

Very different hunting situation than the one most are discussing here.

Apples/oranges.
Originally Posted by 28lx

Never left Benning served in the Marine Corps nothing against the Army. Been in the sandbox with 1st Battalion 8th Marines and 3rd battalion 8th Marines. Never saw a sniper attached to a platoon and never had a warrior I didnt know behind me when kicking in a door. When that door opens I want a proffesional with the safety off covering the left right and overhead ready to fire.If the man behind you is an idiot that safety being on aint gonna help you. Its a high intensity environment thats why we trade off and take turns kicking in the door. I will take a trained Marine with a hot weopon and safety off over a trained marine safety on anyday your YMMV. What conflicts before Iraq did you kick in alot of doors before becoming a sniper.


Dude, we're in to different worlds. Enjoy yourself.
Originally Posted by Stan V
I could care less how anyone carries their rifle when hunting if they are alone.....I find it hilarious that we've become such a nanny state that some feel the need to press upon their comrades in arms how a rifle should be handled while hunting.

I don�t think most of the cold carry types care what others do � with the perfectly proper exception that they SHOULD care how others around them handle their weapons.

When I see unsafe behavior I see that it is corrected or I make myself scarce. When my hunting buddies and I go afield we have rules we all agree to � things like anyone can call for a safety check at any time and everyone actually LOOKS at their safety while PHYSICALLY CHECKING it before announcing a firearm is on safe. Before a rifle goes in my vehicle the chamber gets checked the same way, visually and with a finger into the chamber. No one has to abide by those rules but I don�t have to haul them around or hunt with them either � and I won�t.

Whether my hunting partners carry hot or cold is generally left up to them. I have asked people I�ve hunted with to empty their chamber for various safety related reasons (usually due to poor muzzle control) and they have always complied. Their choice, but if they had failed to do so they would have been very much on their own afterwards. In any event, they didn�t get an invite the next year.

Quote

Get over yourselves. Frankly, those that protest the most probably shouldn't risk ever loading a rifle, handle an auto loader, or drink a beer and drive within 2 hours.

It's OK to swim after you've eaten, it's only an old wives tale that you'll drown if you swim within 30 minutes of eating.



And of course no one has EVER been accidently shot, right? And the excuses afterwards � and there are always excuses - can�t recall the bullets.

One thing is true, however � no one has ever been shot when the chamber was empy, no exceptions.
About 15 years ago, IIRC, I had an unwanted discharge that made me rethink hunting hot. Before that I was a "safe" hunter, practiced all the "safe" gun handling rules religously, and in all my hunting since 1979 I never had an unwanted discharge. I was one of those guys that figured stuff like that would never happen to me.

I was careful.....

The occurance I'm talking about was with a centerfire deer rifle, 3 in the belly and one in the chamber. I was walking up a sorta steep ridge, thought I had the safety "on", and boom...the ground exploded right in front of me. I SWEAR the safety was on but when I collected myself and looked things over the safety was "off". A little twig had snagged the trigger, and I can't explain how the safety got moved. Maybe I thought I set in on safe, but didn't.

No longer could I say it wouldn't happen to me.....

I was hunting alone and the muzzle was pointed in a "safe" direction, the ground in front of me.....but what if I'd have bounced that bullet back into my own guts, or chest. No one would have found me in time.......

Just last winter my kid and I were walking across some ice back to the house. We'd just been out all day in the cold/ice/snow, were tired and hungry, and REALLY wanting that hot woodstove. I mentioned to the kid that this ice is pretty damn slippery so be careful. No sooner had I got that out of my mouth and his feet went flying out from under him. He slammed hard down on his left hip and his rifle went flying up in the air, probably six feet high. How that happened I don't know because he had it slung on his shoulder via the sling. It all happened in a millisecond and I'll never forget the sound that rifle made when it came down on the ice. You could have made the same sound throwing it down on some concrete from up on a ladder. It bounced from muzzle to butt back to muzzle a few times before coming to rest about 10 feet from him. I feared him a broken hip, and I feared the rifle a busted stock, and a busted scope at a minimum. He was okay other than wounded pride, and the rifle was, to my surprise, unharmed beyond a nasty ding in the wood.

I'm DAMN glad I've taught him to hunt/carry with a cold chamber. If there ever was a fall that could cause an unwanted discharge that was it. Despite the circumstances of being done for the day, within sight of the house, and most anyone's rifles would have been unloaded anyway, that fall could have happened anywhere, and at any time, and to anyone.

The point of his story is that he never thought he was going to take a spill on that ice, neither did I. He never thought he could lose THAT much control of his rifle, neither did I.

Were it not for my own mistake 15 years earlier that taught me to carry cold, his little accident on the ice COULD have killed him, or me, or one of our family members in the house if that rifle had a round in the chamber.

There's just too many risks to carrying a hot chamber, and trust me, NEVER think it can't happen to you......
6 days of hunting farm animals. Even one charge in that lot.


[Linked Image]
OK, I'm convinced. Trigger locks in the field!!

So you Ralphie's won't shoot your eye out!
Pick-up truck, corn feeder, and tripod stand?

Just wondering......
Quote
Even one charge in that lot.


I'm sellin' the "fact" that deer charge in Alaska to my wife grin . One more reason to make the trip.

George
Quote
Trigger locks in the field!!

In some cases where control cannot be maintained that may not be enough.

It's never been about "cold guys" not being able to control and thereby safeing themselves by going cold. It's about absolute safety when one does not have absolute control.

Slips, trips, and falls happen in lots of huntin' woods. Some hunting grounds are as safe in that regard as cleaning a rifle in one's garage, so it's of little issue.

The risk of a ND is small; the consequences are great. That is the point, not clumsy Bubbas afield.

Amazing how few actually get that, isn't it.....
For an example of how folks tend to handle firearms when they "know" the chamber is empty, spend an hour in any gun shop. I agree-a good gun handler, with an empty chamber, is darn safe. But, offsetting that IMHO is the idea of all the bad gun handlers put there... Thinking they have an empty chamber, when they don't. In a season's hunting, in a 100% mandated "cold carry" scenario, rifles would get chambered a LOT. They'd get un-chambered again some smaller number of times... There's risk there, too.

As to risks, manage them as you see fit. Driving 55 on the highway is probably your statistically best place to start- for you and the people around you. Do it for the children.

So... Safe to say the cold carry guys will be the ones putzing along in the slow lane...? smile

My only real interest here is when guys say that hot-carry hunters don't belong in the woods... Dunno if that's happened lately as I'm not monitoring this. It did happen earlier in the thread. Other than that, who cares... Do as you see fit.





You don't get it.....
Originally Posted by wildswalker
You don't get it.....


That's the understatement of the century!...
Originally Posted by wildswalker
Amazing how few actually get that, isn't it.....


Obviously, you favor some type of law, or control by someone other than the adults that hunt? I appreciate your concern for my safety and the safety of my family.....anything else you may want to suggest to help me through the rest of my life?
You make the "cold" case very well. Thanks.

The guys in the gun shop are not mishandling the rifles because they know them to be safe - that's standard practice for those guys.

Nobody is talking about cold chamber mandates - you sound like an Obama democrat...........oh, wait.

It's not to say that someone with a hot chamber cannot handle safely, they certainly can, and mostly do. It's the part that cannot be controlled that is the point.

Also, lotsa really bad analogies made from pistols to shotguns to golf to driving. Here's one for you:

Odds are one of your precious children could run across I-5* in the dark and not get hurt. Would you let them anyway?



*Pick your closest interstate - if ya have one.

Originally Posted by Stan V
Originally Posted by wildswalker
Amazing how few actually get that, isn't it.....


Obviously, you favor some type of law, or control by someone other than the adults that hunt? I appreciate your concern for my safety and the safety of my family.....anything else you may want to suggest to help me through the rest of my life?


So far you and JeffyO are the only ones to advocate for laws and constitutional amendment for cold chambers. Some company you've chosen!

Jeffy-
Please don't PM me anymore.
Nah Stan, I'm in big favor of less litigation/law making.....

Just hopin' stupid people would smart up a tad.

Thanks for pointing out which side of the fence you ride on......
Quote
Just hopin' stupid people would smart up a tad.


Never gonna happen. I just wish that stupid people only injured/killed themselves. I wouldn't worry about things then. As it stands though.....

George
I'm guessing we shouldn't stop with hunting season and hot/cold issues.....let's control driving at night. Surely driving at night is more dangerous than daytime?

I don't care how an adult chooses to hunt when alone.

It's always the idiot that handles a firearm improperly that gets pissed off when you mention it. Guessing that trend is being shown here.

No, what's being shown here are a bunch of people who feel compelled to preach gun safety and thinking they have a higher authority due to their time/member count on the 'fire.

Is that about it? I'm unimpressed, even for the internet.
That can be true. I have seen it more than once.

But on the other side of the coin is the dude who thinks he is the Safety Police...

Both are idiots really. At least the Safety Police won't be the one who kills you...

Having said that, I would rather error on the side of being safe for sure.

That's something we all can agree on.
That's it exactly, here's wishing you an AD, since that's what made you.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
That's it exactly, here's wishing you an AD, since that's what made you.



That's it?


Shove it
It'll never happen to him Scott, he's one of THOSE perfect people.......
Bet you've said that a bunch punk.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Bet you've said that a bunch punk.


It's time to man up and behave like an adult, loser. grin
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Bet you've said that a bunch punk.


Scott, You gotta admit, your comeback:

Originally Posted by Steelhead
That's it exactly, here's wishing you an AD, since that's what made you.


was about as hard to follow-up as a whitetail that has just been gut "winged" by a MatchKing in a cedar swamp.
Must be my post count....
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
...

My only real interest here is when guys say that hot-carry hunters don't belong in the woods...


Some of the hot carry types are adamant that hot carry is the only smart way to go and the cold carry guys are too stupid to even be in the woods with a firearm � when cold carry is the only method that is 100% safe. Makes perfect sense to them, I guess.

Originally Posted by Jeff_O
{any of his verbage will suffice}



Originally Posted by wildswalker
You don't get it.....


Perfect.
Originally Posted by ironbender
You make the "cold" case very well. Thanks.

The guys in the gun shop are not mishandling the rifles because they know them to be safe - that's standard practice for those guys.

Nobody is talking about cold chamber mandates - you sound like an Obama democrat...........oh, wait.

It's not to say that someone with a hot chamber cannot handle safely, they certainly can, and mostly do. It's the part that cannot be controlled that is the point.

Also, lotsa really bad analogies made from pistols to shotguns to golf to driving. Here's one for you:

Odds are one of your precious children could run across I-5* in the dark and not get hurt. Would you let them anyway?

*Pick your closest interstate - if ya have one.



Lot of emotion flying around. Not sure why folks deem that necessary.

First, you made MY point very concisely. Guys handle guns carelessly when they "know" them to be empty. Not saying that anyone present is a bad gun handler; to the contrary, I suspect everyone here is a very GOOD gun handler. But we, or at least I, am talking in general terms here. Make it mandatory that everyone carry cold (I say that not because I favor government regulation, but because it's the only way to set up a hypothetical where everyone is carrying cold), and you know as well as I do that there'd be some damn sloppy gun work out there. Why? Because, you see... everyone "knows them to be safe", right?

You are wrong about my driving analogy. It's actually a very GOOD analogy. Here's why. The core of this debate, hot vs. cold, is safety. The safety of an individual, and those around him. Driving is exactly analagous. It is a statistical truth that less people would die on the highway if we drove 55 mph. Period. So, driving faster is a choice that you and I make (hell, I do anyway) because we want to, and the FACT that it endangers ourselves and those around us, exposes everyone to more risk, is something we are willing to live with for whatever reasons.

I challenge you, bendy-boy, to explain why that is not a superb analogy. Further, if you do drive faster than say 55 mph on the freeway, I'd like hear how you justify endangering yourself and those around you. Thanks in advance.

Lastly, YOUR analogy is fundamentally flawed and thus, meaningless for the discussion at hand. This is a thread about managing risk while doing something you want or need to do. Not about creating risk doing something like running across a freeway. Not applicable. Try harder.

As I've said before, there's a continuum here, a scale. I unload (unchamber) a rifle all the time, and I've carried "cold" when it seemed reasonable or prudent. When I'm hunting alone, which is most of the time, out in the big woods, I hunt hot and in my opinion that's perfectly safe and reasonable. I'm not in this life to be some puzzy-ass risk avoiding freak (not saying anyone here is). I'll drive 75 on the highway... I'll drink too much... I'll play my guitar too loud... that's just how it is for me.

I'll say again, the deer I killed a few days ago wouldn't have died that night if I'd been hunting "cold". Maybe one of you bad-asses would have gotten him that way; I'll concede that (though I doubt it rather strongly). But that doesn't fill MY freezer.

Some of us are hunting elk and deer with tags in the 10%, 15% success rate range. A guy made a comment earlier about how "the meat always seems to come down the mountain". With all due respect, it ain't like that in some places. Guys go years and years between Oregon public-land elk, for example. I'm not missing out on one because I handicapped myself by needing to chamber my friggin' rifle just to shoot the bastid.

YMMV, bendy-boy. Oh- better go wipe those counters with the anti-microbe stuff.. and don't forget to wash your hands again! smile Danger lurks everywhere... can't be too careful, bendy-boy.
Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
{any of his verbage will suffice}



Originally Posted by wildswalker
You don't get it.....


Perfect.


Yawn.

Funny how when confronted by rational and effective disagreement, a few here seem to need to resort to this kind of stuff. It's like arguing with women.

Telling...
your mean.
Yes, but I'm mean nicely. smile

(who was "Jessica", anyway?)
Yes.
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
{any of his verbage will suffice}



Originally Posted by wildswalker
You don't get it.....


Perfect.


Yawn.

Funny how when confronted by rational and effective disagreement


ONLY in your limited cerebral function is it possible to make that "reasoning".....we can clearly see what led you to that Obama vote.

You still don't, and likely never will...get it.

Can't blame us tho' for your shortcomings, you've been led to water sooooo many times, on soooo many things.
Went back and looked.

I was mis-remembering. It's more like pushing 80/20 percent, hot to cold carry while hunting.

BOY that 20+ percent are some noisy bastids! smile Comes with knowing it all, I suppose.

Originally Posted by wildswalker
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
{any of his verbage will suffice}



Originally Posted by wildswalker
You don't get it.....


Perfect.


Yawn.

Funny how when confronted by rational and effective disagreement


ONLY in your limited cerebral function is it possible to make that "reasoning".....we can clearly see what led you to that Obama vote.

You still don't, and likely never will...get it.

Can't blame us tho' for your shortcomings, you've been led to water sooooo many times, on soooo many things.


Actually, wildswalker, I thought your posts on this subject in the last couple days were excellent. Well thought out, and well said. This is the epitome of a debateable topic. There's truth on both sides. Don't think there's any reason for me to insult you, nor for you to insult me.

You call it being led to water, but I call it reasonable men disagreeing. I simply don't agree that "hot" hunters should stay out of the woods. Nor do I agree that a .223 is the equal of say a 30-06 as a general-purpose deer rifle... etc. See, you and your friends are not RIGHT on those issues; so why would I let myself be led to that water? What happens, though, is that when someone disagrees with you guys, you take it very personally.

While searching back for when I totaled up the percentage of who hunts how, I read some stuff from in the middle of this thread. There's some good, reasonable, debate happening there. I suggest we move back in that direction, but, it's not really up to me.
You fall quite short of that high road you think you are on, and flattery gets you nowhere.

But, whatever.......
Originally Posted by Jeff_O

Guys handle guns carelessly when they "know" them to be empty. Not saying that anyone present is a bad gun handler; to the contrary, I suspect everyone here is a very GOOD gun handler.


You just said one thing, then you said something very different. If everyone here is indeed a good gun handler as you say, the your first quoted sentence makes no sense. The folks I know do not handle guns any differently whether the chamber is hot or not. And I don't expect any less of them or of myself. In fact, I won't be around anyone who handles a gun less carefully when it is empty than when it is hot. The rules are rules and no government dictum will change the fact that their compliance for safety reasons is voluntary. People who are willing to treat an unloaded gun differently are people who are almost certainly going to end up doing two things; they will at times also treat a loaded gun just a bit less carefully, and they will eventually discover that their "unloaded" gun isn't- perhaps even making the discovery when the "unloaded" gun discharges.
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
Went back and looked.

I was mis-remembering. It's more like pushing 80/20 percent, hot to cold carry while hunting.

BOY that 20+ percent are some noisy bastids! smile Comes with knowing it all, I suppose.



soo.. I'm waiting for an "opps I did it again" thread about your latest deer..
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
Originally Posted by Jeff_O

Guys handle guns carelessly when they "know" them to be empty. Not saying that anyone present is a bad gun handler; to the contrary, I suspect everyone here is a very GOOD gun handler.


You just said one thing, then you said something very different. If everyone here is indeed a good gun handler as you say, the your first quoted sentence makes no sense. The folks I know do not handle guns any differently whether the chamber is hot or not. And I don't expect any less of them or of myself. In fact, I won't be around anyone who handles a gun less carefully when it is empty than when it is hot. The rules are rules and no government dictum will change the fact that their compliance for safety reasons is voluntary. People who are willing to treat an unloaded gun differently are people who are almost certainly going to end up doing two things; they will at times also treat a loaded gun just a bit less carefully, and they will eventually discover that their "unloaded" gun isn't- perhaps even making the discovery when the "unloaded" gun discharges.


Klik,

But, go into a gun shop and observe gun handling from the general public when they "know it's empty". It's horrendous.

My point is that that mentality would flow out into the woods.

I was exempting present company because, at least to hear them tell it, they handle guns with exemplary skill and I ain't calling anyone a liar here.

Hunting cold would cost me deer and elk, and for no good reason. That pretty much sums it up, for me. In different circumstances, different quarry, different terrain, who knows. I've run "cold" before and I'll do it again when circumstances warrant. But for the bulk of the hunting I do- hot.
Your post's remind me of my ex-wife's e-mails.

She has a vagina BTW.



Travis
Originally Posted by Jeff_O


But, go into a gun shop and observe gun handling from the general public when they "know it's empty". It's horrendous.

My point is that that mentality would flow out into the woods.


Too late. But one thing is certain � if those people were handling cold firearms no one would get hurt regardless of their idiocy or negligence.

Maybe that�s one reason gun shops don�t hand out loaded weapons...

Originally Posted by Jeff_O
Originally Posted by ironbender
You make the "cold" case very well. Thanks.

The guys in the gun shop are not mishandling the rifles because they know them to be safe - that's standard practice for those guys.

Nobody is talking about cold chamber mandates - you sound like an Obama democrat...........oh, wait.

It's not to say that someone with a hot chamber cannot handle safely, they certainly can, and mostly do. It's the part that cannot be controlled that is the point.

Also, lotsa really bad analogies made from pistols to shotguns to golf to driving. Here's one for you:

Odds are one of your precious children could run across I-5* in the dark and not get hurt. Would you let them anyway?

*Pick your closest interstate - if ya have one.



Lot of emotion flying around. Not sure why folks deem that necessary.

First, you made MY point very concisely. Guys handle guns carelessly when they "know" them to be empty. Not saying that anyone present is a bad gun handler; to the contrary, I suspect everyone here is a very GOOD gun handler. But we, or at least I, am talking in general terms here. Make it mandatory that everyone carry cold (I say that not because I favor government regulation, but because it's the only way to set up a hypothetical where everyone is carrying cold), and you know as well as I do that there'd be some damn sloppy gun work out there. Why? Because, you see... everyone "knows them to be safe", right?

You are wrong about my driving analogy. It's actually a very GOOD analogy. Here's why. The core of this debate, hot vs. cold, is safety. The safety of an individual, and those around him. Driving is exactly analagous. It is a statistical truth that less people would die on the highway if we drove 55 mph. Period. So, driving faster is a choice that you and I make (hell, I do anyway) because we want to, and the FACT that it endangers ourselves and those around us, exposes everyone to more risk, is something we are willing to live with for whatever reasons.

I challenge you, bendy-boy, to explain why that is not a superb analogy. Further, if you do drive faster than say 55 mph on the freeway, I'd like hear how you justify endangering yourself and those around you. Thanks in advance.

Lastly, YOUR analogy is fundamentally flawed and thus, meaningless for the discussion at hand. This is a thread about managing risk while doing something you want or need to do. Not about creating risk doing something like running across a freeway. Not applicable. Try harder.

As I've said before, there's a continuum here, a scale. I unload (unchamber) a rifle all the time, and I've carried "cold" when it seemed reasonable or prudent. When I'm hunting alone, which is most of the time, out in the big woods, I hunt hot and in my opinion that's perfectly safe and reasonable. I'm not in this life to be some puzzy-ass risk avoiding freak (not saying anyone here is). I'll drive 75 on the highway... I'll drink too much... I'll play my guitar too loud... that's just how it is for me.

I'll say again, the deer I killed a few days ago wouldn't have died that night if I'd been hunting "cold". Maybe one of you bad-asses would have gotten him that way; I'll concede that (though I doubt it rather strongly). But that doesn't fill MY freezer.

Some of us are hunting elk and deer with tags in the 10%, 15% success rate range. A guy made a comment earlier about how "the meat always seems to come down the mountain". With all due respect, it ain't like that in some places. Guys go years and years between Oregon public-land elk, for example. I'm not missing out on one because I handicapped myself by needing to chamber my friggin' rifle just to shoot the bastid.

YMMV, bendy-boy. Oh- better go wipe those counters with the anti-microbe stuff.. and don't forget to wash your hands again! smile Danger lurks everywhere... can't be too careful, bendy-boy.

Now that's what I call posting a load......of crap.
Originally Posted by Jeff_O

While searching back for when I totaled up the percentage of who hunts how, I read some stuff from in the middle of this thread. There's some good, reasonable, debate happening there. I suggest we move back in that direction, but, it's not really up to me.




Ok, just promise there will not be any limericks.....
When I hear guys say they chamber a round and take animals say at 30 yrds,I wonder about the game. A mature whitetail here is no way in hell going to let you chamber a round at close range like that. Now maybe a dumb young mulie buck sure that is possible.I can tell by reading post that things vary dramatically across the country.
Originally Posted by highridge1
When I hear guys say they chamber a round and take animals say at 30 yrds,I wonder about the game. A mature whitetail here is no way in hell going to let you chamber a round at close range like that. Now maybe a dumb young mulie buck sure that is possible.I can tell by reading post that things vary dramatically across the country.



