Who is moderating the session? Who determines what questions are answered? If Leupold is in charge of the whole exchange and not a neutral third party, it may prove difficult to get answers for the tough questions.
We should try and come together as a community with a short list of questions that we would really like answered, otherwise there’s likely to be a lot of random crap and/or softball questions thrown out there which may detract from the session. Either vote on a set of questions (possibly set up a poll on this forum), or appoint someone or a couple someones who have their ducks in a row to act as our voice. Probably not enough consensus here to get anything like what I just wrote accomplished, but it’s worth a shot.
I think this is the way to approach it. Gotta have Formid in there since he's the guy who's seen the most samples and the most failures. He would have the data to back it up.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
