Originally Posted by kingston
The technical discussion was nonsense.

Early on they show a slide labeled ‘Myth 5’ which appears to illustrate that a 0.4% deviation in adjustments at 100yrds. ensures 0% deviation in adjustments1000 yards????? I have no idea what this was about.


Exactly. Angular subtension is angular subtension, whether at 100 yards or 1000. That visual aid is nothing but a marketing tool, with no basis in science.

I also loved the “repeatable and accurate” comment about their adjustments that may have slightly incorrect increments. Maybe they missed the countless posts describing the “Leupold shuffle”? So much for repeatable and accurate.

That video was simply a marketing tool that said “There is nothing wrong with our scopes, there is something wrong with you guys.” Kind of a crappy marketing approach, if you ask me.