This has been my exact experience also. In some instances I can and do hunt "cold". But in general, Hunting "hot" has proved it's advantages and I'm more apt to have one chambered when hunting remote areas.
I've done it with whitetails at 40 yards.
Did it last year on a Michigan public land whitetail buck at 40yds.....and I was a week into rifle season. Our bucks are pretty damn spooky by then too. I was stillhunting my way through a cedar swamp. I had my share of slips and trips in that mess too. It's only as hard as you make it, and had I not gotten that buck because of the fact that I had to chamber a round first......it would have been OK.
Cold till I get to my stand. When still hunting or stalking it is cold until it is time to shoot.
Caught up on this this am. Interesting comments. What do the muzzleloaders do?
Single shot anyone?
Went dove hunting with a friend who brought along a scoutmaster, a real one. What a pain in the ass. We had a system for shooting zones just like all of us work out. Anyway, the scoutmaster had a single shot with an exposed hammer. Said ANYTHING else wasn't safe. Also insisted we not have anything in the chamber 'til a flock of birds appeared.
Biy, that was a great day.
Bill
Wondering how the 4 wheeler generation ever gets anything. Noise, movement, fumes and all.
Sounds like what we have here....a bunch of scoutmasters. But, we're not 12 year olds.

By any chance did your friend's friend with the scoutmaster ever hunt once in Alaska and slip and fall?
Stan V,

You are correct. You win. The poll is for "hunting". Shooting tame deer next to a feeder, out of a elevated blind isn't hunting. Not even close. Hunting requires effort, skill, and being able to outsmart your game. Go ahead with your "hot" rifles. Chances of having an AD while sitting in your blind playing gameboy are slim to none..
Pick yourself up, you've fallen down again.

If I'm in Colorado, New Mexico, or West Texas.....I hunt hot and alone. How many internet experts are they that want to ridicule someone for how they hunt? I don't tell you how to drive.

It's laughable!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Originally Posted by Calvin
Shooting tame deer next to a feeder, out of a elevated blind isn't hunting.


Grocery shopping. laugh
grin
Originally Posted by FOsteology
Originally Posted by Calvin
Shooting tame deer next to a feeder, out of a elevated blind isn't hunting.


Grocery shopping. laugh


I wonder how a warden would respond to that. I just love the "holier than thou" folk.
Just giving Stan V a hard time.. I wish I could kill bucks and not have a 2 mile hump back to the rig..
I reckon Sarah has the only pair left in the state.....I love her!
Originally Posted by Calvin
Just giving Stan V a hard time.. I wish I could kill bucks and not have a 2 mile hump back to the rig..


OK, I can deal with a hard time.

Even stand hunting means I have to drag one now and then nearly a hundred yards!! grin
So you see Sarah with a picture of a moose, (omitting the obvious 4 wheeler parked next to it) and suddenly she's got the only "pair" left in the state?

How about this Stan. Buy yourself a plane ticket next Aug and I'll drag your ass up a mountain. Then you can take me "Texas Hunting" We'll compare notes about who has a pair..
Originally Posted by Calvin
Just giving Stan V a hard time.. I wish I could kill bucks and not have a 2 mile hump back to the rig..


I wish I had all the resources of AK in my backyard. I wish I had the means to spend at least a few weeks in the bush each season. Best o luck this season.
Originally Posted by prostrate8
Originally Posted by Calvin
Just giving Stan V a hard time.. I wish I could kill bucks and not have a 2 mile hump back to the rig..


I wish I had all the resources of AK in my backyard. I wish I had the means to spend at least a few weeks in the bush each season. Best o luck this season.



I wish we had some of the weather in August!
Originally Posted by Calvin
So you see Sarah with a picture of a moose, (omitting the obvious 4 wheeler parked next to it) and suddenly she's got the only "pair" left in the state?

How about this Stan. Buy yourself a plane ticket next Aug and I'll drag your ass up a mountain. Then you can take me "Texas Hunting" We'll compare notes about who has a pair..


Was thinking along those lines, but wasn't going to say anything. I figure many folks here - just like some places elsewhere- could probably show a visitor a "good time" which might prove whether said individuals had "a pair" or not. I'm also thinking that many "hot chamber" guys might be cold chamber converts if the were exposed to some of the conditions the "cold chamber" guys call normal, and vise-versa.
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
I'm also thinking that many "hot chamber" guys might be cold chamber converts if the were exposed to some of the conditions the "cold chamber" guys call normal, and vise-versa.


I think that's a very fair call. As a hot chamber hunter I do find myself unchambering on occasion.
I've taken a few hard core Montana hunters who bragged about hauling elk for 5 miles etc... We went up a wimpy hill, on one of he nicer days, and it was a trail of tears up and down..
Was also thinking the same when I made the previous comment - seen the same, not that Alaska has a lock on that situation though. (But some folks aren't as hardy as they think; or in my case, as they once were wink - or like to believe they were. grin )


Mostly yes but of course circumstances dictate.
Calvin,

Please tell the story again about taking a visiting friend deer hunting, and how he shot a 3x3 and two forkies for the freezer- in an afternoon.

Then, come back and bust balls about how guys in states you've never hunted, hunting low-percentage tags, should be willing to let animals walk due to cold chambers, because there's always another deer... wink Those two stories should juxtapose nicely.

FWIW- in difficult terrain, hunting with someone else, I'd likely carry cold. I think there's a LOT more common ground here than it might seem. But if alone, I'll hunt how I please and I don't appreciate guys saying basically that's a hazard to all the poor little chilluns and whatnot.
Here's to hoping that JeffObama continues to carry hot........................

For all the reasons stated against the same.
Just a FEW random thoughts, if I may....

After reading between the lines on several threads it's easy to see that geography, hunting situations, woodsmanship experience, and likely social demographics (urban/rural), all play a large part in how folks "feel" about this.

Am willing to, and without much real anomosity, venture a guess that most of the adamant hot hunters have never really experienced what makes the cold hunters hunt cold. Can easily figure that once they have they would seriously reconsider.

Also can venture a guess that those who insist on cold carry for the most part, are the ones who have guns in their daily civilian lives for one reason or another, hunt more days than any one man should be allowed to, hunt the places where the normal man would never think of going, and aren't hindered by a life that's made up of more desk time than woods time.

The concept of cold carry was never about whether or not someone is capable of safe carry, it's ALL about making damn sure things don't go wrong and taking premptive control of a situation that could so easily go so wrong. Sort of like an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Sort of like taping a muzzle, or using a bullet that is PROVEN to work.

Am not in tune with what happens in the urban world regarding muzzle control at a gun store, what I do see here in Rural America is a healthy respect for firearms and everyone I've ever seen in a gun store goes out of their way to not foul anyone with a gun barrel. Again probably a geographic and/or social demographic thing.

Can wager a fair bet that those folks who do constantly practice sloppy gun safety and pisspoor muzzle control are stacked heavily with evolutionary misfits, and likely have trouble knowing which way to flip a light switch despite it obviously being dark in the room......they are the precise reason we good drivers are required to purchase auto insurance.

Can't for the life of me know why a round MUST already be in the chamber to make a kill. I've my fair share of close thick cover kills; deer, bear, and turkeys, and the simple fact is that the whole idea is to spot them, and kill them, before they even know you are in the world. Can't see that if a hunter is THAT good to be able to sneak undetected into thick cover a mere 10 yards from a wary deer, and then have the balls to complain he can't effectively chamber round to make the kill at some point in time during his super slow ninja stalk prior to taking the shot. Too much telling contradiction there that doesn't add up.

The only thing that makes sense is the hot hunter in thick cover is stomping that cover and taking jump shots......

Jump shooting animals was never my thang and I can't imagine anyone without time to chamber a round being able to accurately assess the backstop behind the animal before sending their shot. If it's THAT much of a surprise that you MUST have a round chambered then you stand a GOOD chance of missing, and you stand a GOOD chance of hitting something on the other side that you don't see, and don't want to hit. The logic there simply escapes me that on one hand a hot jump shooter insists he is practicing GREAT gun safety with his hot chamber but sooo willing to take a risky shot at a fleeing animal.

Also can't for the life of me understand the noisy action thing so willingly put out there. 1.) if a hunter is actually hunting he's spotted the game with time to covertly chamber a round. 2.) all it takes is some practiced manipulation with ones digits within the system to feed and chamber a round as quiet as a church mouse, hell, my nine year old knows how to do that. I'm sort of a bolt gun snob so maybe we have a leg up in that regard. Could very well be WHY I am a bolt gun snob, to begin with.......

Can't, either, wrap my brain around the "I hunt alone" thing. Bullchit, I had my unwanted discharge while hunting alone and it scared the [bleep] out of me after I thought about it for a while. "What if" goes a long way, and bullets can't be called back once launched.

I live in VA, snow and ice are still a long way off for this year. We have more steep ridges here in SW VA than we do thick bogs. Been raining off and on here since last night. The boy and I went squirrel hunting this morning anyway. Upon deciding to head home I stepped on a wet and very slick stick hidden under the wet leaves with the inside arch of my hunting boot, and on a side hill of a ridge. I ALMOST went for a ride but caught myself before going down. Small and unimportant mishap, but everyone that's ever really hunted places like that knows exactly what that sort of "oh chit" thing is. Doesn't make me, or anyone else, a clutz in the woods. It does make it however an unexpected event that noone really can prepare for. Quick reflexes saved my ass and saved me from falling on my rifle. It could so easily have been a catastrophy tho'........
Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Here's to hoping that JeffObama continues to carry hot........................


Surprised he's carries hot.

Not sure they taught that at the YMCA.
ouch!! shocked


That was mean...




grin
Ingwe
Originally Posted by prostrate8
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
I'm also thinking that many "hot chamber" guys might be cold chamber converts if the were exposed to some of the conditions the "cold chamber" guys call normal, and vise-versa.


I think that's a very fair call. As a hot chamber hunter I do find myself unchambering on occasion.


so, someone finally admits cold is not always an option?
Good comments... Depending on where you are, I grew up in the same area, and, until I started reading this thread, didn't realize that this was a controversial issue.
I may have misunderstood something in your message...do you hunt birds w/o a shell in the chamber? Is there a difference...deer vs birds? Of course, the point you made about no round in the chamber when traversing difficult ground isn't germane, as almost all of us agree there. I don't unload my revolver though, as a holstered gun if pretty safe under any circumstance.
I've only been hunting for 48 years and all of it has been in the southeast.
Bill
I gave up "bird" hunting a long time ago, unless you are talking about turkeys...

Hunt 'em here with a rifle, and cold chamber until I'm set up stationary and in the midst of calling to a responsive bird.

Pretty picky about my shots, backstop, ect.....as it all has to click just right else I don't shoot.

Three this Spring......
Wildswalker,

thank you very much for taking the time to do that assessment of yours. I thouroghly agree with you.

Let me try to take this a step further:

This is an issue of 'being in control'. Of yourself, of your hunt, of your rifle, of the situation. The more you feel apt to handle anything that might suddenly appear, the less you feel the need to 'be prepared' for any sudden appearances.

In the process of gaining that aptitude, one will also have had occasion to apreatiate the safety factor and have learned to balance it against any perceived advantage of the hot chamber.

Originally Posted by wildswalker

The only thing that makes sense is the hot hunter in thick cover is stomping that cover and taking jump shots......

Jump shooting animals was never my thang and I can't imagine anyone without time to chamber a round being able to accurately assess the backstop behind the animal before sending their shot. If it's THAT much of a surprise that you MUST have a round chambered then you stand a GOOD chance of missing, and you stand a GOOD chance of hitting something on the other side that you don't see, and don't want to hit. The logic there simply escapes me that on one hand a hot jump shooter insists he is practicing GREAT gun safety with his hot chamber but sooo willing to take a risky shot at a fleeing animal.



Very good piece of work that strikes home with me. I call that going tunnel vision and if truth be told it takes a cool hand to avoid it. The vast majority of us fail miserably.

On the one hand it's a requirement to shoot well and consistently place your shots to the best of you ability, while on the other that one minded concentrated focus, once you decide to shoot is filled with danger. I've told others that when the sights are going to the spot that is my world and all else ceases to exist.

I try to make my judgments before I get there, but when it's over I question just how well I did, and often I come up short. Yes maybe I looked, but couldn't see that guy behind the tree x number of yards away. Then as I make the mount with full concentration on the sights he steps out without me knowing. The more you shoot and hunt the easier it is to go tunnel, because things start running on autopilot.

There is much more going on here than just the question of hunting cold or hot.

As the athletic shoe says: Just do it. In this case that means do whatever it takes for us to be comfortable in knowing we are as safe as humanly possible.
A lot of things well covered that I hadn't thought of before... Why are safeties on guns and what about break open actions. I made another comment which hasn't been covered ...Muzzleloaders?
Bill
Originally Posted by wahoo
A lot of things well covered that I hadn't thought of before... Why are safeties on guns and what about break open actions. I made another comment which hasn't been covered ...Muzzleloaders?
Bill


wahoo,

safeties are not about safety, just a metal form of proof that masses are stupid and not to be trusted.

The analogy for the muzzleloader would be the half cock hammer notch.

Pray tell - you were not going to build a defence of hot chamber hunting on stumbeling around the woods with a primed stuffed and rammed ML, all tippytoed...
As soon as I exit my vehicle, I chamber a round, and there is one in until I get back in the vehicle.
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
Calvin,

Please tell the story again about taking a visiting friend deer hunting, and how he shot a 3x3 and two forkies for the freezer- in an afternoon.

Then, come back and bust balls about how guys in states you've never hunted, hunting low-percentage tags, should be willing to let animals walk due to cold chambers, because there's always another deer... wink Those two stories should juxtapose nicely.

FWIW- in difficult terrain, hunting with someone else, I'd likely carry cold. I think there's a LOT more common ground here than it might seem. But if alone, I'll hunt how I please and I don't appreciate guys saying basically that's a hazard to all the poor little chilluns and whatnot.


Not sure what story you want, but are you pissed that some folks kill bucks, that doesn't involve snap ass shots? Buy a plane ticket Jeff O, come to my area and show us how its done!! Laffin..
Give us, NAHunter, an honest assessment of your typical hunting conditions....

Weather, terrain, the type of hunting you do.

Just curious......
I have read a few posts about people having an accidental discharge while hunting. I'm curious what was the situation that caused your firearm to discharge unintentionally?
I can't explain mine....and that's the disturbing part.

Thought I had the safety "on" as I always did but after the initial shock wore off the safety was definately on "fire", can't remember where/when/how I screwed up.

Thinking it was a twig in that brush that actually pulled the trigger......

I recall staring at that hole in the hillside 5 feet in front of me, and thinking damn that coulda bounced back and I could be bleeding to death right now.

Actually checked myself for holes after that sunk in far enough.

Was one of those bullet proof guys in my 20's.

I didn't make any mistakes, and was never wrong.

Stuff like that couldn't ever happen to me, I knew what I was doing......
Actually your story points out a pretty good fact.
I'm a firearms instructor. Normally when someone has an AD at the range its normally one thing. They had their finger on the trigger. A few have managed to shoot themselves in the leg while holstering because they had their finger on the trigger.

In the field especially when pushing through thick brush unless you cover the trigger guard with your hand a stick getting in the trigger guards is very possible. Always a chance that the safety gets push off as well depending pon the type/style of firearm.

Definately something to think about.



Cold chamber solves the "problem", and is the point......

I never got to know my Dad's cousin who died from an unwanted discharge long before I was brought into this world.

His name was always Little Billy, and I know where he is buried in the old family plot......

Ironic that even after he died no one in my extended family considered hunting cold chamber, or at least I was never aware of it. I do know that those closest to the event never hunted again. Never really was told the accurate circumstances of his death as it was an event that just didn't get talked about. It was an "accident", he was gone, it was sad, and things happen was about all I ever got.

Dad on the other hand made darn sure I knew all the "safety rules" from the git-go, and I think it was Little Billy's death that made him go above and beyond that call of duty.

It didn't help though, as my unwanted discharge made it all mute.......
When I'm still hunting I leave my arrow in the quiver and i don't nock an arrow until the final stalk. If I'm hunting a stand I nock an arrow. Haven't had my bow unexpectedly go off yet. grin
Originally Posted by Rogue
Originally Posted by 28lx

Never left Benning served in the Marine Corps nothing against the Army. Been in the sandbox with 1st Battalion 8th Marines and 3rd battalion 8th Marines. Never saw a sniper attached to a platoon and never had a warrior I didnt know behind me when kicking in a door. When that door opens I want a proffesional with the safety off covering the left right and overhead ready to fire.If the man behind you is an idiot that safety being on aint gonna help you. Its a high intensity environment thats why we trade off and take turns kicking in the door. I will take a trained Marine with a hot weopon and safety off over a trained marine safety on anyday your YMMV. What conflicts before Iraq did you kick in alot of doors before becoming a sniper.


Dude, we're in to different worlds. Enjoy yourself.




Thats what I thought.
I hunt with a round in the chamber.
When you are guiding someone in search of whatever, and you find whatever it is; do you the break open the drilling and chamber? Stumbling around in the woods? Is that necessary? Do you feel that superior? Are you German? If so...Germans have no history that would oblidge to accept advice about the ignorent masses. When bird hunting...hot chamber or not?
Bill

Absolutely did.
Wahoo,

regarding your questions, in order:

when guiding whoever for whatever - it is chamber cold. Hot upon preparing to shoot, after, obviously, having found what we are after.

I do not stumble around any woods.

I pass on any comment on the drilling. I have no use, other than a nostalgic notion for anything of that kind.

I would regard an empty chamber neccessary with a drilling, where a client to use one.

I do feel superior to some, equal to few, and infirior to most.

I am German.

I did not offer any advice.

I do not hunt birds - big game keeps me to busy.

When ready for discussion of hunting practises, safety and such - let me know.

If my language offends - let me know. It is not my mother tongue, so I might slip up. Please consider this, before reaching for psychology and national history to try to put me into the defence.

*****

Admission:

upon rereading posts - I now understand the question about "stumbling around" as a responce to my earlier post.

Apologies.

I've enjoyed this thread. Hope to do it again in two years.
JO will be just as stupid then.
You're so predictable. smile
Originally Posted by rem_7


so, someone finally admits cold is not always an option?


When it comes to safety, cold is always an option.

It may also, on occasion, cause an animal to be last that might otherwise have been harvested. In my personal experience that occasion is so rare I've yet to encounter it. I have lost game when I didn't have time to shoulder my weapon.
CH,

As I've said, the buck I killed last weekend is an example of an animal that wouldn't have been killed if *I* had been hunting hot. That perhaps speaks to MY limitations, though in this case I don't believe so. It just was what it was. Very close, very fast. NOT a jump shot- so don't even go there. Just a deer crossing a small opening in the jungle with me about 10 feet away...

Wildswalker, to your point about how people could be skilled enough to hunt very close to deer and yet not be skilled enough to manipulate the action, you might be misunderstanding me. I'm not claiming great hunting skill here. It just is what it is. I'm sure there were many other deer at 50 yards... 75 yards... 100 yards... 200 yards... etc. But you'd never know it, you cannot see them. So, you either learn how to sit very still in spots that are productive, and/or you learn to still hunt very slowly and carefully, so that you will actually see the bastids. When you do see them, they are usually very close for the reasons described above, and they are a split second or a couple feet away from not being shootable due to vegetation.

A bunch of other Oregon blacktail hunters have said the same thing, but they aren't willing to stay here and get yelled at. But, if you read the whole thread (not advised <g>) you'll see it mentioned repeatadly. Just getting the rifle raised and safety off can blow the whole thing up, and HAS blown it up for me several times, even though I've taken so long to raise a rifle slooooowly that my arms about fall off. It's not a time to be working the action of your rifle with an alert deer 20 yards away, pretending to feed but snapping his head up to look at that strange tree over there...

But again, that's all secondary to the main point which is that it's perfectly reasonable for a person to decide to hunt hot. I drink too much. I drive too fast. I ski like an insane person. I play my guitar too loud. So? Just how pussyfied are we supposed to be here? A guy hunting hot might be increasing his risk slightly, but it's still minute, and still NOTHING compared to the risk he took driving 75 mph to get to deer camp... he could have slowed down to 55 and greatly reduced his chance of dying that week, but you know what? He didn't, because [bleep] it, we are MEN here and we do take risks sometimes.



Laughable.....
And to all: Have a safe season.

"Th-th-th-that's all folks! ...








I doubt it!!!!
I'm soooo pussified... You nailed it Jeff! You get that buck on private land again? Do they have shooting hours in Oregon? I'd say that if it's too dark to take a good picture on a neck shot buck at 25ft, then it's too dark to discharge a weapon. But that's just me being a giant vagina and all..










[/quote]
Maybe this has been mentioned already, but I have always hunted HOT with the safety on. Some don't trust safeties. If the safety is untrust worthy or has been know to fail, that is an unsafe rifle and has no business in the field in the first place. There has been far to many instances hunting in the field that I had absolutely no time to chamber a round and if I had to, it would have been long gone anyway from the racket. Maybe the critters I hunt are more skittish, but there is no way they will stand there while I chamber a round with out bolting out of there like they were struck by lightning. For info, my father who taught me every thing about hunting in the field was a master gunsmith and owned a gunsmith shop in CO called Front Range Gunsmithing and attended the same school (CST) and had the same instructors as Darcy Echols (gun maker). If this was good enough for them, it was most certainly good enough for me.
Originally Posted by Calvin
I'm soooo pussified... You nailed it Jeff! You get that buck on private land again? Do they have shooting hours in Oregon? I'd say that if it's too dark to take a good picture on a neck shot buck at 25ft, then it's too dark to discharge a weapon. But that's just me being a giant vagina and all..



I won't contest your "giant vagina" status; if you say so, I believe you. smile

I don't carry a camera. I use my cell phone camera. It has no flash.

It was about 5 minutes before the end of legal light (1/2 hour after sunset). It was, indeed, dark. Not too dark for someone to shoot who has a good scope, has been sitting there over an hour sussing out the situation, has a buck in spear distance, and is basically shooting into a hillside.

I see that you aren't contesting that it was not a shot that could have been made "cold"; you are choosing to just bust balls in every other way you can think of. Duly noted, but it don't win you any debate points.

Wildswalker... how many tags do you get, and if you hunt reasonably hard, how many will you fill, on average?
Originally Posted by battue
And to all: Have a safe season.



