If the change was made in 94, that means Bush's boom has had lower unemployment rates than Clinton's...measured by the same standards. Right?

The rest of that article, much as I like Walter Williams, is basically pulled directly out of...well, thin air. The netherworld, by definition, is unknown. And do we count the millions employed illegally, or in the crime business?

Comparing apples with apples, the rate is lower than during the late 90s, when everybody was raving about the wonderful economy. You can use whatever index blows up your skirt, but I'll stick to the standard one that economists and the media use.....with all due respect to you and Walter.

Proudly representing oil companies, defense contractors, and firearms manufacturers since 1980. Because merchants of death need lawyers, too.