"Those predictions were/are for a course of 12 to 16 weeks beginning Mar 10."
Bullshit. You used the crap January date as the first infection date, and ran crap predictions from that.
You can't fake the death rate, and the fact that it is linear and not exponential, so you try and shift the focus to tests.
And the increase in confirmed tests is nothing more than a reflection of increased tests.
More bullshit.
BSometer is a crap lib site. No surprise it's your go to place.
They took down their statistics and graphs when they showed that the serious infections were 2% of the confirmed tests, and the graphs showed no exponential growth.
So even with the "confirmed tests" fraud, the serious cases were less than 3%.