You too, battue. Be safe, and good luck.
Originally Posted by SUPERDIESEL1
Maybe this has been mentioned already, but I have always hunted HOT with the safety on. Some don't trust safeties. If the safety is untrust worthy or has been know to fail, that is an unsafe rifle and has no business in the field in the first place. There has been far to many instances hunting in the field that I had absolutely no time to chamber a round and if I had to, it would have been long gone anyway from the racket. Maybe the critters I hunt are more skittish, but there is no way they will stand there while I chamber a round with out bolting out of there like they were struck by lightning. For info, my father who taught me every thing about hunting in the field was a master gunsmith and owned a gunsmith shop in CO called Front Range Gunsmithing and attended the same school (CST) and had the same instructors as Darcy Echols (gun maker). If this was good enough for them, it was most certainly good enough for me.



Obviously, your dad never hunted Alaska and fell down. Country so tough a gun should never be carried hot....where men were men, years ago. Another example of immigration hurting the native population.

(that's a joke! Welcome to the fire and pay attention to what your dad taught you)
TFF!
Laffin'! smile

Originally Posted by Jeff_O
Originally Posted by Calvin
I'm soooo pussified... You nailed it Jeff! You get that buck on private land again? Do they have shooting hours in Oregon? I'd say that if it's too dark to take a good picture on a neck shot buck at 25ft, then it's too dark to discharge a weapon. But that's just me being a giant vagina and all..



I won't contest your "giant vagina" status; if you say so, I believe you. smile

I don't carry a camera. I use my cell phone camera. It has no flash.

It was about 5 minutes before the end of legal light (1/2 hour after sunset). It was, indeed, dark. Not too dark for someone to shoot who has a good scope, has been sitting there over an hour sussing out the situation, has a buck in spear distance, and is basically shooting into a hillside.

I see that you aren't contesting that it was not a shot that could have been made "cold"; you are choosing to just bust balls in every other way you can think of. Duly noted, but it don't win you any debate points.

Wildswalker... how many tags do you get, and if you hunt reasonably hard, how many will you fill, on average?



Noticed you dodged the question about it being Private Land..
Originally Posted by Jeff_O

Wildswalker... how many tags do you get, and if you hunt reasonably hard, how many will you fill, on average?


I don't see the relevance, but if I told you, you'd chit yourself.......
Do tell. State and unit, please. It's relevant.
No it's not, it makes no difference if I get to kill one deer or a thousand....the issue is firearms safety during the act of hunting ONE animal.

Per THAT, you fail..............
Funny, people can sit at there keyboard and tell everyone else how to hunt,what it takes to get it done in an area they have no earthly idea of the terrain or technique required.And to top it off they don't even know the species! LOL!! GET REAL!
Always have...always will.

My deer huntin' territory is thick, PNW forests which few states can match for thick cover. Still hunting or sittin' and waitin' are by far the most employed methods of huntin' blacktail and IMHE.......by far, the most productive. That said, most deer here (and in many other states) are killed no more than 70 yards away......some muuuuuch closer. So yeah, either the action or noise of chambering a round isn't a benefit given these huntin' parameters. Can one do it....sure, likely as often as not, but that's not the main reason I hunt "hot".

WA state has the second highest population of black bears behind only AK. I can expect to run into fresh bear sign each day when afield, if not the actual depositer of such sign. I have crossed paths with many bears, 3 in one day with my daughter while huntin' grouse. I do not intend to cross paths with any bear, with my daughter or alone, without the ability to immediately respond to an aggressive bear...or anything else showing aggression, for that matter, 2 or 4 legged. I don't believe that cougars are any less able to ruin one's day either......and we have a bunch of those as well.

When not huntin', I wear a sidearm when afield. It is always "hot". When I carry daily in either urban or rural areas, formal or informal settings, I carry "hot". Why would I not do so when huntin'?

I fully expect that many who are posting their thoughts on this specific thread either use cell phones or text while driving.......at the very least, exceed the speed limit on a regular basis......just guessin'. Heck, how many here drink and drive on a regular basis................? Are these actions not considered unsafe, both to oneself and to all others in our near vicinity? Any one of these unsafe driving conditions could potentially take out a whole bunch of people just due to anyone of these careless, but seemingly very accepted driving practices (sans somewhat the drinkin' and drivin' stuff). Obviously our driving practices, for many of us anyway, are actually quite dangerous. Probably more dangerous because we do it so often that we think we're real good at doing them!

Not so while huntin'......IMHO. If one hunts deer and elk with modern firearm in WA state, you'll get anywhere from 3-4 weeks total time afield, to hunt both......not alot of time. Whether we're very experienced hunters or inexperienced hunters, I'm thinkin' that we naturally would pay far more attention to safety concerns associated with our huntin' practices than we do our driving practices since we're such "experienced" drivers and therefore more "inherently" safe in that regard.

Whether right or wrong, real or imagined.....I know that I approach both activities in the aforementioned manner. Driving......somewhat nonchalant. Hunting/carrying.....acutely aware of safety concerns.

For all the reasons why I carry hot while visiting the theatre or grocery store, the same reasons apply to when I'm afield for any type of sport or recreational activities.........to be able to respond as quickly as necessary to put oneself and/or other's out of harm's way ASAP. If the expediance of huntin' hot also benefits me in the taking of a game animal.....an added bonus.

YMMV....which if fine and completely understandable. Just the way I approach this subject.

Good luck to all this season.





i hunt in the northeast and anyone who doesnt hunt with a round in the chamber doesnt really plan on harvesting any game. why bother even carrying a weapon if it is not ready to fire. if one thinks its unsafe to hunt with one in the chamber, they should hit the range and familiarize themselves with that weapon. Also, that is why safetys are on all firearms.... to keep them safe while the weapon is hot.
Reading comprehension is lacking. Please tell me how firearm familiarization and falling ass over end have anything to do with one another.

Safeties keep firearms safe when weapon is hot. Define safe.
do you take a dump right before you shoot too? you either hunt game that has never seen a human, or hunt a "game preserve" or your your hunting skills are so great that your wasting your time talking to lamen on this site
I like the statement:
A rifle with out a round chambered is ..... a stick. You can carry a stick or a rifle your choice.
+10
I'm betting you wipe your azz before you [bleep], ain't my still.

Please, tell me how firearms familiarization and falling have anything to do with one another.

That's it, I just hunt zoos.
Can't chamber a round in a stick, though I'm sure some ain't figured that one out yet.
if your climbing a cliff or something like that, i can understand. otherwise hunters would be extinct. you think your the only one who ever fell while hunting. why dont you carry a walking stick instead of a rifle, or a butterfly net
I have hunted for over 60 years with one chambered. Lots of animals would not have been harvested if I had to chamber a cartridge. Just keep that muzzle pointed away from people. Even an empty gun makes me nervous if someone is carless in handling. I tell them that when they do it.
Good deal, go from A to Z and forget the stuff betwixt.

Define safe.
safe is knowing basic firearm safety. safe is also making a good judgement call when something tells you to use your head for a second and think . so i guess you believe that hunting with a round in the chamber is unsafe, then i'm the most reckless hunter around.
Quote
Also, that is why safetys are on all firearms.... to keep them safe while the weapon is hot.


Keep up ace, safe in the context used above.
what are you getting at steelhead , are you referring to my spelling error
No, not spelling, you say a safety is to keep a gun safe when hot. How do you define safe in that context?

being safe is not falling on your ass while your hunting .it doesnt matter if you have one in the chamber or not. doesnt matter if i'm hunting or not, i dont like to fall on my ass period. thats my definition of safe.
So you know when you are and aren't going to fall? Why is falling not safe, because as you've stated that is why you have a safety on your gun, to keep it SAFE. So if you fall and you have a safety on and the gun is pointed at your head there is no concern, that is why you have a safety. Hell, you could walk around with it pointed at your head all day long, because after all the safety keeps it safe.

as i stated before , basic gun safety. muzzle in a safe direction, trigger finger out of trigger guard . keep the snow and mud out of the end of your barrel. know what is behind the animal your trying to kill. etc,etc, etc oh yeah, and dont fall on my ass
But how do you know if/when you might slip? Guessing if you get in a hairy situation you take one out of the chamber? Only wear a seat belt when you know you're going to be in an accident?
i always hunt with a gun pointed at my head. isnt that how everybody hunts
Finally, something I don't doubt.
if you practice good gun handling and safety, one can fall and not shoot themselves. you might bust your leg or blowout your knee or bruise your ass and have to crawl back to camp.thats why i try not to fall just as much as i try not to shoot myself or another person. also i dont want to be laid up , injured from a fall
Be safe out there, the worse that will happen with a cold chamber is not getting a deer. The worse that will happen otherwise is much more dramatic.

They are just critters.
how about this . you go hunt with an unloaded gun and fall all over the place and i'll stay upright with a LOADED GUN, THE WAY YOUR SUPPOSED TO CARRY A WEAPON THAT YOU PLAN ON USING
Eeverything aside , i practice safe gun handling. its the only way i do it, even if the gun is hot. stay well
Good luck staying upright through a clear cut in SE Alaska.
sounds pretty tough up there. all kidding aside, does a healthy person fall that much in that kind of country. i've never been
i also wish you luck trying to kill a whitetail in central NY at 40yds moving through a hemlock stand or thicket with an unloaded chamber. even if you had the time to chamber a round that deer would be on the next ridge before before you'd have a bead on it.
As stated on the other pages, I have always carried hot. Has it made a difference in getting game? I doubt it. Although where I hunt there isn't much room for moving around because when you come upon a deer, bear what have you, it's usually within 50 yards. I'm betting that cycling an action to load my rifle be it a bolt or single shot the animal would be spooked and I would be empty handed. Thats just how it is where I hunt. If I were out west or somewhere else where the shots were a little longer and I had the room to move around a bit I might have a cold chamber. In fact I'm going to give it a try this year and see how it works out. Beef isn't that expensive if I get skunked. I will side with steelhead on his point in rough terrain. I have never spent time in Alaska however, I did two years pounding the jungle in Panama. In rough terrain where the ground can disappear from underneath you in a big hurry I would definitely go with a cold chamber.
brinky, i fully agree with you, if you have long shots and are glassing game, you have plenty of time to load a chamber.steelhead thinks because hes a veteran on this site and im new to this site that i bought my first bb gun yesterday,but not the case in the least bit. he seems fairy arrogant as well having explain safe gun handling to him like hes a teacher and im the student. when conditions dictate, i might have a cold chamber, but im certainly not hunting w/ one as a rule. all guns should be handled like there hot. this topic is like beating a dead horse and if i ever go to a clearcut in se alaska, i'll be sure to ask stellhead for advice and permission
2 things:

1) Few could safely negotiate an East Texas clearcut, we Texans (being much more intelligent than Alaskans, or those that spent the night there) go around clearcuts. Try it, you'll like it.

2) I'm thinking we should be discussing boot wear for Alaskans. Or, at least check your laces and make sure they're tied. Double knot like I do for the grand kids? They still fall down, but not because they stepped on an untied lace.

Or (OK, 3 things), are most Alaskans simply uncoordinated and clumsy? I want to go, but it seems to leave a mark on those that pass through......poor things.
in the rough terrane of WV my chamber is empty and bolt open when footing is unsure, Also when walking with others I almost always carry open bolt. Have busted my hinny many times on our hills and you can't control muzzel direction under those conditions. Don't remember ever loosing a chance to shoot because of open bolt.
I'm going to try this one more time... When I learned to hunt, the deer population was much lower than now. Sometimes the deer season was less than 1 week long in most counties west of the Blue Ridge. Anyway, we still hunted or drove deer (quietly) towards a line of shooters.
The key to all of this was moving quietly and slowly. I'm a big guy, but learned how to do this. If you are moving quietly, you don't fall down a lot. I also learned that mountain climbers may find game, but not whitetails. They aren't mountain climbers either.
I've been out west, but have not hunted there. I have gone hiking in the mountains...beautiful country. I haven't fallen a lot there either. Maybe the rengefinders, binoculars, weather station and all the other gear a lot of guys use gets in the way.
Whenever I'm on uneven ground, I'm extra careful, which includes making sure the rifle is safe.
I'm going to the range this week...and I will ask some of the guys about this thread. It's not something I've ever discussed before.
I've asked a couple of cold chamber guys about bird hunting and been told they don't hunt birds. Well you almost always hunt birds with other hunters and I can't see the difference as regards to gun handling. Are shotguns safer somehow, anyway, it's been illuminating. How the other 10% lives so to speak.
Bill
Originally Posted by grizzyallen
i also wish you luck trying to kill a whitetail in central NY at 40yds moving through a hemlock stand or thicket with an unloaded chamber. even if you had the time to chamber a round that deer would be on the next ridge before before you'd have a bead on it.


Bullschit.

BT/DT, in upstate NY (guarantee that the Saddles, near Whitehall on the South Bay of Lake Champlain ain't easy walking). Buck was feeding along, through the thick stuff, as I was still hunting up the side-hill. Caught his movement, chambered a round (in a single-shot, no less; T/C Encore .300WM), and popped him nicely in the lungs at about 35 yards as he was moving alert, but not hauling it. If I'd spooked him, I'd have not shot, nor would I have had one.

Done the same on State Land near Lake George, and TNC property on the old IP lands near Speculator.

Done likewise in laurel thickets in VA, briar-tangled creek bottoms in VA and NC.......................

To say that "well, it can't be done because of............" is simple bullschit. Those saying that it can't be done, have simply never tried it.

And, yes, I've hunted "hot" before as well; until I figured out that it was an accident waiting to happen, and it simply was not worth it.

Your life, or the life of someone you hunt with, might be worth that "maybe I couldn't have gotten that buck" chance, but mine's not, nor are those I hunt with.

YMMV..................
Saying that one should always practice the 'safer' method might apply to many things that we could not do then.

Saying that one 'never tried it' is not a complete thought. One can easily imagine hunting with an empty chamber.

Always hunting with an empty shotgun chamber is not acceptable in terms of common sense.

I have tried it (rifle hunting with an empty chamber) and its slower and it takes away from a best shot and extra noise and motion happens. Of course it requires a greater effort on gun handling when the chamber is loaded.

I have 57 years of experiance hunting every year in the hills of Southern Vermont near my camp there. The hills are quite steep in many places and care is required.

I carry my gun chamber empty when going in when its dark before legal light and I unload the chamber when its rough going such as a very steep decline, sometimes with snow and ice on the ground and dragging a deer out and as required at the end of the day and to put the gun in the vehicle.

Perhaps it is those who have guns that can not be unloaded on safe when a round is in the chamber who make the argument of hunting with an empty chamber?

Good hunting to all.

[Linked Image]

You'll be hoping I'm hunting with a 'cold' chamber if I come to NY sometime, else someone might be wondering where the blue eyed/blond kid came from 9 months later.

Walk around clear cuts, damn Stan, never thought of that.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
�
� Just how pussyfied are we supposed to be here? A guy hunting hot might be increasing his risk slightly, but it's still minute, and still NOTHING compared to the risk he took driving 75 mph to get to deer camp... he could have slowed down to 55 and greatly reduced his chance of dying that week, but you know what? He didn't, because [bleep] it, we are MEN here and we do take risks sometimes.


Jeff �

There is nothing pussified about hunting with a cold chamber. Frankly, when someone is behind me I much appreciate that they have a cold chamber � not because the risk of a hot chamber is high in absolute numbers but because the risk with a cold chamber is absolutely zero.

�Slightly greater�? Compared to the zero risk with a cold chamber, the risk with a hot chamber is INFINITELY greater.

For my purposes, I�ll continue to hunt hot or cold depending on circumstances. If I miss an animal as a result no big deal.
Course cold chambers don't work on whitetails....

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Or wuffs

[Linked Image]

Or bear

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[img]http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b297/Shoalcove/Stuff1/Beartoday.jpg[/img]

[img]http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b297/Shoalcove/blackbear-2.jpg[/img]


Nor moose

[img]http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b297/Shoalcove/Stuff1/Moose.jpg[/img]

And most definitely NOT fish

[img]http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b297/Shoalcove/FISH1/Halibut1July.jpg[/img]
Originally Posted by Steelhead

And most definitely NOT fish

[Linked Image]


That one always just cracks me up.
Originally Posted by DayPacker
I like the statement:
A rifle with out a round chambered is ..... a stick. You can carry a stick or a rifle your choice.
+10


A guy has to be in a pretty low gear to understand that logic!
A car with any empty gas tank is ......a stick.
Originally Posted by wahoo
�
I've asked a couple of cold chamber guys about bird hunting and been told they don't hunt birds. Well you almost always hunt birds with other hunters and I can't see the difference as regards to gun handling. Are shotguns safer somehow, anyway, it's been illuminating. How the other 10% lives so to speak.
Bill


The bird hunting I�ve done is very different from my big game hunting.

First, much of it is done when hunters are spread out in a line with shooting more or less perpendicular to the line, not following one another down a trail. (When we trail to our duck/goose hunting spot we have cold chambers.) Second, much of our bird hunting is done from a stationary position - not much chance of falling when you�re sitting in a blind or laying in a ditch. Third, although I�ve seen an idiot pepper someone else with dove shot 100 yards or so across a watering hole, the pellets didn�t even penetrate the clothing � try that with a rifle. (By the way, I don�t hunt with that particular idiot since that event.)

So, yeah � for me there is quite a bit of difference. And, for what it is worth, I often have an empty chamber when hunting birds. Just takes a split second to chamber one in the 870 and the birds don�t seem to mind.


Doves? quail? I still don't see the difference. When I hunt with friends, we don't follow single file like we are on a contact patrol. No over unders or side by sides? Then... bunnies?
Thanks for the reply...I was wondering if anyone else here had a shotgun.
Bill
yes
Originally Posted by Stan V
2 things:

1) Few could safely negotiate an East Texas clearcut, we Texans (being much more intelligent than Alaskans, or those that spent the night there) go around clearcuts. Try it, you'll like it.



If you consider that Alaskans tend to use (an) "awl" for making holes in certain things, whereas Texans tend to make holes for their "awl", I'm not so sure that you can make a case for Texans being more intelligent. grin grin
This thread is still going?
Originally Posted by grizzyallen
i also wish you luck trying to kill a whitetail in central NY at 40yds moving through a hemlock stand or thicket with an unloaded chamber. even if you had the time to chamber a round that deer would be on the next ridge before before you'd have a bead on it.


Simply by reading these sorts of threads one can EASILY sort out the douche bags that cause all the hunting accidents we hear about....

The logic they defend their stupidity with is astoundingly accurate with their results.

Don't think you have a lock on something "thick" in central NY as you are likely speaking with folks here that have BT/DT a time or two. We know you are full of chit because central NY, in all that wide open farm land between 90 and 86, isn't "thicker", and damn sure isn't steeper, than the western end, or the eastern end of the state. Visability where I hunt bear in the west side of the 'Dacks is 5 feet in some places......and yes I killed a bear there.

Killing a deer in the Alleganys of western NY doesn't have anything to do with "luck" for me either, as I have a clue, or two, about it.

NY, last season, cold chamber.....and even without your wishing me luck.

[Linked Image]

Hunted here in NY, my "back yard" at the time, cold chamber....

[Linked Image]

And here....

[Linked Image]

Here too....

[Linked Image]

Managed a LOT of deer when I lived there, like this late season Doe, and with an unprimed muzzleloader of all things....

[Linked Image]

And this one too.....despite what the "experts" are trying to tell me.

[Linked Image]

Yeah tell me more tearful tales about how hard it is to hunt cold chamber in the thick stuff.......

[img]http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c66/wildswalker/other%20stuff%2007/HPIM2016.jpg[/img]

[img]http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c66/wildswalker/other%20stuff%2007/HPIM2012.jpg[/img]







How many people think this same thread will get resurrected next year, as opposed to starting a new one that says the same things?
I think both...
Originally Posted by Steelhead


Walk around clear cuts, damn Stan, never thought of that.


Really? /S/ off (in case you didn't get it)

We're in clearcuts all the time to recover game (the only time we're in 'em), but we're not hunting if we're picking up animals we've already shot......how many times do you shoot your dead animals?

What kind of boots do you own?
ok dickbag , i didnt realize someone could actually know every hill and valley in all of ny. you dont even know what county or town im referring to. i know what thick is as far as terrain and its not a clover field. if your such an expert with expert picture witness, looks like you gut shot that doe with your cold chamber jackass. your pics really dont impress me either. and where i own land isnt farm country . maybe if you asked you could spare all your chest pounding and time it took to put your trophy portfolio on this page.
you'll b e wishing you had a hot chamber after i beat your alaskan ass
Oh, boots! Let's talk about boots!
I screwed up my left ankle four years in a row wearing corks to keep me from slipping and falling all the time. They really grab in good wood! We have so much wood on or near the ground here that you have to wear corks or you'll spend more time on your ass than on your feet. That was several years ago, but I still have my Currins. I got some rubber corks once, but ended up taking the corks out and putting airbobs on them...not as good but can be worn more places....like where you can actualy walk on the ground all day.
Walk around clearcuts? Great, I'll come back tomorrow and see if you're out yet.
Stalked?

if you did in the leaves and snow,i'm impressed....
Originally Posted by Bulletbutt
Oh, boots! Let's talk about boots!
I screwed up my left ankle four years in a row wearing corks to keep me from slipping and falling all the time. They really grab in good wood! We have so much wood on or near the ground here that you have to wear corks or you'll spend more time on your ass than on your feet. That was several years ago, but I still have my Currins. I got some rubber corks once, but ended up taking the corks out and putting airbobs on them...not as good but can be worn more places....like where you can actualy walk on the ground all day.
Walk around clearcuts? Great, I'll come back tomorrow and see if you're out yet.


Actually, we drive around clearcuts. grin

I'm wondering about the boots worn by our campfire friends that are upright challenged when hunting.....I'm wanting to get to the bottom of this falling down syndrome.
His Florida ass. He's from Florida.

You can calm down now. Both wildswalker and SH have plenty of good information regardless of your difference in opinions. Take a breath, agree to disagree and enjoy the site. You might learn something. I know I have.


Travis
Originally Posted by grizzyallen
you'll b e wishing you had a hot chamber after i beat your alaskan ass


[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by Bulletbutt
How many people think this same thread will get resurrected next year, as opposed to starting a new one that says the same things?
I think both...



