No it’s not pointless. You said originally that this vaccine was covered under The 1988 Act. It is not.
It is only covered under 2005 PERP ACT. There is a huge difference.
it was fast tracked w/o due diligence. So unless given protection status under PERP the pharmaceuticals would had been liable. And that’s because the drug isn’t vetted properly.
Decades of voting for the lesser of two evils has gotten us just that.....
