attached chart....bar graph scale distorts difference....shows Bush average rate slightly lower than Clinton but not by a whole lot. The difference, of course, is how the media covered it. Bush's performance was either ignored, or caveated with "but experts say" and then downplayed. Clinton's was cited as evidence of the man's genius, and a reason to overlook his other, uh, issues.

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/01/bush-unemployment-at-50-bad-clinton.html

Proudly representing oil companies, defense contractors, and firearms manufacturers since 1980. Because merchants of death need lawyers, too.