JO already has a launch date marked on his calendar for next year!
Priceless!
I've got to say I'm impressed by the pictures. From the posts, I thought they were older.
Bill
Go figure that grizzly-a-loon can't cipher an exit wound on a quartering toward shot, nor that facts trump his position across the board.

Can't know what central NY county has it all over the 'dacks for rough and thick, but I'm hoping to learn. Grizzly-a-loon, you're welcome to try the Saddles for a spell, but leave the 4-wheeler at home; the trails were done in by your's truly, and the terrain has central NY trumped, handily.

Ditto the same for the Wallingford Pond and Victory State Forest areas of Vermont; and, Amherst, Alleghany, Augusta, Bedford, Nelson, Pulaski, Rockbridge, and Rockingham counties in VA. BT/DT, in those locales (amongst others). You're welcome to try..... Though, comparatively, they ain't even that rough.

Do tell on that hellish central NY county, though.....
All the game ever bred, isn't worth one man dead.

But I still will hunt with a hot chamber!
I'm not reading this stuff...but I will carry my gun loaded and on safety as long as I am hunting..unload it back at the truck..

What I don't do is point it at anybody! unless I need to!:)
Lee24 squared
Any AK guides let you do that?
Originally Posted by Stan V
...

I'm wondering about the boots worn by our campfire friends that are upright challenged when hunting.....I'm wanting to get to the bottom of this falling down syndrome.


Come hunt with me sometime. Everyone I can think of has fallen one time or another. I did it twice on one stone rubble slope last year, coming down off Bears Ears opening morning. My son-in-law went down once on that slope. (NW side of the western ear.) There are other slopes my hunting partners and I have taken over the years where falling is just part of getting up or down, even when dryish - let alone wet or snow covered. No need to unchamber if you're already running cold.
Originally Posted by atkinson
I'm not reading this stuff...but I will carry my gun loaded and on safety as long as I am hunting..unload it back at the truck..

Why unload at the truck? The safety's on.
yep, whenever im out of the saddle. Kinda like carrying my handgun with no round in the chamber. It,s to late.
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by atkinson
I'm not reading this stuff...but I will carry my gun loaded and on safety as long as I am hunting..unload it back at the truck..

Why unload at the truck? The safety's on.


In Nebraska having a loaded shotgun in your truck is illegal and could get you in trouble if you are caught driving down the road with it loaded. On the other hand having a loaded rifle in the truck is quite legal, it allows ranchers to shoot coyotes while checking their property.
never said c ny is hellish or tougher than the dacks. some of you havent read the previos pages. we were talking about thick cover . not that all of central ny is thick.WHERE I HAVE LAND IS THICK. i guess youll be the third person who knows my land better than me. until your invited over , take my word for it. ill take pics of it like steelhead and the other one and maybe you guys can relax. this started about a hot or cold chamber, not about what part of ny has the craziest terrain. opinions are like a-holes. steelhead so big and tough with all his thick cover and trophies, that he made mention of banging my wife. that sounds like he got off the subject a bit. everyone has an opinion here and thats what this sight is for but dont start putting words into my posts, until you go back and read all the previous pages. i hunt to get away from know -it- alls and every crap that life throws at you. you and the dacks sound way to tough for me just like the others. ive been around and i know what the dacks has to offer. none of you clowns still havent asked where i hunt , your just talking [bleep] like the other two. enjoy your know it all buddies.
Actually, I have asked you where you hunt. Reading comprehension is a wonderful skill to pick up.................
Originally Posted by grizzyallen
never said c ny is hellish or tougher than the dacks. some of you havent read the previos pages. we were talking about thick cover . not that all of central ny is thick.WHERE I HAVE LAND IS THICK. i guess youll be the third person who knows my land better than me. until your invited over , take my word for it. ill take pics of it like steelhead and the other one and maybe you guys can relax. this started about a hot or cold chamber, not about what part of ny has the craziest terrain. opinions are like a-holes. steelhead so big and tough with all his thick cover and trophies, that he made mention of banging my wife. that sounds like he got off the subject a bit. everyone has an opinion here and thats what this sight is for but dont start putting words into my posts, until you go back and read all the previous pages. i hunt to get away from know -it- alls and every crap that life throws at you. you and the dacks sound way to tough for me just like the others. ive been around and i know what the dacks has to offer. none of you clowns still havent asked where i hunt , your just talking [bleep] like the other two. enjoy your know it all buddies.


Seems to me that you are the one with the problem here.....nice way to start off on a website....you will go far! crazy
my bad , you did. your a road scholar and im an a hole. i almost forgot. chenango county i know its a pussy county and im a pussy and your a tough guy with tough terrain just like steelhead and sidewinder. your the first to ask where i hunt, ill give you credit for that.
i do have a problem. im wasting precious time during hunting season talking to guys instead of being in the woods
Why does anyone care if a hunter has a hot or cold chamber if you aren't hunting with them? I mean other than some douchebag starting the thread just to justify their position.
Rhodes Scholarships, never did much for me.

Chenango County.

Beautiful area. I drive through there on 88 when to/from VT getting and returning my daughter. Hiked it a bit. Not overly hilly (flat in some places), and good river bottoms (need to fish that area near Afton sometime.......). Seems to be decent wildlife habitat, and to some degree a lot like the flatter areas of some of the counties in VA I hunt.

Not a bad place to hole up in.

And, yeah, your season is in. Get out there......... it don't last long up there in that area.
Originally Posted by Clintk
I mean other than some douchebag starting the thread just to justify their position.


Him just pegged JeffObama squarely.......................
thats the smartest thing ive read on this subject so far
im in ne chenango , its rolling hills with a couple of small mountains, good hunting and thats it. hardly any farming, mostly woods and couple of green fields. good turkey and deer hunting
From what I've seen, that'd have been my guess of it up there. Again, much like many of the flatter areas of the counties in VA I frequently hunt.

Now, get at it........... IIRC, the NY seasons are rather short.
Thick, steep, remote areas predominate this thread. To me, deer hunting means whitetails, and I've had the most success hunting the edges and have found the harder the country the fewer chances for a whitetail.
Bill
Originally Posted by wahoo
Thick, steep, remote areas predominate this thread. To me, deer hunting means whitetails, and I've had the most success hunting the edges and have found the harder the country the fewer chances for a whitetail.
Bill


If you have that option.
Have you tried Botetourt Co?
Bill
Haven't hunted Botetourt yet.

In VA, the option is there, if you have access to those lands (private); public (esp. wilderness areas, which is what I prefer if I hunt public), no so much so. In the 'dacks, not so much so, as it's nearly all public, and not much open, nor flat.

Damned good (though tough) hunting, though.

Don't remember saying anything about another person's wife, must be a reading comprehension issue again.

Hey grizz, did you go to school stupid or did you just come out that way?
love the new avatar SH
Originally Posted by Stan V
2 things:

1) Few could safely negotiate an East Texas clearcut, we Texans (being much more intelligent than Alaskans, or those that spent the night there) go around clearcuts. Try it, you'll like it.

2) I'm thinking we should be discussing boot wear for Alaskans. Or, at least check your laces and make sure they're tied. Double knot like I do for the grand kids? They still fall down, but not because they stepped on an untied lace.

Or (OK, 3 things), are most Alaskans simply uncoordinated and clumsy? I want to go, but it seems to leave a mark on those that pass through......poor things.


These are all jokes, right? Gotta be...because I've hunted in Texas, and while it's less than half the size, it's about a tenth the hunting difficulty of Alaska. Maybe not that much. If you can't get out into clearcuts in Texas...you definitely want to stay out of Alaska.

As far as boots go -- if you ever do come up here, even on a cruise ship, find out about boots first. Cause you clearly just don't get any of it.

Unless you're just joking, in which case, pretty funny, if a bit opaque.

Dennis
Of course it's a joke. HEHE

Enjoy Alaska and I'll enjoy Texas......one thing I won't do is tell you how to hunt, or what to hunt with.

I only hunt with loaded chamber when hunting the fearsome prebles meadow jumping mouse. They make EVERYTHING in Texas and Alaska seem tame! grin No mouse guns either! You need at least a .475 Tomcat!
Didn't realize this was such a touchy subject. I'll try the cold chamber approach this season to see the difference. I have a sit awhile walk awhile approach to hunting and I take my sweet time doing it. I also hunt alone so don't need to worry about taking out a fellow hunter. If I do hunt with someone muzzle discipline is always paramount. I'll get back to this after deer season and then give my opinion. However the deer are pretty keen where I come from. They get shot at starting mid July by the indians and archery season ends on January 1. We'll see if they allow me to load one first. No offense but every time I heard about a hunter that accidentally shot himself while hunting I always thought it was intentional or lumped them into the same category as those people who shoot themselves while cleaning their gun.
Dennis-
You can't drive your 4wheeler to the corn tosser no more! smile





Hey! That's a joke!
Originally Posted by ironbender
Dennis-
You can't drive your 4wheeler to the corn tosser no more! smile
Hey! That's a joke!


No need when you can hook a corn tosser up to your truck and/or ATV to corn the roads/sendero's. Deer follow behind gobbling up the corn like a vacuum cleaner.

Dump some corn down a road to get them to stop...
Cool! Instant roadkill. Just add rubber! laugh
Originally Posted by FOsteology
Just add rubber!


Someone's dad should've thought of that..
Originally Posted by GreatWaputi
Originally Posted by FOsteology
Just add rubber!


Someone's dad should've thought of that..


Albeit crass, Paul had a humorous comment along similar line of thought...
Any of you guys back East wear corks? Probably not in the snow, huh?
Originally Posted by grizzyallen
ok dickbag , i didnt realize someone could actually know every hill and valley in all of ny. you dont even know what county or town im referring to. i know what thick is as far as terrain and its not a clover field. if your such an expert with expert picture witness, looks like you gut shot that doe with your cold chamber jackass. your pics really dont impress me either. and where i own land isnt farm country . maybe if you asked you could spare all your chest pounding and time it took to put your trophy portfolio on this page.


That right there is some very funny stuff noob.....damn near JOish on sooooooo many levels.

Can't wait to see where you are here, in two year's time.......

That would be an inside joke, so to speak, so don't worry if you don't get it.

Flatter yourself azzhole, to think I was seeking to impress YOU with showing you a few dead deer in some of that "thick" habitat you so eagerly stump as impossible to hunt with a cold chamber.

And FWIW, about the ONLY place in NY I haven't set foot is NYC, and on purpose.

How do bow hunters fare in Chenango, BTW?

Do they even friggin' BOTHER?

Can lay HEAVY odds that folks like you are a main reason I left that festering chithole of a liberal dump.......too damnyankee for me.
first off, im the furthest thing from liberal . maybe you should start your a new site called 24hrknowitall.com i believe you'd do well. never said its impossible to hunt with a cold chamber. i said i prefer a hot chamber. my opinion , if thats ok with you
jackass, i was talking about steelhead refrence my wife. maybe you should take up reading, you might learn something
Thought you were going hunting? Keep it up, you are making friends right and left here. Pretty soon you will be in the same boat as all the other trolls.
dont really care .if i personally knew guys like that, we wouldnt be friends to start with .
Originally Posted by grizzyallen
dont really care .


Obviously.......
[Linked Image]
SKane -

All you have to do is ignore it...
just wanted to be #1000. Yes, I have no life.
Bill
Originally Posted by grizzyallen
first off, im the furthest thing from liberal . maybe you should start your a new site called 24hrknowitall.com i believe you'd do well. never said its impossible to hunt with a cold chamber. i said i prefer a hot chamber. my opinion , if thats ok with you


My fragile feelings are soooo [bleep] hurt.....

It'll be most fun having you around.

I'm takin' odds on Oracle status inside 9 months....the potential is there, and a record to break.

Laffin', here....
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
We're at about 90% chambered, which is about what I was expecting...

Carry on gents!

-jeff


We are 90% chambered so far gentlemen!


This forum is the absolute best low cost entertainment going, its better than watching the old 3 stooges movies and a heck of a lot funnier than anything else on TV now a days...
I'm assuming this thread has turned into a train wreck, but I didn't want to wade through 1000 posts to find out, so I'll just answer the original question, (which is a good one):

I always used to hunt "hot." Now, with young teen hunters in tow, we all hunt "cold." Hasn't cost us any critters yet, but I s'pose it will someday. That's a fair trade for the piece of mind I get. Now, if I lived or hunted in Grizzly country...
seriously as a "youth" I saw a 410 shotgun shoot the hat off of a friend by his stupid brother that was walking behind him [bleep] with the trigger, very very lucky the boys were. I have had [bleep] idiots that had been drinking point rifles at my face while they chambered a round, I have had guys shoot in my direction more than once etc. etc. etc. so that part is not so funny. That is why I lease property these days anyway... We can argue and enjoy our arguments till the cows come home but a dead man is not funny. Just be dam careful which ever way you decide to hunt, me personally I see no point in plowing thru a briar patch with a round in the chamber, I do however carry a 2 inch barreled hammerless 38 revolver with two snake shot in it for what might be a problem in those cases (in a holster), if I needed something bigger it would be a holstered revolver of some type.
I posted this on the other thread but since it addresses some comments made here I�m posting it here as well:

Jeff �

Nowhere have I ever suggested that my way is the only way. Never. In fact, as I have often pointed out, I hunt both ways depending on circumstances. If I was sitting on a small clearing a hot chamber with rifle in hand would probably be my MO.

The facts are, however, that I often walk miles with a rifle on my back, taking it off only when resting. And the chamber is often cold throughout.

Sometimes there just isn�t any need for a hot chamber. Often, in fact, where I hunt. Mostly, in fact.

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[img]http://www.hunt101.com/data/500/medium/811532704-R1-14-9.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.hunt101.com/data/500/medium/961454-R1-04-4A_1.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.hunt101.com/data/500/medium/079585-R1-25-24.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.hunt101.com/data/500/medium/32703-R1-01-24_002.jpg[/img]

On one occasion we watched a small herd of elk from 11:30 in the morning until after sundown before I finally was able to crawl to within 350 yards through cactus and sage before taking a bull. Yet because I often choose to carry cold � the absolute safest manner for carry - I�ve been slammed along with others who do so as too stupid and/or clumsy to carry a gun.

Go figure. I guess some people think the �smart� thing to do is carry hot even when there is absolutely no necessity for doing so?
Define "thick":

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Chamber cold. How could it NOT be?

Define "open":

[Linked Image]

Chamber cold. Why would it not be?

What was the question again?


Seems there is a similar thread on a Canandian forum, running parallel to this one. A quick scroll down the first page turned up this........

Originally Posted by Boomer
If I expect that I might have to shoot, the rifle is in my hands, the action is cocked, the chamber is loaded, the safety is off, and my strong hand protects the trigger guard.


Here I thought a safety served a purpose, turns out, all you need is a "strong hand".....
FWIW, strong hand meaning dominant hand.
That may very well be the case, but even if you're Super Man, it ain't gonna help you in a fall.

A safety is no substitute for an empty chamber, but it sure as he!l is light years safer than cocked/unlocked.....
I generally take the bolt out of my rifle and carry it in my pocket until I'm read to rock.
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Go figure. I guess some people think the �smart� thing to do is carry hot even when there is absolutely no necessity for doing so?


Likely correlates with the same people who "think" they can hunt, and the same people who "think" they are safe, and the same people who "think" something bad could never happen to them, and the same people who "think" they are intelligent....ect., ect.

Guessin' we have more of them around than we thought......
I try to put 2 in the chamber when I hunt.
This whole thread has me wondering this.
How many of you have a concealed handgun license and dont carry it hot??
And your question makes me wonder how many can't tell the difference between a deer and defending your life.
I carry a DA semiauto concealed with an empty chamber and a full mag with complete confidence.....I dare you.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
And your question makes me wonder how many can't tell the difference between a deer and defending your life.


Exactly, but still, I can't feel the pain.....sorry.
I generally carry the frame of my Glock in a holster and the slide in my pocket.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
And your question makes me wonder how many can't tell the difference between a deer and defending your life.


It's still a legit question.
After all most carrying never have to defend their life.
And most people do know the difference between deer as well as two leg and four leg varmints.
I don't give a shiit what anyone thinks, I'll let 100 deer get away before I think [bleep] like this should happen.

11-year-old killed in hunting accident

By Christian Boone
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
10-12-09
An 11-year-old boy hunting Friday night was shot and killed after his gun accidentally discharged, shooting the child in the head.
John Wayne Corcoran was hunting with this grandfather, Bernard Corcoran, when the shot was fired, said Ted Bearden, Dawson County coroner. Both family members are from Dawsonville in north Georgia.
Originally Posted by GreatWaputi
I generally carry the frame of my Glock in a holster and the slide in my pocket.

The direction i should have took, i'm learning..

I'm working on a Wheelbarrow sytem, with my reloading equipment mounted on it and will only load a round if needed.

patent pending
I can hear the dad of that 11 year old "Damn people can't walk around the woods without falling, wonder how they carry a CCW" It's all about muzzle control.

Yep, here's hoping it don't happen to any of you but I expect it will.
nobody ever said 100% of the time, or especially with kids.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
I don't give a shiit what anyone thinks, I'll let 100 deer get away before I think [bleep] like this should happen.

11-year-old killed in hunting accident

By Christian Boone
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
10-12-09
An 11-year-old boy hunting Friday night was shot and killed after his gun accidentally discharged, shooting the child in the head.
John Wayne Corcoran was hunting with this grandfather, Bernard Corcoran, when the shot was fired, said Ted Bearden, Dawson County coroner. Both family members are from Dawsonville in north Georgia.


Hell i would let 10,000 deer go before i think crap like that that should ever happen.
I just posed a simple to answer question in the midst of all of this clatter.
Originally Posted by rem_7
nobody ever said 100% of the time, or especially with kids.


Right, not 100% of the time, so then it's a question of risk/reward.

Risk is a dead kid, reward is a squirrel?

Guessing we have different priorities.
Originally Posted by rem_7
nobody ever said 100% of the time, or especially with kids.


I rarely hunt without my kids these days....so that matters.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Risk is a dead kid, reward is a squirrel?

Guessing we have different priorities.


And I'll add friend, wife, brother, sister, cousin, uncle, grandfather, guy I never met.......

Steely and me are riding in the boat, Rem7 just got tossed by the wake.......
you missed it..

my only argument is that cold is not always a succesful option when pertaining to (MY HUNT ALONE) or if i hunt with my capable friends. we are adults and kids or inexperienced hunters are another story.

if we decided at a certain area or species we are hunting that we need to be hot,i'm confident we can make it a few hours without killing each other, any experienced hunter should feel the same about there own ability
WW, i wouldn't hunt with you if you payed for everything,and if i did i guarantee you would get beat to the punch.
You missed it, but I ain't surprised.
So you've hunted every species known to man,in every circumstance and know what they all require to be succesful?
part of that should include a necessity for a "hot" chamber and the ability of the hunter not to kill himself.. if there is anyone that can't do that, they need to give it up..
You win
Originally Posted by rem_7
WW, i wouldn't hunt with you if you payed for everything,and if i did i guarantee you would get beat to the punch.


Flatter yourself, nitwit......
Originally Posted by Steelhead
You win


Prayers sent... grin...
Having gone into tight cover following a wounded bear without a hot chamber... and surviving it more than once... I find some of the "I can't do it" crowd far beyond amusing.
Calvin and Coyote Hunter saying their rifles were slung 90% of th time was illustrative.

Different conditions lead to different ways of hunting. Can promise that a guy hunting blacktail how and where I hunt them with a cold chamber and rifle slung (on a 14% tag) will be enjoying Tag Soup.

On the other hand a guy hunting Sitkas where the deer stands there looking at you while you whistle to your buddy, chamber a round in your .357 mag carbine, then shoot it could probably hunt just about any old way and still fill the freezer. smile

I don't feel like digging back. Wildswalker, did you ever confess what state and unit you are hunting in?

Thankfully Jerry Lewis does a telethon for them, though it don't seem to be helping much.
You're still and idiot Jeff. I've killed deer in 8 states hunting cold.

I gotta wonder why guys unload their guns when going up and down a deer stand? God knows a bunch of folks slip/fall out them every year and they gun generally ain't unloaded at that time.

Damn shame your grandfather didn't give you the same lesson at 11 as that kid.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Having gone into tight cover following a wounded bear without a hot chamber... and surviving it more than once... I find some of the "I can't do it" crowd far beyond amusing.



that has to be the dumbest thing i ever [bleep] heard, you would rather take your chances with a wounded bear than trust your own ability..give it up..
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
will be enjoying Tag Soup.


Rather that than ham and casseroles following a funeral...
What was it Saddlesore said, less than ONE death in Colorado every year? Gotta be many hundreds of thousands of hunters..... and that one death is going to be due to things other than AD/ND at least some of the time...

If you are gonna sweat odds THAT long, many many places to look before you start hunting with an empty rifle... IMHO.
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
What was it Saddlesore said, less than ONE death in Colorado every year? Gotta be many hundreds of thousands of hunters.....

If you are gonna sweat odds THAT long, many many places to look before you start hunting with an empty rifle... IMHO.


That attitude is fine except for the ONE PERSON that draws the short straw...


Some years ago a member of my erstwhile hunting party discovered his saftey was for looks only - somewhere along the way it had ceased to be functional, even though it was in the "SAFE" position. The only thing that had prevented an AD was good gun handling (keeping his finger off the trigger) and the grace of god.

I would be willing to bet that most of the adamant "hot carry" types here don't really check their safety's functionallity by pulling the trigger after a round is loaded...

No one, including myself, will ever know how close I came to being the ONE PERSON that year. But I can tell you it was TOO DAMN CLOSE.
You're right Jeff, one death per year is pretty damn good. I'm sure your wife would be consolled knowing that you were the "ONE" and it could so easily have been prevented......

Too many puns to count, I know, but that weren't my intent.
You missed the point of it only taking one.....

You missed it by a huge margin....

You likely will never see/get that.

Why don't you Jeffy, post up Oregon's bow hunting success stats.

Those guys have got to be at their wits end and forever eating tag soup the way you describe it.
So, Wildswalker, the number of tags and the success rate of them will make your position look a little tainted by circumstance, thus, you won't tell us?

Wildswalker: post your state and unit!

(just kidding for Pete's sake... unload the flamethrower...)
Originally Posted by rem_7
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Having gone into tight cover following a wounded bear without a hot chamber... and surviving it more than once... I find some of the "I can't do it" crowd far beyond amusing.



that has to be the dumbest thing i ever [bleep] heard, you would rather take your chances with a wounded bear than trust your own ability..give it up..


If you think that's dumb I suggest you go back an read all your posts.
Maybe someday he'll figure out hunting ain't all about killing.

And waiting for someone to comment about the need to feed their family...
Originally Posted by Texas Hunter
This whole thread has me wondering this.
How many of you have a concealed handgun license and dont carry it hot??


Once again I am guilty. Full mag, empty chamber, safe off to allow a rapid load.

Haven�t carried that way for a while though � not since last Saturday and Sunday, but all day both days. Of course, I haven�t carried since then, either.

Originally Posted by RiverOtter
You're right Jeff, one death per year is pretty damn good. I'm sure your wife would be consolled knowing that you were the "ONE" and it could so easily have been prevented......

Too many puns to count, I know, but that weren't my intent.


Lotta ways to die in this world, and the one you guys are horned up is most certainly one of them.

Again, statistically, you can minimize the risk to yourself and those around you greatly by driving an un-modified vehicle (no lifts), on highway tires (no mud tires), below the speed limit.

I trust you are all doing that? If not, why not?
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Texas Hunter
This whole thread has me wondering this.
How many of you have a concealed handgun license and dont carry it hot??


Once again I am guilty. Full mag, empty chamber, safe off to allow a rapid load.

Haven�t carried that way for a while though � not since last Saturday and Sunday, but all day both days. Of course, I haven�t carried since then, either.



When I carry CCW it's with one in the chamber, and a pistol with NO traditional safety (Kahr or Glock).

Yipes. The danger. I just peed myself.
Originally Posted by rem_7
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Having gone into tight cover following a wounded bear without a hot chamber... and surviving it more than once... I find some of the "I can't do it" crowd far beyond amusing.



that has to be the dumbest thing i ever [bleep] heard, you would rather take your chances with a wounded bear than trust your own ability..give it up..


Have had to guide more than one individual adamant about carrying hot. The few that got past "No way" got to carry until I looked down their muzzle just one time. None ever made it an hour. The more they claimed perfect muzzle control they less likely they could deliver it.

Actually I trust my own ability perfectly, but there is no way I will be two-faced about it, either. I have had to find out just how fast and well I can shoot with bears coming at me. My abilities were at least adequate.
Originally Posted by Jeff_O

Again, statistically, you can minimize the risk to yourself and those around you greatly by driving an un-modified vehicle (no lifts), on highway tires (no mud tires), below the speed limit.

I trust you are all doing that? If not, why not?


Jeff - A much more valid hot/cold chamber comparison to driving a vehicle would be someone driving down the road � at any speed � versus the guy having a morning cup of coffee in his kitchen, car keys in pocket.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by rem_7
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Having gone into tight cover following a wounded bear without a hot chamber... and surviving it more than once... I find some of the "I can't do it" crowd far beyond amusing.



that has to be the dumbest thing i ever [bleep] heard, you would rather take your chances with a wounded bear than trust your own ability..give it up..


If you think that's dumb I suggest you go back an read all your posts.


sure,i like eggs too
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
So, Wildswalker, the number of tags and the success rate of them will make your position look a little tainted by circumstance, thus, you won't tell us?

Wildswalker: post your state and unit!

(just kidding for Pete's sake... unload the flamethrower...)


No Jeff, you want to argue hunter safety stats and tag allocations, and terrain "difficulty" like it makes your damn case or something.

What you FAIL to realize is that it's a matter of One, YOU, singular and in ultimate control and responsibility of your weapon.

It's what YOU may or may not do, by your own power or by something beyond your control, that affects the outcome of a situation, good or bad.

YOU, an imperfect human being just like the rest of us, toting a mechanical devise otherwise known as a deadly weapon, that might fail without warning, both certainly can be documented as failing without warning and/or explanation.....and relying soley on YOU and IT to make it back home safely.

Since you couldn't find for yourself the root reason to vote AGAINST Obama, for example, we can't realistically expect you to understand this.....as this, like that, requires a little more than seeing things on the surface, or taking things at face value.

I don't give a damn if Oregon may have not had an accidental discharge of a firearm in the last thousand years....the NEXT ONE should never happen.

The fact that YOU advocate, and with childish stupidity, creating a situation that could very well cause ONE (in the statistical sense) to happen (that ALSO could have been easily prevented by YOUR willing action)leaves us cold chamber guys knowing it would be ONE TOO MANY.

We definately would say "toldja so".........

With all your insistant arguing against something that WOULD save your own life during an activity (that these days is really only recreational to most and NOT a matter of life and death survival) it's astounding to us that you would have so little disregard for your wife's future without you....should you shoot yourself in the head.

And don't give me that crap you NEED a deer, you post here on this forum with your cell phone.....let THAT sink in all the way before you knee jerk on it.

To hear you tell about your locale it sounds like you need to be parked in the deep and dark, facing a random opening, rifle at assault battery and pointed in the precise location a deer will be, and ready to blast 'em when the fleeting glimpse presents itself.....I call bullchit. THAT's YOU not being able to Hunt your locale. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know what you'll say, I don't know anything about Oregon. You are still full of chit on it.

Like I asked about before, What do the bow hunters do up there? Do they even bother with the conditions being so terrible and against them? Am betting they just find an easier state to hunt, huh..........
Originally Posted by rem_7
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Having gone into tight cover following a wounded bear without a hot chamber... and surviving it more than once... I find some of the "I can't do it" crowd far beyond amusing.



that has to be the dumbest thing i ever [bleep] heard, you would rather take your chances with a wounded bear than trust your own ability..give it up..


the way i read Sitka deer's post, he trusts his ability just fine.

Calm down.

I agree that an individual is responsible for their firearm.

I disagree, as does about 80% of us, that it needs to be unloaded while hunting, in order for that to be considered "responsible".

It's about that simple, and that it chaps your ass isn't my fault!

Now, your state and unit is completely relevant. I suspect, you are hunting an area with MANY tags, and very high success rates. In an area like that, a guy might make the decision to lose a few deer every year over the noise and motion of chambering a rifle. Or, your terrain and vegetation might be such that it kind of renders that moot; you are killing them from 150 yards away (as you've mentioned). You could probably CLEAN your rifle before taking that shot.

But you are extrapolating THAT into getting sand in your clam and gettin' all preachy about how the rest of us should hunt, or by God we are unsafe and don't belong in the woods! That's your mistake, and it's the part I take issue with. We aren't all hunting the same place, or the same way. In Oregon, we don't run deer with dogs. We don't do drives, that I've heard of anyway. We can't legally feed deer. In Wyoming, it seems that guys drive around glassing from their rig for miles around, then get out and try and put a stalk on a deer. Not much reason for THAT guy to be hunting hot; I'll agree with you!

That's not how it's done here. We get ONE TAG. It is a difficult, low-success rate tag. Not many Oregon blacktail hunters are gonna give up the one chance they MIGHT have on a buck because when they finally did everything right, or else got real real lucky, and there's your legal deer, you still have to be dickin' around loading the dang thing. A deer 20, 30 yards away won't stand for that.

So again, for the sake of fleshing our your side of the debate, give a general description of your state, unit, and the terrain and vegetation you hunt it. No reason not to... or is there?

Oergon bow hunters get a different (better) season, still have low success rates, and bitch plenty. smile And, I don't face a random opening. If I'm on stand, it's facing a very CAREFULLY CHOSEN opening... which is how I do well.

One last thing. I don't buy red meat. My deer and elk are what we eat for the year as far as that. Do I NEED it? No... but it's important to us, not for financial reasons but for other reasons.

What is your success rate annually on average, Jeff...?
Do y'all wonder if African guides follow up with a cold chamber?

Or, do just the safe/intelligent guides follow up cold?


Quick reply utilized, not directed at Stan_V

No matter how fervently you're moved, you can only say "Amen preacher" for so long... At some point the sermon has to stop. Saved or burnin' at some point you gotta say "Shutup preacher, it's time to go home". This thread is a good ways past that point....
Originally Posted by rem_7
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Having gone into tight cover following a wounded bear without a hot chamber... and surviving it more than once... I find some of the "I can't do it" crowd far beyond amusing.



that has to be the dumbest thing i ever [bleep] heard, you would rather take your chances with a wounded bear than trust your own ability..give it up..




Looking forward to how you would do it differently. (Advice from those who've not been there is always fun. I live considerably closer to SD than you apparently do, but I hardly feel like I'm in a position to second guess what he does.)
This thread and the other cold/hot thread have been quite educational to me. I had no idea how many people walk around in the woods hunting without a round in the chamber. I do know all the guides with whom I have hunted have said that they would tell me when to chamber a round. I also seem to remember Capstick saying that one of the things he feared the most was walking in front of a hunter who had a loaded chamber and that Nash Buckingham did not have a safety on his favorite duck gun. I doubt, however, that I will change the way I have been doing things for over a half of a century.
Originally Posted by Stan V
Do y'all wonder if African guides follow up with a cold chamber?

Or, do just the safe/intelligent guides follow up cold?




I wouldn't expect that to be answered.
I got an email today that reminded me of this ongoing argument. Part of it follows.

If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't own one.
If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a conservative isn't interested in hunting, he doesn't hunt.
If a liberal isn't interested in hunting, he wants hunting outlawed with severe penalties.

If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat.
If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.


...anyway this thing went on and on. I'll spare everyone from reproducing it all, but the point is this.
Does it seem to anyone else here like there are two distinct camps here other than the hot and cold chamber?
One group wishes to be left alone while the other feels everyone should do it their way.
Not gonna get into the same "he won't post it" bullchit you like to play.

Childish.....

My locale, to you personally, is none of your [bleep] business....period.

That's privilaged info to a very few folks here whom I trust, and you are not one of them.

Be proud, you earned that with very little effort.......

No feeders or even bait here, nor dogs.

Organized drives are illegal, as is hunting from a truck.

Can't hunt deer or bear with a .22 caliber anything, ect., ect.

Can say my state runs the full ambit of terrain, from deep dark and swampy to high steep and slippery, and much in the middle. Even get a good share of snow and ice here. It happens to be the second state I've lived in that's like that, though one was definately worse on snow, and taxes. I don't live there anymore.

I live where it's high steep and slippery, and on purpose. Even still it's easy here to show you places with five feet, at best, of visability. From where I'm sitting now there's terrain I hunt that 20 yards would be a damn long shot due to geographical features and veg, yet also, I can easily walk to where a 700 yard shot is possible should I see fit.

My point Jeff, isn't one place is easier to hunt than the other, or that having some deciding factor on a level of gun safety. When my kid lost it on the ice and the rifle he was carrying flung 6 feet in the air and came clattering down with enough force to fire it, he was on the flat, very flat. As I said before neither one of us could imagine anyone losing that much control of a rifle. But he did, it was cold chamber, and we are both still here.

I called Dad last night to ask him about his cousin, and what happened. The person carrying the gun thought the safety was on, it wasn't. Cousin was running across the barnyard to greet the hunters and suprised them with his presence. The trigger caught on something he was wearing as he swung the gun in a "safe" direction away from Cousin. The round bounced up off the ground and caught him in the belly. Back then THE fastest way to the hospital was get in the car and drive like hell. Cousin bled to death on the way......

My point is and always will be trusting a mechanical device with 100% reliability to prevent a tragedy, too many "hunters" do that, and worse actually defend that. Steelies point is noone have 100% control of their muzzle 100% of the time, too many hunters "think" that, and worse actually defend that.

Cousin died from a combination of both.........

We've repeatedly stated over and over that if our azz is moving then we are cold chamber, and there in lies the crux of our argument/intention. Can see many reading into this that we rigidly intend cold chamber until the exact moment of the shot, even on "stand". And I think much of the hot chamber argument comes from them, and even you.

I spend a lot of my time moving around with a cold chamber, and have killed plenty doing that, so I personally KNOW it's not impossible, nor even really difficult...BUT, there's plenty a time too when I reach a "deery", or a "beary", or whatever game fits place/time, plant my azz, then chamber a round in expectation of an animal showing itself. I don't do that with my kids in tow, and that's MY only concession on hunting hot "alone".

Jeff, I simply hunt. I guess I have an idea what you do from the way you tell it but I know the animals I'm killing, I know where they are going to be and have a fairly good read on what time they will be there, and why. I hunt the wind and terrain to my advantage, and I usually spot them long before they spot me. Now that might mean only 20 yards from me in the thick, or it might mean glassed at 700 yards, or somewhere in between...but that's what I mean by hunting. To me hunting with a cold chambered rifle spot and stalk is no different than hunting with my Mathews bow spot and stalk. I'm either chambering a rifle, or I'm drawing a bow. I guess I'm fairly good at it because to me it's no hinderance to do either. I don't feel the need to walk around with my bow already drawn, nor do I feel the need to hunt absolute with a round in the chamber.

I also voted against that insane POS [bleep] Obama, and on purpose......
Very well put Wilds....
Wildswalker,
Excellent post.
Compelling also.
Yeah and then there's the 347 posts out of over a 1000 that are some whining [bleep] bitching about the thread.

Can't believe someone is holding a gun to your head right now to read it.

Better ask 'em though, if the safety is on..........
JO will find a loophole to nitpick...

He's predictable.......
The only thing i was ever trying to get at was, is it the only option 100% of the time??

lion?
bear, by yourself? wounded?
even pigs or wounded pigs?

will one "cold" supporter admit it might not be an option 100% of the time? and if so, can you make it without killing someone?
I just did, when I'm planted on my azz and not moving.

You wound stuff?

Bet that could garner another 1000 posts from the azz shooting glee club......
if you can't answer that,your a bigger [bleep] idiot than i thought.
answer the question "All knowing one"
What question is it that you expect me to answer?
I want you to say "I'm a [bleep] idiot and i have been a [bleep] idiot since birth"
Originally Posted by rem_7
The only thing i was ever trying to get at was, is it the only option 100% of the time??

lion?
bear, by yourself? wounded?
even pigs or wounded pigs?

will one "cold" supporter admit it might not be an option 100% of the time? and if so, can you make it without killing someone?
Um, again...I did, when I'm planted on my azz and not moving.

You can't read very well can you........
Originally Posted by wildswalker
Um, again...I did, when I'm planted on my azz and not moving.

You can't read very well can you........


It doesn't always work that way.

answer?
hello?
c'mon, you can't have that much pride
maybe you do...sad
Does your step dad know you are up this late on the internet?

School day tomorrow isn't it.......
Maybe you are a chick......
Or a dick....
thats it??

pride will kill ya!
Better log off and go to bed before he beats your red headed azz.......
Now i know how Oprah and Dr. Phil feel!
I answered your question, now go to bed before you get your wii taken away for a month.......
lol!
Originally Posted by rem_7
i'm done


So much for that plan, huh...

You're not even a good troll.

Was hoping for so much more.....
digging huh?

no other options?

give it up....
Originally Posted by Notropis
... I also seem to remember Capstick saying that one of the things he feared the most was walking in front of a hunter who had a loaded chamber and that Nash Buckingham did not have a safety on his favorite duck gun. I doubt, however, that I will change the way I have been doing things for over a half of a century.


That's the exact thing one of my friends, a bear guide says. He even tells of a time when he tracked a wounded bear into the alders; two hunters he was guiding came in after. The bear wasn't found until the next day. It had actually come around on their back trail. Still, he felt his greatest danger was the hot chambers the two hunters carried.
what would you expect from most payed hunters?
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
Originally Posted by Notropis
... I also seem to remember Capstick saying that one of the things he feared the most was walking in front of a hunter who had a loaded chamber and that Nash Buckingham did not have a safety on his favorite duck gun. I doubt, however, that I will change the way I have been doing things for over a half of a century.


That's the exact thing one of my friends, a bear guide says. He even tells of a time when he tracked a wounded bear into the alders; two hunters he was guiding came in after. The bear wasn't found until the next day. It had actually come around on their back trail. Still, he felt his greatest danger was the hot chambers the two hunters carried.


Its funny, this same exact thread is going on a Canadian board....Only difference I saw was that I had a fool tell me today that when he goes into the thick stuff after wounded grizzly bears he goes in chamber hot, finger outside the guard, with the safety off....

Even had a few guys agree with him, that safety OFF, chamber HOT, is better than safety on, or chamber empty...I was dazzled, to say the least.
Some (few) are neophyte hunters...
Most are,IMO. i would be leary too..
Funny thing... As a human with modest hand speed I can still mount a rifle and put a round in the chamber fast enough to shoot as soon as the rifle butt meets shoulder... Bears are far from supernatural... They are still bound by all those laws of physics... Molding components of the limits of blood, bone and muscle for millennia.

If the physical act of raising a gun and flipping off the safety is too much there is an issue bigger than hot-cold.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Funny thing... As a human with modest hand speed I can still mount a rifle and put a round in the chamber fast enough to shoot as soon as the rifle butt meets shoulder... Bears are far from supernatural... They are still bound by all those laws of physics... Molding components of the limits of blood, bone and muscle for millennia.

If the physical act of raising a gun and flipping off the safety is too much there is an issue bigger than hot-cold.


Well, I suppose that can be Art. On the other hand, anyone cool enough to hit the thick stuff after wounded DG and confident that some thick stuff doesn't obstruct chambering a round when needed could find themselves just as wounded, or worse. No? I got to tell you, fearing carrying hot over hitting thickets in search of DG somehow doesn't compute.
Originally Posted by rem_7
Most are,IMO. i would be leary too..


Makes perfect sense; "I'm not sure about hunting, but I think I'll spend greater than ten grand to go try kill something that bites back." Very logical. :eyesroll: Of course, you would know "most are" - your opinion even- based on what experience around the hunting of the big bears? Perhaps it's only your own personal experience?
Haven't got into this arument. I have observed however that guys I know who will not travel with a round chambered in a CF rifle do not appear to hesitate to cap their in-line ML's or their traditional ML's or prime the pan on a flinter when they go out into the woods. A bit of a Jekyll and Hyde approach to things I guess.
Originally Posted by rem_7
The only thing i was ever trying to get at was, is it the only option 100% of the time??

lion?
bear, by yourself? wounded?
even pigs or wounded pigs?

will one "cold" supporter admit it might not be an option 100% of the time? and if so, can you make it without killing someone?


rem_7

Apparently you have a reading comprehension problem. Wildswalker had admitted there are times when he may hunt hot and I have stated many times that I hunt both hot and cold depending on circumstances. There have been others as well.

That said, cold is ALWAYS an option and it is the ONLY option that is 100% safe with regard to ADs. Period. Could it cost the hunter an opportunity to take game? Perhaps, but an honest evaluation comes to the conclusion that such instances are relatively rare.

(Note that I am talking about ADs, not going into the brush following wounded DG, in which case I would be hot with the safety on.)

Someone else pointed out the risk/reward factor where (paraphrasing) the reward equaled a squirrel in the pot and the risk equaled injury or death. There are a lot of people here that have always hunted hot, loading up as soon as they leave their vehicle and staying hot until they return, and probably always will. It seems that many of these hunters are somehow threatened by the fact that others come to the conclusion that hunting cold is a safer method. Cold hunters have been incorrectly slandered as too stupid and/or clumsy to handle firearms safely when in fact they choose the safest possible method of carry, knowing that neither mechanical safeties nor good gun handling can always prevent injury. Mechanical systems are prone to breakage and people are prone to failure. Either can result in the unwanted when the chamber is hot � and often HAS resulted in same.

You cannot recall a fired bullet and �Oops, sorry� doesn�t cut it.


ETwin,

The original question is kind of a yes/no question. I would like to think that most people probably would say "some of the time". Clearly, no one will ever fire a shot if they don't "put one in". So, what happens with a yes/no question is that people respond to how they tend to run things most of the time.

I run "cold" as I have indicated, and that happens 98-99% of the time. If I'm lying in wait for geese to fly over, then there's one in, safety on. (If anyone gets up to walk around, actions are opened.) If the gun is on my back - which is where is is most of the time- it's cold. If I'm wandering through bear thickets I'll most likely have the rifle in my hands and there'll be one in the pipe - safety on. (But I won't second guess what others do in this regard, and I'd be very uncomfortable if there were any others carrying hot if I was in the lead.) If I feel there is a high need to carry hot, I prefer to carry a weapon that can be carried uncocked safely- like an exposed hammer gun. I think this is one reason for the popularity of the Marlin Guide Guns in Alaska.

But I survived my youth and it wasn't necessarily because I deserved to. And I have managed to live through enough experiences to realize that the rules of safe gun handling are not without merit, nor should they be cherry-picked. And while the rule of muzzle control and pointing the weapon has been frequently cited in these many pages without refute, many folks seem willing to overlook another one of the basic safety rules about keeping the chamber empty until you are ready to take the shot. (This has nothing to do with how one might carry a weapon when hunting, or being hunted by, humans; I'm not really sure why that was brought in except, perhaps, for lack of more logical straws to grasp.)

The bottom line for which there can be no argument is that a cold chambered weapon is a safer condition in terms of having an accidental discharge than is "sometimes hot". Whether that may make one miss a shot opportunity or not may be open to argument. However, it is probably also without question that in most cases an instantaneous opportunity taken is going to be one where other accepted rules of safety being violated.
Klik, I have absolutely no issues with what you have just said. I was merely making an observation of what some guys do. I also need to state that these same guys are extremely careful and aware of their muzzles regardless of which flavor rifle they have in hand. Don't think for a heartbeat that I haven't busted their balls about it either.
I find it funny some accept the possibility of 100% muzzle control, yet feel carrying sometimes hot is safer due to greater inherent concern over loaded guns. Either the human animal can do something as important as staying safe, or they cannot.

I obviously feel I can make mistakes...
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
I obviously feel I can make mistakes...


There it is in a nutshell, and why i almost never carry a hot chamber.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
I find it funny some accept the possibility of 100% muzzle control, yet feel carrying sometimes hot is safer due to greater inherent concern over loaded guns. Either the human animal can do something as important as staying safe, or they cannot.

I obviously feel I can make mistakes...


Yes. Of course. But, to say that a hot chamber is more dangerous than following up wounded DG while cold by extention suggests that an unloaded gun in the home when an intruder enters is the smart thing to do (so you can't shoot yourself?).

I reckon it's fair to say it doesn't make sense. whistle
Coyote, Klik, ET, Art.....much more eloquently said than I can muster.

Would be nice to end this on that note, but we all know different........
It seems like alot of accidents really happen when someone is loading or unloading there rifles. Everyone I know around here carries with a round in the chamber. Can't recall any accidents. Not saying it is safer ,because that is just not possible.Guys that are nuts are the guys that road hunt with a loaded chamber.Do police carry with a empty chamber?
Do police go everywhere waving their gun around, standing in line at the doughnut shop, walking in the hospital, taking the kid to school? Pistol always out of the holster and in hand?

Course they ain't any difference between being paid to 'serve and protect' and a deer....
Originally Posted by highridge1
Do police carry with a empty chamber?


I expect the police hunt with 270s and such like other do as opposed to their service 40s or whatever. Not sure how what police do at work, or how a handgun in the nightstand relates to hunting? I would think that many LEOs would be more inclined to follow the "letter of the law" so to speak when it comes to hunter safety guidelines. I could be wrong.
Originally Posted by highridge1
It seems like alot of accidents really happen when someone is loading or unloading there rifles. Everyone I know around here carries with a round in the chamber. Can't recall any accidents. Not saying it is safer ,because that is just not possible.Guys that are nuts are the guys that road hunt with a loaded chamber.Do police carry with a empty chamber?


I recall a certain video where a cop was demonstrating to school children why only trained professionals should handle guns - as he shot himself in the leg.

Seems like cold carry would have been more appropriate...
Thinking the cop (was DEA, right?) also proved who was right by suing his employer because they did not stop the video from leaking... And he lost the respect of his peers and was subjected to ridicule...
Yeah, but he didn't kill anyone.
Actually,he was cold until he decided to chamber a round in front a classroom full of kids. Bad case of dumbazz...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am-Qdx6vky0
Just some thing to think about. How many of you hunt with friends and family? Is accidentaly killing one of them worth having one in the chamber. Would the 3-5 seconds it takes to jack a round in the chamber going to make that big of a difference? Could that few seconds give you a little exrta time to make a good decision about your shot?

I cary a loaded handgun every day and never (knock on wood) have had a accidenal discharge. But here is something to think about.

I was at the range one day with a new rifle that I had shot on 2 prior occasions and was setting up to shoot a group. I put one in the chamber and put the safety on. I then took a second to look through me spotting scope at the target and the next thing I knew I was hit in the chest with the butt of the gun. I was in shock. I look at my budy standing next to me and we both were in disbelief. The Gun just went off with no one touching it. I then looked over the gun and found nothing that would tell me there was a problem. I loaded another round and it shot fine. shot 2 more and then boom it happened again, now we looked closer at the gun and found that If the bolts was just barely touched or even shock wave from some one shooting next to me would drop the firing pin without ever touching the trigger. thank god no one was hurt.

Now take that gun in the field with a round in the chamber and give it to you 12 year old son to take his first deer. Is one in the chamber worth risking the chance of hitting the 1 in a million odds and destroying your family?

YOUR CHOICE CHOOSE WISELY. I choose not to have one in the chamber.

Just wanted to share a thought.

Originally Posted by rem_7
Actually,he was cold until he decided to chamber a round in front a classroom full of kids. Bad case of dumbazz...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am-Qdx6vky0


OK, he went hot when there was not only no need, but when it was really dumb to do so.

Your point is...?
My point? he's a DUMBAZZ!!!!!!!!

CH,if your comparing yourself to him......???
Originally Posted by rem_7
My point? he's a DUMBAZZ!!!!!!!!

CH,if your comparing yourself to him......???


Nothing could be further from the turth - I wouldn't instruct a classroom full of kids with a handgun with cartridges in the mag. Incredibly stupid.

Cold would have been better...
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
......... I wouldn't instruct a classroom full of kids with a handgun with cartridges in the mag. Incredibly stupid.

Cold would have been better...


You mean, because it can happen to anyone?
watch it again, read the post again..


This is another favorite

Originally Posted by Cossatotjoe
show up in the strangest places. Anyone ever had one of your rifles load itself after years of sitting in the back of the rack?

I never keep any loaded weapons around except for one shotgun and one handgun in the house. But today, while showing my nephew a few candidates for his new deer rifle, he racked the bolt a couple of times on a .270 and out flies a shell. Now, it wasn't in the chamber before he worked the bolt a few times and there was no real danger because safe gun handling was being practiced, but I was a little shaken, then mad at myself.

I honestly don't know the last time that rifle was used and I really don't know how it was loaded. Well...I guess I know I left it with a few in the magazine but I don't know why or how.

So, I know I'm preaching to the choir, but I'll reiterate the old axiom to treat every gun as if it is loaded because it just may be.



Don't see how handing a loaded gun to a kid and not knowing that it's loaded and then not having the kid check and so on and so forth is consider safe gun handling.

I enjoy what folks think is 'safe'
"Safe" because some of the rules were being followed. (Is that like being married six days out of every week? )
Here's what I enjoy- learning things that make my life better-Read lots of Steelhead's posts about carrying cold- Now I carry cold A LOT more- I liked learning that
Trouble with changing one's mind is that it's a admission that one wasn't born knowing everything everything,but, what the hell

Royce
As I've said before, I could care less if folks shoot themselves, in fact I'm all for it, but when they start shooting others I have an issue.
I sure has heck don't know everything and that is exactly the reason I do carry cold.

Didn't always, didn't always think a 223 would work for deer. It took some doing and a few key falls to make me rethink some stuff.

Originally Posted by rem_7
38 pages...why the bump?


because he likes to troll
why is that? because i'm opinionated like the rest of ya? and have the nuts to say it?

most people here hunt hot, oh well,who gives a [bleep] as long as they don't hunt with you?
JO logic +P, can't make this [bleep] up.
now i'm gonna lose sleep.
Take a 120gr pill, that should put you out.
natural cause here.thanks dad
Originally Posted by Royce
Here's what I enjoy- learning things that make my life better-Read lots of Steelhead's posts about carrying cold- Now I carry cold A LOT more- I liked learning that
Trouble with changing one's mind is that it's a admission that one wasn't born knowing everything everything,but, what the hell

Royce


wink I agree. Eating crow beats starving just as waking up smarting beats not waking up at all. As Steelhead just said, I think most folks who come around to carrying largely cold have done so only through simple luck, fate, or the grace of God - they weren't born to operate so safely (we're guys for Pete's sake!)

I'm thinking if one can find it possible to learn these things even "between Flippant and Glib", then it should be possible for just about anyone - even me. grin
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
Originally Posted by Royce
Here's what I enjoy- learning things that make my life better-Read lots of Steelhead's posts about carrying cold- Now I carry cold A LOT more- I liked learning that
Trouble with changing one's mind is that it's a admission that one wasn't born knowing everything everything,but, what the hell

Royce


wink I agree. Eating crow beats starving just as waking up smarting beats not waking up at all. As Steelhead just said, I think most folks who come around to carrying largely cold have done so only through simple luck, fate, or the grace of God - they weren't born to operate so safely (we're guys for Pete's sake!)

I'm thinking if one can find it possible to learn these things even "between Flippant and Glib", then it should be possible for just about anyone - even me. grin


Posts like this, most people can relate to and take in advice,not, your a [bleep] idiot if you don't do it my way.My only stance has been it is not an option 100% of the time and i will always believe that.
Originally Posted by rem_7

Posts like this, most people can relate to and take in advice,not, your a [bleep] idiot if you don't do it my way.My only stance has been it is not an option 100% of the time and i will always believe that.


It is ALWAYS an option. It may not always be the BEST option, but it is always the safest option with regard to ADs and the only one that is 100% effective.

I, for one, wouldn�t crawl through the alders after a wounded griz with an empty chamber � I�d go hot with the safety on. But I�ll probably never have to worry about it, either, or DG of any kind.

By the way, I don�t recall any cold carry types calling hot carry types idiots � can�t say the same for the reverse. I guess the cold carry types don�t have their egos threatened if others choose a different method of carry...
Deer season starts in about 6 hours...can't sleep..............shocked. Happens every season.....smile.

BUT.......having added one post to this thread and read most others ('cuz I like to learn as well and see what others think and why), I must disagree that those espousing "hot" initiated the spewing of disparaging, contentious, unproductive and quite childlike remarks earlier on than any expressing "cold" as their preference.

I believe that "douche bag" and "stupidity" (long for stupid, I'm thinking), were thrown out to describe those that didn't conform with one zealously leaning "cold".

Just sayin'...............tryin' to keep the record straight and the playin' field level........if possible.

Could care less how other's may choose to carry while huntin' as long as they consistently practice all other safe, gun handling etiquette (to include carrying "cold", if they so choose). Can't imagine anyone caring quite so much.

I am very selective about whom I hunt with and rarely are any other hunters within miles of me and mine when afield. IF I choose to hunt with someone other than my son and they/he engages in reckless gun behavior, they don't go afield with me or my son again. That has happened once and he about blew my head off from 4 ft. away (gettin' up from the prone after missin' several shots at a nice blacktail that I'd spotted for him....having chambered another round while still in the prone....turned my way with his 338 and pulled the trigger for some unknown reason). It went right over my head and I was deaf for quite awhile. Not good, but things work out, at least partially sometimes.

This guy quit "huntin" (thankfully) shortly thereafter and wondered if I could find a buyer for his 338. I jumped on it right away, for 2 reasons. He'd just recently lost his job and had 2 young one's at home and needed the $ AND he shouldn't ever have owned a firearm......IMHO. I accept some of the blame as he asked to go with me and I said yes. I like to help others hunt and my son and I had already tagged out. For the life of me I can't figure how one determines if another knows and follows huntin' etiquette before one hunts with that person? Seemingly squared away otherwise..................?

Another member of this site now owns that 338.....a much more deserving individual in regards to safety issues and being aware of such things.

Carry on.................
I carry cold 99.99% of the time. the exception being the gig already mentioned when diggin out a wounded bruin in the thick and nasty, then the sling comes off, you slooowww way down, colors seem brighter, you hear better, it's an exhilirating experience.

specially when you pause to think "hey I'm gettin $200 a day to do this chit, lucky me"

I've walked up to an old moose kill hot on occassion when there's been bear sign about, but more often I've walked up cold just ready to cycle and fire.

I think how a guy hunts the majority of the time and who and how he was instructed to hunt early on, plays a large part in his decision whether to or not.

I have hunted hot in my youth for both squirrel and deer, but I changed that in adulthood when I realized I can work my action pdq and just felt like it wasn't worth it.

am thinking guys that only still hunt and are moving ever soooo slooowwly have a hard time grasping how some dumbazz falls down with a rifle in hand.

I've bailed guys off the side of a mountain, run a sprint across giant tussocks (the tundra hop) to get to the other side of a valley so that we could intercept caribou migrating. Lots of spills in that sorta action.

if I still hunt (not one of my fave ways to hunt) I prefer spot and stalk, it takes enormous discipline for me to move as slow as I feel you need to in order to be effective at still hunting.

took me a long time to develop the discipline to glass, glass, glass and glass some more to find animals.


I used to be in a hurry.


really feel you don't give up much if anything by hunting cold in the majority of scenarios and am hopin cooler heads prevail and guys will just evaluate if it might be a better way for them to do things.

for lots of other reasons than "hot or cold" I'm picky about who I hunt with as I believe most folks here probably are as well.

but I do go cold the vast majority of the time, it just makes sense to me. YMMV
"hey I'm gettin $200 a day to do this chit, lucky me"

That pops to mind in just those moments, doesn't it?

smile

The issue "cold vs. hot chamber" can IMHO put to rest as follows:

Hot chamber only while stand hunting (sitting, not moving) or ferreting (as 1akhunter describes above).

In stand hunting, because it can be done safely and in ferreting because it need be done (one would not want to fumble a load in such instance).

Anybody advocating a need for a round in the chamber while moving through thickets hunting deer, revokes reason.

It has been proven, in real hunting by expert hunters, and laid out in these threads through pictures too often, that hunting thick stuff cold can very much so be done successfully to keep incisting on a "need" for a hot chamber to do so.






weren't directed at you but if you feel the need to get bunched up at every little thing, knock yourself out.
realized later, my bad..
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
For an example of how folks tend to handle firearms when they "know" the chamber is empty, spend an hour in any gun shop. I agree-a good gun handler, with an empty chamber, is darn safe. But, offsetting that IMHO is the idea of all the bad gun handlers put there... Thinking they have an empty chamber, when they don't. In a season's hunting, in a 100% mandated "cold carry" scenario, rifles would get chambered a LOT. They'd get un-chambered again some smaller number of times... There's risk there, too.

As to risks, manage them as you see fit. Driving 55 on the highway is probably your statistically best place to start- for you and the people around you. Do it for the children.

So... Safe to say the cold carry guys will be the ones putzing along in the slow lane...? smile

My only real interest here is when guys say that hot-carry hunters don't belong in the woods... Dunno if that's happened lately as I'm not monitoring this. It did happen earlier in the thread. Other than that, who cares... Do as you see fit.







This has been beat to death yet you chose to thread it and then bump it a year later. Bottom line is few will change so it's just you trolling.
Originally Posted by BradArnett
Did it last year on a Michigan public land whitetail buck at 40yds.....and I was a week into rifle season. Our bucks are pretty damn spooky by then too. I was stillhunting my way through a cedar swamp. I had my share of slips and trips in that mess too. It's only as hard as you make it, and had I not gotten that buck because of the fact that I had to chamber a round first......it would have been OK.


Bout sums it up.
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter

It is ALWAYS an option. It may not always be the BEST option, but it is always the safest option with regard to ADs and the only one that is 100% effective.


Cold Carry isn't a 100% safety gaurantee. How many people have thought a chamber was "cold" when in fact was not? I think nobody here will argue that it is without a doubt, "safer"

Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter

By the way, I don�t recall any cold carry types calling hot carry types idiots � can�t say the same for the reverse. I guess the cold carry types don�t have their egos threatened if others choose a different method of carry...

Then read this.
Originally Posted by Calvin
Only a [bleep] idiot would walk around with a hot chamber...


I am a cold carry type (usually). I am just trying to keep this fair.
Originally Posted by Dog_Hunter
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter

It is ALWAYS an option. It may not always be the BEST option, but it is always the safest option with regard to ADs and the only one that is 100% effective.


Cold Carry isn't a 100% safety gaurantee. How many people have thought a chamber was "cold" when in fact was not? I think nobody here will argue that it is without a doubt, "safer"


Cod carry is 100% safe 100% of the time. By definition �cold carry� means the chamber is really empty. A hot chamber that is believed to be cold is still a hot chamber.

No one has ever been shot with a cold chamber and no one ever will � by definition. People used to think the world was flat but they were mistaken about that, too.

Quote


Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter

By the way, I don�t recall any cold carry types calling hot carry types idiots � can�t say the same for the reverse. I guess the cold carry types don�t have their egos threatened if others choose a different method of carry...

Then read this.
Originally Posted by Calvin
Only a [bleep] idiot would walk around with a hot chamber...


I am a cold carry type (usually). I am just trying to keep this fair.


Someone pointed that out in the other thread as well. I was correct in saying �I don�t recall� any such statements, but like those that mistake a hot chamber for a cold one, I was mistaken...
I hunt hot, been doing it all my life as well as following gun safety rules all my life. Was taught that way by my dad before I was old enough to start hunting, and I've taught all my kids the same way. Been one accidental discharge from both sides of my family in over 80 years of hunting and it happened to me with a worn shotgun safety on an old Stevens double barrel 410 when I was about 12 years old. No repercussions as the gun was pointed in a safe direction at the time. I also sleep hot when in the woods, you never know what might walk in your tent. Had a black bear walk in our tent about 4 years ago banging and clashing pots and pans as he knocked around in our kitchen. Three forths of us came up with pistols drawn and pointed towards the intruder. Nobody had to shoot as alot of hollering chased the big blackie out of the tent. I might also add all guns were pointed at the bear and we all took a stance where if we needed to shoot nobody would of been in harms way. An unloaded gun in the woods is just a club, I prefer having more of an equalizer if I ever need it. If your not a safe gun handler, you don't hunt with us period. If your new and get invited, you're watched by everyone present to make sure you practise safe gun handling, if you don't, you're asked to leave and you're not invited back, no exceptions no second chances.
I hunt with a round in the chamber. A rifle without a round in the chamber is just another piece of pipe-useless.
I also hunt alone so I don't give a crap about bush etiquette.

Where do rangers go when they want to get away from it all?
LOL
Well, I did yesterday.
I hunt hot in a "hot" area, especially in thick timber. I don't hike in or out hot.
My 11yo son thinks the "hot carry" crowds adamant and feverishly spouted reasons for their chosen methods simply doesn't cut the mustard....

Case in point:

This weekend while still hunting in some thick brush, my boy had absolutely no problem with wracking a round, raising his rifle while simultaneously flipping the scope covers open, pasting his cross-hair and trippin' the trigger on this freakish spike at under 30 yards.

[Linked Image]
Wouldn't consider a spike deer or elk to be very smart, seen alot of really dumb ones over the years. Lets see him try that with a cagey old buck thats been around for awhile. Bet they won't be standing still long enough to feed a round in the chamber at under 30 yards.
How bout a wolf or a B&C buck?
How about wild boar?

[Linked Image]
Guess it depends on the animal and how many humans they've been around and how many hunting seasons they've lived thru. I've walked up to B&C caribou on the north slope that acted no different than walking up to a domestic cow in a field. Also saw an artic fox with a dog collar around its neck the same winter. I'm sure I could of drug a wheelbarrow load of rifles right up to either one of them, loaded them all, flipped off the safetys and flipped open the scope covers and they would of stood their stupidly looking at me waiting to be shot. Now try the same thing with a wolf who's had his ass burned by a rancher for trying to take down a cow and I'd venture to say he'll be hauling ass as soon as he hears the screen door open, much less stay around for a round to get chambered. So yeah, I'd say there's wolves and B&C bucks out there that have never seen or smelled a human much less been shot at before. And we all know the young of any wild critter out there is WAY less smart than the older ones who've been around for awhile, thus my comment regarding spikes.
Guess I'll just happily keep killing the stupid ones.
Raised on a farm, part of my chores included having to feed the hogs. I know they're supposed to be smart but sorry I just don't see it. Figure their about as smart as a chicken, not so much in my opinion. Wild hogs that have been hunted, maybe so. Guess they'd be no different than any other animal thats been chased and shot at by man, the more pressure they've seen the spookier they get.
Agreed on the farm and wild hog analogy. Much like cows and deer.
Hunting season runs year round in Germany. 81 Mio. people in a country smaller than most states in the US.

Any tract of land not inhabited is under some hunters lease or trust by law.

I double dare any population of game animals to be more hunted and accustomed to human haressment than most here in Germany.

Here are some facts in despite:

Game populations soar and strive. Great hunting.

You still do not need any Hubble - type telescopes. Animals are not nocturnal.

You still do not need to do any hasty snap shots from a hot chamber - despite thick undergrows and hunting weary critters.

There is no 'need' for a hot chamber. Keep arguing a 'want' - just be frank about it.
I fed these on a farm as a kid

[Linked Image]

No difference between them and a wild turkey, in fact I usually just hunt wild turkey with an ax.....laffin
I very seldom have a need for a hasty snap shot in the country I hunt. Used to get a kick out of going into the thick stuff and sneaking up on them in their beds, not so much anymore, been there done that for many years. Been into long range shooting for almost ten years now so I much prefer more open country. Hell nowadays I'd have enough time to chamber 50 rounds without them even knowing I'm anywhere around. Alot of times I'm watching them for quite awhile before I've decided to take my shot. I just see no point in not having a round chambered for most all my hunting. Now if I had my gun slung and was trying to scale a particularily steep area or one that I had a chance of taking a tumble down the mountainside, I'll remove the one in the chamber - its just common sense.
I've done my share of turkey hunting also. A turkey can be both the smartest and the dumbest critter in the woods. If you don't believe me get in some thick stuff and let a flock come right up to you, then jump up yelling and waving your arms. I've seen them same 'smart gobblers' fly right into vines and trees knocking themselves to the ground trying to get away. Funny how they can be so smart at times and so damn stupid in another situation. Did that more than once as a youngster just for the laughs it provided.
I really don't think any of them (deer, turkey etc) are smart, they are just wild.
Long thread and I don't know if it's been asked in a while but..... How do the cold carry folks hunt with a muzzleloader?

Do they view that type of arm inherently more dangerous? I'm not being facecious.. I'd like an answer.

Both my #11 percussion cap inline and flinter would be difficult to get ready without at least taking my eyes off the game.

I believe the guys when they say they can "hunt" cold but to me it's more of a personal preference, this from a person who worked in industrial safety for 10 years, prevention, investigation and reporting.

Where is the poll? I hunt with one ready to go and the safety on.
JO has all the numbers.........
I'd like to hear what the final tally is myself. I'd venture at least 80% hunt hot, just not curious enough to wade thru 117 pages of votes to find out the answer.
Originally Posted by gmack
Long thread and I don't know if it's been asked in a while but..... How do the cold carry folks hunt with a muzzleloader?

Do they view that type of arm inherently more dangerous? I'm not being facecious.. I'd like an answer.

Both my #11 percussion cap inline and flinter would be difficult to get ready without at least taking my eyes off the game.

I believe the guys when they say they can "hunt" cold but to me it's more of a personal preference, this from a person who worked in industrial safety for 10 years, prevention, investigation and reporting.



A capping tool hung around the neck makes capping my .50�s a pretty quick proposition. There have been times when I�ve loaded powder and bullet, capped the nipple and still got a shot off. Still, I tend to hunt hot more with my muzzlestuffers than with the centerfires.
Is ignorance bliss?

When I've formally taught hunter safety classes to youth, it's always been kids who've grown up around and have already been using guns whom I've instructed. Most of them recognize a "safe" rifle or shotgun. So one of the first things I do it show them my 870 and ask them to inspect the safety to make sure the shotgun cannot fire. After examining and affirming that it is safe to handle, I grab the barrel and thump the butt on the floor whereupon the hammer disengages, firing the primed-only shell which was previously placed in the chamber. It gets their attention. The point is to teach the fact that no safety should be counted on. Secondly, it is a point from which one can teach the idea that there is very little to prevent a firearm's sear from disengaging - and all it takes is the smallest particle of ordinary debris common to the outdoors to make the usually adequate sear engagement no longer safe.

I'm sure those who don't have an awareness and appreciation for their guns' mechanisms probably traipse along with greater confidence in their infallibility. That is the precise reason I almost never engage a safety.
Originally Posted by gmack
Long thread and I don't know if it's been asked in a while but..... How do the cold carry folks hunt with a muzzleloader?

Do they view that type of arm inherently more dangerous? I'm not being facecious.. I'd like an answer.

Both my #11 percussion cap inline and flinter would be difficult to get ready without at least taking my eyes off the game.

I believe the guys when they say they can "hunt" cold but to me it's more of a personal preference, this from a person who worked in industrial safety for 10 years, prevention, investigation and reporting.



If you "can" take the safer route, you are dense not to.

This from a person who makes a living teaching wildlife management and hunting practise to forestry students and guides in Germany and Alaska.

Translation of the last sentence - whenever I work whereever, my counterparts and I are handling rifles. I cringe at the thought of all those chambers hot...

Did you rig it or is this a defect? I've known several trap shooters who get trigger jobs on their 870s. The sear engegement is considerable, and with so many of these around; they're everywhere, a problem like this whoud get noticed.
Is this one of the reasons for trigger locks?
There have been several posts from people who had guns w/o sufficient sear engagement...guns that 'just went off' upon releasing the safety.
What do you consider the proper trigger pull?
Bill
Originally Posted by wahoo
...
There have been several posts from people who had guns w/o sufficient sear engagement...guns that 'just went off' upon releasing the safety.
What do you consider the proper trigger pull?
Bill


Remington finally changed their trigger design a while back due to a M700 design flaw that was known since the 60�s. The problem was that some rifles could fire on the release of the safety. The number of rifles affected varied by model but I think it was about 1% for normal M700s and near 50% for M600�s or whatever they called them.

Remington knew of the problem and preferred to pay off lawsuits rather than fix the design. Only recently (a few years back) did they issue a recall. Most of the affected rifles have not been modified and probably never will be.

Sounds to me like a good reason to go cold until actually ready to shoot.



Thanks for the reply... the point of my comment was a reference to 870 shotguns by another.
Still, what is a correct trigger pull?
Bill
yes.
Originally Posted by slymule
Wouldn't consider a spike deer or elk to be very smart, seen alot of really dumb ones over the years. Lets see him try that with a cagey old buck thats been around for awhile. Bet they won't be standing still long enough to feed a round in the chamber at under 30 yards.


is that for real?
I pulled the trigger section out and rigged it. It was apparent in studying it that the smallest piece of crud, even a bit of rust, could easily cause a potential problem. So I rigged the problem to demonstrate how small the line is that we walk when trusting the mechanism.

Since that time, I know at least one young man who took a shotgun blast at close range. Fortunately it was a richochet so the brunt of the energy was somewhat diminished and he survived.

I still have and use the shotgun I used years ago in making the demonstration. It keep it clean. It has never failed. I very rarely use a safety; I never trust them.
amazing a subject as stupid as this, can make 118 pages and still counting..
Just play some with your settings. Could make it more pages or less.

The issue remains same.
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by wahoo
...
There have been several posts from people who had guns w/o sufficient sear engagement...guns that 'just went off' upon releasing the safety.
What do you consider the proper trigger pull?
Bill


Remington finally changed their trigger design a while back due to a M700 design flaw that was known since the 60�s. The problem was that some rifles could fire on the release of the safety. The number of rifles affected varied by model but I think it was about 1% for normal M700s and near 50% for M600�s or whatever they called them.

Remington knew of the problem and preferred to pay off lawsuits rather than fix the design. Only recently (a few years back) did they issue a recall. Most of the affected rifles have not been modified and probably never will be.

Sounds to me like a good reason to go cold until actually ready to shoot.





Coyote Hunter
If you do a search here on 700 triggers, the Walker trigger, whatever, you can likely find details of the cases involved and much more than you want to read.

But a couple points; there was never a recall, several changes were made over time including using beefier trigger weight springs, the trigger change was not related to any civil action or defect in the Walker trigger, the primary case cited was a MT woman that shot her son on the other side of a horse trailer with a rifle that could not be made to fail again.

The most dangerous aspect of that trigger was the Bubba that got inside it...
art
Put me down as hunting hot, safety on, finger always outside the trigger housing until ready to shoot, and always very conscious as to where my muzzle is pointing. I will go cold when crossing fence lines, in rough terrain, and while bringing my rifle up to my tree stand.

Originally Posted by slymule
An unloaded gun in the woods is just a club,...

Can you explain how to cycle the bolt on a club? smile
Originally Posted by 378Canuck
A rifle without a round in the chamber is just another piece of pipe-useless.

Or a pipe?
Originally Posted by Seafire
amazing a subject as stupid as this, can make 118 pages and still counting..
Considering the ramifications - the possibility of people being saved from injury or much worse as a result of this thread - I for one hardly think this is a "stupid subject". In act, I would rank the subject matter as one of the more important ones being discussed anywhere on this web site.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer

Coyote Hunter
If you do a search here on 700 triggers, the Walker trigger, whatever, you can likely find details of the cases involved and much more than you want to read.

But a couple points; there was never a recall, several changes were made over time including using beefier trigger weight springs, the trigger change was not related to any civil action or defect in the Walker trigger, the primary case cited was a MT woman that shot her son on the other side of a horse trailer with a rifle that could not be made to fail again.

The most dangerous aspect of that trigger was the Bubba that got inside it...
art


Sitka deer �

There is indeed a lot of info available, and I�ve read a bunch of it. Interesting stuff, and much of what is available paints Remington as a company whose interest was more in corporate profits than in the safety of their consumers.

�Recall� may not be the technically correct term, but it was widely described as such in many places. Remington calls it a �Safety Modification Program�. (http://www.remington.com/safety/safety_center/safety_modification_program/model_700.asp)
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Seafire
amazing a subject as stupid as this, can make 118 pages and still counting..
Considering the ramifications - the possibility of people being saved from injury or much worse as a result of this thread - I for one hardly think this is a "stupid subject". In act, I would rank the subject matter as one of the more important ones being discussed anywhere on this web site.


LMAO!

Even more important than BBQ?
Coyote HUnter
"Remington finally changed their trigger design a while back due to a M700 design flaw that was known since the 60�s."

This line is where I disagree with you. You are confusing Walker trigger issues with the bolt-locking safety. Those are two entirely different issues and relate to the bolt stop only which is not a trigger part.

From the link speaking about what they might find and bill you extra for: "Your rifle�s trigger assembly is found to be in an unsatisfactory or potentially unsafe operating condition because of any number of factors, including wear, alteration or maintenance."

I find it funny they would find maintenence a subject for creating safety issues.... Actually the bastids will take out your trigger if it shows any sign of tampering and replace it with a current POS, and then charge you for the pleasure!

No ill will intended nor taken.
art
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
...

No ill will intended nor taken.
art


Same here. I'm sure you are more expert on the subject than I am.

Best,

CH
Damn if this ain't a happy, friendly place.


Originally Posted by ironbender
Damn if this ain't a happy, friendly place.



Heck yea! Why wouldn't being called dumbazz, delusional and dangerous cause one carries hot lead to a warm fuzzy place? cool
Thought you were hunting (hot).
Originally Posted by ironbender
Thought you were hunting (hot).


Did, back and recovering for coming weekend. Left some hogs out there....and a monster buck!
I hope that's what you wanted! smile
Not sure if this applies but I'll through it out there.

Does anyone hunt for ducks and geese from a blind with a cold chamber?
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Seafire
amazing a subject as stupid as this, can make 118 pages and still counting..
Considering the ramifications - the possibility of people being saved from injury or much worse as a result of this thread - I for one hardly think this is a "stupid subject". In act, I would rank the subject matter as one of the more important ones being discussed anywhere on this web site.
Lots of ways I'd being willing to wake up. Stupid ain't my first choice. Dead ain't any of them.
Originally Posted by Clintk
Not sure if this applies but I'll through it out there.

Does anyone hunt for ducks and geese from a blind with a cold chamber?


been answered, several times, yes..
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by Seafire
amazing a subject as stupid as this, can make 118 pages and still counting..
Considering the ramifications - the possibility of people being saved from injury or much worse as a result of this thread - I for one hardly think this is a "stupid subject". In act, I would rank the subject matter as one of the more important ones being discussed anywhere on this web site.
Lots of ways I'd being willing to wake up. Stupid ain't my first choice. Dead ain't any of them.


Yea, well you're not getting out of here alive. I reckon it's time to post the top 1000 ways humans die and the causes......let's see where AD is on the list. Much bigger stuff to worry about, like shoveling snow, any of y'all shovel snow? Or, just BS? grin
Who would have thought this could go soo long the cold chamber dudes are hardcore
Originally Posted by Stan V

Yea, well you're not getting out of here alive. I reckon it's time to post the top 1000 ways humans die and the causes......let's see where AD is on the list. Much bigger stuff to worry about, like shoveling snow, any of y'all shovel snow? Or, just BS? grin


The way I look at it there is no reason to hurry the inevitable along...
Originally Posted by jcdixon77
Who would have thought this could go soo long the cold chamber dudes are hardcore


Yeah pretty retarded isn't it.

Debating firearms safety, WTF has this world come to.........
Originally Posted by wildswalker
Originally Posted by jcdixon77
Who would have thought this could go soo long the cold chamber dudes are hardcore


Yeah pretty retarded isn't it.

Debating firearms safety, WTF has this world come to.........


I don't know what the world has come to, but America has become a nanny state....like I said before, the 'fire is becoming more and more feminized.

Sorry, girls.
If you spent more time hunting and shooting, Stanley, than you do posting on the www, you'd have a friggin' clue........
Originally Posted by wildswalker
If you spent more time hunting and shooting, Stanley, than you do posting on the www, you'd have a friggin' clue........



So, all my life's experience doesn't add up to yours?
Just sayin'...

One smart azz remark for another.

Happy Tuesday to ya Stanley, got your corn feeder all ready set go?
Hmmmmmm..............

I'll make sure the camera batteries are good to go for this weekend, as there's be what, 5?, cold chambers in pursuit of tasty critters, and assuming scheduling doesn't get derailed by She-Who-Will-Not-Be-Named ( wink ), I doubt the game bag will be empty long.
Originally Posted by wildswalker
Just sayin'...

One smart azz remark for another.

Happy Tuesday to ya Stanley, got your corn feeder all ready set go?


You bet it's ready....I see you joined the 'fire 6 months after I did, yet you have 1500 more posts. Ah, what about not posting on the www gives you more experience?
Some schit, just ain't worth it.

Whether that be carrying hot and potentially taking a bullet yourself or passing it through something you don't intend to..........

Or trying to hold a horse's head underwater until it drinks.......... or drowns........

Some horses are hell bent on drowning......
I wouldn't worry about how other adults hunt if you're not part of the hunting party. Just how many handwringers do we have now?


Are we going to start saving horses from drowning now?
Just one AD away.

Or, one too many.

When Darwin and Murphy collide, the results can be interesting.

Thinkin' more on the lines of common sense and substance, but we can't expect you to not trip on that/those concepts.

Enjoy your hunting this year, don't trip/fall climbing into that shooting tower.......
Originally Posted by Stan V
I wouldn't worry about how other adults hunt if you're not part of the hunting party. Just how many handwringers do we have now?


Are we going to start saving horses from drowning now?


Case in point.......
Originally Posted by Stan V
I wouldn't worry about how other adults hunt if you're not part of the hunting party.


Nope, 'cause there's never anyone you didn't think of (or know about) within miles of you, unless they are your own party (and then, hey, they are all careful, so why worry? You only know them, their kids, their wives, might even be related to them...............)

Carry on.

As an aside, it would appear that sometimes NOT knowing, is half the battle.
We deal with those 2 everyday of our lives....this has become as bizarre a thread as I've seen on the 'fire. Youngsters with more experience than old pharts and old pharts belittling fellow old pharts. Tell me we have'nt become a nanny state.

Darwin and Murphy being the 2 we deal with everyday.
As I said, sometimes not knowing, is half the battle.

Carry on, as I'm sure you will, and God Bless Texas.......................................
Yes, by all means....God Bless Texas.
Originally Posted by wildswalker
Give us, NAHunter, an honest assessment of your typical hunting conditions....

Weather, terrain, the type of hunting you do.

Just curious......


Just ran across this, and I suppose it was meant as bait..but if not...........

Where I live, pushing small bluffs is the norm if in a group. Flat stubble fields, - 15 to -20 deg celcius. Also hunt pasture on foot. For moose and elk, different terrain, etc hunt mostly on foot all day, but do alot of sitting, calling etc.

I always treat my fiream "hot" whether in the house, outside, loaded or unloaded. My finger never touches the trigger until game is spotted and the safety goes off. I prob check the position of the safety 15 times during the day......a bit anal about that. When in the cabinet, actions are often (not always) left open.

Does that satisfy??
Got back from elk camp a couple days ago... Carried "hot" the whole time, other than stream crossings on a log and the like.

Commenting because I noticed the comment about checking the safety 15 times a day. From all the yapping we've done on this subject, I kind of self-analyzed how I habitually carry... I do NOT sling my rifle, it's always in my hands. Anyway, noticed that, by habit, always, my right thumb flat LIVES on the safety, checking and insuring it's pulled back, trigger finger is parallel to the stock, outside the triggerguard, other than to often give the bolt handle a downward nudge to insure it is fully in battery.

Hadn't realized just how obsessively I ride that safety. This sort of habit would have prevented your AD/ND, Wildswalker.

As to risk maneagement, I never once wore a seatbelt on those logging roads, and (gasp!) I had three whole beers one night. Not to mention leaving camp in the dark, busting butt into the big woods, and not getting back to camp until after dark.... Oh, didn't carry my full elk pack (Badlands Superday), so I only had one bottle of water, one space blanket, etc.

I am, truly, livin' on the edge. smile

I did talk to a cold-chamber guy up there, but it was hard to understand him through the bubble-wrap he'd covered himself in... grin...
Once an ignorant azzhole....ALWAYS an ignorant azzhole.
Guess you prove THAT one.

wink
My Dad can kick your dad's azz......
Probably so... grin...

Did you ever cough up what state and unit you hunt, WW? I was gone for a week...

Boondock, USA.

Can't you read?

Same "unit" I'm sitting in now.....though, we really don't have "units" per se.

Guessin' you missed where I said my AO was none of your damn business?!?

Some things never change, like your frequent and unrelenting idiocy, for example.

Nor do you disappoint us by letting that which matters most solidly sink in.

A laughing stock you are, and a safe bet you'll make an internet career of it.

Continue in your bliss poser, you are golden, it'll never happen to you......
I bet I know where you are! wink smile
Originally Posted by wildswalker
Boondock, USA.

Can't you read?

Same "unit" I'm sitting in now.....though, we really don't have "units" per se.

Guessin' you missed where I said my AO was none of your damn business?!?

Some things never change, like your frequent and unrelenting idiocy, for example.

Nor do you disappoint us by letting that which matters most solidly sink in.

A laughing stock you are, and a safe bet you'll make an internet career of it.

Continue in your bliss poser, you are golden, it'll never happen to you......


He who can't make his point without personal insults, likely has a very weak point. smile

Gonna speculate, then, that you gets lots of tags and filling them is near-trivially easy. That is most certainly pertinant to the discussion.

If I'm wrong, correct me- with your state, and general area of your hunting.

Otherwise, if I'm right (bet I am), you are extrapolating incorrectly.

JObama....

You are trying to make your weak point stronger, and cover up the fact that you simply can't hunt.

Clearly evident to all of us who CAN hunt, and who watch you POSE........

Can't lay claim myself to the "difficulty" of killing animals that you seem to conjure up for yourself...because for me, it's ALWAYS been easy, anywhere I hunt.

If that somehow offends you, then, I just don't give a chit.......

The fact that the concept escapes you of gun safety while practicing common sense and visa versa, is telling, as the evidence leaks from your flapping yap at every turn you take.

This childish pissing match you are trying to create to bolster the "difficulty" of your hunt, and I guess by default make mine appear "easy", is going to get you nowhere regarding carrying a rifle in search of a single animal in a single day's time.

Or, in the single instant in time that your weapon unpredictably discharges and splatters your brain matter all over the underbrush........

My 9 year old kid killed his first animal on a one day only hunt that HE led me on, and did it cold chamber......THAT JeffyO trumps anything you can possibly muster in your lame defense of your ample stupidity.
Originally Posted by wildswalker
JObama....

You are trying to make your weak point stronger, and cover up the fact that you simply can't hunt.

Clearly evident to all of us who CAN hunt, and who watch you POSE........

Can't lay claim myself to the "difficulty" of killing animals that you seem to conjure up for yourself...because for me, it's ALWAYS been easy, anywhere I hunt.

If that somehow offends you, then, I just don't give a chit.......

The fact that the concept escapes you of gun safety while practicing common sense and visa versa, is telling, as the evidence leaks from your flapping yap at every turn you take.

This childish pissing match you are trying to create to bolster the "difficulty" of your hunt, and I guess by default make mine appear "easy", is going to get you nowhere regarding carrying a rifle in search of a single animal in a single day's time.

Or, in the single instant in time that your weapon unpredictably discharges and splatters your brain matter all over the underbrush........

My 9 year old kid killed his first animal on a one day only hunt that HE led me on, and did it cold chamber......THAT JeffyO trumps anything you can possibly muster in your lame defense of your ample stupidity.


Maybe it's just me, but perhaps you could be a little more obtuse, arrogant and use more foul language to make your point? Doesn't sound like you're really getting into it.....remember, it's the internet.
Your continued avoidance of the question just shows how right I am...

Gun safety is between the ears, Wildswalker. A guy can hunt safely with a round in the chamber. In fact... most of us do just that.

How about you post a link to a hunter's safety course that says people should hunt empty-chamber? I had to take the Oregon course last year to hunt in Colorado... it was never mentioned once.

Look at this.

"Total number of deaths caused by motor vehicle accidents in 2005: 45,343

Odds of Death Caused By Motor vehicle accidentsin 1 year: 1/6,539

Odds of Death Caused By Motor vehicle accidents in a lifetime: 1/84"



You have a 1 in 84 chance of being killed in a car accident in your lifetime. WOW!

You want to reduce your odds of getting kilt, start there.





Originally Posted by Stan V
Originally Posted by wildswalker
JObama....

You are trying to make your weak point stronger, and cover up the fact that you simply can't hunt.

Clearly evident to all of us who CAN hunt, and who watch you POSE........

Can't lay claim myself to the "difficulty" of killing animals that you seem to conjure up for yourself...because for me, it's ALWAYS been easy, anywhere I hunt.

If that somehow offends you, then, I just don't give a chit.......

The fact that the concept escapes you of gun safety while practicing common sense and visa versa, is telling, as the evidence leaks from your flapping yap at every turn you take.

This childish pissing match you are trying to create to bolster the "difficulty" of your hunt, and I guess by default make mine appear "easy", is going to get you nowhere regarding carrying a rifle in search of a single animal in a single day's time.

Or, in the single instant in time that your weapon unpredictably discharges and splatters your brain matter all over the underbrush........

My 9 year old kid killed his first animal on a one day only hunt that HE led me on, and did it cold chamber......THAT JeffyO trumps anything you can possibly muster in your lame defense of your ample stupidity.


Maybe it's just me, but perhaps you could be a little more obtuse, arrogant and use more foul language to make your point? Doesn't sound like you're really getting into it.....remember, it's the internet.


Okay....[bleep] you, Stanley.

That better..??
You're famous for comparing apples to oranges to bolster a weak point.

Car wrecks have zero to do with gun safety, and if you were anything remotely close to reasonably witted, you'd know that.

Simple fact Jeff, a cold chamber IS safer than a hot one, and I'm sure you've heard that before...at least once.

Tough for ya isn't it, being out hunted by a 9 year old.......

Any one hunt cold in a single shot? I hunt hot as well in my Ruger No.1s. However, I also know how to check my safety. If it's not safe with the safety, it has no business being out on the hunt in the first place.

Also when my rifle isn't in my hands, it's slung but end up (muzzle down). Ever tried bring the rifle to a shooting position from the typical muzzle up slung position in comparison to muzzle down? In bear country, you'll quickly see which is quicker.

I'm sure this will be ridiculously and redundantly dissected into a "what if" and about how dangerous it is for the extreme tiny moment I'm not checking the safety, and a bush reaches in and cleverly toggles off the safety and deliberately slips it's self into the trigger guard without myself being aware to any degree of this activity.

Cold chamber hunting isn't taught at the hunters education in CO.
Quote
Gonna speculate, then, that you gets lots of tags and filling them is near-trivially easy. That is most certainly pertinant to the discussion.


I've stayed out of things, but since you want to make tags an issue...

The NH deer herd sucks. That's a fact. This year, I'm thinking due to the HUGE acorn crop, scouting indicates things are going to be worse than normal.

All of that aside, my 7600 will be riding a cold chamber. I'm thinking I can work the slide if an opportunity comes up. BTW, the evergreen hummocks and swamps I hunt are just as thick as anything you've posted up. Funny thing, around here that's where we find deer wink .

George
The International Hunters Education Association does not even teach "cold chamber hunting"
It teaches that you should treat every gun with the respect that is a loaded gun
Im not saying theres anything wrong with unting with a cold chamber I even condone it when kids are involved but some will call you irresponsible for doing it on here
Originally Posted by cmg
Originally Posted by gmack
Long thread and I don't know if it's been asked in a while but..... How do the cold carry folks hunt with a muzzleloader?

Do they view that type of arm inherently more dangerous? I'm not being facecious.. I'd like an answer.

Both my #11 percussion cap inline and flinter would be difficult to get ready without at least taking my eyes off the game.

I believe the guys when they say they can "hunt" cold but to me it's more of a personal preference, this from a person who worked in industrial safety for 10 years, prevention, investigation and reporting.



If you "can" take the safer route, you are dense not to.

This from a person who makes a living teaching wildlife management and hunting practise to forestry students and guides in Germany and Alaska.

Translation of the last sentence - whenever I work whereever, my counterparts and I are handling rifles. I cringe at the thought of all those chambers hot...



If you can hunt (not transporting,"handling", etc.) hot with the an extremely high probability (.... not even mentioned in hunter education classes) of not having an AD incident then it is Safe!

But, how can I argue with Safererererer.

I cringe at the thought of anyone handling a gun, they "think" is unloaded, in an unsafe manner.

Originally Posted by SUPERDIESEL1
Any one hunt cold in a single shot? I hunt hot as well in my Ruger No.1s. However, I also know how to check my safety. If it's not safe with the safety, it has no business being out on the hunt in the first place.


I carry my #1s empty nearly all the time. When I begin the stalk, that's when one goes in the pipe. Last moose I shot with a #1 had us looking each other in the eye while I "thunked" one in the tube. 'Course, at under 50 yards, I knew I had plenty of time to beat him even if he made a run for it.

I think more people would choose otherwise if they studied the mechanics of their weapons and knew what their safeties did - or didn't do. Simply blocking the trigger - as many "safeties" do- is often relatively meaningless.
+1, especially with the No. 1.

Some European single-shots, though, have a "safety" that actually cocks the rifle. It can't go bang unless the safety is pushed forward, which is very handy. My Merkel .308 is like this. You could beat on the rifle with a big hammer and it would never go off.
Originally Posted by Klikitarik

I think more people would choose otherwise if they studied the mechanics of their weapons and knew what their safeties did - or didn't do. Simply blocking the trigger - as many "safeties" do- is often relatively meaningless.


Let me get this correct. Are you saying the safeties on firearms don't make them safe? There is legal implications and liabilities going with the safeties that are installed on modern firearms. If your stating that there not up to task, this needs to be brought up and the aspects of it with viewable to the public documentation. I worked for a Master Gunsmith who was the owner of Front range Gunsmithing from 76'-89'. I know what the safeties are about and there workings. That is why I say what I said about having them in the field (they have no business there if it's compromised). Just want to clear this up.
Technical mountain climbers don't use 1/4" hardware store nylon braid for safety line, yet that would probably be a safer proposition than to trust the safety systems often found on many weapons. Don't pretend that years of gunsmithing or whatever somehow means others shouldn't learn about what it is that they trust their safety to. There is a reason why every hunter/gun safety training program in the country emphasizes the idea of never pointing a weapon at anything you would not be willing to shoot.
Never meant for you to interpret it the way you did about muzzle direction or obvious firearm safety. This is a given, however I'm still surprised to see the lack of safety practiced every now and then. Should be common sense, but,,,.

There's no true HARD evidence to prove to me it's an unsafe practice and that you shouldn't carry hot when it's not a clear and present danger to others when hunting (walking or sitting looking for game of course).

Interpretation can be taken many different ways from a statement. You can never cover all aspects of how it will be taken by others unfortunately.

On another note: Your very fortunate in my eyes to live in the place you do klikitarik. Not many places like it left.
Originally Posted by gmack
Originally Posted by cmg
Originally Posted by gmack
Long thread and I don't know if it's been asked in a while but..... How do the cold carry folks hunt with a muzzleloader?

Do they view that type of arm inherently more dangerous? I'm not being facecious.. I'd like an answer.

Both my #11 percussion cap inline and flinter would be difficult to get ready without at least taking my eyes off the game.

I believe the guys when they say they can "hunt" cold but to me it's more of a personal preference, this from a person who worked in industrial safety for 10 years, prevention, investigation and reporting.



If you "can" take the safer route, you are dense not to.

This from a person who makes a living teaching wildlife management and hunting practise to forestry students and guides in Germany and Alaska.

Translation of the last sentence - whenever I work whereever, my counterparts and I are handling rifles. I cringe at the thought of all those chambers hot...



If you can hunt (not transporting,"handling", etc.) hot with the an extremely high probability (.... not even mentioned in hunter education classes) of not having an AD incident then it is Safe!

But, how can I argue with Safererererer.

I cringe at the thought of anyone handling a gun, they "think" is unloaded, in an unsafe manner.



Ayup.
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
Technical mountain climbers don't use 1/4" hardware store nylon braid for safety line, yet that would probably be a safer proposition than to trust the safety systems often found on many weapons. Don't pretend that years of gunsmithing or whatever somehow means others shouldn't learn about what it is that they trust their safety to. There is a reason why every hunter/gun safety training program in the country emphasizes the idea of never pointing a weapon at anything you would not be willing to shoot.


On that note, I remember well the first time I climbed at Joshua Tree. The bolted climbs there were put up under the American aesthetic, which is bottom-up rather than on rappel like the Euros do it. So, every bolt was put in by a guy on a stance, not clipped to anything, scary far above the last bolt, using an impact hammer an expansion bolts... As you can imagine, the bolts are few and far between! To your point, Klik, they often WERE manky old 1/4" hardware-store crap, too.

In an area like Smith Rocks, where climbs were put up under the Euro aesthetic, there's a bolt like every 8 feet, and they are usually these beautiful, 3/8 or 1/2" stainless climbing-specific bolts...
I'm not saying what you should or should not do. All I'm saying is that the safety often isn't. (Kind of got that point driven home to the obvious hypocritical point in teaching hunter safety for some years.) And, as many have pointed out, hunting empty-chamber is obviously a safer way; not that it is always necessary perhaps, but always safer than not. Doesn't matter one way or the other as long as one can be safe. I will argue that that is important. And believe me, though I don't invite SAR opportunities, I hardly shrink from danger where I live.

Yes, Diesel, Klikitarik is a fine place.

[Linked Image]
When guns are outlawed, only lynx will have guns.
Klik -

That looks like a bobbed off Ruger? What cartridge?
It's actually a bone-stock MK II 30-06 (22"), a fairly recent acquisition. So far, the lynx, a few fox, and three moose to its credit. (And I have yet to print groups on paper with that rifle; it sure wastes water bottles easily at 200-300 yards with good loads though.)
Klik �

The barrel looked to short � I would have guessed 18-20� tops.

Nor surprised that it shoots � all my Rugers do as well. Then again I�m an unabashed Ruger fan of Ruger bolt guns and revolvers � and the #1�s.

Tomorrow morning I take off to hunt elk and deer. We plan to hunt cold and I hope to remember to pay attention to how long we have to load once we spot the game.

I wonder how many people have been accidentally shot with a cold chamber?
I'm an empty chamber guy....its what my dad taught me when I was a kid. Cant think of a single big game animal lost because of it and I've been at for 40+ years. It's just good common sense...

As for JeffO carrying his rifle in his hand and not using a sling how does he glass? with one hand? Or does he just use the scope on his loaded rifle?
I never use a sling, just set the rifle down, throw it down, lean it against something or put it betwixt my legs.
Have you ever raised your rifle up for a quick glance at something?
Nope
That's self control..
That's why I carry binoculars, don't shoot deer in the azz and don't keep a round in the chamber.
I carry and use binoculars as well, dont butt end deer either....kudo's for the empty chamber.
I'd rather be in the field with binos and no rifle than the other way around.
+1...What do you run for glass?
Swaro SLC 7x42's, Minox HG 8.5x43 and 10x43
[Linked Image]

I use Leica Ultravid's 10X42's. Also use a Vector.7X42.
[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by scenarshooter


As for JeffO carrying his rifle in his hand and not using a sling how does he glass? with one hand? Or does he just use the scope on his loaded rifle?


I carry Swarovski 8x30 SLC's around my neck, always, when hunting, and I use them all the time. I do not glass with my riflescope, ever.

It's not complicated to use binos while carrying a rifle, at least where/how I hunt, but some would like to make it so. smile

By the way, scenarshooter. If the pic you posted is representative of where you hunt, it could not be more different from my blacktail hunting. Be careful about extrapolating what works acceptably well from open-country Montana hunting to PNW wet-side blacktail hunting... I'm guessing you don't average 20-30 yards for your deer kills? wink

I've never hunted an area as open as in your photo. If I was, I could certainly see how a cold chamber wouldn't be a liability.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
That's why I carry binoculars, don't shoot deer in the azz and don't keep a round in the chamber.


You've shot a deer in ass.
[Linked Image]

Steelhead, nice country...lots of heavy bush for sure.

JO, I've killed a lot of big game in the timber.
[Linked Image]

Fidalgo Bay, Alaska...Alder brush and Devil's club.
Originally Posted by scenarshooter
[Linked Image]

Steelhead, nice country...lots of heavy bush for sure.

JO, I've killed a lot of big game in the timber.


Gorgeous animal!

That "timber" looks about like the part of eastern Oregon where I hunt elk... Not what I'm talking about at all.

It's not worth fighting over. smile You might very well do just fine hunting "cold" where I hunt. I know for a fact that hunting cold would cost me animals- and how well others hunt doesn't fill my freezer, you know?

By the way- the profile for the militant "cold" guys is that they hunt open country, or in game-rich areas with lots of easy tags. Just saying, my circumstances are different.
Very nice bears! Congrats!

Originally Posted by Steelhead
That's why I carry binoculars, don't shoot deer in the azz


Here, here on the binos. Seen to many SCOPE other hunters. Some times it was by accident. Swaro EL 10x42s do my bidding.

Also saw a guy not dot the i on a hind end shot. Never have had to do it, but couldn't say I wouldn't if the situation called for it like a wounded animal on the run. Anyway, he had a 7 Mag and hit the Lt. hind quarter square! Flipped the Muley end over end for about 30 yds and decimated that quarter. It was ugly. This was a slob hunter that was well known for blowing 2 or 3 legs off of the animal before dispatching it as well (most all the animals he put down was like this). Don't have much patients for this kind of BS.

Anyone else carry muzzle down when you have your rifle slung?
[Linked Image]

Fall Chokecherry bear...most of the bears I've killed are in heavy cover or not far from it...still had time to "chamber up" and put one in the boiler room on this one.

It's only my opinion...I'll keep it clear until it's time to kill something. There is one exception.......
Sure seems to work for you, scenar! Rock on! smile
Jeff;

You don't have a patent on tight cover hunting, and you've never hunted with a cold chamber, so saying that it would, absolutely, cost you game is a non-starter.

FWIW, wildswalker's son (14 year old) took a nice, fat spike at about 20 feet this morning, cold chamber, and having hunted with both of them in that area, it's THICK. Of course, the kid is a killin' SOB, and a sneaky bastid, so that probably tips the scales some...............
[Linked Image]

Was hunting black bears in Alaska a few years back with a good friend...while we were skinning a nice boar up on the mountain about a mile above our backpack camp, this coastal grizzly walked right through our camp. We did'nt see him but found these tracks when we got back. My friend was living in Anchorage at the time and had a grizzly permit in his pocket...we chambered up and followed him until the snow got too deep. Needless to say it was the most intense hour of tracking I've ever done.
Originally Posted by SUPERDIESEL1
Anyone else carry muzzle down when you have your rifle slung?


[Linked Image]
I need to learn something from this thread....... smile

About the only time I sling my rifle is when I'm walking in before light or walking out after light. It's tight across my back, always barrel pointing up behind my left shoulder, stock behind my right hip (chamber and mag empty). When it's light enough to see it's in my hands...... That being said, even if I may never use the barrel down method, I'd appreciate hearing the details of it. Thanks,

JCM
Nice pics ScenarShooter! I'm still diggin' the sling and matter of fact I'll call on Monday AM and order another one.
I'll be chasin elk and mule deer but the little lady can take your order....Thanks man!!

Got any big whitetails picked out back home yet?
Originally Posted by Furprick
A rifle with out a round chambered is ..... a stick. You can carry a stick or a rifle your choice.


+1
Can you chamber a round into a stick?
No I can not, but if I could then that is how I would carry the stick.
So a rifle without a round chambered ain't a stick.
Always have a round chambered with safety on.
My Ruger 77 has a 3 position safety that physically blocks the firiing pin from going forward when on full safe. I do carry a round in the chamber in this rifle. Some of my other rifles do not have this type of safety and I do not carry a round in the chamber.
Originally Posted by scenarshooter
I'll be chasin elk and mule deer but the little lady can take your order....Thanks man!!

Got any big whitetails picked out back home yet?


Actually I don't have any picked out yet. This has been the slowest year for seeing good bucks that I've had in a LOOOOOOONG time. I'm chalking it up to the fact that I've been far to busy to put in the scouting time that I usually do. Also done more duck hunting this fall than I have in a long time. I have to admit though that I have no complaints. I'll fill the freezer with late season does if I have to.......as long as they stand around long enough for me to chamber a cartridge. LOL.
NH, as a rule, normally has a low "accident" rate during the season. We went quite a spell without a death. It's not shaping up for this year, though.

Condolences to the family of the deceased, but I'm thinking these could have been avoided if they hadn't been "hot". At least one of them will live.

Union Leader

George
Originally Posted by SUPERDIESEL1

Anyone else carry muzzle down when you have your rifle slung?

Mr. SUPERDIESEL1;
That is my prefered carry method and I'd think I carry that way at least 90% of the time if the rifle is slung.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, I glass better with both hands so that's what my hunting has evolved into for the most part.

Good luck on your upcoming hunts.

Regards,
Dwayne
Different conditions call for different actions.
I will say I am 60 been hunting on my own over 45 years, carried chamber full 90+% of that and it's been safe so far.
Some guys walking the woods aren't safe with any gun, others are fine with one in the chamber.
Ya'll carry how ya want I'll do what I see fit for me, when and where.

I'd like to see the guy that hunts upland birds with a double and keeps his chambers empty. Doubt he gets many birds.
Originally Posted by WinModel70
Always have a round chambered with safety on.


Precisley, for me at least that works.
Originally Posted by 700LH
I'd like to see the guy that hunts upland birds with a double and keeps his chambers empty. Doubt he gets many birds.

I hunt upland with a double, and it's real easy - keep the gun open with the safety off. Chambers not empty, but safer than relying on that ("never fail") safety catch

Why do people try to make things so complicated....?
unbelievable................
Was that aimed at me?
the entire thread...
Many folks are disappointed, I suspect, that others can make something so simple, yet effective....and safer. (It does defy what one might think, if thinking were all there was to it.)
For what it's worth, I always hunt cold chamber with a rifle (if that calms you down, or stirs you up - whatever)
I know..

carry on...
If I'm packin my bolt action Model 70,I always chanmber a round and then close the bolt with the trigger depressed. I need to recock the bolt in order to fire the round and feel this is much safer than a chambered round and safety on.
Originally Posted by tangozulu
If I'm packin my bolt action Model 70,I always chanmber a round and then close the bolt with the trigger depressed. I need to recock the bolt in order to fire the round and feel this is much safer than a chambered round and safety on.

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE JOKING - read the entire thread and see how what you are doing has the firing pin resting directly on the primer. Even a safety catch is better that that.
OR, you may get struck by lightning, causing an electric current to go through your rifle and you might shoot your buddy in the face!

Think about it man!!
Originally Posted by rem_7
the entire thread...


Isn't it.....

Yesterday AM about 60 yards behind him back down over the ridge, in the Thick Stuff, my kid saw this spike and three does coming towards him at about 50 yards. He capped his inline all sneaky like, got ready all ninja like, and poked lungs at about 20 feet...

'Course, he does have a clue.........

[Linked Image]

Never said it couldn't be done and i'll take your word for it that he did it, good for him. I will say like i always have, it is not always an option..
Killing a critter, to us, isn't a life or death necessity.

The option to safeguard against killing each other, or someone else, definately is.....

Kinda surprised tho' that he burned a buck tag on this spike knowing there's five 8 points running around in the same neighborhood.

It was his choice, as was hunting cold with a muzzleloader.

The end result was all three of us coming home, and meat in the freezer....and I'm not arguing with that.
congrats to your son,it will be some good eatin!
I need to get my hind end in gear, he's two up on me this year between this one and Youth Day back in September, and my youngest is up by one....

I skunked myself yesterday by passing on a smaller scrapier spike than his, and waited on one of those 8 points that didn't show.

Oh well, Life could suck if I let it.......
Nothin wrong with lettin the youngun's fill there tags!You can put them in there place when needed.
Laffin'...

It's all about them these days, and that's on purpose, I'd guess.

Can't think of better hunting buddies to have.......
Originally Posted by wildswalker
Laffin'...

It's all about them these days, and that's on purpose, I'd guess.

Can't think of better hunting buddies to have.......


Mr. wildswalker;
Amen sir, amen!

Our girls filled both their mule and whitetailed deer tags this year and I've yet to cut a tag. With time ticking away on my season, I wouldn't do it any different if I could.

A tip of the hat to you again sir for taking your kids out and teaching them these important life lessons.

All the best to you and yours.

Regards,
Dwayne

A 130 pages and still going strong!........Sheesh.



Originally Posted by wildswalker


It's all about them these days, and that's on purpose, I'd guess.

Think it ain't no guess.
Originally Posted by wildswalker
Originally Posted by rem_7
the entire thread...


Isn't it.....

Yesterday AM about 60 yards behind him back down over the ridge, in the Thick Stuff, my kid saw this spike and three does coming towards him at about 50 yards. He capped his inline all sneaky like, got ready all ninja like, and poked lungs at about 20 feet...

'Course, he does have a clue.........

[Linked Image]



Congrats to your son!

If he saw it at 50 yards, it wasn't that thick.. And that deer is dead in a meadow.

Not trying to be an azz; just a friendly reminder that we are hunting a very different tag, in significantly different conditions. Change enough variables, and a person can come to a perfectly reasonable different conclusion... make sense?

But then, that would require that you acknowledge that the roughly 80% of us guys hunting "hot" might have a clue too. smile
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
Not trying to be an azz

It aint working you are and always will be...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6I_qa24tcNw&feature=related
Originally Posted by Jeff_O

Congrats to your son!


I asked him if that impressed him coming from you, he said it didn't...sorry.

He's 14 and this is his 8th kill in three years, where were you per deer hunting at age 14?


Originally Posted by Jeff_O
Not trying to be an azz;


Spare me, will ya.......


Originally Posted by Jeff_O

If he saw it at 50 yards, it wasn't that thick..

just a friendly reminder that we are hunting a very different tag, in significantly different conditions. Change enough variables, and a person can come to a perfectly reasonable different conclusion... make sense?


Here's a friendly reminder to you too, thick is thick, and you don't have a lock on it. If you can't see 50 yards across a steep brushed in gully to see several deer coming down the other side in your direction, then you are blinder than a friggin' bat......he didn't shoot because he didn't have a clear shot until it was 20 feet from him up on his side.

Make....any......sense.....Jeff?

It would seem you are the one having a hard time realizing certain realities of all this......


Originally Posted by Jeff_O

And that deer is dead in a meadow.


City slickers and liberal tree huggers use such words as a "meadow". It's a damn black angus cattle pasture on that side of that ridge, cleared off and kept cleared off since the civil war days. Battles were probably fought right there. It ain't a "meadow", dude, it's a vast and steep in places open field, at best,of about 200 acres on that side, and if you could read, or deduce the pixelated imagary presented to you, you would know the boy is at the very top of the ridge with the thick side of it behind him...and the spike ran about 60 yards up and over the top.


Originally Posted by Jeff_O

But then, that would require that you acknowledge that the roughly 80% of us guys hunting "hot" might have a clue too. smile


I'll acknowledge that you "think" you have a clue, though that don't always make it so...........
Yawn.

Ok... So it's dead in a pasture... grin... you win.
The very first yawn was on 4/21/07...and wasn't by you.

You've made a point with all this, though I doubt it's the one you wanted.

Carry on Jeff, I hope it doesn't happen to you, but if it does, I'm the first that WILL say toldja so.......
Jeff;

The offer to come hunting out here stands.

You might even learn something, if you leave the bag of dumbphuckitude at home.
VA, I missed that offer! Thank you. How much are out of state tags?

I was as close as 12-14 feet from a deer I really wanted to kill, last night. The whole thing played out over about 10 minutes, ended with the deer about 20 yards away. Never got an angle on it. It never knew I was there.

Can't see how cycling the action of my m700 was an option. Can't see how one in the chamber was unsafe, either. wink
I dont get it. I dont care about hunting hot or cold or blue tape or not. When does deer management come into play? I hunt hot but that is not the issue i have passed on hundreds at least, maybe thousands of small bucks and young spikes. Lets face it. If you factor the hours hunting x price of tags x price of rifle. Where do you come out ahead on killing a 2.5 yr old spike or 4 point? If you factor the price or hours of processing and your time is worth anything to you, its cheaper to buy beef. Whats the point of killing a 40" deer when you could have shot a doe that is guaranteed to never grow into a trophy and has better meat? I know kids is the reason but would a kid have any preferance over a 40" 4 point or an old doe? Enlighten me.
If you have to ask, then you will never understand......
I would understand. Im not looking for an intrawebnet fight. But my old man made me pass on several that I was itching to kill and I always connected on a tender doe in about 15 minutes. Maybe I worded it wrong. At what age does management kick in?
That spike above is my kid's 8th deer in three seasons of hunting.

Guessin' the first 7, all does, a couple three were Old Does, weren't good enough for ya, huh......

He's paid his dues, and I don't care if he kills the next hundred spikes he sees.

It's just how we are, and meat is meat.........
Not downin your kid bro. Just a simple question of when does management come into play as a general question. I dont know how to put it in any plainer engrish than that. What age do you recommend management as a whole? Geesh, relax, god knows i have shot my share of skipes just wondering what is the right age to teach conversation.
edit: Any young man that can shoot like your son obviously can, can ride in my camp anyday
Depends on the circumstance I would imagine.

I was taught to put meat in the freezer........

Never lived anywhere that a lack of deer to kill was a problem, and that's been on purpose.

Around here, VERY few bucks make it past 2.5 years.

If we let 'em walk, someone else won't.

We've a lot of land to hunt, but none of it's an exclusive ranch conducive of Texas Style deer management.

Wish it were sometimes, but it just ain't gonna happen here......

I hear ya. I guess everything comes down to acres available. I have agreements with 7800 acres around me with an understanding on bucks age. I understand that sometimes that it is unfeasable to let a buck walk that you dont think will be there next year. So that being said, sometimes there is no management because you dont have any cooperating neighbors. So management starts at all different ages or sometimes not at all if you are hunting next to uncoperative neighbors who will not agree to the overall "plan". Pease excuse me if I have been out of line, but I have my own little "slice of Heaven" finally and I am trying to establish ground rules for members for generations to come. For better or worse
Smithwr,

I've killed lots of forkies and a few spikes... We simply don't have enough deer, generally speaking, to think in terms of management. We also can't bait them, or use dogs... Different areas work differently.

I got two tags. Already filled my buck tag on a 2x3; my remaining tag is good for a doe or spike... My first choice is a dry doe, but with two days left, I'll pop a spike tomorrow, or a doe with grown kids, if that's how it plays out.

As WW says, meat is meat. The meat is important to me and it's not a money thing. I eat beef but I don't buy it other than T-bones on one of my cooking nights at elk camp and the odd fast-food hamburger... Basically, we don't eat beef. I don't kill our red meat, we don't eat it...
© 24hourcampfire